GC-MS analysis of the essential oil identified 11 main compounds. The results are presented in detail in
Table 1. The oil consisted of alkanes, oxygenated and non-oxygenated monoterpenes, and sesquiterpenes. The oxygenated monoterpenes were either alcohols or esters, and the oxygenated sesquiterpenes were in the form of acetates and oxides. The results of the antimicrobial activity of the essential oil from A. aucheri seeds are presented in detail in
Table 2. The oil was active against S. aureus, E. coli, and L. monocytogenes.
4.1. Phytochemical Analysis
The results of the gas chromatographic analysis of A. aucheri oil are presented in
Table 1. The constituents identified were as follows: decane, ρ-cymene, 1,8-cineol, linalool, ρ-mentha-8-ol, triene, borneol, lavandulol, and bornyl acetate as monoterpene constitiuents; and chrysanthenyl acetate, dehydro-aromadenderene, and caryophyllene oxide as sesquiterpene constituents. Decane (5.4%) was the only alkane identified in the oil. As clearly illustrated in
Table 1, decane, as an unbranched alkane, gave rise to a significant homologous series of alkyl ions, C
nH
2n+1+, thereby showing a typical spectra that could be recognized on sight. The C
nH
2n+1+ ion alkyl series gives peaks at m/z 57, 71, 85, etc., and could be traced from C
4H
9+ to C
10H
21+. All of the important peaks except M
+ were ions with an even number of electrons. The rates of initial decomposition of any molecular ion involving cleavages of different carbon-carbon bonds are comparable to each other, as are the rates of secondary decomposition of the primary product ions. This accounts for the regular increase in concentration with decreasing size of the alkyl ions. The possibility of rearranged products of greater stability becomes higher with the secondary reactions, so that the smaller ions, such as C
3H
7+ and C
4H
9+, are generally the more stable branched carbonium structures. Thus, the distribution of ions is maximized in the C
3 and C
4 region of the higher alkanes (
24).
The hydrocarbon monoterpene ρ-cymene (1.7%) was also present in the oil. A characteristic of the spectra of most cyclic hydrocarbon monoterpenoids is the prominent M-34 ion m/z 93. ρ-Cymene has the most intense fragment ions at higher m/z-values (m/z 93 and above), indicating a certain stability of the ring system (
25). ρ-Cymene, being an aromatic hydrocarbon, gave large fragment ions at m/z 134(M), m/z 119 (M-15)(base peak), and m/z 91(M-43).
Linalool (27.1%) was the main alcohol monoterpene constituent of the oil. The other major monoterpene alcohol components were borneol (7.8%), lavandulol (4.1%), and 1,8-cineol (3.3%). The fragmentation spectra of the monoterpene alcohols, 1.8-cineol, linalool, borneol, and lavandulol, are shown in
Table 1. The mass spectra of alcohols are generally more complex and less similar to one another owing to the influence of the polar hydroxyl group and its position in the structure. The spectra of the acyclic monoterpene alcohol linalool has the parent peak at m/z (M) 154 with m/z 71 as the base peak. The latter fragment is formed by splitting the bond that is in the allylic position relative to the double bond present in the respective molecules. The presence of a hydroxyl group is indicated by the occurrence of m/z (M-18) or of a fragment derived from this ion. The fragment m/z 93 is due to (M-18-43). As expected, the spectra of the analogue compounds lavandulol and linalool do not differ substantially. The mass spectra of the bicyclic monoterpene alcohol borneol is also shown in
Table 1. The base peak for borneol is m/z 95 (M-18-15), and a second peak is at m/z 139(M-15). Caryophyllene oxide (4.7%) was the main sesquiterpene constituent, followed by chrysanthenyl acetate (2.3%) and dehydro-aromadendrene (2.3%). Aromadendrene, which is a simple sesquiterpene, may undergo fragmentation in a manner similar to the corresponding monoterpenoids (
26). Thus, it will yield an intense peak at m/z 69 arising from the loss of the isopentenyl end group by allylic cleavage as described above.
Most of these compound identified from A. aucheri seed oil have also been reported in other Artemisia species. However, earlier studies have also indicated that A. scoparia contains beta-pinene, A. diffusa contains camphor, and A. turanica contains 1,8-cineol as major constituents of their oils (27). Further, davanone has been identified as a major compound in the oil of A. persica (28). It is well known that the concentration of mono- and sesquiterpenoids in aromatic plants varies from species to species and with growth stage and seasonal variation (29-31).
The composition of the essential oil from the seeds of A.
aucheri determined in the present study shows little similarity to that of the essential oil from the plant’s aerial parts investigated in previous studies (
20). There has been controversy over the composition of these oils. Some authours have reported that the oil obtained from the aerial parts is mainly composed of geranyl acetate (17.2%), a-citral (17.1%), linalool (12.7%), geraniol (10.7%), and Z-citral (10.5%) (
30). Another study has indicated that the major components are camphor (45.5%) and 1,8-cineole (14.3%) (
32), whereas other researchers have found that the essential oil of A. aucheri is rich in linalool (44.1%), geranyl acetate (10.7%), (E)-citral (9.7 %), and (Z)-citral (7.7 %) (
33). Similarly, camphor (22.87%) was determined to be the main component of the plant essential oil (
34). Sefidkon et. al. have reported that the main constituents of the oil extracted from A. aucheri plants collected from Semnan Province, Iran, are verbenone (21.5%), camphor (21.0%), 1,8-cineol (8.3%), and trans-verbenol (8.1%) (
35). Linalool is the only compound that has been found to occur in both the aerial parts and the seeds of the plant. These variations in the composition of the A. aucheri essential oils may due to variations in environmental parameters, such as irradiance, climate, nutrients, soil water availability, or to seasonal adaptations. It is well known that medicinal plant materials derived from the same species can show significant differences in quality when collected at different sites, owing to the influence of soil, climate, and other factors. These differences may also relate to physical appearance or to variations in their constituents, the biosynthesis of which may be affected by extrinsic environmental conditions, including ecological and geographical variables.