Cover image of the article: Mast Cells as Central Hubs of Immune Dysregulation: Decoding Novel Pathogenic Circuits and Pioneering Therapeutics in Autoimmunity

Image Credit:J Inflamm Dis

Mast Cells as Central Hubs of Immune Dysregulation: Decoding Novel Pathogenic Circuits and Pioneering Therapeutics in Autoimmunity

Authors

Bahareh Abd NikfarjamBahareh Abd Nikfarjam ORCID1, Kamyar EntezariKamyar Entezari ORCID2, Shahrzad GhorbanzadehShahrzad Ghorbanzadeh ORCID2, Sepide RasouliSepide Rasouli ORCID2, Salar DadrasSalar Dadras ORCID2, Fatemeh SabbaghziaraniFatemeh Sabbaghziarani ORCID3,*

Abstract

Context:

Mast cells are increasingly recognized as central orchestrators of immune dysregulation in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, extending their established role as histaminergic effector cells in allergy.

Evidence Acquisition:

This review synthesizes recent evidence positioning mast cells as key regulators of chronic inflammation, tissue remodeling, and neuroinflammation. Studies published between 1997 and 2026 have identified mast cells as focal points of immune dysregulation and helped define novel pathogenic pathways and develop therapeutic approaches for various autoimmune conditions.

Results:

We describe the multifaceted roles of mast cells in breaching immune-privileged sites, amplifying autoantibody production through interactions with B and T cells, and promoting pathology in rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, and juvenile dermatomyositis through IgE-independent pathways involving receptors such as MRGPRX2. We also explore their contributions to neurodegenerative processes, including Alzheimer's disease, through disruption of the blood-brain barrier and facilitation of leukocyte infiltration. Beyond these mechanisms, we critically evaluate emerging therapeutic strategies designed to precisely modulate mast cell activity. These strategies include targeting FcεRI signaling with Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, engaging inhibitory checkpoints such as CD300a, and depleting mast cells through KIT receptor inhibition.

Conclusions:

By reframing mast cells as dynamic cellular rheostats and actionable therapeutic nodes, this review outlines approaches for translating these insights into targeted therapies for refractory autoimmune conditions.

How to Cite:Abd Nikfarjam B, Entezari K, Ghorbanzadeh S, Rasouli S, Dadras S, et al. Mast Cells as Central Hubs of Immune Dysregulation: Decoding Novel Pathogenic Circuits and Pioneering Therapeutics in Autoimmunity. J Inflamm Dis. 2026;30(3):e173195. doi: https://doi.org/10.69107/jid-173195

1. Context

First described by Paul Ehrlich in 1878 on the basis of their distinctive granule-filled (“fattened”) cytoplasm, mast cells represent an ancient and versatile immune cell lineage (1, 2). For more than a century, they were viewed predominantly in the context of allergy, chiefly because of their role in IgE-mediated anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity (2). Contemporary research has substantially expanded this view, revealing mast cells as multifunctional sentinel cells and key regulators of physiological and pathological processes, ranging from innate immunity to tissue remodeling (3, 4).
Located at host-environment interfaces, including the skin, mucosal barriers, and perivascular spaces, mast cells are among the first responders to pathogens, injury, and other immunological insults (4, 5). Their longevity and relative stability in tissues enable them to exert sustained effects on their microenvironment, and their numbers increase through hyperplasia in chronic inflammatory, fibrotic, and autoimmune conditions (3). Mast cells originate from hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow and complete their differentiation in peripheral tissues under the influence of local cytokines, particularly stem cell factor, which is essential for their survival and function (4, 6).
The broad functional repertoire of mast cells reflects their diverse activation pathways and potent mediator release. Although the high-affinity IgE receptor (FcεRI) is the best-characterized activation pathway, mast cells can also be activated through Toll-like receptors, complement components, neuropeptides, and cytokine receptors (7). Activation initiates a rapid, two-phase response: 1) the immediate release of preformed granule mediators, including histamine, proteases such as tryptase and chymase, heparin, and presynthesized TNF-α; and 2) the subsequent de novo synthesis and release of lipid mediators, including leukotrienes and prostaglandins, as well as cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors such as VEGF and TGF-β (6, 8, 9). These mediators enable mast cells to regulate vascular permeability, leukocyte recruitment, smooth muscle contraction, fibrosis, and angiogenesis (9, 10).
Disruption of the finely regulated balance of the immune system, manifested as the loss of self-tolerance and an attack on host tissues, leads to autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and multiple sclerosis (MS) (4, 11). Recent findings indicate that gut microbiota-mediated inflammatory processes contribute to the induction and persistence of autoimmunity, thereby adding to the network of immune dysregulation in which mast cells participate (12). Increasing evidence implicates mast cells in the pathogenesis of these conditions (13, 14). Infection-related immune dysregulation is also increasingly recognized as a relevant context for mast cell activation in autoimmune diseases, because infectious agents can impair self-tolerance and promote inflammatory pathways involving mast cell mediators (15). Mast cell numbers are elevated in affected tissues, including the salivary glands of patients with Sjögren's syndrome, the synovium of patients with RA, and the skin of patients with lupus. Their inflammatory mediators, such as tryptase, are present at high levels in the synovial fluid of patients with RA and SLE and in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with MS, suggesting an active role rather than a bystander role (13).
This review aims to synthesize current knowledge about the multifaceted roles of mast cells in autoimmune diseases. We examine their activation by autoantibodies and self-antigens, the release of mediators that exacerbate inflammation and tissue damage, and their bidirectional interactions with T cells, B cells, and dendritic cells that amplify autoimmune responses. By elucidating these mechanisms, we seek to characterize mast cells as central orchestrators of autoimmunity and identify potential therapeutic approaches for these complex diseases. Targeting mast cell activation, specific mediators, or interactions with other cells may help interrupt the core pathophysiology of autoimmune disorders and extend treatment beyond symptomatic relief.

2. Evidence Acquisition

This article is a narrative review. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies addressing the role of mast cells in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, with particular emphasis on neuroinflammation and therapeutic targeting. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were systematically searched for papers published between June 1997 and July 2026. The search combined controlled vocabulary (MeSH and Emtree) and free-text terms. The core search string was as follows: ("mast cell" OR "mastocyte" OR "mast cells (MC)") AND ("autoimmun" OR "autoimmune disease" OR "rheumatoid arthritis" OR "systemic lupus erythematosus" OR "lupus" OR "multiple sclerosis" OR "Sjogren" OR "juvenile dermatomyositis") AND ("neuroinflammation" OR "Alzheimer" OR "neurodegener" OR "blood-brain barrier" OR "MRGPRX2" OR "FcεRI" OR "IgE" OR "bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor" OR "cytokine" OR "therapeutic target" OR "treatment"). Additional searches for therapeutic strategies used terms such as "mast cell stabilizer", "mast cell depletion", "nanoparticle", "nanotherapy", "biologic", "omalizumab", "ligelizumab", and "quilizumab".
Studies were eligible if they were peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or preclinical studies, including in vitro studies and animal models, and were published in English. Eligible studies addressed mast cell biology, activation pathways, mediator release, interactions with immune cells, or therapeutic modulation in autoimmune, inflammatory, or neurodegenerative conditions. Non-English publications, conference abstracts without full text, editorials, letters without original data, duplicate records, and studies not directly relevant to mast cells in autoimmunity or neuroinflammation were excluded. Narrative reviews were included only when they provided comprehensive mechanistic insights unavailable in primary research.
Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts. The full texts of potentially eligible records were then assessed against the inclusion criteria, and disagreements were resolved through discussion. Data were extracted on study design, disease model or population, mast cell source and phenotype, activation pathways, mediators, therapeutic interventions, and main outcomes. Findings were synthesized narratively because of methodological and clinical heterogeneity.
The methodological quality of included studies was critically appraised according to study design. Randomized controlled trials were assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, whereas preclinical studies were evaluated for reporting of randomization, blinding, and sample size. Given the narrative nature of this review, no quantitative meta-analysis was performed.

