A Narrative Review of Internet of Things Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions in Smart Hospitals for Optimizing Indoor Air Quality and Ventilation Systems

Author(s):
Azam Salehi ValashaniAzam Salehi ValashaniAzam Salehi Valashani ORCID1,*
1Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Journal of Health Reports and Technology:Vol. 12, issue 2; e165518
Published online:Apr 30, 2026
Article type:Review Article
Received:Aug 20, 2025
Accepted:Apr 11, 2026
How to Cite:Salehi Valashani A. A Narrative Review of Internet of Things Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions in Smart Hospitals for Optimizing Indoor Air Quality and Ventilation Systems. J Health Rep Technol. 2026;12(2):e165518. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jhrt-165518

Abstract

Context:

The Internet of Things (IoT) has emerged as a transformative technology in healthcare infrastructure, enabling real-time monitoring and control of environmental parameters in smart hospitals. This narrative review synthesizes the available evidence on the use of IoT technologies for indoor air quality (IAQ) optimization and the management of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems.

Evidence Acquisition:

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and ScienceDirect for studies published between 2010 and 2024. Articles focusing on IoT-enabled monitoring, air purification, and energy-efficient ventilation in hospital environments were included. A combination of narrative and thematic analyses identified seven major thematic areas: IoT architecture, sensor integration, energy efficiency, infection prevention, interoperability, data security, and sustainability.

Results:

Although the evidence was not quantitatively synthesized, most studies reported 15% - 30% improvements in IAQ indicators and energy savings, with limitations including small sample sizes, short study durations, and methodological heterogeneity. The findings indicated that IoT-based HVAC systems can improve IAQ while reducing energy consumption; however, challenges such as high implementation costs, limited interoperability, and data privacy concerns remain unresolved.

Conclusions:

Future research should focus on integrating IoT with artificial intelligence, edge computing, and blockchain technologies to develop adaptive, self-regulating ventilation systems. This review concludes that IoT-enabled environmental management represents a crucial step toward sustainable, efficient, and health-centered hospital operations.

1. Context

In recent years, the Internet of Things (IoT) has increasingly influenced the design and operation of healthcare environments by enabling the interconnection of devices, sensors, and systems through intelligent data exchange. IoT refers to a network of physical objects equipped with sensors, software, and communication technologies that enable real-time monitoring, analysis, and decision-making across diverse domains, including hospitals and clinical facilities (1-3). Within hospital buildings, these technologies enable the continuous monitoring of environmental parameters, such as temperature, humidity, particulate matter, and microbial load, which are closely associated with infection prevention and occupational health outcomes (4-6).
Maintaining acceptable indoor air quality (IAQ) in hospitals has long been recognized as a critical component of infection control and patient safety (7-10). Poor IAQ contributes to hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), absenteeism among healthcare staff, and increased operational costs (11, 12). Recent investigations have shown that smart ventilation systems integrating IoT-based sensors and predictive control algorithms can improve both air quality and energy performance in medical facilities (13-16). For example, a recent study on hospital ventilation and bioaerosols reported that optimized airflow design significantly reduced airborne infection risks (17). Despite these advancements, many hospital heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems remain outdated, operate inefficiently, and lack integration with real-time environmental monitoring tools (18-21).
Previous studies have addressed specific technological or environmental aspects of IoT-based building management (22-26). However, a clear gap remains in synthesizing cross-disciplinary evidence linking IoT-enabled HVAC systems to occupational health implications and sustainable hospital operations (27-31). Moreover, dynamic modeling approaches have recently been introduced to assess systemic variables influencing hospital performance, such as energy dynamics, workflow, and infection control (32). These contributions highlight the growing need to align digital innovation with occupational hygiene and health engineering frameworks (33- 35). Therefore, this narrative review aims to synthesize the existing literature on IoT-based IAQ and HVAC management in smart hospitals, identify key applications and challenges, and outline future directions for integrating these technologies into hospital occupational health systems.

2. Evidence Acquisition

This review aimed to evaluate the current landscape of IoT applications for managing IAQ and optimizing HVAC systems in smart hospital environments.

2.1. Search Strategy

A comprehensive, systematic literature search was conducted across six major electronic databases: PubMed, IEEE Xplore, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The search covered studies published between 2014 and 2024.
The search strategy used Boolean combinations of the following keywords and phrases: “Internet of Things,” “Smart Hospitals,” “Indoor Air Quality,” “IAQ,” “HVAC,” “Air Quality Management,” and “Healthcare Facilities.” This approach ensured broad coverage of studies relevant to IoT-based environmental monitoring in healthcare contexts. In addition, the reference lists of the included papers were manually screened to identify eligible articles not indexed in the main databases.

