The HCV infection is a major public health issue, especially in developing nations with limited resources such as Iraq. The infection can lead to deleterious complications, such as liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (
1,
2). Timely identification and efficient intervention are vital in averting these outcomes (
1,
2). While earlier studies have indicated a low prevalence of HCV in Iraq, the arrival of highly effective DAA treatments has been a significant advancement toward eliminating the virus in the nation (
5).
The possibility of recurrence, which may appear as reinfection following treatment or as a delayed relapse after reaching SVR, is one challenge to expanding HCV treatment. Individuals who participate in ongoing high-risk activities, such as injecting drug users (IDUs), are particularly vulnerable due to their increased likelihood of reinfection. A meta-analysis study showed that the 5-year recurrence risk for HCV low-risk patients was 0.95%, with a pooled recurrence rate of 1.85 per 1000 person-years of follow-up (PYFU). On the other hand, the 5-year recurrence risk for high-risk patients was 10.67% due to a considerably higher pooled recurrence rate of 22.32 per 1000 PYFU (
7). In our study, none of the patients who finished DAA treatment had a recurrence during the follow-up period. Our findings contrast with several previous studies reporting recurrence rates in HCV patients. For example, a study by Huang et al. found that for low-risk patients, the pooled recurrence rate was 0.89/1000 PYFU. For high-risk patients, the pooled recurrence rate was 29.37/1000 PYFU (
8). The differences between our study and other studies can be explained by human genetic makeup, viral genotypes, and the treatment regimen used.
Additionally, our research supports other studies that emphasized that the lack of coinfections can significantly predict long-term treatment success (
9,
10). Furthermore, efficient post-treatment management and compliance with preventive measures may have played a role in the zero-reinfection rate observed in our group.
Our study has limitations. Firstly, we recruited patients without high-risk behaviors, which may limit generalizability. However, the study allowed for a focused analysis of relapse in a well-defined group. Secondly, the small sample size and lack of patient diversity make it difficult to generalize the results. However, we included all the patients we received during the study period, and we believe that it reflects real-world outcomes with minimal selection bias. Finally, being a single-center study may limit external applicability, but the study provides important long-term data from a unique population.
5.1. Conclusions
Our research showed that there were no instances of HCV recurrence or reinfection in patients who received treatment with DAAs. These results underscore the strong effectiveness of DAAs in attaining a SVR and avoiding recurrence. The findings are optimistic, despite the limited sample size and the possibility that our group represents a lower-risk subset of HCV patients. Future research with larger and more diverse populations is warranted to confirm these results and to further elucidate the factors that contribute to the durability of SVR over extended periods. Further investigation involving larger groups and extended follow-up times is crucial to better understand the long-lasting effects of DAAs in the Iraqi population. In particular, studies that include patients with co-morbidities and HBV co-infection would be valuable. Additionally, genomic and immunological studies may help identify host or viral factors associated with long-term treatment success or relapse. Future research with larger sample sizes, particularly targeting high-risk populations, could help to enhance these findings.