The MIS-C is a hyperinflammatory state during COVID-19 infection with diagnostic criteria as pointed out in the introduction. The relationship between genetic susceptibility and triggering factors, which leads to hyperinflammatory responses and the development of MIS-C, is shown. Some reports indicate differences in the rate and severity of involvement in cases from different countries. This suggests the role of genetic susceptibility in the pathogenesis of MIS-C. Triggering factors are generally infectious agents, drugs, environmental agents, or traumas that cause immune-mediated responses and cytokine storm syndrome in children (
18).
Although, according to the findings of some similar studies, the median age of confirmed cases in MIS-C is reported to be 7 - 11 years (
19); in our study, it was lower, around 4 years. This difference may be due to racial differences. Our study showed an incidence rate of 1.74 percent for MIS-C among children with COVID-19 up to 12 years old. Some similar published studies have shown different results. The incidence of MIS-C in the study by La Torre et al. in Southern Italy was 3.27/100,000 (
20), and in the cohort study of Luxembourg for ages 0 - 15 years old, it was 51/100,000 (
21). Payne et al. found this incidence to be 31.6/100,000 in cases between 0 to 21 years old in the United States (
22). These differences could be due to different age groups in cases and the potential genetic role in the occurrence of MIS-C.
Cardiac involvement in our cases was 24 percent of all MIS-C patients (48 of 200 cases), whereas previous studies revealed cardiac involvement in up to 67 - 80 percent of their patients (
23), and Campanello et al. reported cardiac involvement in up to 84 percent of MIS-C cases (
24). Kostik et al., following a multicenter cohort study, reported heart involvement in 41.9 percent of patients with MIS-C (
25). It seems that cardiac involvement was less common in our cases compared to similar studies. On the other hand, based on the study by Wu and Campbell, decreased left ventricular function was observed in 34 - 50 percent of children with MIS-C (
23), while it was only 10 percent in our cases, significantly less than their results. Pericardial effusion in the studies by Campanello et al. and Simon Junior et al. was detected in 80 and 48 percent of MIS-C cases with heart involvement, respectively (
24,
26); whereas, it was just 11 percent in our patients.
In our study, the results indicated 8 individuals with coronary artery involvement (including 6 cases with dilatation and 2 with small aneurysms, totaling 4 percent of all MIS-C patients); other similar studies showed higher statistics. Campanello et al. reported 48% (
24), Simon Junior et al. found 38% (
25,
26), and Misra et al., through their study in 66 hospitals across 31 states in the USA, showed 20 percent coronary artery involvement (
27). We detected 8 cases of cardiogenic shock among all the cases (16 percent). This was 19.8 percent in the report by Tahera Nazrin et al. from Bangladesh (28). Based on the report by Misra et al., the occurrence of hypotension was 52 percent in MIS-C cases (
27). This report pointed to hypotension due to several causes, such as depressed left ventricular systolic function, persistent tachycardia, cardiogenic shock, and so on; therefore, we prefer not to compare.
Mitral regurgitation was observed in 16 cases (8 percent) in our study, and in studies by Campanello et al. and Tahera Nazrin et al. (
28), it was 40 percent (
24) and 13.32 percent (
28), respectively. Comparison of our clinical findings showed some differences with similar studies; for instance, pericardial effusion and reduced LVEF were the two most common cardiac findings in this study, whereas in the study by Campanello et al., pericardial effusion and atrioventricular valve regurgitation were the two most common (
24). Overall, compared to other similar studies, heart involvement was less common in our cases. Two reasons that could be considered are the role of genetic background and/or the probability of the effect of early initiation of IVIG and corticosteroid treatment for the patients. Proving each of these two probable causes requires further research. In one study of 55 patients with MIS-C, 38 percent ECG abnormalities were reported (
29), while it was 29.5 percent in our study.
Laboratory findings in our study revealed important points: Comparing two groups — those with cardiac involvement and those with a normal heart — in all cases with MIS-C showed significant differences in some items, including white blood cell count (P = 0.001709), lymphocyte count (P < 0.00001), platelet count (P < 0.00001), the level of troponin I (P < 0.00001), and the level of D-dimer (P < 0.00001). Additionally, the results of RT-PCR for COVID-19 showed significance (P < 0.01). On the other hand, there was no significance between the two groups for neutrophil count, the level of hemoglobin, and CRP.
Based on our results, increased troponin I and D-dimer were more commonly seen in the condition of cardiac involvement; therefore, these inflammatory factors could be considered important markers. Similarly, thrombocytosis was found more in cases with heart involvement (P < 0.05). Thrombocytopenia was more likely seen in cases with a normal heart (64.5 percent) and was seen in only 20.8 percent of patients with cardiac involvement (P < 0.00001). Another significant finding in our study was the lower incidence of cardiac involvement in the presence of lymphopenia (lymphopenia in: 16.6 percent of cases with cardiac involvement vs. 67.1 percent in cases with a normal heart; P < 0.00001).
The rate of increase in troponin I in cases of cardiac involvement in our study was 87.5 percent, similar to the studies by Rodriguez-Gonzalez et al. and Jiang et al., which were 86.8 percent and 80.9 percent (
30,
31), respectively. Contrary to these results, some studies showed lower rates of increased troponin I, such as the studies by Kochi et al. with 16.7 percent (
32) and Dionne et al. with only 8 percent (
33). Among our patients, individuals with reduced LVEF and pericardial effusion had higher levels of inflammatory markers than others.