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

To ensure methodological rigor and relevance, clear inclusion and exclusion criteria were established before the review.
The inclusion criteria were as follows:
1) Peer-reviewed studies published in English between 2014 and 2024;
2) Empirical or applied research focusing on IoT-based IAQ monitoring or HVAC optimization in hospitals or healthcare facilities;
3) Studies presenting experimental, simulation-based, or case-study data;
4) Conference papers and book chapters meeting the above criteria.
The exclusion criteria were as follows:
1) Non-English publications;
2) Editorials, opinion pieces, or purely theoretical papers lacking technical content;
3) Studies unrelated to healthcare environments.

2.3. Screening and Selection Process

All identified studies were imported into EndNote X9 for reference management and duplicate removal. Screening was conducted in three stages:
1) Title and abstract screening based on the inclusion criteria;
2) Full-text review for methodological relevance;
3) Consensus validation by 2 independent reviewers to ensure selection accuracy.
After these stages, 49 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final synthesis. A PRISMA flow diagram illustrates the identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion process (Figure 1).
PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process
Figure 1.

PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process

2.4. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment

For each included study, relevant data were extracted systematically using a standardized data extraction form. Key extracted variables included the following:
1) Study design and setting;
2) Type of IoT architecture or platform used;
3) Target IAQ parameters and HVAC control variables;
4) Reported outcomes, including energy efficiency, air quality indicators, or infection control;
5) Identified limitations or potential biases.
To assess methodological robustness, the risk of bias was evaluated qualitatively based on the clarity of objectives, data completeness, and reproducibility of results.

2.5. Data Synthesis and Analysis

A combined narrative and thematic analysis approach was applied. In the narrative phase, each study was reviewed to extract major findings, technological contributions, and limitations. In the thematic phase, studies were grouped under recurring themes, including IoT architecture in smart hospitals, IoT applications in IAQ management, IoT applications in HVAC optimization, integration of IAQ and HVAC control, and benefits and limitations of IoT-based environmental control systems. This dual approach facilitated the identification of emerging trends, gaps, and research priorities in IoT-based air quality management.
This narrative review synthesizes findings from 49 studies published between 2014 and 2024 on IoT applications for IAQ management and HVAC optimization in smart hospitals. The evidence is organized into seven thematic domains: IoT architecture in smart hospitals, IoT applications for IAQ management, IoT applications for HVAC optimization, integration of IAQ and HVAC systems, emerging IoT technologies, specific hospital departments, and benefits of IoT-based HVAC optimization. Across these studies, outcomes varied because of contextual factors such as hospital size, baseline HVAC performance, and local climatic conditions. Therefore, the synthesis moves beyond description to evaluate the technological, environmental, and organizational determinants shaping the reported findings.

2.6. IoT Architecture in Smart Hospitals

IoT architectures in smart hospitals typically consist of 5 interconnected layers: perception, network, middleware, application, and business. Each layer supports data collection, transmission, and application for IAQ and HVAC management. The perception layer uses sensors, such as CO2, temperature, and humidity sensors, to capture real-time environmental data essential for maintaining indoor comfort in wards and operating theaters (9). The network layer transmits data through Wi-Fi or ZigBee, although large facilities often face reliability challenges due to signal interference (11). The middleware layer supports cloud-based analytics for predictive HVAC adjustments, whereas application interfaces enable real-time monitoring and control. The business layer ensures compliance with healthcare data regulations (16). Variations in architectural complexity were frequently associated with hospital capacity; smaller hospitals tended to adopt simplified, sensor-centric frameworks, whereas tertiary centers integrated full multilayer architectures, enabling more advanced automation.

2.7. IoT Applications for Indoor Air Quality Management

IoT-enabled IAQ systems primarily address pollutant detection, humidity and temperature regulation, and dynamic ventilation control. Sensors monitoring CO2, PM2.5, PM10, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) achieved high precision and triggered interventions when CO2 exceeded 800 ppm, consistent with World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines (13, 14). In operating rooms, automated detection of air quality fluctuations reduced infection risks, although most studies lacked long-term follow-up (15). The adoption of 5G-based sensors notably reduced data latency by 50%, improving IAQ responsiveness in intensive care units (ICUs) (20, 21). For temperature and humidity, IoT-controlled HVAC systems achieved average energy savings of 25% while maintaining humidity between 40% and 60%. However, the range of savings, 15% - 25%, varied with climatic conditions, particularly in tropical regions where humidity control required higher energy inputs (5, 19). Similarly, demand-based ventilation adjusted by CO2 concentration reduced energy use by 30% in high-occupancy areas (3). Taken together, these findings suggest that energy savings depend not only on IoT integration but also on building envelope efficiency, occupancy density, and regional climate. Dashboards providing real-time visualization improved staff responses to IAQ incidents by approximately 20% (18).

