Based on electronic searches of several databases in this study, all publications related to the association between LC and rs361525 polymorphisms were investigated until 2022. The association of TNF-α-238 with the LC risk of LC was investigated in a wide range of populations using a meta-analysis.
Table 1 lists the general characteristics of the meta-analysis articles and shows the distribution of the rs361525 genotype. The 95% odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (9% CI) for each study were determined to estimate and evaluate the effect and relationship between the
TNF-α-238 gene and the risk of LCLC risk. The data on polymorphisms identified in each study showed the presence of heterogeneity. Therefore, the combined studies were merged using an additive model (AM). The results showed a significant difference between the two studies, while no significant difference was found in the other studies. However, the final overall OR reports with a value of (0.66; 1.88) OR = 1.11 indicate that the additive model AM in the TNF-α-238(rs361525) SNP increases the LC risk of LC in the random model (
Figure 2).
On the other hand, besides the entered data, the OR and the data analysis results show that the overall OR equals 0.96 (0.78; 1.18) with a 95% CI. Therefore, the rs361525 SNP reduces the chance of LC in the fixed model (
Figure 3).
Figure 4 shows the results of distribution bias data shown symmetrically in the funnel diagram. As can be seen, there is (
Figure 4) show no bias (P = 0.83) in the analyses, and there is also evidence of high heterogeneity between the studies (I2 = 83%, P = 0.83).
Although the relationship between the
TNF-α-238 gene polymorphisms and various types of cancers is reported in many studies (
13-
17), the association between this gene polymorphism and LC is still one of the most challenging issues. Therefore, the present study investigated the association between
TNF-α-238 polymorphisms and LC patients using database search methods. The results showed that the two studies differed significantly based on the obtained results, while no significant difference was found in the other studies. Moreover, the AM in the TNF-α-238 (rs361525) SNP increases LCLC risk. In agreement with this finding (
Table 1), Liang et al. investigated the relationship between the genotypes of
TNF-α-238 polymorphisms and LC by the PCR-RFLP method. They reported that the GG genotype of TNF-α-238 polymorphisms and the G allele could have an additive effect on LC in a Chinese population (
13). Kaabachi et al. investigated the relationship between the genotypes of
TNF-α-238G polymorphisms and LC using the PCR technique. They found that TNFα-238G > A could increase LCLC risk in the Chinese population (
15). Also, Flego et al. examined the relationship between the genotypes of
TNF-α-238 polymorphisms and LC using the PCR-RFLP technique. This study showed that the GG genotype of
TNF-α-238 polymorphisms and the G allele could have an additive effect on LC (
21). Flego et al. studied the relationship between the genotypes of
TNF-α-238 polymorphisms and LC using the PCR-RFLP method. Their results indicated that the
TNF-α-238 polymorphisms were not significantly related to the severity of LC (
20). Shih et al. reported a significant relationship between the
238 G/A polymorphisms in the TNF promoter region and increased LC by the PCR technique (
14). In contrast, the results of Eaton et al. presented evidence that
TNFα-238G >
A could reduce the risk of LCLC risk (
18). A study showed a significant association between the
TNF-a-238 polymorphism and the reduction of cervical cancer risk in Argentinian women (
16). A relationship between
TNF-a-238 polymorphisms and the increased risk of liver cancer in the Asian population was reported in another study (
17). Despite the significant findings regarding the positive association of
TNF-a-238 polymorphisms with various types of cancer (
13-
15,
17), the results of some studies are not promising in this field (
15,
18).
In this study, since our search was limited to studies published in English, which may lead to some bias. Moreover, there were inadequate studies for the subgroup analysis. Therefore, more studies are needed to identify the precise association of TNF-a-238 with the increased risk of LCLC risk.