LV dysfunction was present in 10% of the patients at the beginning of this study, with full recovery observed in all except two patients. Coronary involvement was observed in 8 patients (4%) of the children during the acute phase. In the one-year follow-up, small coronary aneurysms (Z score 2.5 - 5) remained in two patients. Pericardial effusion, mitral regurgitation, and electrocardiogram abnormalities disappeared in all patients at follow-up. The results of our follow-up in this study are almost similar to the study by Cantarutti in Italy (
34). Studies about the follow-up of children with cardiac involvement in MIS-C are very limited. Longer-term studies are required to understand the clinical course of cardiac involvement in children with MIS-C.
5.1. Clinical Implications and Management Considerations
The findings of our study provide valuable insights for clinicians managing MIS-C, particularly in populations with lower rates of cardiac involvement. Several key points emerge from our data:
1. Early diagnosis and risk stratification: (1) Elevated levels of troponin I, D-dimer, and thrombocytosis were strongly associated with cardiac involvement in our study, making them useful biomarkers for identifying high-risk patients; (2) Conversely, lymphopenia was more prevalent in patients without cardiac involvement, suggesting that its presence may indicate a different inflammatory trajectory.
2. Role of early IVIG and corticosteroid therapy: (1) Our data suggest that early administration of IVIG and corticosteroids may contribute to a lower incidence of severe cardiac complications; (2) This aligns with emerging evidence supporting the use of early anti-inflammatory treatment to reduce cardiovascular involvement in MIS-C.
3. Prognosis and long-term monitoring: (1) Most patients with reduced LVEF or pericardial effusion recovered fully, except for two cases with persistent small coronary aneurysms; (2) One-year follow-up demonstrated a good overall prognosis, with resolution of mitral regurgitation and ECG abnormalities in all cases; (3) These findings underscore the importance of structured follow-up to monitor for late cardiac complications, even in patients who initially present with mild or moderate disease.
4. Comparisons with global data and future directions: (1) The lower rates of cardiac involvement in our study compared to Western cohorts highlight the need for population-specific guidelines in MIS-C management; (2) Future studies should focus on genetic and immunological factors that may contribute to variations in disease severity across different ethnic and racial groups; (3) Long-term follow-up studies are essential to determine whether early treatment strategies provide sustained cardiac protection beyond the one-year mark.
5.2. Conclusions
In this study, we found less common cardiac involvement compared to similar studies, and this lower rate was observed in all components, including decreased LVEF, coronary abnormalities, pericardial effusion, valvular disorders, ECG abnormalities, and cardiogenic shock. This may be due to differences in genetic background or related to the early use of IVIG and corticosteroids. Cardiac involvement in the one-year follow-up showed a good prognosis. Some laboratory findings showed significance between the two groups of cardiac involvement and normal heart among MIS-C patients, including WBC count, lymphocyte count, platelet count, and the levels of troponin I and D-dimer; for all these items, P was less than 0.05. On the other hand, no significant difference was seen for neutrophil count and the levels of hemoglobin and CRP. Thrombocytosis was significantly more common in cases of cardiac involvement (P < 0.05), whereas in cases with a normal heart, the occurrence of lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia was significantly higher (for both items: P < 0.05). Furthermore, elevated troponin I, D-dimer, and thrombocytosis emerged as potential biomarkers for predicting cardiac involvement.
5.3. Limitations
This study has a few important limitations. First, it was conducted at a single referral center, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other populations or regions. Second, we relied mainly on echocardiography and ECG to assess cardiac involvement. More detailed imaging, such as cardiac MRI, was not available at our center; therefore, subtle heart issues could be missed. Third, although all patients were followed for one year, we cannot draw conclusions about longer-term cardiac outcomes beyond that period. Fourth, while we suggested that genetic background or early treatment might explain the relatively mild cardiac involvement in our patients compared to similar studies, we did not include any genetic testing or multi-center comparisons to explore this further. Fifth, we did not adjust for potential confounding factors (such as underlying comorbidities, socioeconomic status, or timing of treatment), which may have influenced the observed cardiac outcomes. In addition, the absence of a predetermined sample size may have reduced the statistical power to detect subtle differences in less prevalent outcomes, potentially limiting the ability to generalize findings to other settings with different MIS-C prevalence rates. Future multi-center, prospective studies with control groups and more advanced imaging tools are needed to validate and expand on these observations.
5.4. Future Research Directions
While our study provides valuable insights, several key questions remain unanswered. Future research should focus on the following areas to better understand the role of genetics and treatment timing in MIS-C-related cardiac involvement:
1. Genetic and immunological studies: Large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) could help identify genetic markers associated with lower cardiac involvement in MIS-C.
2. Treatment timing and effectiveness: Prospective cohort studies comparing early versus late administration of IVIG and corticosteroids could determine how timing affects cardiac outcomes.
3. Long-term cardiac follow-up: Multicenter longitudinal studies tracking MIS-C patients over several years would help determine whether early treatment leads to lasting cardiac protection.
4. Advanced imaging studies: Advanced imaging studies, such as cardiac MRI, could provide more detailed assessments of long-term myocardial function and coronary artery health.