This descriptive–analytical study was conducted in 2024 among veterans affiliated with the Martyrs and Veterans Affairs Foundation in Abadan, Iran. Although a registry of eligible participants was available, random sampling was not feasible due to administrative and methodological constraints, including confidentiality regulations and the need to verify clinical information through in-person review of medical records. Therefore, convenience sampling was adopted as the most feasible approach to obtain complete and accurate data. While this method may limit generalizability, the use of an adequate sample size and transparent reporting helped reduce selection bias and support internal validity.
The inclusion criteria included having chronic pain, the ability to answer questions, and willingness to participate in the research. The exclusion criteria included the use of medication for sever psychiatric disorders and the misuse of stimulant or narcotic substances. According to the inclusion criteria, 192 veterans with various types of pain, who were identified through the veteran health monitoring system, voluntarily participated in the research. The final sample size of 192 veterans was determined based on both feasibility considerations and reference to prior studies conducted among Iranian veterans with chronic pain. Previous research in similar populations has typically employed sample sizes in the range of 150 - 200 participants, which have been demonstrated to provide sufficient statistical power for correlational and regression analyses (
16,
21).
According to established power-analysis principles, approximately 180 participants are required to detect moderate effect sizes (R = 0.25 - 0.30; Cohen’s f2 ≈ 0.06 - 0.10) with 80% power at α = 0.05 in multiple regression models. The inclusion of 192 veterans exceeded this threshold, ensuring adequate statistical power for detecting meaningful associations among pain characteristics, psychosocial variables, and coping strategies. Furthermore, all regression analyses incorporated reporting of effect-size indices (standardized β coefficients and Cohen’s f2 values), allowing readers to evaluate the magnitude and practical significance of the observed effects beyond reliance on P-values alone.
The data collection tools were a demographic questionnaire, the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI), and the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ).
The SF-MPQ was first developed by Melzack in 1971. A revised 22-item version was designed by Dworkin et al. in 2009, covering 4 dimensions: Affective pain, neuropathic pain, continuous pain, and intermittent pain. This scale is scored on a range of 0 to 10. The minimum and the maximum scores are 0 and 220, respectively. This questionnaire does not have reverse scoring, and a higher score indicates more pain. The alpha coefficient for the total scale (SF-MPQ-2) was reported to be 0.95, and the coefficients for its subscales, including affective pain, neuropathic pain, continuous pain, and intermittent pain, were 0.86, 0.83, 0.87, and 0.87, respectively (
24). To evaluate and standardize it for the Iranian population, in a study, Khosravi et al. confirmed its content validity and reported its reliability using Cronbach's alpha coefficient as 0.86 (
25).
The WHYMPI was developed by Kerns, Turk, and Rudy at West Haven-Yale University in 1985 (
26). This 52-item questionnaire has 12 scales across three parts. Part 1 includes questions about pain interference with daily life, support from others, pain severity, life control, and affective distress. Part 2 assesses punitive responses, solicitousness by others, and distraction by others. Part 3 examines household chores, outdoor activities (yard work), activities away from home, and social activities. The value of each question in this questionnaire is graded on a scale of 0 to 6. The validity and reliability of this questionnaire in Iran were examined and reported in different sections by Mirzamani et al. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the three parts were calculated as 0.86, 0.78, and 0.75, respectively, and the total Cronbach's alpha was 0.77. The reliability coefficient of this questionnaire using the test-retest method was reported as 0.95 (
27).
The CSQ is a 42-item scale developed by Rosenstiel and Keefe to measure six coping strategies, including diverting attention, reinterpreting pain sensations, coping self-statements, ignoring pain sensations, catastrophizing, and praying/hoping (
28). Each coping strategy consists of seven phrases. Respondents are asked to read each phrase carefully and indicate the extent to which they use each of the strategies when experiencing pain, on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from “never” to “always”, The scores of the 7 phrases are summed to obtain a composite score for each coping strategy, which can range from 0 to 42. Higher scores on each scale denote a greater use of that strategy in coping with chronic pain. The reliability of this test and its internal consistency coefficients, as measured by Cronbach's alpha, were reported for the main factors as 0.82, 0.77, 0.82, 0.83, 0.80, 0.74, respectively, with a total Cronbach's alpha of 0.926 (
29).
Before statistical analysis, all completed questionnaires were reviewed for accuracy and completeness. Questionnaires with more than 10% missing items were excluded from the study to preserve data quality. For cases with minimal item-level missingness, mean substitution within each respective subscale was applied to avoid unnecessary data loss while maintaining consistency across instruments. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that these imputation procedures did not alter variable distribution patterns or affect the results of correlation and regression analyses.
To collect data, the researchers, after obtaining the necessary permissions from Abadan University of Medical Sciences, went to the Martyrs and Veterans Affairs Foundation in Abadan, Iran, to sample veterans. Data collection was conducted during clinic visits and was based on a review of medical records and documented evidence contained in the veterans’ files. All questionnaires were completed under the supervision of trained interviewers who followed standardized instructions to ensure consistency. Clarifications were provided only when necessary, allowing participants to respond independently. This approach maintained high data quality and minimized any potential influence of the interviewers on participants’ responses.
Afterward, the collected data were analyzed using SPSS software version 26. For descriptive analysis, frequency percentages, means, and standard deviations were calculated. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was employed to examine the relationships among the questionnaires’ dimensions, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was utilized to check the normality of the data.
3.1. Ethical Considerations
Ethical safeguards were incorporated throughout the research process. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Abadan University of Medical Sciences. Participation was entirely voluntary, and written informed consent was obtained after participants received comprehensive information about the study objectives, confidentiality protections, and their right to withdraw at any stage without penalty. To preserve confidentiality, all data were anonymized, securely stored, and accessible only to authorized members of the research team. To minimize the potential for psychological distress, data collection was carried out by trained interviewers with prior experience working with veteran populations. These procedures ensured adherence to internationally recognized ethical standards for conducting research with potentially vulnerable groups.