The therapeutic landscape for TNBC remains a major clinical challenge, primarily because of the lack of established targeted therapies, such as hormone receptor-directed treatments, and the high propensity for chemoresistance. This study investigated a novel drug-repositioning strategy by evaluating the synergistic antitumor effects of combining the lipophilic statin Lov with As2O3 in the MDA-MB-231 TNBC cell line.
Our primary and most compelling finding was the enhanced cytotoxic effect of Lov on TNBC cells when used in conjunction with As
2O
3. As monotherapies, both agents exhibited concentration-dependent cytotoxicity, with estimated IC
50 values of 2 µM for Lov and 7.5 µM for As
2O
3. However, their simultaneous administration resulted in a marked, synergistic enhancement of growth inhibition. This synergy was rigorously quantified by the CI, with values consistently below 1 across multiple concentration levels, specifically with 0.5 - 2 µM Lov in combination with 7.5 µM As
2O
3, strongly suggesting a potent synergistic interaction. Isobologram analysis further substantiated these findings by demonstrating responses below the line of additivity (CI = 1), confirming a potent synergistic interaction in MDA-MB-231 cells. These results suggest that therapeutic efficacy can be achieved using substantially lower concentrations of each agent when administered together, which is a critical advantage for potential clinical translation, particularly for As
2O
3. The ability of the combination to reduce the required As
2O
3 concentration while maintaining or enhancing efficacy could translate into improved therapeutic outcomes and a reduced risk of treatment-related side effects and relapse in patients. These findings are consistent with published reports on drug combinations and synergy in TNBC, which highlight the potential of multiagent approaches to overcome resistance mechanisms (
26).
Beyond immediate cytotoxicity, the clonogenic assay provided crucial insights into the long-term implications of this combined therapy. The results demonstrated that the Lov-As
2O
3 combination effectively abolished the long-term survival capacity of MDA-MB-231 cells, a hallmark of aggressive TNBC phenotypes. In TNBC models, the clonogenic assay serves as a functional indicator of sustained proliferative and survival capacity rather than short-term metabolic activity, making it particularly relevant for evaluating therapeutic responses. Although short-term viability assays, such as MTT, showed no significant toxic effects, the long-term clonogenic assay demonstrated notable potentiation of toxicity at lower single and combined concentrations. This suggests that combination treatment effectively reduced the concentration required to inhibit long-term survival and colony formation, a phenomenon not apparent in shorter proliferation assays. This finding highlights the potential of the combination to disrupt persistent, therapy-resistant cell populations that are often responsible for tumor recurrence and is integrated with findings from studies on statins and stemness/epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), demonstrating that statins can inhibit cancer stem cell properties and EMT, which are crucial processes for TNBC recurrence and metastasis (
27,
28).
Our results align with recent literature highlighting the mevalonate pathway as a metabolic vulnerability in TNBC and are consistent with the induction of cell death reported in recent studies of As
2O
3-treated TNBC models (
20,
29). The observation that Lov and As
2O
3 enhance cytotoxicity mirrors findings by other researchers reporting that As
2O
3 enhances antineoplastic effects through mitochondrial dysfunction (
30). Similarly, our focus on the mevalonate pathway as a sensitizing mechanism is supported by investigators who identified the mevalonate-YAP/TAZ axis as a key driver of TNBC growth (
31).
Additional evidence supporting pathway-targeted therapeutic strategies in TNBC has been reported in studies demonstrating that modulation of AKT/mTOR/β-catenin signaling suppresses proliferation and survival in MDA-MB-231 cells (
36). Comparative morphological assessment revealed that coadministration of Lov and As
2O
3 elicited markedly more severe structural alterations in MDA-MB-231 TNBC cells than either monotherapy. These phenotypic shifts align with prior observations in breast cancer models, reinforcing the established capacity of statins to remodel the cytoarchitecture of malignant breast epithelial cells (
32,
33). Similar modulation of oncogenic signaling pathways has also been observed in studies evaluating natural compounds that alter epidermal growth factor receptor expression in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells (
37).
Although numerous studies have explored statins as monotherapies or in combination with conventional chemotherapeutics, our research provides a distinct perspective by demonstrating synergy with a heavy-metal-based agent such as As
2O
3. These findings are compatible with reports on statin combinations with conventional chemotherapies, and they extend this evidence by showing potent synergy with the heavy-metal agent As
2O
3. The observed transition of surviving colonies to a paraclone-like morphology in our combination group further supports the findings of Zheng et al, who reported that Lov can inhibit EMT and stemness in TNBC, processes intrinsically linked to aggressive phenotypes and therapeutic resistance (
34). Consistent with this concept, previous studies have demonstrated that modulation of EMT-associated regulators, including ZEB1, ZEB2, and E-cadherin, can alter the aggressive phenotype of triple-negative breast cancer cells (
38).
Despite the robust synergy and promising mechanistic insights generated by this study, several limitations warrant careful consideration and will guide future research. First, the current findings were derived exclusively from experiments conducted in the MDA-MB-231 cell line. Although this cell line is a widely used and accepted model for TNBC, the inherent heterogeneity of the disease necessitates validation across a broader spectrum of TNBC subtypes. Future studies should incorporate additional TNBC cell lines, including those with different molecular profiles and varying degrees of chemoresistance, as well as patient-derived xenograft models. This will be crucial to ensure the generalizability of our findings and to confirm that the observed synergistic effects are not cell line-specific, as supported by an article on drug repositioning for TNBC (
35).
Although isobologram analysis indicated that synergistic interactions between Lov and As2O3 may allow effective growth inhibition at reduced concentrations, the present study did not assess systemic toxicity, pharmacokinetics, or in vivo therapeutic response. Consequently, any potential safety advantage associated with concentration reduction remains preliminary. Further in vivo investigations are required to characterize the pharmacological interactions, tolerability, and therapeutic index of this combinatorial strategy.
Although significant findings were obtained with simultaneous treatment with Lov and As2O3 in the MDA-MB-231 cell line, a notable limitation of this study is the absence of concurrent exposure evaluation in healthy cell lines and other breast cancer subtypes. Future research should broaden the scope by investigating synergistic effects across a more diverse cellular landscape, including normal cells and other breast cancer models, to fully ascertain the specificity and potential clinical applicability of this therapeutic strategy. Addressing these limitations is a priority for future work by the research team, and this study will be pivotal in bridging the gap between preclinical efficacy and potential clinical application.
5.1. Conclusions
This study demonstrates that combined treatment with Lov and As
2O
3 exerts synergistic antiproliferative effects in the MDA-MB-231 TNBC cell line. Combination treatment significantly reduced cell viability and impaired long-term clonogenic survival compared with single-agent exposure. These findings support further investigation of metabolic pathway-targeted combination strategies in TNBC. However, additional studies involving mechanistic validation, multiple TNBC models, normal epithelial controls, and in vivo systems are necessary before translational relevance can be established. This graphical abstract provides a concise visual summary of the study design, experimental groups, and key analytical outcomes (
Figure 6).
Schematic representation of the experimental design, treatment groups, and main analytical approaches used to evaluate the biological effects and outcomes of the study.