Hearing impairment is one of the most important causes of childhood behavioral disorders among the various types of disabilities (
1). Bilateral dominant hearing loss affects 1 out of every 750 children (
2). Hearing impairment can occur in conjunction with other symptoms and as part of a disease, which is referred to as syndromic hearing loss, or it can occur as a single symptom, which is referred to as non-syndromic hearing loss (
3,
4). Given that children form their most fundamental and vital bonds with their families, the failure of families to understand the responsibility and solve children’s social problems can result in negative traits and aggressive behaviors in children. One of the manifestations of disruptive behavior disorders (DBDs) is aggression. Similar to any other behavior, aggression is a multifaceted and complex phenomenon (
5).
Different environmental stimuli are combined with various mental and psychological processes, resulting in distinct forms of aggression (
6,
7). There is ample evidence that aggression is a major risk factor for delinquency and behavioral disorders (
8,
9). As a result, it is critical to identify this component and its precursors accurately. Despite the relatively high prevalence of aggression and its clinical importance, few attempts have been made to classify aggressive behavior systematically and orderly, consistent with clinical objectives. This can be attributed to the psychological and social complexity of aggressive behavior, a lack of consistency in its etiology, or the diversity of aggressive groups (
10). Therefore, it is necessary to examine and control the health problems of aggressive children through the implementation of a cohesive plan to help their families adapt and care for their disabled children and improve their health status.
The functional division of aggression is a type of classification used in recent decades to describe aggression. It explains how a person’s internal motivation for aggressive behavior works. There are two types of aggressive behavior based on the function and motivation of the person: reactive and proactive (
11). The emotional response to a perceived threat is known as reactive aggression; however, proactive aggression is more common in externalizing disorders, such as antisocial behavior and heavy drug and alcohol abuse (
12). Studies have shown that reactive aggression is associated with negative emotions and internalizing disorders in childhood and adolescence (
13,
14).
Moreover, previous physical abuse, the early onset of attention problems and impulsivity, being a victim of bullying, suicidal thoughts, incompatibility with peers, poor emotional and behavioral regulation, inconsistent parenting, excessive caution against threat cues, and unpredictable environments all contribute to the development of reactive aggression (
15). Aggressive functions are a subset of aggressive behavior that are classified according to their purpose (
16). Studies indicate that the structure of these purposes varies depending on how social cues are interpreted (
17). As a result, in ambiguous social situations, adolescents with reactive aggression attribute more hostile intent to others. However, proactive aggression occurs when aggression is used to achieve a predetermined goal (
11).
According to the schema theory of family relations, beliefs and expectations are formed in children due to family experiences in a stressful environment (
18). Cong et al. (
19) also assessed the family and its role in the “McMaster” family functioning system model. This model describes the family’s structure, organization, and exchange pattern and tests family relationships on a scale ranging from healthy to severely mentally ill. McMaster’s model is based on the following basic hypotheses of system theory: (1) Family members are inextricably linked; (2) no family member can be studied separately in the absence of others; (3) family structure and organization are essential determinants of the family member’s behavior; and (4) the family interactive pattern strongly influences the behavior of each family member.
This model assesses and measures five aspects of family life: Problem-solving, roles, emotional accountability, emotional companionship, and behavior control. As a result, it is critical to investigate the factors influencing children’s aggression on the part of families, particularly mothers, because mothers spend more time with their children than fathers do, and most of the children’s behavioral consequences are formed by their interactions with mothers (
20).
Parents’ attitudes toward having a disabled child can cause aggressive behavior in children. When parents see a disability in their child after nine months of waiting, they will face a score of despair, failure, and depression. The heavy look of pity from relatives, friends, and acquaintances is another factor that negatively affects parents of such children (
21). Families with deaf and hard-of-hearing children frequently face serious mental and emotional tensions. Children with hearing impairment put a great burden on parents because this impairment causes serious mental distress and stress for parents (
10). A high level of stress in parents of deaf and hard-of-hearing children is associated with aggression and behavioral problems in children (
20).
Chronic fatigue has depressive mood symptoms, such as sleep disorders, attention deficits, cognitive deficits, and debilitating fatigue, which can sometimes be contradictory (
22). Researchers define fatigue as a feeling of weakness and reduced capacity to perform mental and physical activities (
23). The global prevalence of this syndrome ranges from 0.2% to 2.8% (
24). Having a deaf or hard-of-hearing child can be stressful for mothers and cause many complications for them, such as chronic fatigue syndrome. Individuals with chronic fatigue patients experience severe disability and discomfort as a result of these symptoms (
25). Due to the multidimensional nature of fatigue, particularly in psychological and mental dimensions, the relationship between chronic fatigue and cognitive processes has attracted great attention in recent years (
26). For example, Fisher et al. (
27) reported that chronic fatigue was more common in parents of disabled children than those of normal children.
In general, investigations into parents’ attitudes toward children with special needs are of special importance and applied value for developing appropriate educational and rehabilitation programs. Having a child with special needs often causes irreparable harm to the family. Some families are so vulnerable to such harm that the mental health of their members suffers severely.