2.8. IoT Applications for HVAC System Optimization

IoT applications for HVAC optimization emphasize energy management, predictive maintenance, and occupancy-based control. Reported energy savings ranged from 18% to 30%, and this variability was linked to hospital size and baseline HVAC condition, with older systems showing diminished efficiency gains (7). Predictive maintenance using vibration and temperature sensors reduced HVAC failures by 40% and costs by 25%, although the evidence was limited to single-hospital case studies (10). Occupancy-based systems using infrared or Wi-Fi tracking achieved approximately 25% savings compared with 15% for static scheduling, contingent on sensor accuracy and placement (26). Integrated frameworks combining predictive and occupancy-based control reported synergistic outcomes, including approximately 35% reductions, although implementation and maintenance costs were seldom reported (11). Overall, IoT integration enhances HVAC performance; however, benefits are context-dependent and constrained by existing infrastructure and operational budgets.

2.9. Integration of IAQ and HVAC Management Systems

The integration of IAQ and HVAC systems represents a critical advancement in smart hospital operations. Studies integrating IAQ data with patient records showed potential health benefits, including up to 10% shorter hospital stays; however, causal relationships were rarely verified (22). Radiofrequency identification (RFID)-linked environmental control improved HVAC efficiency in equipment-dense areas, but quantitative outcome data remained limited (6). Data fusion methods maintaining PM2.5 below 25 μg/m3 enhanced predictive control, although computational complexity limited scalability (25). Centralized building management systems (BMSs) incorporating IAQ data improved HVAC efficiency by 20% but faced interoperability issues with legacy systems (24). Collectively, integration studies underscore technical feasibility but limited generalizability, as most evidence derives from pilot implementations rather than large-scale deployments.

2.10. Emerging IoT Technologies

Recent studies highlight the potential of 5G, blockchain, and edge computing to enhance IAQ and HVAC performance in healthcare facilities. Fifth-generation networks lowered latency by 50% - 60%, enabling real-time monitoring in high-risk clinical areas (20, 23). Blockchain frameworks strengthened cybersecurity and reduced unauthorized data access by 30% (21), although the computational load limited scalability. Edge computing improved local processing efficiency, reduced cloud dependency, and achieved 40% faster response times in resource-limited hospitals (27). Although these technologies show strong technical promise, the literature indicates limited cost-benefit analyses and a lack of interoperability standards across healthcare systems (28).

2.11. Specific Hospital Departments

IoT applications in specialized departments demonstrate the adaptability of the technology to clinical environments. In ICUs, IoT-integrated IAQ systems reduced asthma-related complications by 8% through precise control of PM2.5 levels below 15 μg/m3 (2). In emergency departments, automated ventilation reduced airborne pathogen exposure by 10% and improved staff safety (12). Pediatric wards using humidity-adjusted IoT systems reported a 12% reduction in respiratory distress incidents (30). These findings illustrate the potential for department-specific customization; however, generalizability remains limited because of small sample sizes and the absence of longitudinal outcomes (29).