3. Results

3.1. The Pivotal Role of Mast Cells in Autoimmune Pathogenesis

Beyond their established role in allergy, MCs are increasingly recognized as contributors to the initiation and progression of a broad range of autoimmune diseases. Their location at barrier surfaces and in connective tissues, together with their extensive repertoire of preformed and newly synthesized mediators, enables them to coordinate inflammatory responses, disrupt tissue integrity, and modulate adaptive immunity. This section describes the mechanisms through which MCs contribute to pathology in key autoimmune conditions. Table 1 summarizes the main evidence and mechanisms.
Table 1.
Mast Cell Involvement in Autoimmune and Inflammatory Diseases: Key Evidence and Mechanisms a
DiseasesHistopathological EvidenceMechanisms of Mast Cell-Driven PathogenesisNotable Mediators and PathwaysClinical ImplicationsReferences
Multiple Sclerosis (MS)/ Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE)↑MCs in plaques and meninges; ↑Tryptase in CSF1. BBB disruption 2. Direct demyelination and axonal injury 3. Th17 polarization and Treg suppressionHistamine, VEGF, Tryptase, Chymase, TNF-α, IL-6Exacerbates demyelination and neuronal oxidative stress; dual pro-/anti-inflammatory roles in EAE models(16-18)
Rheumatoid Arthritis↑Activated MCs in synovium1. Synovitis via pro-inflammatory cytokines 2. Cartilage degradation and pannus formation 3. Pain induction via PAR-2 activationTNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, Tryptase, ChymaseJoint destruction, cartilage degradation, systemic inflammation(6, 22-30)
Cutaneous Lupus (DLE/SCLE)↑MCTC and MCT subtypes in lesional skin1. Neutrophil chemotaxis 2. Vasodilation and edema 3. IgE autoantibody-mediated activationHistamine, Chemokines (e.g., for neutrophils)Cutaneous lesions, renal involvement, systemic organ damage(30, 32, 33)
Bullous Pemphigoid and Pemphigus Vulgaris↑MC density in lesional skin1. Proteolytic cleavage of BM proteins (e.g., BP180) 2. Neutrophil recruitment 3. Vascular leakage and edemaTryptase, Chymase, TNF-α, IL-8, HistamineMucocutaneous erosions, non-itchy lesions(34-36)
Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)↑MC infiltration in islets and pancreatic tissue1. β-cell toxicity and dysfunction 2. Recruitment of autoreactive T cells 3. Potential regulatory role (context-dependent)TNF-α, IL-6, ChemokinesHyperglycemia, insulitis, diabetic complications(39-41)
Guillain-Barré Syndrome(Potential role based on biology)1. Direct nerve damage via proteases 2. Blood-nerve barrier disruption 3. Molecular mimicry-driven activationTryptase, Chymase, Histamine, VEGFAscending paralysis, respiratory failure(42, 43)
Graves' OphthalmopathyPronounced MC infiltration in orbit1. Fibrosis and tissue remodeling (GAG deposition) 2. Inflammation and painTryptase, TNF-α, IL-1β, HistamineOphthalmopathy, eyelid swelling, vision loss(44, 45)
Sjögren’s SyndromeMCs in glands, near nerves/ducts1. Glandular dysfunction 2. Chronic inflammation maintenance 3. Disruption of neural secretion signalsHistamine, Proteases, IL-1, IL-6, TNF-αDry eyes/mouth, systemic fatigue(46, 47)
Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseMucosal MCs; ↑Mediators in stool1. Epithelial barrier disruption 2. Visceral pain and motility changes (PAR-2) 3. Innate immune amplification (e.g., via P2X7)Tryptase, Histamine, IL-6, ATPDiarrhea, abdominal pain, weight loss(36, 49-52)
PsoriasisPerivascular MC accumulation (early)1. Vascular activation and leukocyte recruitment 2. Amplification of IL-23/Th17 axis 3. Suppression of Treg functionTNF-α, VEGF, IL-22, IL-17AErythematous plaques, Koebner phenomenon(53-55)
Systemic Vasculitides↑MCs and degranulation in vessel walls1. Neutrophil recruitment 2. Vessel wall destabilization 3. Amplification of inflammationTryptase, Chymase, IL-8, LTB4, Histamine, TNF-αOrgan ischemia, cutaneous lesions, glomerulonephritis(56-59)
Inflammatory Myopathies (PM/DM)↑MCs in muscle and skin lesions1. Direct myofiber damage 2. Pruritus (e.g., via IL-31 in JDM) 3. Recruitment of cytotoxic T cellsProteases, IL-31, Chemokines, TNF-αProximal weakness, dermatomyositis rashes(60-63)
Alzheimer’s Disease↑MCs in brain early in pathology1. BBB disruption 2. Amyloid-β-induced neuroinflammation 3. Synaptic dysfunction (PAR-2)TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, TryptaseCognitive decline, neurofibrillary tangles(68, 69)
a Abbreviations: MC, Mast Cell; MCTC, Tryptase+/Chymase+ MC; MCT, Tryptase+ MC; BBB, Blood-Brain Barrier; CSF, Cerebrospinal Fluid; Treg, Regulatory T Cell; PAR-2, Protease-Activated Receptor 2; DLE, Discoid Lupus Erythematosus; SCLE, Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus; BM, Basement Membrane; GAG, Glycosaminoglycan; JDM, Juvenile Dermatomyositis.

3.1.1. Multiple Sclerosis and Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system, characterized by demyelination, axonal damage, and neuroinflammation driven by autoreactive T cells and other immune mediators (16). Mast cell numbers are elevated in MS plaques and the meninges. Levels of the MC-specific protease tryptase, a biomarker of MC activation, are significantly increased in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with MS (16, 17). Mast cells contribute to MS pathogenesis through several mechanisms. Upon activation, MC-derived histamine, VEGF, and proteases, including tryptase and chymase, disrupt the blood-brain barrier (BBB), increase vascular permeability, and facilitate leukocyte entry into the central nervous system parenchyma (17). Mast cell proteases can also directly induce demyelination, degrade myelin, and cause axonal injury and neuronal apoptosis. In addition, MCs present myelin antigens to T cells and release cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-6, that polarize T cells toward a proinflammatory Th17 phenotype while suppressing regulatory T cell (Treg) function (17, 18). Evidence from experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) models is more nuanced: although MC deficiency often ameliorates disease, some studies show exacerbated symptoms. These findings suggest that MCs may also have immunoregulatory functions, potentially through the release of IL-10 or other anti-inflammatory mediators during later disease stages (19). This dual role underscores the context-dependent nature of MC function.

3.1.2. Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by chronic inflammatory synovitis that leads to joint destruction and disability (20). The inflamed synovium contains numerous innate and adaptive immune cells (21), including a significantly expanded population of activated MCs (6, 22-24). In RA, MCs are activated by diverse stimuli, including immune complexes acting through Fcγ receptors, IL-33, complement anaphylatoxins such as C5a, and neuropeptides (25-27). Activated synovial MCs are a major source of proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-17, which drive synovitis and activate fibroblasts (6, 25, 26, 28). Tryptase and chymase also contribute directly to cartilage degradation and activate synovial fibroblasts, promoting pannus formation (25, 29, 30). Mast cell tryptase activates protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) on sensory neurons, contributing to RA-associated pain (26, 29). Consistent with this mechanism, studies of pain sensitization in inflammatory conditions and pediatric populations support the importance of neuroimmune interactions in maintaining inflammatory pain (31). The MC-stabilizing drug cromolyn sodium ameliorates disease severity and protects against bone erosion in animal models of RA. Its efficacy is enhanced when combined with anti-IL-17A therapy, highlighting the potential of targeting multiple pathways (25, 26).

3.1.3. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a multisystem autoimmune disease characterized by loss of tolerance, autoantibody production, and immune complex deposition. Mast cell involvement is most clearly documented in cutaneous lupus. Quantitative histology shows significantly increased numbers of both tryptase (MCTC) (tryptase+/chymase+) and MCT (tryptase+) subtypes in the skin of patients with discoid lupus erythematosus and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, compared with patients with SLE or healthy controls (32). Mast cells contribute to skin inflammation through chemotaxis, vasodilation, increased vascular permeability, and interactions with autoantibodies. They release chemokines that recruit neutrophils and other inflammatory cells to sites of lesion formation (30). Histamine release contributes to erythema and edema, while IgE autoantibodies may trigger MC degranulation, linking adaptive and innate immunity in lupus skin pathology (33).

3.1.4. Pemphigus Vulgaris and Bullous Pemphigoid

Pemphigus vulgaris and bullous pemphigoid (BP) are autoimmune blistering diseases characterized by autoantibodies against skin adhesion proteins, including desmogleins in pemphigus vulgaris and BP180/BP230 in BP, leading to acantholysis and blister formation. Both diseases show significantly increased MC density in lesional skin, as demonstrated by toluidine blue staining (34). Mast cells actively contribute to pathology and blister formation. Their proteases can directly cleave hemidesmosomal proteins, such as BP180, and desmosomal components, thereby weakening dermal-epidermal adhesion and acting synergistically with autoantibodies (35). They amplify inflammation by releasing TNF-α and IL-8, which recruit neutrophils, the key effector cells in BP blister formation (36). Although MCs drive inflammation, their products, including chymase, also contribute to wound repair. This may help explain the chronic, cyclical pattern of blister healing and recurrence in these diseases (37).

3.1.5. Type 1 Diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disorder resulting in the selective destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic β-cells. Mast cells participate in the inflammatory milieu of the islets of Langerhans, termed insulitis, during disease progression (38). Histopathological studies show significant MC infiltration in pancreatic islets, pancreatic lymph nodes, and peripancreatic adipose tissue in individuals with T1D and in nonobese diabetic mouse models. This finding is less prominent in other forms of diabetes (39, 40).
Mast cells may contribute to β-cell damage through several pathways. The MC-derived proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 can exert direct toxic effects on β-cells and promote the differentiation and activation of autoreactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, shifting the balance away from Tregs (39, 41). Mast cells also release chemokines that recruit other leukocytes, amplify insulitis, and facilitate β-cell destruction. However, their role in T1D is complex. Some evidence suggests a regulatory function in which MCs support local Treg responses and restrain autoimmune attack, potentially explaining conflicting results in interventional studies (41). This context-dependent duality highlights the need to define the timing and signals that determine MC function in T1D.

