The SNPs rs530118201 and rs72876529 were assessed for association with COVID-19 susceptibility using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests (
Figure 1). For rs530118201, no significant correlation was observed between genotype frequencies in patients and controls (χ² = 0.407, P = 0.641). The odds ratio (OR) was 2.111 (95% CI: 0.203 - 21.873). For rs530118201, no significant correlation was observed between genotype frequencies in patients and controls (χ² = 0.407, P = 0.641). The OR was 2.111 (95% CI: 0.203 - 21.873); however, the wide confidence intervals crossing 1.0 and the non-significant P-value indicate no evidence of association in this sample. These null findings are attributable to the limited sample size and low statistical power (
Table 2). Similarly, rs72876529 did not demonstrate a significant difference (χ² = 0.892, P = 0.45), with an OR of 2.25 (95% CI: 0.405 - 12.478), which does not provide statistical evidence of association given the confidence interval includes the null value of 1.0. These results indicate that, individually, neither SNP demonstrates a statistically significant association with COVID-19 status in this population (
16).
Wide confidence intervals reflect a limited sample size (n = 80 total) and low minor allele frequencies (MAF). No statistically significant associations were detected (P > 0.05 for both SNPs).
For rs530118201, no significant correlation was observed between genotype frequencies in patients and controls (χ² = 0.407, P = 0.641). The OR was 2.111 (95% CI: 0.203 - 21.873), indicating no evidence of increased risk; however, this finding was not statistically significant, attributable to wide confidence intervals and limited sample size.