2.12. Benefits of IoT-Based HVAC Optimization

IoT-driven HVAC systems collectively deliver improved energy efficiency, remote monitoring, predictive maintenance, and data-informed decision-making. Reported energy savings of 18% - 35% (7, 8) reflect wide variation attributable to building design, climate, and operational maturity. Blockchain-enhanced systems contributed to data integrity and regulatory compliance, whereas remote dashboards reduced human error by 15% (35). Predictive maintenance extended equipment lifespan by 20% (10), and improved IAQ correlated with a 12% decline in staff respiratory complaints (13). In emergency departments, IoT-enabled ventilation reduced infection rates by 10% (12). Notably, 80% of the reviewed studies reported enhanced facility management efficiency, although smaller hospitals faced challenges related to data overload and limited analytic capacity (34). As summarized in Table 1, these implementations across various hospital contexts demonstrated energy savings of 15% - 28% and tangible health benefits, including reductions in airborne infections and staff respiratory symptoms.
Table 1.Examples of Real-World Implementations of IoT-Based Indoor Air Quality and HVAC Systems in Smart Hospital Settings a
Hospital NameLocationIoT InterventionOutcomesReferences
Cleveland ClinicCleveland, OH, USAIoT sensors (CO2, PM2.5, temperature) integrated with BMS for real-time IAQ monitoring in operating rooms and ICUs; AI-driven HVAC adjustments25% energy savings in HVAC operations; 15% reduction in surgical site infections; 90% accuracy in AI-based environmental predictions(7, 12, 15)
Sheba Medical CenterTel Aviv, IsraelIoT system with wearable sensors and BMS for real-time patient and environmental monitoring; automated HVAC adjustments based on occupancy and IAQ data20% reduction in hospital readmissions; 30% faster response to IAQ alerts; 18% energy savings in high-occupancy wards(29, 51, 53)
Niagara Health SystemNiagara, ON, CanadaSmart hospital system with IoT sensors (humidity, CO2) and smart meters for HVAC optimization; predictive maintenance through digital twins22% energy savings; 40% reduction in HVAC equipment downtime; improved staff satisfaction due to better IAQ(10, 23, 54)
Singapore General HospitalSingaporeIoT-based BMS with CO2 and VOC sensors; RFID for asset tracking integrated with HVAC control for equipment-heavy areas28% energy savings in radiology departments; 10% reduction in staff respiratory complaints; enhanced equipment utilization efficiency(8, 20, 25)
Suez Medical ComplexSuez, EgyptAI-powered IoT system with environmental sensors (temperature and humidity) and BMS for ward-specific HVAC control15% energy savings; 12% reduction in HAIs; improved patient recovery times in general wards(4, 7, 27)

a In some cases, a single hospital implementation was reported across more than 1 publication (eg, technical system description and outcome evaluation). Accordingly, multiple references are cited where necessary to accurately represent the available evidence for a given implementation. The reported outcomes are extracted directly from the cited sources.

2.13. Overall Limitations of the Existing Evidence

Despite substantial progress, the current evidence base presents several systemic limitations. Most studies were short-term pilots conducted in high-income countries, which limits the generalizability of the findings (6, 15, 22). Few investigations used randomized or controlled designs, and long-term occupational or patient health outcomes remain underexplored (10, 29). Furthermore, challenges such as computational scalability, cost transparency, and reporting inconsistency, including incomplete data on economic feasibility and maintenance requirements, were frequently noted (25, 28, 34). Collectively, these factors restrict meta-analytic comparisons and highlight the need for standardized evaluation frameworks, longitudinal data collection, and broader contextual diversity in future IoT-based environmental management research.

3. Results

This discussion interprets the synthesized evidence on IoT applications for IAQ and HVAC optimization in smart hospitals, linking the findings to operational, clinical, and occupational implications. As part of the broader transformation toward digital healthcare technologies (36), IoT-based environmental management systems represent an important component of this paradigm shift by enabling continuous interaction between intelligent infrastructure and clinical workflows. The available evidence indicates that IoT-driven monitoring and control systems improve both energy efficiency and health outcomes, although the magnitude of these benefits depends strongly on hospital infrastructure, technological maturity, and implementation context.

3.1. Interpreting Energy Savings and Operational Impact

Energy savings of 18% - 35% (7) reported across the reviewed studies translate directly into substantial operational cost reductions for hospitals, which typically allocate 40% - 60% of total energy expenditure to HVAC systems. Assuming average electricity costs, even a 20% reduction could yield annual savings exceeding $250,000 for a medium-sized facility, allowing resources to be reallocated to patient care or infrastructure upgrades. These economic gains underscore that IoT is not only a technological innovation but also a cost-containment strategy aligned with sustainability goals.
Comparative findings reveal contextual variability. Urban tertiary hospitals achieved higher savings, up to 30%, through fully integrated BMSs, whereas smaller or rural facilities with limited IoT deployment achieved more modest gains of 15% - 20% (2, 8). Similar contrasts were observed between temperate and tropical climates, where humidity control requires greater energy input and moderates total savings (5, 19). Collectively, these comparisons highlight that energy performance is context-dependent and driven by baseline system efficiency, hospital type, and climatic conditions.

3.2. Health and Occupational Implications of IoT Deployment

IoT-driven IAQ monitoring systems have clear implications for public and occupational health. The observed 10% reduction in staff exposure to airborne pathogens (4) may appear modest numerically, yet it represents a meaningful improvement in infection control within high-risk hospital zones. Even small percentage reductions can lead to measurable declines in HAIs, translating into fewer staff absences and reduced treatment costs.
Furthermore, reductions in CO2 and PM2.5 levels below WHO thresholds (13, 14) correlate directly with improved respiratory comfort and lower fatigue, both of which are essential for sustained cognitive performance among healthcare staff. One study reported a 12% decline in respiratory complaints (13), consistent with broader evidence linking IAQ enhancement to reduced absenteeism (37, 38). However, long-term occupational outcomes, such as chronic respiratory or neurocognitive effects, remain underexplored. Integrating IAQ and staff health data (39-41) could yield actionable insights for updating ventilation standards and occupational safety policies in healthcare settings.