3.1.6. Guillain-Barré Syndrome

Guillain-Barré syndrome is an acute autoimmune neuropathy, often triggered by a preceding infection, that causes demyelination and axonal damage in the peripheral nervous system. Although direct human histopathological evidence is less abundant than for other diseases, the known biology of MCs suggests a potential contribution to GBS pathogenesis (42). Mast cell proteases, including tryptase and chymase, can directly damage the myelin sheath and impair nerve conduction. As with their effects on the BBB, MC mediators such as histamine and VEGF can increase blood-nerve barrier permeability, allowing antibodies and inflammatory cells to access peripheral nerves. Following infection, MCs may be activated by antibodies against pathogens that share epitopes with nerve components, such as gangliosides. This cross-reactivity may lead to degranulation and localized inflammation targeting nerves (43).

3.1.7. Graves' Disease and Ophthalmopathy

Graves' disease is an autoimmune disorder driven by antibodies against the thyrotropin receptor (TSHR), resulting in hyperthyroidism. Its most common extrathyroidal manifestation is Graves' ophthalmopathy, which involves inflammation and remodeling of orbital tissues. Pronounced MC infiltration is a hallmark of active Graves' ophthalmopathy, with abundant MCs in retro-orbital connective tissue and extraocular muscles. Mast cells are activated in the orbital microenvironment, likely by IgG antibodies and local cytokines. Mast cell tryptase acts as a potent fibrogenic factor, activating orbital fibroblasts and promoting glycosaminoglycan (GAG) deposition, which contributes to the characteristic tissue swelling, proptosis, and remodeling. The release of TNF-α and IL-1β contributes to edema and immune cell recruitment, perpetuating the inflammatory cycle (44, 45).

3.1.8. Sjögren's Syndrome

Sjögren's syndrome is a systemic autoimmune disease that targets the lacrimal and salivary glands and causes sicca symptoms, including dry eyes and mouth. Affected glandular tissue exhibits substantial lymphocytic infiltration and local inflammation. Mast cells are frequently found in inflammatory foci in affected salivary and lacrimal glands, often close to nerves and ducts. Histamine and proteases can directly impair acinar and ductal cell function, contributing to glandular dysfunction and reduced fluid secretion. Mast cells also release proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α, that maintain the inflammatory microenvironment and support B and T cell activation. In addition, MCs engage in bidirectional interactions with cholinergic nerves, potentially disrupting the neural signals that normally stimulate saliva and tear production (46, 47).

3.1.9. Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is characterized by chronic, relapsing inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract (48). Mucosal MC numbers are significantly increased in patients with IBD, and levels of their mediators, including tryptase and histamine, are elevated in the mucosa and stool and correlate with disease activity (36). Intestinal MCs exacerbate inflammation through several pathways. Their proteases cleave and disrupt epithelial tight junction proteins, such as zonula occludens-1, increasing intestinal permeability and allowing access to luminal antigens (49).
Activation of PAR-2 on visceral sensory neurons by MC tryptase is a key mechanism underlying abdominal pain and altered motility in IBD (50). Mast cells sense extracellular ATP, a danger signal released by damaged cells, through P2X7 receptors, triggering further degranulation and amplifying the inflammatory cascade (51). They also produce cytokines such as IL-6 that promote the differentiation of proinflammatory Th17 cells, a key cell population in IBD pathogenesis (52).

3.1.10. Psoriasis

Psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune skin disorder driven by the IL-23/Th17 axis and characterized by keratinocyte hyperproliferation and a complex inflammatory infiltrate. Mast cells are important initiators and amplifiers of the psoriatic inflammatory cascade (53, 54). Perivascular MC accumulation and degranulation around postcapillary venules are hallmarks of developing psoriatic plaques and precede the full clinical manifestation of lesions (53). Mast cell-derived TNF-α and VEGF activate the dermal endothelium and upregulate adhesion molecules, including VCAM-1 and ICAM-1, facilitating the recruitment of neutrophils, T cells, and other leukocytes. Mast cells are also an important source of IL-22 and can sequester extracellular IL-17A through receptor-mediated endocytosis, storing it for rapid release to amplify this key cytokine pathway (53, 55). Through OX40/OX40 L interactions, activated MCs can suppress Treg function and promote pathogenic Th17 cell differentiation, thereby sustaining inflammation. Studies showing that chymase inhibitors reduce inflammation and promote a more regulatory cytokine profile highlight the role of MC proteases and identify MCs as a potential therapeutic target in psoriasis (55).

3.1.11. Systemic Vasculitides

Vasculitides are a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by immune-mediated inflammation of blood vessels. Mast cells reside in perivascular locations throughout the body and are positioned to orchestrate this inflammation (56). Increased MC density and evidence of degranulation have been documented across several vasculitides. In necrotizing glomerulonephritis associated with ANCA-associated vasculitis, these findings correlate with disease severity (57). Mast cells localize to inflamed coronary arteries in Kawasaki disease and temporal arteries in giant cell arteritis (56). Degranulation is also a feature of small-vessel inflammation in cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis (58). Mast cells contribute through the release of chemoattractants, such as IL-8 and LTB4, that recruit neutrophils, the primary effector cells in AAV. Proteases such as tryptase and chymase can degrade and destabilize the basement membrane and extracellular matrix, weakening vessel walls and promoting aneurysm formation or rupture. Histamine increases vascular permeability, whereas TNF-α amplifies vessel-wall inflammation. Animal models suggest that MC stabilization can ameliorate disease, supporting a proinflammatory role. However, the release of mediators such as heparin also suggests context-dependent protective functions in regulating thrombosis (56, 59).

3.1.12. Autoimmune Inflammatory Myopathies

Autoimmune inflammatory myopathies, including polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM), involve chronic skeletal muscle inflammation. Mast cells infiltrate affected muscle bundles and skin, contributing to weakness and pathology (60, 61). Their numbers are elevated in muscle biopsies from patients with PM and DM and in the characteristic skin rashes of DM (60, 62). Mast cell proteases can directly damage myofibers, contributing to muscle injury and necrosis. In juvenile dermatomyositis, MCs are implicated in debilitating pruritus, potentially through IL-31 release, making them a potential target for antipruritic therapy. Mast cells also release cytokines and chemokines that recruit cytotoxic T cells and neutrophils to muscle, thereby amplifying autoimmune attack on myocytes (62, 63). The hypothesis that inhibiting MC degranulation could mitigate muscle damage remains a promising but underexplored approach to adjunctive therapy (62).

3.1.13. Alzheimer's Disease: A Role in Neuroinflammation

Although Alzheimer's disease (AD) is not a classic autoimmune disease (64), it is characterized by chronic neuroinflammation (65, 66), in which MCs may play a significant role (67, 68). Mast cell numbers increase in the hippocampus and cortex early in AD, even before substantial plaque deposition, suggesting that these cells may sense initial pathological changes (68, 69). Mast cell-derived cytokines, including TNF-α and IL-6, and proteases can disrupt tight junctions, increase BBB permeability, and permit peripheral inflammatory cells to enter the brain (68). Amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides can activate MCs, triggering a feed-forward loop of inflammatory mediator release, including IL-1β and IL-6, that exacerbates neuritic damage and accelerates plaque pathology (68, 69). Tryptase activates PAR-2 on neurons and microglia, potentially contributing to synaptic dysfunction and neuroinflammation. The cognitive benefits observed with masitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets MC survival and activation through c-Kit, provide clinical evidence supporting MC involvement in AD pathogenesis and suggest a potential therapeutic strategy (69).

3.2. Therapeutic Targeting of Mast Cells in Autoimmunity: Established Concepts and Novel Paradigms

3.2.1. Rationale for Mast Cell-Targeted Therapy

Mast cells contribute to the pathogenesis of a broad range of autoimmune diseases by initiating inflammation, disrupting vascular integrity, and coordinating immune cell recruitment. Their location at host–environment interfaces and extensive repertoire of preformed and newly synthesized mediators make them attractive but complex therapeutic targets. Emerging approaches aim to modulate MC activity precisely, disrupting autoimmune pathways while preserving essential homeostatic functions. Although the mechanisms that activate MCs in autoimmunity remain incompletely defined, accumulating evidence supports their potential as therapeutic targets (30). This section describes current and investigational pharmacological strategies for suppressing pathological MC signaling and explores emerging approaches to therapeutic targeting.

