1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Plant Material Collection and Essential Oil Extraction
2.2. Phytochemical Characterization Using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
2.3. Bacterial Isolation and Identification
2.4. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing
2.5. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Determination
2.6. Antioxidant Activity Assessment by DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. GC-MS Results and Phytochemical Composition
3.1.1. Major Volatile Components
| Number | RT (min) | Area% | Name | Quality (%) | CAS Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.612 | 1.17 | alpha-Pinene | 96 | 007785 - 26 - 4 |
| 2 | 6.78 | 1.99 | beta-Myrcene | 97 | 000123 - 35 - 3 |
| 3 | 7.486 | 1.01 | o-Cymene | 95 | 000527 - 84 - 4 |
| 4 | 7.859 | 88.45 | D-Limonene | 99 | 005989 - 27 - 5 |
| 5 | 8.357 | 4.79 | gamma-Terpinene | 95 | 000099 - 85 - 4 |
| 6 | 16.073 | 0.06 | beta-Elemene | 96 | 000515 - 13 - 9 |
| 7 | 16.669 | 0.14 | Caryophyllene | 99 | 000087 - 44 - 5 |
3.1.2. Early-Eluting Monoterpene Hydrocarbons
3.1.3. Oxygenated Monoterpenes and Minor Components
3.1.4. Sesquiterpene Constituents
3.1.5. Quantitative Analysis and Relative Abundance
3.1.6. Compound Identification Quality and Mass Spectral Matching
3.2. Bacterial Isolation and Identification
3.2.1. Sample Viability and Bacterial Production
3.2.2. Confirmatory Identification Using VITEK 2
3.3. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing and Multidrug Resistance Patterns
| Bacterial Type and Isolate No. | FEP (mm) | CAZ (mm) | AK (mm) | CN (mm) | E (mm) | AZM (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | ||||||
| 2 | Z | Z | Z | - | - | - |
| 3 | Z | Z | Z | - | - | - |
| 5 | Z | Z | 10 | - | - | - |
| 6 | Z | 10 | Z | - | - | - |
| 11 | Z | 11 | Z | - | - | - |
| Staphylococcus aureus | ||||||
| 1 | - | - | - | Z | Z | Z |
| 4 | - | - | - | Z | Z | Z |
| 8 | - | - | - | Z | Z | Z |
| 11 | - | - | - | 9 | Z | 23 |
| 14 | - | - | - | Z | Z | Z |
| 16 | - | - | - | Z | Z | Z |
Abbreviations: FEP, cefepime; AK, amikacin; CAZ, ceftazidime; CN, gentamicin; AZM, azithromycin; E, erythromycin. Z indicates no measurable inhibition zone (complete resistance); values are inhibition-zone diameters in millimeters.
Representative disc diffusion plates illustrating the high frequency of multidrug-resistant phenotypes among Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates, with minimal or absent inhibition zones around most tested antibiotics. A, S. aureus MDR isolates displaying resistance to multiple antibiotic agents, indicated by absent or minimal inhibition zones around test discs. B, P. aeruginosa MDR isolates showing characteristic resistance patterns with restricted zones of inhibition. Visible zones of inhibition around discs indicate susceptibility; absence of clear zones indicates antimicrobial resistance.
| Treatment and Concentration (ppm) | Isolate 2 | Isolate 3 | Isolate 5 | Isolate 6 | Isolate 11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mandarin | |||||
| 40000 | - | - | - | - | - |
| 20000 | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10000 | + | + | + | + | + |
| Control | |||||
| 40000 | + | + | + | + | + |
| 20000 | + | + | + | + | + |
| 10000 | + | + | + | + | + |
a + indicates visible bacterial growth; - indicates complete inhibition (no growth).
| Treatment and Concentration (ppm) | Isolate 1 | Isolate 4 | Isolate 8 | Isolate 14 | Isolate 16 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mandarin oil | |||||
| 40000 | - | - | - | - | - |
| 20000 | + | + | + | + | + |
| 10000 | + | + | + | + | + |
| Control | |||||
| 40000 | + | + | + | + | + |
| 20000 | + | + | + | + | + |
| 10000 | + | + | + | + | + |
a + indicates visible bacterial growth; - indicates complete inhibition (no growth).
3.6. Antioxidant Activity of Citrus Reticulata Essential Oil as Determined by DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay
| Concentration (%) | Mandarin oil | Ascorbic acid | DMSO (1%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 60.05 ± 2.10 | 54.08 ± 3.50 | 1.05 |
| 75 | 48.12 ± 3.21 | 38.77 ± 1.40 | 1.05 |
| 50 | 38.21 ± 1.76 | 31.12 ± 2.80 | 1.05 |
| 25 | 30.15 ± 2.12 | 20.91 ± 3.10 | 1.05 |
a Values are expressed as mean ± SD.