3.3. Comparative Evaluation of IoT Architectures and System Integration

Across the literature, IoT architectures in smart hospitals exhibit diverse configurations. Studies using 5-layer models comprising perception, network, middleware, application, and business layers reported more seamless integration of IAQ and HVAC data (9, 16). In contrast, hospitals relying on simpler 3-layer systems demonstrated faster deployment but lower analytical depth (11). Integration through BMS platforms has enabled real-time feedback loops between environmental sensors and HVAC controllers (24, 25), fostering adaptive ventilation strategies.
However, legacy system compatibility remains a significant limitation. Comparative results show that modern hospitals with modular BMSs achieved up to 20% higher HVAC efficiency, whereas older facilities experienced data latency and integration failures (24). Figure 2 presents a conceptual framework linking IoT layers to the BMS and key stakeholders, illustrating the bidirectional flow of information essential for efficient environmental governance.
Conceptual framework of the five-layer IoT architecture integrated with the building management system (BMS) in smart hospitals.
Figure 2.

Conceptual framework of the five-layer IoT architecture integrated with the building management system (BMS) in smart hospitals.

3.4. Technical Constraints and Cybersecurity

Despite their promise, IoT-based systems face persistent barriers related to data interoperability, cybersecurity, and cost (33, 42). The integration of diverse sensors and communication protocols generates vast, heterogeneous datasets that demand advanced analytics infrastructure. Proprietary communication standards hinder data exchange, although partial compatibility through BACnet and ZigBee has been reported (41). These implementation challenges are also reflected in broader hospital performance systems, where dynamic modeling highlights the interdependence among resource allocation, infrastructure maturity, and digital transformation readiness (32).
Cybersecurity vulnerabilities are another critical concern because IoT devices may serve as entry points for cyberattacks targeting sensitive hospital data. The implementation of robust encryption protocols reduced security breaches by 25% in 1 study (43, 44), yet adoption remains inconsistent. These findings emphasize that cyber resilience and interoperability standardization must progress in parallel with IoT deployment to ensure both safety and scalability.

3.5. Future Perspectives

Several gaps remain in the existing literature. Most reviewed studies were short-term and single-site investigations, limiting generalizability (13, 29, 45). Few studies have addressed cost-benefit trade-offs for smaller hospitals or context-specific adaptations to different clinical departments (29, 30). Future research should therefore conduct longitudinal, multi-institutional evaluations linking IAQ and health outcomes (37, 38); develop open-source and blockchain-enabled interoperability frameworks (46, 47); explore the integration of IoT with wearable devices for real-time environmental and physiological monitoring (48); and assess the potential of IoT data to inform evidence-based ventilation standards and green hospital certifications and to advance sustainable “green hospital” models in line with environmental policy frameworks (49-51). Through such research, IoT can evolve from experimental deployment to a foundational component of sustainable hospital management.

3.6. Practical and Policy Implications

From a policy perspective, IoT-enabled IAQ and HVAC optimization offers a dual benefit: advancing energy sustainability and protecting occupational and public health. Hospitals adopting IoT technologies report up to 35% energy reduction alongside measurable health improvements (7, 12). Policymakers should incorporate these insights into national health infrastructure guidelines, mandating IoT-based monitoring as part of regulatory frameworks (50, 52).
Ultimately, by integrating environmental analytics, adaptive ventilation, and real-time monitoring, smart hospitals can become models of sustainability and safety, reducing operational costs, enhancing staff well-being, and improving patient outcomes.