3.2.2. Established and Repurposed Pharmacological Approaches

3.2.2.1. Attenuating Proximal Activation Signals

3.2.2.1.1. Anti-IgE Monoclonal Antibodies

Omalizumab: Diseases involving IgE-mediated autoimmunity include SLE, BP, and chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). In SLE, autoantibodies against dsDNA or Smith antigen may be of the IgE isotype. These antibodies activate basophils or plasmacytoid dendritic cells, leading to type I interferon production and increased tissue damage.
Omalizumab (Xolair) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets human IgE. It binds to the IgE Cε3 domain, which mediates IgE binding to FcεRI and FcεRII/CD23, and reduces circulating free IgE by more than 95%. Omalizumab does not bind to IgE already bound to receptors on MCs and basophils. Reduced free IgE leads to downregulation of FcεRI on MCs, basophils, and dendritic cells, thereby reducing their responsiveness. Anti-IgE therapy has been validated in numerous trials involving children and adults with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma (70). Its established efficacy in CSU, an MC-driven disease, supports investigation in other autoimmune conditions involving IgE, although its utility in purely nonallergic contexts remains under investigation (71). IgE is a potent immune mediator subject to strict regulation. Failure of this regulation because of genetic or environmental factors may lead to serious autoimmune disorders. The success of omalizumab supports this concept and encourages the development of drugs with high-affinity or multitargeted approaches (70).
Ligelizumab: Ligelizumab (QGE031), a high-affinity monoclonal antibody targeting IgE, was derived from the earlier antibody TNX90. It is a recombinant humanized IgG1κ monoclonal antibody specific for IgE. Binding of ligelizumab prevents the resulting antibody-IgE complex from engaging the high-affinity IgE receptor FcεRIα on MCs and basophils. This blocks effector-cell activation and the release of mediators responsible for clinical symptoms. in vitro comparisons indicate that ligelizumab binds human IgE with approximately 50-fold greater affinity than omalizumab and more potently suppresses IgE-mediated MC degranulation (72).
Ligelizumab is an investigational therapy being developed exclusively for CSU. The first phase 2b randomized controlled trial reported that it was safe and effective (73). Molecular studies have identified mechanistic and functional differences between ligelizumab and omalizumab. Differences in their IgE-binding epitopes appear to confer distinct abilities to interfere with IgE association with low- and high-affinity receptors. Omalizumab primarily impairs IgE binding to the low-affinity receptor CD23, whereas ligelizumab more effectively inhibits binding to FcεRI. Laboratory and early clinical findings suggest that ligelizumab suppresses free IgE for longer than omalizumab. Ligelizumab also decreased IgE synthesis in peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures, potentially through interactions with IgE:CD23 complexes on B cell surfaces (71).
Quilizumab is an investigational afucosylated humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting the M1′ region of membrane-anchored IgE on B lymphocytes, a site absent from free IgE. Animal experiments showed that quilizumab eliminated IgE class-switched B cells through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (74). In healthy participants and individuals with allergic rhinitis or mild asthma, quilizumab reduced serum total and allergen-specific IgE concentrations for at least six months after the final dose. These findings suggest an effect on the long-lived IgE memory pool, potentially offering a more durable therapeutic effect than omalizumab. Quilizumab does not recognize IgE bound to FcεRI but, unlike omalizumab, can engage IgE associated with CD23. It has been proposed that quilizumab, like omalizumab, neutralizes IgE without inducing MC or basophil activation. It may also share the ability of an anti-CD23 monoclonal antibody to cross-link CD23 on B cells and thereby suppress IgE production (71).

3.2.2.1.2. Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

BTK is a critical component of FcεRI signaling in MCs. BTK inhibitors, including remibrutinib, can suppress MC activation and have been investigated in CSU and autoimmune diseases such as RA, offering a more targeted approach than broad immunosuppression (75, 76, 77). Bruton's tyrosine kinase regulates PLCγ phosphorylation, calcium mobilization, degranulation, and proinflammatory cytokine production downstream of FcεRI cross-linking. Genetic or pharmacological BTK ablation impairs MC degranulation and reduces the secretion of cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-2 (78). BTK inhibition also suppresses MRGPRX2-mediated MC activation, indicating activity across IgE-dependent and IgE-independent pathways. This dual mechanism, affecting both MC effector function and B cell autoantibody production, distinguishes BTK inhibition from therapies targeting IgE alone (76, 78).
In the pivotal phase 3 REMIX-1 and REMIX-2 trials in CSU, remibrutinib significantly reduced UAS7 at week 12 compared with placebo, with improvements sustained through week 52. Mechanistic analyses showed reduced serum autoantibodies against FcεRI and thyroid antigens in patients with a positive Chronic Urticaria Index, consistent with a potential disease-modifying effect on MC-driven autoimmunity (79).
Fenebrutinib, a second-generation reversible BTK inhibitor, blocks IgE-mediated histamine release from MCs in vitro and has demonstrated efficacy in antihistamine-refractory CSU (76). Nevertheless, challenges remain, including resistance mutations such as C481S, the need for validated biomarkers, and long-term safety requirements. Future studies should determine whether BTK inhibition produces durable disease control by concurrently targeting FcεRI-dependent MC activation and B cell autoimmunity (76, 78).

3.2.2.2. Antagonizing Key Mediators

Nonsedating H1-antihistamines and leukotriene receptor antagonists alleviate symptoms by blocking the effects of histamine and leukotrienes released from activated MCs (80). Nonsedating H1-antihistamines remain the most frequently prescribed agents targeting the MC mediator pathway in chronic urticaria (CU). However, efficacy varies substantially among patients, with approximately half failing to achieve a meaningful response (81). Adjunctive agents, such as H2 receptor antagonists and leukotriene receptor antagonists, are therefore commonly added (82). Although these agents provide symptomatic relief, their value as monotherapy for systemic autoimmune diseases is often limited, emphasizing the need for combination regimens that target upstream activation events (80).

3.2.2.3. Mast Cell Depletion Strategies

KIT receptor-targeting agents include the small-molecule inhibitors imatinib, midostaurin, and avapritinib, as well as the investigational anti-KIT monoclonal antibody barzolvolimab. Targeting KIT, which is essential for MC survival, proliferation, and function, can reduce MC populations. Small-molecule KIT inhibitors are used in aggressive systemic mastocytosis. Their potential repurposing for severe MC-driven autoimmune conditions is limited by off-target effects and toxicity, including myelosuppression, and therefore requires careful assessment of benefits and risks (83).
Mast cell depletion aims to suppress overall MC function rather than individual effector targets, potentially providing a broader therapeutic approach. KIT (CD117), a receptor tyrosine kinase, regulates MC differentiation, tissue migration, adhesion, maturation, survival, and activation (84). Blocking KIT reduces MC burden independently of the activating trigger. However, because KIT is also expressed on hematopoietic stem cells, melanocytes, and germ cells, its inhibition can cause hair depigmentation, myelosuppression, impaired erythroid and myeloid progenitor function, and impaired spermatogenesis (85). Imatinib mesylate, avapritinib, and midostaurin are small-molecule KIT inhibitors approved for aggressive systemic mastocytosis; MC-depleting agents for CU are described here as investigational. A phase 2 study of barzolvolimab in CSU demonstrated sustained improvement in the mean urticaria control test (UCT7) score and depletion of cutaneous MCs. Other investigational KIT inhibitors include nilotinib and bezuclastinib, which are reported to be in phase 1/2 trials for systemic mastocytosis (83).

3.2.3. Novel and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies

3.2.3.1. Targeting the MRGPRX2 Axis to Disrupt Neurogenic Inflammation

The Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor-X2 (MRGPRX2) is a key mediator of IgE-independent MC activation in response to neuropeptides, host defense peptides, and certain drugs. This pathway is implicated in neurogenic inflammation in conditions such as CU, psoriasis, and atopic dermatitis.
Specific MRGPRX2 antagonists, including INCB000262 and EVO756, offer an approach to inhibiting this pathological pathway without interfering with adaptive IgE-mediated immunity. Small-molecule antagonists, such as compound C9, have demonstrated the druggability of this target in preclinical models (77, 86, 87).
Future directions: Research should focus on optimizing the pharmacokinetic properties of lead compounds, developing effective topical formulations for cutaneous diseases, and initiating phase I/II clinical trials to establish safety and proof-of-concept efficacy in humans.

3.2.3.2. Harnessing Intrinsic Inhibitory Receptors: The CD300a Checkpoint

Engaging natural inhibitory receptors offers an approach to raising the MC activation threshold without depleting these cells. CD300a delivers a potent intracellular inhibitory signal that suppresses MC degranulation and cytokine release. Strategies such as a recombinant CD300a-Ig fusion protein have demonstrated efficacy in preclinical models, illustrating an approach based on immune modulation rather than suppression (88, 89).
Future directions: Key steps include comprehensive in vivo toxicology and efficacy studies in autoimmune models, evaluation of effects on other CD300a-expressing immune cells, and exploration of the potential for treating systemic diseases such as RA and MS.

