Reports indicate approximately 5 million global deaths related to AMR caused by bacteria, significantly affecting Asian and Middle Eastern countries (
2,
16). Over the years,
S. aureus has developed various mechanisms of drug resistance, making it difficult to treat with conventional antibiotics. Published systematic reviews and meta-analyses have assessed the epidemiology of VRSA globally, showing its prevalence across different years and regions (
17). Although the incidence of VRSA in developed countries is relatively low, it can be said that its burden in developing countries, such as Iran, is quite high and significant. According to the findings of the present study, the prevalence of VRSA was estimated at 19.05%, which was consistent with some reports in other parts of the world (especially Africa) (
18) and significantly higher compared to some other studies (
17). Furthermore, our findings are higher than the systematic reviews and meta-analyses conducted in Iran up to 2012, which reported a prevalence of 2.4% from thirteen studies (
19). Of course, this prevalence has increased over the last 12 years and has been addressed in various studies within the country (
1,
20,
21).
The high rate of VRSA observed in the patients in this study may be attributed to insufficient surveillance of the types of infections present or the inappropriate use of antibacterial drugs among these patients compared to other groups (
22). Additionally, this issue is likely worsened by the irrational use and widespread availability of over-the-counter antibacterial drugs in many developing countries (
23). In summary, it can be acknowledged that today, the frequent use of vancomycin as the choice for the treatment of infections caused by MRSA and other MDR gram-positive pathogens has led to the emergence of
S. aureus isolates with high resistance to vancomycin or other last-line antibiotics (
24,
25).
The results of this study showed different levels of VRSA frequency in different individuals in terms of disease type, age, gender, and type of sample studied, which indicates the existence of changes among the parameters studied. It can be said that a kind of heterogeneity or significant difference (P < 0.05) was observed in some findings of this study, such that VRSA was more common in individuals with diabetes, aged older than 35 to 78 years, women, and wound samples. The possible reason for this heterogeneity could be differences in methodology, study participants, study design, and sample size, all of which affect the prevalence of VRSA. Another part of this study was to evaluate the resistance of S. aureus isolates to different antibiotic groups and determine the resistance pattern for each of the MRSA and VRSA isolates, which was subsequently determined by the type of drug resistance of each isolate. The differences in study results can be attributed to variations in sample size, the selected antibiotic stress, bacterial origin, and methods used for determining drug resistance. Additionally, VRSA frequently exhibits MDR to various antimicrobial drugs; however, in the current study, MDR strains accounted for 91% of the total VRSA isolates.
In the present study, the highest antibiotic resistance observed in MRSA isolates was to cefoxitin (100%), followed by gentamicin at 52.98% and ciprofloxacin at 44.05%. The lowest resistance was noted for linezolid at 1.79%. Studies in other regions assessing the antibiotic resistance patterns of MRSA isolates have yielded both similar and different results compared to the present study. In a study involving ocular samples from Gorgan, 80% of the isolates were identified as MRSA (
12). A study conducted in 2024 reported a 40% resistance rate attributed to MRSA. In the current research, all resistant isolates were identified as MRSA; these were found to be sensitive to linezolid, and one isolate was also sensitive to daptomycin. However, all isolates displayed resistance to other antibiotics from various groups. This issue, along with the relative sensitivity of more than 16% of the isolates to vancomycin (VISA), will be of particular importance in analyzing bacterial reactions to antibiotics used in most therapeutic procedures related to microbial infections. In the study in Tabriz (2008), no resistant (VRSA) or intermediate susceptible (VISA) cases were reported to vancomycin (
26). In another study in southern India, 16 strains of
S. aureus showed MICs of about 4 - 8 μg/mL against vancomycin, which were reported as VISA isolates. The results of these studies do not match the results of the present study, but in the reports, 68.7% of the strains had MICs of 16 μg/mL, indicating an increase in vancomycin resistance in recent years (
27).
In this regard, a 2021 systematic review and meta-analysis (with data up to 2020) showed that the global prevalence of VRSA has more than tripled in the past two decades, from 2% before 2006 to 7% between 2015 and 2020. The study also stated that the highest prevalence of VRSA was in Africa (16%) and Asia (5%), followed by North America (4%), South America (3%), and Europe (1%).
The main objective of the present study was to investigate vancomycin resistance and the presence of the
vanA gene in MRSA isolates. Current molecular analyses indicated that the
vanA resistance gene was detected in 71.88% of VRSA isolates, similar to a meta-analysis study conducted in 2021 (
17). Totally, reports indicate that VRSA strains have been identified in several countries, including Pakistan, Iran, and others. The USA, Nigeria, and India (
28). Some reports indicate that the prevalence of VRSA isolates is increasing in Iran, while others show a decrease in prevalence over the past five years (
3,
29). The observed heterogeneity and discrepancies may be attributed to the shift in research approaches and healthcare priorities beginning in 2020, in response to the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. As a result, the number of studies conducted during this time has decreased, which may lead to an underestimation of findings from these periods.
The present study has some limitations. These include the small number of isolates categorized by disease type due to the cross-sectional design, the absence of VISA analysis, and the lack of molecular typing beyond vanA. However, a key strength of this study is the monitoring and measurement of drug resistance in S. aureus isolates from specific patients in the northern region of the country.
5.1. Conclusions
This finding, along with the increasing reports of MRSA and VRSA outbreaks across the country, complicates treatment. It affects incidence rates, mortality, hospital length of stay, and healthcare costs, particularly for vulnerable patients. This situation underscores the urgent need to update and develop national treatment guidelines. These guidelines should include alternative and highly effective antimicrobial agents that specifically target resistant strains of Staphylococcus. Furthermore, it is essential to implement comprehensive surveillance strategies for antimicrobial agents, supported by robust systemic monitoring.
To effectively contain the transmission of VRSA, prioritizing infection control measures is crucial. This includes enforcing contact precautions, conducting thorough screenings, properly sterilizing healthcare equipment, and maintaining a clean and hygienic environment. Due to its strong antibacterial effects, linezolid is a valuable option for treating severe infections caused by drug-resistant S. aureus.