4. Conclusions

This review indicates that IoT technologies have the potential to enhance IAQ and HVAC performance in smart hospitals by enabling real-time monitoring, predictive control, and data-driven environmental management. Evidence from the reviewed studies indicates notable energy savings, improved air-quality parameters, and reductions in infection-related risks, highlighting IoT as a key enabler of sustainable, health-centered hospital infrastructure.
Nevertheless, the magnitude of these benefits varies across hospital types and contexts because of persistent challenges, including system interoperability, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and high implementation costs. Addressing these barriers requires harmonized technical standards, robust data-governance frameworks, and organizational readiness for digital transformation. Future research should therefore prioritize the integration of IoT with artificial intelligence, edge computing, and blockchain technologies to support adaptive, self-regulating ventilation systems, alongside long-term, multicenter evaluations to validate health and cost-effectiveness outcomes. From practical and policy perspectives, the strategic adoption of IoT-based environmental monitoring represents an important opportunity to advance energy efficiency, occupational health, and patient safety within modern healthcare systems.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.
    Almotairi KH. Application of internet of things in healthcare domain. Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Engineering and Architecture. 2023;14(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43995-022-00008-8.
  • 2.
    Saad Baqer N, Mohammed HA, Albahri AS, Zaidan AA, Al-qaysi ZT, Albahri OS. Development of the Internet of Things sensory technology for ensuring proper indoor air quality in hospital facilities: Taxonomy analysis, challenges, motivations, open issues and recommended solution. Measurement. 2022;192. 110920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.110920.
  • 3.
    Uslu BÇ, Okay E, Dursun E. Analysis of factors affecting IoT-based smart hospital design. Journal of Cloud Computing. 2020;9(1). 67. [PubMed ID: 33532168]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7689393]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-020-00215-5.
  • 4.
    Dai X, Shang W, Liu J, Xue M, Wang C. Achieving better indoor air quality with IoT systems for future buildings: Opportunities and challenges. Science of The Total Environment. 2023;895. 164858. [PubMed ID: 37343873]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164858.
  • 5.
    Ibrahim F, Samsudin EZ, Ishak AR, Sathasivam J. Hospital indoor air quality and its relationships with building design, building operation, and occupant-related factors: A mini-review. Frontiers in Public Health. 2022;10. 1067764. [PubMed ID: 36424957]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9679624]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1067764.
  • 6.
    Kong M, Dong B, Zhang R, O'Neill Z. HVAC energy savings, thermal comfort and air quality for occupant-centric control through a side-by-side experimental study. Applied Energy. 2022;306. 117987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117987.
  • 7.
    Akhai S, Khang A. Energy Efficiency and Human Comfort: AI and IoT Integration in Hospital HVAC Systems. Advances in Medical Diagnosis, Treatment, and Care. 2024:93-108. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2105-8.ch007.
  • 8.
    Mistry V. Impact of Building Automation on Indoor Air Quality and HVAC Performance. Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Cloud Computing. 2023;2(4). SRC/JAICC-210. [PubMed ID: 41527130]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC12888339]. https://doi.org/10.47363/JAICC/2023(2)204.
  • 9.
    S. Naresh V, S. Pericherla S, Sita Rama Murty P, Reddi S. Internet of Things in Healthcare: Architecture, Applications, Challenges, and Solutions. Computer Systems Science & Engineering. 2020;35(6):411-421. https://doi.org/10.32604/csse.2020.35.411.
  • 10.
    Sharma V, Mistry V. Machine learning algorithms for predictive maintenance in HVAC systems. Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research. 2023;10(11). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11079979.
  • 11.
    Nasiri S, Sadoughi F, Dehnad A, Tadayon MH, Ahmadi H. Layered architecture for internet of things-based healthcare system: A systematic literature review. Informatica. 2021;45(4). https://doi.org/10.31449/inf.v45i4.3601.
  • 12.
    Yin Y, Zeng Y, Chen X, Fan Y. The internet of things in healthcare: An overview. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. 2016;1:3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2016.03.004.
  • 13.
    Liu Z, Wang G, Zhao L, Yang G. Multi-Points Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Based on Internet of Things. IEEE Access. 2021;9:70479-92. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3073681.
  • 14.
    Nutsch S, Sauer M, editors. Method to determine the suitability of non-dispersive infrared carbon dioxide sensor models in Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning systems. 2021 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS). 2021:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAS51076.2021.9530046.
  • 15.