3.2.3.3. Improving Delivery Through Nanoengineered Targeted Therapies

The clinical utility of conventional MC stabilizers, including cromolyn sodium and ketotifen, is limited by poor bioavailability and nonspecific distribution. Encapsulation of these drugs or novel inhibitors in nanoparticle-based systems, such as lipid or PLGA nanoparticles, can enhance bioavailability, enable sustained release, and facilitate targeting to inflammatory sites (90, 91).
Future directions: Priorities include designing nanocarriers for specific administration routes, such as dissolving microneedles for dermal delivery in psoriasis and encapsulated formulations for gastrointestinal (GI) targeting in IBD; conducting rigorous biodistribution studies; and evaluating nanoformulated drugs in humanized disease models. Table 2 summarizes established, repurposed, and emerging therapeutic strategies.
Table 2.
Overview of Mast Cell-Targeting Therapeutic Strategies in Autoimmune Diseases a
Therapeutic StrategyMechanism of ActionExample AgentsPotential Autoimmune IndicationsDevelopment Stage / ConsiderationsReferences
ANTAGONIZING ACTIVATION
Anti-IgE TherapyBinds circulating IgE, downregulates FcεRI expression on MCsOmalizumab; Ligelizumab; QuilizumabChronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU), Potential in IgE-associated SLE subsetsOmalizumab is approved for CSU; ligelizumab and quilizumab are investigational in the described context. Efficacy in nonallergic autoimmunity requires further study.(70-74)
BTK InhibitionInhibits Bruton's tyrosine kinase, a key signal transducer in FcεRI pathwayRemibrutinib; FenebrutinibRA, SLE, CSURemibrutinib: 52-week phase III CSU results reported. Other agents and autoimmune indications remain under investigation; dual blockade of MC effector function and B cell autoantibody production.(75-79)
MRGPRX2 AntagonismBlocks IgE-independent MC activation induced by neuropeptides and drugsINCB000262, EVO756, Compound C9Chronic Urticaria, Psoriasis, Atopic Dermatitis, RosaceaPreclinical to Phase II; A novel pathway with high specificity.(77, 86, 87)
BLOCKING MEDIATORS
H1-AntihistaminesAntagonizes histamine (H1) receptors to alleviate symptomsBilastine, FexofenadineCSU, Symptomatic relief in RA, SLEWidely used; limited efficacy as monotherapy in systemic disease(80-82)
Leukotriene InhibitionAntagonizes cysteinyl leukotriene receptors (CysLT1)Montelukast, ZafirlukastOften used in combination with antihistamines for CSU.Adjunct therapy; similar limitations to antihistamines.(80-82)
MC STABILIZATION
Classic StabilizersPrevents degranulation by blocking chloride channels or unclear mechanismsCromolyn Sodium, KetotifenOff-label for systemic mastocytosis symptoms; GI disorders.Limited by poor oral bioavailability.(3, 90, 91)
Nano-Engineered StabilizersEnhances bioavailability and enables tissue-specific targeting of stabilizersNano-formulated Cromolyn/KetotifenPsoriasis (dermal delivery), IBD (GI targeting)Preclinical development; a promising approach to revitalize old drugs.(90, 91)
ENGAGING INHIBITION
CD300a AgonismLigation of inhibitory receptor raises MC activation thresholdCD300a-Ig fusion proteinRA, Multiple Sclerosis, Broad potentialPreclinical; aims to "calm" MCs without depletion(88, 89)
DEPLETION STRATEGIES
KIT InhibitionTargets the KIT receptor, which is essential for MC survival and proliferationImatinib; Midostaurin; Avapritinib; BarzolvolimabAggressive Systemic Mastocytosis, Severe MC-driven pathologiesImatinib, midostaurin, and avapritinib are approved for ASM; barzolvolimab is an investigational anti-KIT antibody studied in phase II CSU trials. Small-molecule KIT inhibitors have significant off-target toxicity, including myelosuppression.(83-85)
COMBINATION & FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Nano-Combination TherapyCo-delivery of multiple targeted agents (e.g., antagonist + inhibitor) to target complementary pathwaysMRGPRX2 Antag. + CD300a agonist in a nanocarrierSevere, treatment-resistant autoimmune diseasesConceptual/preclinical; aims to achieve synergistic effects with precision(90, 91)
Biomarker-Driven TherapyPatient stratification based on MC activation pathways (e.g., IgE vs. MRGPRX2 high)N/AAll indicationsA critical future direction for improving clinical trial success and personalized medicine.(76-83)
a Abbreviations: MC, Mast Cell; BTK, Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase; RA, Rheumatoid Arthritis; SLE, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus; IBD, Inflammatory Bowel Disease; GI, Gastrointestinal; ASM, Aggressive Systemic Mastocytosis; CSU, Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria; MRGPRX2, Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor-X2; FcεRI, High-affinity IgE receptor; N/A, not applicable.

3.2.4. Future Perspectives and Translational Challenges

Translating MC-targeted therapies from mechanistic concepts into clinical practice depends on addressing several key challenges.
Functional and disease heterogeneity: The roles of MCs in both pathology and homeostasis require a precision medicine approach. Future strategies should selectively inhibit pathogenic MC functions while preserving protective functions. This requires a better understanding of context-dependent MC phenotypes and the development of biomarkers, such as MC-specific mediator profiles and genetic signatures, for patient stratification. A therapy targeting the IgE pathway will be ineffective for a patient whose disease is driven by MRGPRX2 or IL-33.
Rational combination therapies: The complexity of autoimmune networks supports the development of multitargeted approaches. For example, a nanocarrier could be coloaded with an MRGPRX2 antagonist to block one activation pathway and a CD300a-engaging agent to lower overall reactivity. Such an approach could produce synergistic effects in severe, treatment-resistant disease.
Clinical evidence: Rigorously designed, biomarker-stratified clinical trials are needed to move beyond proof of concept and demonstrate superiority over standard care. Defining meaningful clinical endpoints and establishing long-term safety will be essential, particularly for strategies involving depletion or sustained inhibition.

4. Conclusions

This review highlights a shift in the understanding of MC biology, from viewing MCs primarily as histaminergic effectors of allergic responses to recognizing them as central orchestrators of immune dysregulation in autoimmunity and chronic inflammation. Located at host-environment interfaces and immune-privileged sites, MCs detect danger signals and respond through IgE-dependent and IgE-independent pathways. They release preformed mediators and newly synthesized cytokines, chemokines, lipid mediators, and growth factors that increase vascular permeability, leukocyte recruitment, tissue remodeling, and neuroinflammation.
In autoimmune conditions, MCs breach immune-privileged sites, interact bidirectionally with B and T cells to promote autoantibody production, and contribute to diseases including RA, SLE, and juvenile dermatomyositis, particularly through MRGPRX2-mediated pathways. In AD, they compromise the BBB, facilitate leukocyte infiltration, and connect peripheral activation to neurodegeneration. Together, these roles characterize MCs as dynamic cellular rheostats that actively shape disease rather than acting as passive bystanders.
These findings position MCs as potential therapeutic targets in refractory autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. Emerging strategies include targeting FcεRI signaling with BTK inhibitors, engaging inhibitory checkpoints such as CD300a, antagonizing MRGPRX2, stabilizing MCs, depleting pathological populations, and using nanotherapeutic delivery systems. These approaches offer the potential to interrupt self-amplifying inflammatory loops and extend treatment beyond symptomatic relief.
Mast cells also play essential roles in host defense, wound healing, and tissue homeostasis. Therapies targeting them must therefore be precise, disease-specific, spatially restricted, and temporally controlled to preserve these functions. Biomarkers of MC activation and patient stratification will be important for identifying patients most likely to benefit and monitoring their responses. Combining targeted agents with existing immunomodulators could improve efficacy, permit lower doses, and reduce the toxicity of conventional immunosuppression.
Future research should define disease-specific MC phenotypes, identify optimal therapeutic windows, validate combination regimens in humanized models, and advance promising candidates into early-phase clinical trials. Emerging tools, including siRNA, mRNA, CRISPR-based editing, and antibody-drug conjugates, may enable precise modulation of MC function. Progress will require collaboration among immunologists, pharmaceutical scientists, bioengineers, and clinicians to translate these insights into mechanism-based, patient-tailored interventions for refractory autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. The context-dependent protective and pathogenic roles of MCs in autoimmune diseases, together with potential therapeutic targets, are summarized in Figure 1.
Protective and pathogenic roles of mast cells in autoimmune diseases and potential therapeutic targets.
Figure 1.
Protective and pathogenic roles of mast cells in autoimmune diseases and potential therapeutic targets.

Footnotes

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Disclosure:The authors declare that no generative AI tools were used in the creation of this article.

  • Authors' Contribution:Writing – Original Draft, Visualization, and Investigation: K. E.; Writing – Original Draft: S. G., S. D., and S. R.; Writing – Review & Editing, Writing – Original Draft, Validation, Supervision, Project Administration, Investigation, and Conceptualization: F. S. and B. A. N.

  • Conflict of Interests Statement:The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • Data Availability:The dataset presented in the study is available on request from the corresponding author during submission or after publication.

  • Funding/Support:This research received no funding or support.

