Pomegranate peel contains various bioactive compounds, including tannins, flavonoids, and organic acids, demonstrating significant pharmacological properties (
21). Our study showed that the extract of
P. granatum at concentrations of 0.1 and 0.2 mg/mL after 72 h did not inhibit the growth of promastigote forms of
L. major. However, this extract at concentrations of 0.3 - 0.9 mg/mL after 72 h significantly decreased the growth rate of promastigote forms and subsequently the viability of promastigote forms compared with the control group. Finally, no live parasites were observed. The ability of
P. granatum extract to alter the morphology of promastigotes, even at lower concentrations, underscores its potential mechanism of action, which may warrant further investigation into the specific phytochemicals responsible for this effect. However, previous studies using different extraction methods have reported varying levels of efficacy, which may be attributed to differences in the solubility and bioavailability of active compounds. For example, one study found that hydroalcoholic extracts of pomegranate peel effectively inhibit
L. major promastigotes in vitro, likely due to the enhanced solubility of bioactive compounds like tannins, flavonoids, and alkaloids. This method extracts both hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds, resulting in greater bioactivity (
19). In contrast, our study focused on the aqueous extract, which, while still demonstrating significant antiparasitic and immunomodulatory effects, shows less pronounced efficacy at lower concentrations compared to the hydroalcoholic extract.
Another study demonstrated that oral administration of
P. granatum juice significantly reduced CL lesion size in infected mice, with the therapeutic effects being linked to an increase in antioxidant enzyme activity (
20). This suggests that systemic administration of pomegranate-derived compounds may contribute to enhanced immune responses against
L. major. In contrast, our study utilized topical application of the aqueous extract, which also led to significant lesion reduction, particularly at 20% and 40% concentrations. The differences in efficacy between oral and topical administration highlight the need for further research to determine the most effective delivery method for
P. granatum-based treatments.
Also, these results were consistent with those of previous studies, indicating the anti-leishmanial properties of widely consumed plants and indicating their potential for use as anti-infective drugs. Yousefi et al. (
22) showed that the percentage of macrophage viability after 60 h of adding 200 µg/mL of extracts of
P. harmala and
Alkanna tinctoria was observed to be 80%. Also, Ezatpour et al. (
23) showed the anti-promastigote properties of
Pistacia khinjuk extract against
L. major with a 58.6 ± 3.2 µg/mL.
In the in vivo experiment, it was observed that
P. granatum extract at concentrations of 20% and 40% significantly inhibited CL in male BALB/c mice infected with
L. major, resulting in recovery rates of 27% and 84%, respectively. Consistent with our findings, research has shown that gum from
Pistacia atlantica effectively managed CL in mice infected with
L. major (
24). Rahimi-Moghaddam et al. (
25) reported a notable reduction in both lesion size and parasite load in treated animals compared to those given a placebo or in control groups.
Topical bioavailability is crucial for treating cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis with natural products like pomegranate peel extracts. Lipophilic extracts, which penetrate the skin’s lipid-rich outer layer, are more effective for deeper dermal treatment, while aqueous extracts may struggle with skin penetration. However, when enhanced with penetration agents or nanocarriers, aqueous extracts can still be effective (
26). Additionally, combining pomegranate peel extracts with conventional drugs may provide a dual approach, leveraging its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immune-stimulating properties to complement traditional treatments and promote wound healing.
The anti-leishmanial effects of
P. granatum peel extract in this study can be attributed to its ability to induce oxidative stress in
L. major promastigotes. Pomegranate peel extract induces oxidative stress in
L. major promastigotes. Bioactive compounds like tannins, flavonoids, and organic acids in the peel extract increase reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, damaging cellular structures and triggering parasite cell death. Additionally, the extract may boost immune responses, including macrophage activation and NO production, further aiding in parasite elimination (
27-
29). A comparison to
Artemisia annua shows similar mechanisms, where ROS generation leads to oxidative damage and cell death in both cases (
30).
One of the primary limitations of this study is the lack of a standard anti-leishmanial drug (e.g., glucantime or amphotericin B) as a positive control. Future studies should include a standard anti-leishmanial drug as a positive control to enable direct comparison with established treatments. The study did not quantify the levels of key bioactive compounds, such as punicalagin and ellagic acid, which may be responsible for the observed therapeutic effects. Given that a crude extract was utilized in this study, further investigations are suggested to isolate active chemical constituents that could lead to the development of new treatments for CL. While this study reports the treatment dosages as percentages (e.g., 20%, 40%), converting these to a more universally accepted measure of dosage, such as mg/kg/day, would have facilitated better reproducibility and comparison with other studies. Additionally, the findings are limited to a small animal model, which may not fully replicate clinical conditions. Therefore, further research is needed to assess efficacy in larger, more diverse populations.
5.1. Conclusions
The study shows that the aqueous extract of P. granatum peel exhibits strong anti-leishmanial effects against L. major both in vitro and in vivo, effectively controlling CL in mice. However, further research is needed to compare different extract types (aqueous, hydroalcoholic, and methanolic) in terms of their phytochemical composition, pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and to isolate the active compounds, optimize treatments, and assess safety and efficacy in clinical settings.