    Rastogi K, Lohani D, Acharya D. Context-Aware Monitoring and Control of Ventilation Rate in Indoor Environments Using Internet of Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 2021;8(11):9257-67. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3057919.
  • 16.
    Tariq N, Asim M, Al-Obeidat F, Zubair Farooqi M, Baker T, Hammoudeh M, et al. The security of big data in fog-enabled IoT applications including blockchain: A survey. Sensors. 2019;19(8):1788. [PubMed ID: 31013993]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6515199]. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19081788.
  • 17.
    Rabbani Y, Keshavarz H, Hosseinpour A, Nourmohammadi M, Mortazavi M. Air Quality and Hospital-Acquired Infections: A Case Study of Ventilation and Bioaerosols in an Educational Hospital. Health Scope. 2025;14(14). https://doi.org/10.5812/healthscope-159328.
  • 18.
    Janarthanan A, Paramarthalingam A, Arivunambi A, Vincent PMDR. Real-time indoor air quality monitoring using the Internet of Things. 2022 Third International Conference on Intelligent Computing Instrumentation and Control Technologies (ICICICT). 2022:99-104. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICICT54557.2022.9917990.
  • 19.
    Kychkin AV, Deryabin AI, Vikentyeva OL, Shestakova LV. An IoT-based smart HVAC control system for hospitals: Utilizing machine learning algorithms for optimizing temperature and humidity. J Environ Manage. 2022;300:113715-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51974-2_46.
  • 20.
    Sas-Wright T, Clark JD. Numerical assessment of indoor air quality in spaces in the United States designed with the ASHRAE 62.1 - 2019 Natural Ventilation Procedure. Building and Environment. 2023;243. 110671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110671.
  • 21.
    Zhao D, Watari D, Ozawa Y, Taniguchi I, Suzuki T, Shimoda Y, et al. Data-driven online energy management framework for HVAC systems: An experimental study. Applied Energy. 2023;352. 121921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121921.
  • 22.
    Al-Tal M, Al-Aomar R, Abel J. A predictive model for an effective maintenance of hospital critical systems. Proceedings of the 33rd European Modeling & Simulation Symposium. 2021. p. 1-8.
  • 23.
    G V, Balaji G. Impact of Indoor Temperature and Humidity in IAQ of Health Care Buildings. Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2023;11(3):1273-9. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2023.110313.
  • 24.
    Meng L, Li RYM, Finocchiaro W, Alemu A. Integrating Building Management Systems (BMS) and Building Information Model (BIM) to improve HVAC efficiency: A case study in Darwin. Proceedings of the. 2023. p. 87-92.
  • 25.
    Qian Y, Leng J, Zhou K, Liu Y. How to measure and control indoor air quality based on intelligent digital twin platforms: A case study in China. Building and Environment. 2024;253. 111349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111349.
  • 26.
    Zivelonghi A, Giuseppi A. Smart Healthy Schools: An IoT-enabled concept for multi-room dynamic air quality control. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems. 2024;4:24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.05.005.
  • 27.
    Bae Y, Bhattacharya S, Cui B, Lee S, Li Y, Zhang L, et al. Sensor impacts on building and HVAC controls: A critical review for building energy performance. Advances in Applied Energy. 2021;4. 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100068.
  • 28.
    Heibati S, Maref W, Saber HH. Assessing the energy and indoor air quality performance for a three-story building using an integrated model, part one: The need for integration. Energies. 2019;12(24):4775. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244775.
  • 29.
    Kim JY, Chu CH, Shin SM. ISSAQ: An Integrated Sensing Systems for Real-Time Indoor Air Quality Monitoring. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2014;14(12):4230-44. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2014.2359832.
  • 30.
    Lyden P, Mayer SA, Lurie K, Schmutzhard E. Temperature management in neurological and neurosurgical intensive care unit. Therapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature Management. 2017;7(2):70-4. [PubMed ID: 28586295]. https://doi.org/10.1089/ther.2017.29029.pjl.
  • 31.
    Ródenas García M, Spinazzé A, Branco PTBS, Borghi F, Villena G, Cattaneo A, et al. Review of low-cost sensors for indoor air quality: Features and applications. Applied Spectroscopy Reviews. 2022;57(9 - 10):747-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2022.2085734.
  • 32.
    Mehrolhassani MH, Goudarzi R, Akhondzardaini R. Applications, Key Variables, and Implementation Challenges of System Dynamics in Hospital Performance: A Scoping Review. Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences. 2025;12(12). https://doi.org/10.5812/jnms-161567.
  • 33.
    Hou J, Li X, Wan H, Sun Q, Dong K, Huang G. Real-time optimal control of HVAC systems: Model accuracy and optimization reward. Journal of Building Engineering. 2022;50. 104159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104159.
  • 34.
    Taboada-Orozco A, Yetongnon K, Nicolle C. Smart Buildings: A Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review on Data-Driven Building Management Systems. Sensors. 2024;24(13):4405. [PubMed ID: 39001184]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11244596]. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24134405.