References

  • 1.
    Christy AL, Brown MA. The multitasking mast cell: positive and negative roles in the progression of autoimmunity. The Journal of immunology. 2007;179(5):2673-9. [PubMed ID: 17709477]. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.179.5.2673.
  • 2.
    da Silva EZM, Jamur MC, Oliver C. Mast cell function: a new vision of an old cell. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. 2014;62(10):698-738. [PubMed ID: 25062998]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4230976]. https://doi.org/10.1369/0022155414545334.
  • 3.
    Zhang T, Finn DF, Barlow JW, Walsh JJ. Mast cell stabilisers. European journal of pharmacology. 2016;778:158-68. [PubMed ID: 26130122]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.05.071.
  • 4.
    Yu X, Kasprick A, Petersen F. Revisiting the role of mast cells in autoimmunity. Autoimmunity reviews. 2015;14(9):751-9. [PubMed ID: 25913139]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2015.04.008.
  • 5.
    Derakhshan T, Boyce JA, Dwyer DF. Defining mast cell differentiation and heterogeneity through single-cell transcriptomics analysis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2022;150(4):739-47. [PubMed ID: 36205448]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9547083]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2022.08.011.
  • 6.
    Xu Y, Chen G. Mast cell and autoimmune diseases. Mediators of inflammation. 2015;2015(1). 246126. [PubMed ID: 25944979]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4402170]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/246126.
  • 7.
    Sahid MNA, Kiyoi T. Mast cell activation markers for in vitro study. Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry. 2020;41(4):778-816. [PubMed ID: 32501748]. https://doi.org/10.1080/15321819.2020.1769129.
  • 8.
    Metcalfe DD, Baram D, Mekori YA. Mast cells. Physiological reviews. 1997;77(4):1033-79. [PubMed ID: 9354811]. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1997.77.4.1033.
  • 9.
    Galli SJ, Grimbaldeston M, Tsai M. Immunomodulatory mast cells: negative, as well as positive, regulators of immunity. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2008;8(6):478-86. [PubMed ID: 18483499]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2855166]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2327.
  • 10.
    Mukai K, Tsai M, Saito H, Galli SJ. Mast cells as sources of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. Immunological reviews. 2018;282(1):121-50. [PubMed ID: 29431212]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5813811]. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12634.
  • 11.
    Wang L, Wang F, Gershwin ME. Human autoimmune diseases: a comprehensive update. Journal of internal medicine. 2015;278(4):369-95. [PubMed ID: 26212387]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC12321957]. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12395.
  • 12.
    Momen S, Soleimani N. The microbiota gut axis and their role in inflammation, autoimmunity and multi organ diseases as a therapeutic target. J Inflamm Dis. 2025;29(3). e162271. https://doi.org/10.69107/jid-162271.
  • 13.
    Robbie-Ryan M, Brown M. The role of mast cells in allergy and autoimmunity. Current opinion in immunology. 2002;14(6):728-33. [PubMed ID: 12413522]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-7915(02)00394-1.
  • 14.
    Elieh Ali Komi D, Wöhrl S, Bielory L. Mast cell biology at molecular level: a comprehensive review. Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology. 2020;58(3):342-65. [PubMed ID: 31828527]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-019-08769-2.
  • 15.
    Mirnia M, Mirnia K, Boostani K, Navidinia M. The Relationship Between COVID-19 and Auto-immune Hepatitis: An Infectious Agent or Cause for Deterioration? Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2025;20(20). https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid-145586.
  • 16.
    Elieh-Ali-Komi D, Cao Y. Role of mast cells in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology. 2017;52(3):436-45. [PubMed ID: 28025778]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-016-8595-y.
  • 17.
    Conti P, Kempuraj D. Important role of mast cells in multiple sclerosis. Multiple sclerosis and related disorders. 2016;5:77-80. [PubMed ID: 26856948]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2015.11.005.
  • 18.
    Dobson R, Giovannoni G. Multiple sclerosis-a review. European journal of neurology. 2019;26(1):27-40. [PubMed ID: 30300457]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC12885721]. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13819.
  • 19.
    Beghdadi W, Madjène LC, Benhamou M, Charles N, Gautier G, Launay P, et al. Mast Cells as Cellular Sensors in Inflammation and Immunity. Frontiers in Immunology. 2011;volume. [PubMed ID: 22566827]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3342044]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2011.00037.
  • 20.
    Abd Nikfarjam B, Hajiaghayi M. Nanotechnology for targeted rheumatoid arthritis therapy: innovations and challenges. J Inflamm Dis. 2025;29(2). e162710. https://doi.org/10.69107/jid-162710.
  • 21.
    Hajiaghayi M, Dolati-Somarin AH, Gholizadeh F, Abd-Nikfarjam B. The efficacy of evening primrose in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Res J Pharmacogn. 2024;11(2):71-9. https://doi.org/10.22127/RJP.2023.414090.2212.
  • 22.
    Kan JI, Mishima S, Kashiwakura JI, Sasaki-Sakamoto T, Seki M, Saito S, et al. Interleukin-17A expression in human synovial mast cells in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Allergology International. 2016;65(Supplement. 1):11-6. [PubMed ID: 27209051]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alit.2016.04.007.
  • 23.
    Lin YJ, Anzaghe M, Schülke S. Update on the pathomechanism, diagnosis, and treatment options for rheumatoid arthritis. Cells. 2020;9(4):880. [PubMed ID: 32260219]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7226834]. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9040880.
  • 24.
    Mishima S, Kashiwakura JI, Toyoshima S, Sasaki-Sakamoto T, Sano Y, Nakanishi K, et al. Higher PGD2 production by synovial mast cells from rheumatoid arthritis patients compared with osteoarthritis patients via miR-199a-3p/prostaglandin synthetase 2 axis. Scientific reports. 2021;11(1). 5738. [PubMed ID: 33707464]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7952410]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84963-7.
  • 25.
    Gutowski Ł, Kanikowski S, Formanowicz D. Mast cell involvement in the pathogenesis of selected musculoskeletal diseases. Life. 2023;13(8):1690. [PubMed ID: 37629547]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10455104]. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13081690.
  • 26.
    Min HK, Kim KW, Lee SH, Kim HR. Roles of mast cells in rheumatoid arthritis. The Korean journal of internal medicine. 2020;35(1):12-24. [PubMed ID: 31722515]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6960056]. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2019.271.
  • 27.
    Nigrovic PA, Binstadt BA, Monach PA, Johnsen A, Gurish M, Iwakura Y, et al. Mast cells contribute to initiation of autoantibody-mediated arthritis via IL-1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104(7):2325-30. [PubMed ID: 17277081]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1892913]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610852103.
  • 28.
    Abd-Nikfarjam B, Abbasi M, Memarzadeh M, Farzam SA, Jamshidian A, Dolati-Somarin A. Therapeutic efficacy of Urtica dioica and evening primrose in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Journal of Herbal Medicine. 2022;32. 100556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hermed.2022.100556.
  • 29.
    Lei Y, Guo X, Luo Y, Niu X, Xi Y, Xiao L, et al. Synovial microenvironment-influenced mast cells promote the progression of rheumatoid arthritis. Nature Communications. 2024;15(1). 113. [PubMed ID: 38168103]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10761862]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44304-w.
  • 30.
    Javan MR, Akhlaghi M, Hormozi A, Hosseini M, Khosrojerdi A. Mast cells in autoimmune disease: Unveiling their multifaceted roles and therapeutic potential. Human Immunology. 2025;86(4). 111334. [PubMed ID: 40479837]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2025.111334.
  • 31.
    Ahmad N, Roke D, Kilkelly J, Demidovich T, Zepeda A, Oster A, et al. A Retrospective Study on Pain Sensitivity in Pediatric Patients with Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Undergoing Adenotonsillectomy. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. 2025;15(4). e163436. [PubMed ID: 41103676]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC12523812]. https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-163436.
  • 32.
    Kaczmarczyk-Sekuła K, Dyduch G, Kostański M, Wielowieyska-Szybińska D, Szpor J, Białas M, et al. Mast cells in systemic and cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Polish Journal of Pathology. 2015;66(4):397-402. [PubMed ID: 27003772]. https://doi.org/10.5114/pjp.2015.57253.
  • 33.
    Caraffa Al, Gallenga CE, Kritas SK, Ronconi G, Conti P. Impact of mast cells in systemic lupus erythematosus: can inflammation be inhibited. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2019;33(3):669-73. [PubMed ID: 31195792].
  • 34.
    Vidal BDC, Mello MLS. Toluidine blue staining for cell and tissue biology applications. Acta histochemica. 2019;121(2):101-12. [PubMed ID: 30463688]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acthis.2018.11.005.
  • 35.
    Fang H, Zhang Y, Li N, Wang G, Liu Z. The Autoimmune Skin Disease Bullous Pemphigoid: The Role of Mast Cells in Autoantibody-Induced Tissue Injury. Front Immunol. 2018;9. 407. [PubMed ID: 29545809]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5837973]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00407.
  • 36.
    He SH. Key role of mast cells and their major secretory products in inflammatory bowel disease. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2004;10(3):309. [PubMed ID: 14760748]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4724914]. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i3.309.
  • 37.
    Douaiher J, Succar J, Lancerotto L, Gurish MF, Orgill DP, Hamilton MJ, et al. Development of mast cells and importance of their tryptase and chymase serine proteases in inflammation and wound healing. Advances in immunology. 2014;122:211-52. [PubMed ID: 24507159]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4115062]. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800267-4.00006-7.
  • 38.
    Bluestone JA, Herold K, Eisenbarth G. Genetics, pathogenesis and clinical interventions in type 1 diabetes. Nature. 2010;464(7293):1293-300. [PubMed ID: 20432533]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4959889]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08933.
  • 39.
    Masini M, Suleiman M, Novelli M, Marselli L, Marchetti P, De Tata V. Mast cells and the pancreas in human type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Cells. 2021;10(8):1875. [PubMed ID: 34440644]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8391487]. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10081875.
  • 40.
    Martino L, Masini M, Bugliani M, Marselli L, Suleiman M, Boggi U, et al. Mast cells infiltrate pancreatic islets in human type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2015;58(11):2554-62. [PubMed ID: 26276263]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-015-3734-1.
  • 41.
    Carlos D, Yaochite JNU, Rocha FA, Toso VD, Malmegrim KCR, Ramos SG, et al. Mast cells control insulitis and increase Treg cells to confer protection against STZ‐induced type 1 diabetes in mice. European Journal of Immunology. 2015;45(10):2873-85. [PubMed ID: 26234742]. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201545498.
  • 42.
    Hagen KM, Ousman SS. The Neuroimmunology of Guillain-Barré Syndrome and the Potential Role of an Aging Immune System. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12. 613628. [PubMed ID: 33584245]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7873882]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.613628.
  • 43.
    Dines KC, Powell HC. Mast cell interactions with the nervous system: relationship to mechanisms of disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1997;56(6):627-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005072-199706000-00001.
  • 44.
    Łacheta D, Miśkiewicz P, Głuszko A, Nowicka G, Struga M, Kantor I, et al. Immunological Aspects of Graves' Ophthalmopathy. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:7453260-12. [PubMed ID: 31781640]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6875285]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7453260.
  • 45.
    Van Steensel L, Paridaens D, van Hagen PM, Kuijpers R, Van den Bosch WA, Drexhage HA, et al. Mast cells are major contributors to the pathophysiology of Graves' Ophthalmopathy (GO). Journal of Translational Medicine. 2010;8(Suppl 1). P22. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3007765]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-8-S1-P22.
  • 46.
    Alexander V. Blagov, Vasily V. Kashtalap, Ksenia O. Lapshina, Amina E. Karimova, Alikhan Z. Asoyan, Alexander Orekhov. New strategies for treating Sjogren's syndrome. Cellular and Molecular Biology. 2025;71(4):111-9. [PubMed ID: 40285777]. https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2025.71.4.14.
  • 47.
    Khalafalla MG, Woods LT, Jasmer KJ, Forti KM, Camden JM, Jensen JL, et al. P2 receptors as therapeutic targets in the salivary gland: from physiology to dysfunction. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2020;11. 222. [PubMed ID: 32231563]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7082426]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00222.