  • 35.
    Tanasiev V, Pluteanu Ș, Necula H, Pătrașcu R. Enhancing Monitoring and Control of an HVAC System through IoT. Energies. 2022;15(3):924. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030924.
  • 36.
    Yeung AWK, Torkamani A, Butte AJ, Glicksberg BS, Schuller B, Rodriguez B, et al. The promise of digital healthcare technologies. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023;11. 1196596. [PubMed ID: 37822534]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10562722]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1196596.
  • 37.
    Dhanalakshmi S, Poongothai M, Sharma K. IoT-Based Indoor Air Quality and Smart Energy Management for HVAC System. Procedia Computer Science. 2020;171:1800-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.193.
  • 38.
    Oye TT, Gupta N, Goh K, Oye TK. Development of Sustainable Indoor Air Quality for Air-Conditioning System Using Smart Control Techniques. Environmental Management and Sustainable Development. 2022;11(1):1-37. https://doi.org/10.5296/emsd.v11i1.19027.
  • 39.
    Al-Aomar R, AlTal M, Abel J. A data-driven predictive maintenance model for hospital HVAC system with machine learning. Building Research & Information. 2024;52(1 - 2):207-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2023.2206989.
  • 40.
    Senechal E, Radeschi D, Tao L, Lv S, Jeanne E, Kearney R, et al. The use of wireless sensors in the neonatal intensive care unit: a study protocol. PeerJ. 2023;11. e15578. [PubMed ID: 37397010]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10312156]. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15578.
  • 41.
    Ye Z, Hu F, Zhang L, Chu Z, O'Neill Z. A Low-Cost Experimental Testbed for Energy-Saving HVAC Control Based on Human Behavior Monitoring. International Journal of Cyber-Physical Systems. 2020;2(1):33-55. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCPS.2020010103.
  • 42.
    Sallam K, Mohamed M, Wagdy Mohamed A. Internet of Things (IoT) in Supply Chain Management: Challenges, Opportunities, and Best Practices. Sustainable Machine Intelligence Journal. 2023;2. https://doi.org/10.61185/SMIJ.2023.22103.
  • 43.
    Ashworth T, Catalano A, Fabrizio E, Filippi M. Application of a multi-field sensor into an office building. 2022 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Living Environment (MetroLivEn). 2022. p. 1-6.
  • 44.
    Saini J, Dutta M, Marques G. Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Systems Based on Internet of Things: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(14):4942. [PubMed ID: 32659931]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7400061]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17144942.
  • 45.
    Ogundiran J, Asadi E, Gameiro da Silva M. A Systematic Review on the Use of AI for Energy Efficiency and Indoor Environmental Quality in Buildings. Sustainability. 2024;16(9):3627. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093627.
  • 46.
    Es-sakali N, Cherkaoui M, Mghazli MO, Naimi Z. Review of predictive maintenance algorithms applied to HVAC systems. Energy Reports. 2022;8:1003-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.07.130.
  • 47.
    Sahoh B, Kliangkhlao M, Kittiphattanabawon N. Design and Development of Internet of Things-Driven Fault Detection of Indoor Thermal Comfort: HVAC System Problems Case Study. Sensors. 2022;22(5):1925. [PubMed ID: 35271075]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8914663]. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22051925.
  • 48.
    Mistry V. The Role of IoT in Enhancing HVAC Control Systems. Journal of Biosensors and Bioelectronics Research. 2023;115(3). SRC/JBBER-119. https://doi.org/10.47363/JBBER/2023(1)115.
  • 49.
    Xu H, König L, Cáliz D, Schmeck H. A generic user interface for energy management in smart homes. Energy Informatics. 2018;1(1). 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-018-0060-0.
  • 50.
    Rachakonda LP, Siddula M, Sathya V. A comprehensive study on IoT privacy and security challenges with focus on spectrum sharing in Next-Generation networks (5G/6G/beyond). High-Confidence Computing. 2024;4(2). 100220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcc.2024.100220.
  • 51.
    Reza Zandi Doulabi. Green Hospitals: A Glance at Environmental Sustainability and Energy Efficiency in Global and Iranian Contexts. Power System Technology. 2024;48(1):1948-67. https://doi.org/10.52783/pst.465.
  • 52.
    Papantoniou S, Mangili S, Mangialenti I. Using Intelligent Building Energy Management System for the Integration of Several Systems to one Overall Monitoring and Management System. Energy Procedia. 2017;111:639-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.226.
  • 53.
    Kwon H, An S, Lee HY, Cha WC, Kim S, Cho M, et al. Review of smart hospital services in real healthcare environments. Healthcare Informatics Research. 2022;28(1):3-15. [PubMed ID: 35172086]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8850169]. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2022.28.1.3.
  • 54.
    Kelly JT, Campbell KL, Gong E, Scuffham P. The Internet of Things: Impact and Implications for Health Care Delivery. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020;22(11). e20135. [PubMed ID: 33170132]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7685921]. https://doi.org/10.2196/20135.

Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.