  • 48.
    Khodayar B, Farzaei MH, Abdolghaffari AH, Bahramsoltani R, Baeeri M, Sabbagh Ziarani F, et al. The protective effect of the gallic acid against TNBS-induced ulcerative colitis in rats: role of inflammatory parameters. Journal of Iranian Medical Council. 2018;1(1):34-42.
  • 49.
    Scudamore CL, Jepson MA, Hirst BH, Hugh R, Miller P. The rat mucosal mast cell chymase, RMCP-11, alters epithelial cell monolayer permeability in association with altered distribution of the tight junction proteins ZO-1 and occludin. European Journal of Cell Biology. 1998;75(4):321-30. [PubMed ID: 9628318]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0171-9335(98)80065-4.
  • 50.
    Deng K, Cao J, Wang Z, He J, Jia J, Nie R, et al. The Mast Cell-PAR2-TRP Axis: A Convergent Mechanism for Visceral Hypersensitivity Independent of Divergent Motility in IBS. Biomolecules. 2026;16(3):469. [PubMed ID: 41897404]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC13024028]. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16030469.
  • 51.
    Kurashima Y, Amiya T, Nochi T, Fujisawa K, Haraguchi T, Iba H, et al. Extracellular ATP mediates mast cell-dependent intestinal inflammation through P2X7 purinoceptors. Nat Commun. 2012;3(1). 1034. [PubMed ID: 22948816]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3658010]. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2023.
  • 52.
    Strober W, Fuss IJ. Proinflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(6):1756-67. [PubMed ID: 21530742]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3773507]. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.016.
  • 53.
    Zhou XY, Chen K, Zhang JA. Mast cells as important regulators in the development of psoriasis. Frontiers in Immunology. 2022;13. 1022986. [PubMed ID: 36405690]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9669610]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.1022986.
  • 54.
    Sangeetha RS, Jayaprakash HT. Pathogenesis of psoriasis: a new angle with mast cell. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 2016;3(4):617-21. https://doi.org/10.5958/2394-6792.2016.00114.9.
  • 55.
    Harvima IT, Nilsson G, Suttle MM, Naukkarinen A. Is there a role for mast cells in psoriasis? Archives of dermatological research. Archives of Dermatological Research. 2008;300(9):461-78. [PubMed ID: 18719932]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-008-0874-x.
  • 56.
    Ribatti D, Tamma R, Ruggieri S, Annese T, Marzullo A, Crivellato E. Mast cells and primary systemic vasculitides. Microcirculation. 2018;25(8). e12498. [PubMed ID: 30120855]. https://doi.org/10.1111/micc.12498.
  • 57.
    Gan PY, Summers SA, Ooi JD, O’Sullivan KM, Tan DSY, Muljadi RCM, et al. Mast cells contribute to peripheral tolerance and attenuate autoimmune vasculitis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2012;23(12):1955-66. [PubMed ID: 23138486]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3507370]. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2012060572.
  • 58.
    Inamura H, Igarashi Y, Kashiwase Y, Morioka J, Suzuki K, Kurosawa M. Mast cells in cutaneous allergic vasculitis: a case report. Allergology International. 2006;55(3):343-5. [PubMed ID: 17075278]. https://doi.org/10.2332/allergolint.55.343.
  • 59.
    Johnston B, Burns AR, Kubes P. A role for mast cells in the development of adjuvant-induced vasculitis and arthritis. Am J Pathol. 1998;152(2):555-63. [PubMed ID: 9466582]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1857978].
  • 60.
    Vincze A, Herczeg-Lisztes E, Szabó K, Béldi TG, Nagy-Vincze M, Pór Á, et al. Pruritogenic molecules in the skin of patients with dermatomyositis. Frontiers in Medicine. 2023;10. 1168359. [PubMed ID: 37250649]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10213747]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1168359.
  • 61.
    Mammen AL. Autoimmune myopathies. CONTINUUM: Lifelong Learning in Neurology. 2016;22(6):1852-70. [PubMed ID: 27922497]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5898966]. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.CON.0000511070.50715.ab.
  • 62.
    Yokota M, Suzuki K, Tokoyoda K, Meguro K, Hosokawa J, Tanaka S, et al. Roles of mast cells in the pathogenesis of inflammatory myopathy. Arthritis research & therapy. 2014;16(2). R72. [PubMed ID: 24636001]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4060256]. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar4512.
  • 63.
    Davidson A, Diamond B. Autoimmune diseases. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(5):340-50. [PubMed ID: 11484692]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200108023450506.
  • 64.
    Abd‐Nikfarjam B, Dolati‐Somarin A, Baradaran Rahimi V, Askari VR. Cannabinoids in neuroinflammatory disorders: Focusing on multiple sclerosis, Parkinsons, and Alzheimers diseases. BioFactors. 2023;49(3):560-83. [PubMed ID: 36637897]. https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.1936.
  • 65.
    Athari Nik Azm S, Djazayeri A, Safa M, Azami K, Ahmadvand B, Sabbaghziarani F, et al. Lactobacilli and bifidobacteria ameliorate memory and learning deficits and oxidative stress in β-amyloid (1 - 42) injected rats. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 2018;43(7):718-26. [PubMed ID: 29462572]. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2017-0648.
  • 66.
    Borhani M, Sharifzadeh M, Farzaei MH, Narimani Z, Sabbaghziarani F, Gholami M, et al. Protective effect of Iris germanica L. in β-amyloid-induced animal model of alzheimer's disease. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary, and Alternative Medicines. 2017;14(4):140-148. [PubMed ID: 28638877]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5471461]. https://doi.org/10.21010/ajtcam.v14i4.17.
  • 67.
    Khan S, Barve KH, Kumar MS. Recent advancements in pathogenesis, diagnostics and treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Current neuropharmacology. 2020;18(11):1106-25. [PubMed ID: 32484110]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7709159]. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570159X18666200528142429.
  • 68.
    Dileepan KN, Raveendran VV, Sharma R, Abraham H, Barua R, Singh V, et al. Mast cell-mediated immune regulation in health and disease. Frontiers in Medicine. 2023;10. 1213320. [PubMed ID: 37663654]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10470157]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1213320.
  • 69.
    Dong H, Zhang X, Qian Y. Mast cells and neuroinflammation. Medical science monitor basic research. 2014;20:200-206. [PubMed ID: 25529562]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4282993]. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSMBR.893093.
  • 70.
    Dinesh P, Nandhakumar N, Krishnakumar P, Parthiban S, Madhumithra M, Manoj A, et al. Immunoglobulin E (IgE): from discovery and structure to molecular regulation, genetics, and therapeutic targets in allergic and autoimmune diseases. Int J Med Pharm Sci. 2026;2(7):484-7. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21274289.
  • 71.
    Wedi B, Traidl S. Anti-IgE for the treatment of chronic urticaria. ImmunoTargets and Therapy. 2021;Volume 10:27-45. [PubMed ID: 33628747]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7898214]. https://doi.org/10.2147/ITT.S261416.
  • 72.
    Arm JP, Bottoli I, Skerjanec A, Floch D, Groenewegen A, Maahs S, et al. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of QGE 031 (ligelizumab), a novel high‐affinity anti‐IgE antibody, in atopic subjects. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. 2014;44(11):1371-85. [PubMed ID: 25200415]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4278557]. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.12400.
  • 73.
    Maurer M, Giménez-Arnau AM, Sussman G, Metz M, Baker DR, Bauer A, et al. Ligelizumab for chronic spontaneous urticaria. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(14):1321-32. [PubMed ID: 31577874]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1900408.
  • 74.
    Brightbill H, Lin Y, Lin Z, Tan M, Meng Y, Balazs M, et al. Quilizumab is an afucosylated humanized anti-M1 prime therapeutic antibody. Clinical Anti-Inflammatory & Anti-Allergy Drugs (Discontinued). 2014;1(1):24-31. https://doi.org/10.2174/22127038114019990003.
  • 75.
    Ringheim GE, Wampole M, Oberoi K. Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors and autoimmune diseases: making sense of BTK inhibitor specificity profiles and recent clinical trial successes and failures. Frontiers in immunology. 2021;12. 662223. [PubMed ID: 34803999]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8595937]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.662223.
  • 76.
    Rozkiewicz D, Hermanowicz JM, Kwiatkowska I, Krupa A, Pawlak D. Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKIs): review of preclinical studies and evaluation of clinical trials. Molecules. 2023;28(5):2400. [PubMed ID: 36903645]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10005125]. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28052400.
  • 77.
    Kumar M, Duraisamy K, Annapureddy RR, Chan CB, Chow BKC. Novel small molecule MRGPRX2 antagonists inhibit a murine model of allergic reaction. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2023;151(4):1110-22. [PubMed ID: 36581009]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2022.12.805.
  • 78.
    Lin EV, Suresh RV, Dispenza MC. Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibition for the treatment of allergic disorders. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2024;133(1):33-42. [PubMed ID: 38492772]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11222055]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2024.03.002.
  • 79.
    Giménez-Arnau AM, Szalewski R, Hide M, Jain V, Khemis A, Lebwohl M, et al. Remibrutinib in chronic spontaneous urticaria: 52-week results from two phase 3 studies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2026;157(1):143-54. [PubMed ID: 41115533]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2025.09.028.
  • 80.
    Kou E, Zhang X, Dong B, Wang B, Zhu Y. Combination of H1 and H2 histamine receptor antagonists: Current knowledge and perspectives of a classic treatment strategy. Life. 2024;14(2):164. [PubMed ID: 38398673]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10890042]. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14020164.
  • 81.
    Lee N, Lee JD, Lee HY, Kang DR, Ye YM. Epidemiology of chronic urticaria in Korea using the Korean Health Insurance Database, 2010 - 2014. Allergy, asthma & immunology research. 2017;9(5):438-45. [PubMed ID: 28677358]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5500699]. https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2017.9.5.438.
  • 82.
    Bernstein JA, Lang DM, Khan DA, Craig T, Dreyfus D, Hsieh F, et al. The diagnosis and management of acute and chronic urticaria: 2014 update. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(5):1270-7. [PubMed ID: 24766875]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2014.02.036.
  • 83.
    Metz M, Kolkhir P, Altrichter S, Siebenhaar F, Levi‐Schaffer F, Youngblood BA, et al. Mast cell silencing: a novel therapeutic approach for urticaria and other mast cell‐mediated diseases. Allergy. 2024;79(1):37-51. [PubMed ID: 37605867]. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15850.
  • 84.
    Lennartsson J, Rönnstrand L. Stem cell factor receptor/c-Kit: from basic science to clinical implications. Physiological reviews. 2012;92(4):1619-1649. [PubMed ID: 23073628]. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00046.2011.
  • 85.
    Galanis A, Levis M. Inhibition of c-Kit by tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Haematologica. 2015;100(3). e77. [PubMed ID: 25425690]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4349281]. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2014.117028.
  • 86.
    Wollam J, Solomon M, Villescaz C, Lanier M, Evans S, Bacon C, et al. Inhibition of mast cell degranulation by novel small molecule MRGPRX2 antagonists. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2024;154(4):1033-43. [PubMed ID: 38971540]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2024.07.002.
  • 87.
    Lansu K, Karpiak J, Liu J, Huang XP, McCorvy JD, Kroeze WK, et al. in silico design of novel probes for the atypical opioid receptor MRGPRX2. Nature chemical biology. 2017;13(5):529-36. [PubMed ID: 28288109]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5391270]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.2334.
  • 88.
    Bachelet I, Munitz A, Levi-Schaffer F. Abrogation of allergic reactions by a bispecific antibody fragment linking IgE to CD300a. Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2006;117(6):1314-20. [PubMed ID: 16750992]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2006.04.031.
  • 89.
    Lee H, Nakahashi-Oda C, Lyu W, Tanaka M, Rai A, Muramoto Y, et al. Inhibitory immunoreceptors CD300a and CD300lf cooperate to regulate mast cell activation. The Journal of Immunology. 2025;214(3):325-34. [PubMed ID: 40073110]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jimmun/vkae030.
  • 90.
    Vora LK, Donnelly RF, Larrañeta E, González-Vázquez P, Thakur RRS, Vavia PR. Novel bilayer dissolving microneedle arrays with concentrated PLGA nano-microparticles for targeted intradermal delivery: Proof of concept. Journal of Controlled Release. 2017;265:93-101. [PubMed ID: 29037785]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.10.005.
  • 91.
    Rao L, Wu L, Liu Z, Tian R, Yu G, Zhou Z, et al. Hybrid cellular membrane nanovesicles amplify macrophage immune responses against cancer recurrence and metastasis. Nature communications. 2020;11(1). 4909. [PubMed ID: 32999291]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7527506]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18626-y.

Copyright

Copyright © 2026, Journal of Inflammatory Diseases. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for the copying and redistribution of the material only for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

2
Aug
2020
Application of extracellular vesicles in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Application of extracellular vesicles in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

neda heidari,
Hajar Abbasi,
Kaveh Baghaei,
Saeed Namaki,
Seyed Mahmoud Hashemi

heidari N, Abbasi H, Baghaei K, Namaki S, Hashemi SM. Application of extracellular vesicles in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Koomesh. 2020;22(2):e153171. doi:

31
Jul
2026
Epigenetic and Molecular Regulation of the IL-6 Axis in COVID-19: A Narrative Review of the Most Important microRNA-Mediated Mechanisms Involved in Cytokine Storm and Therapeutic Perspectives

Epigenetic and Molecular Regulation of the IL-6 Axis in COVID-19: A Narrative Review of the Most Important microRNA-Mediated Mechanisms Involved in Cytokine Storm and Therapeutic Perspectives

Mahdi Atabaki,
Narges Arbabi

Atabaki M, Arbabi N. Epigenetic and Molecular Regulation of the IL-6 Axis in COVID-19: A Narrative Review of the Most Important microRNA-Mediated Mechanisms Involved in Cytokine Storm and Therapeutic Perspectives. Int J Infect. 2026;13(2):e174438. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iji-174438

15
May
2024
NETosis and SARS-COV-2 Infection-Related Autoimmunity: A Narrative Review

NETosis and SARS-COV-2 Infection-Related Autoimmunity: A Narrative Review

Roqaye Karimi,
Donya Nazarinia,
Amir Atashi,
Mahin Behzadifard

Karimi R, Nazarinia D, Atashi A, Behzadifard M. NETosis and SARS-COV-2 Infection-Related Autoimmunity: A Narrative Review. J Adv Immunopharmacol. 2024;4(1):e143672. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jai-143672

29
Mar
2026
Enterotype 3-Driven Gut Dysbiosis: A Primary Pathway to Systemic Inflammation and CNS Autoimmunity in Multiple Sclerosis

Enterotype 3-Driven Gut Dysbiosis: A Primary Pathway to Systemic Inflammation and CNS Autoimmunity in Multiple Sclerosis

Abolfazl Abdollahi,
Mohammad Ali Jafari,
Nika Shojaei Fard,
Narjes Khatoun Shabani Sadr,
Mehrdad Behmanesh

Abdollahi A, Jafari MA, Shojaei Fard N, Shabani Sadr NK, Behmanesh M. Enterotype 3-Driven Gut Dysbiosis: A Primary Pathway to Systemic Inflammation and CNS Autoimmunity in Multiple Sclerosis. Jentashapir J Cell Mol Biol. 2026;17(1):e167241. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjcmb-167241

30
Jun
2026
Targeted Biologic and Cellular Therapies for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Targeted Biologic and Cellular Therapies for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Reyhaneh Taheri,
Cobra Moradian

Taheri R, Moradian C. Targeted Biologic and Cellular Therapies for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. J Adv Immunopharmacol. 2026;6(2):e173131. doi: https://doi.org/10.69107/jai-173131

More by these authors

Bahareh Abd NikfarjamPubMedScholar
Kamyar EntezariPubMedScholar
Shahrzad GhorbanzadehPubMedScholar
Sepide RasouliPubMedScholar
Salar DadrasPubMedScholar
Fatemeh SabbaghziaraniPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics