Cover image of the article: A survey of students' perspectives of open-book examinations in histology/embryology

Image Credit:J Med Edu

A survey of students' perspectives of open-book examinations in histology/embryology

Authors

Hamidreza Mahmoudzadeh-Sagheb1, 2, Zahra Heidari1, 2,*, Mahdi Mohammadi3
1Research Center for Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Bou-Ali Hospital, Zahedan, Iran
2Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
3Department of Statistics and epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Associate Professor, Department of Histology, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran. Tel/Fax: (+98) 5433414572 Email: heidari@zaums.ac.ir

Journal of Medical Education for Future Demands:Vol. 14, issue 1; e105422
Published online:Jun 04, 2015
Article type:Research Article
Received:Feb 07, 2015
Accepted:Jun 04, 2015
How to Cite:Mahmoudzadeh-Sagheb H, Heidari Z, Mohammadi M. A survey of students' perspectives of open-book examinations in histology/embryology. J Med Edu. 2015;14(1):e105422. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v14i1.8158

Abstract

Background and purpose: An open-book exam permits the examinees to consult some specific selected reference sources or materials while answering the exam questions. This study focused on the students' perspectives of open-book examinations in the histology/embryology courses, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences (ZUMS), Zahedan, Iran.Methods: The survey was conducted via a questionnaire after open-book examinations had been conducted in the histology and embryology courses, between 2009 and 2010. Of the 254 students who entered the new education system, 160 students were selected at random.Results: The results revealed that 72% of the students preferred the open-book type to the closed-book kind of examinations. Most of the students voiced that this type of examination was more suited to test high cognitive learning skills and solving real life situation problems, involving less stress while preparing for and taking the exam. They also mentioned that their marks in these examinations were not higher than those from the closed-book examinations. The overall satisfaction scores of the students of the biological sciences were significantly (p<0.001) higher than those of the medical sciences students (16.28±4.17 vs. 12.65±5.16); in the government run university students it was significantly (P<0.001) higher than in the international university students (14.93±4.53 vs. 10.24±5.08); the embryology course results were significantly (p<0.001) higher than the histology course (15.23 ± 4.07 vs. 12.79±5.4) and among the MD students it was significantly (p<0.001) lower than those of the BSc students (12±5.1 vs. 15.93±4.29). There was a positive correlation between the scores they acquired in their course and the overall satisfaction scores with the open-book type of examinations (r=0.46, p value=0.01).Conclusions: The finding of a positive response towards the open-book examination augurs well for extending such a type of examination to other subjects in our university.

Highlights

Fulltext

The body of the article can be found in the PDF file.

References

  • 1.
    References are available in the PDF file.

Copyright

© 2015, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

2
Aug
2017
Medical Students’ Perceptions of E-assessment: Multiple Choice Questions used as a Tool of Assessment for Preclinical Years

Medical Students’ Perceptions of E-assessment: Multiple Choice Questions used as a Tool of Assessment for Preclinical Years

Rajani Ranganath,
Chitra Rajalaksmi,
Miriam A Simon

Ranganath R, Rajalaksmi C, Simon MA. Medical Students’ Perceptions of E-assessment: Multiple Choice Questions used as a Tool of Assessment for Preclinical Years. J Med Edu. 2017;16(1):e105563. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v16i1.14842

30
Jun
2004
Effective factors on the results of the basic sciences examinations at Zahedan University of Medical Sciences

Effective factors on the results of the basic sciences examinations at Zahedan University of Medical Sciences

M Roudbari,
F Dadgar

Roudbari M, Dadgar F. Effective factors on the results of the basic sciences examinations at Zahedan University of Medical Sciences. J Inflamm Dis. 2024;8(1):e155016. doi:

26
Jul
2015
Medical Students' Attitudes towards Comprehensive and Basic Sciences Exam Questions in Birjand University of Medical Sciences

Medical Students' Attitudes towards Comprehensive and Basic Sciences Exam Questions in Birjand University of Medical Sciences

Reza Ghaderi

Ghaderi R. Medical Students' Attitudes towards Comprehensive and Basic Sciences Exam Questions in Birjand University of Medical Sciences. J Med Edu. 2015;14(2):e105429. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v14i2.9235

9
May
2021
Opportunities and Challenges of Online Take-Home Exams in Medical Education

Opportunities and Challenges of Online Take-Home Exams in Medical Education

Abtin Heidarzadeh,
Hanieh Zehtab Hashemi,
Parvane Parvasideh,
Zahra Hasan Larijani,
Parisa Baghdadi,
Monireh Fakhraee
,et al.

Heidarzadeh A, Zehtab Hashemi H, Parvasideh P, Hasan Larijani Z, Baghdadi P, et al. Opportunities and Challenges of Online Take-Home Exams in Medical Education. J Med Edu. 2021;20(1):e112512. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jme.112512

3
Dec
2018
Factors Affecting Anatomy Learning from the Viewpoints of Medical Students at Basic Sciences Stage

Factors Affecting Anatomy Learning from the Viewpoints of Medical Students at Basic Sciences Stage

Navid Golshani,
Bahman Mehraban,
Iraj Rashidi,
Nader Salari,
Cyrus Jalili

Golshani N, Mehraban B, Rashidi I, Salari N, Jalili C. Factors Affecting Anatomy Learning from the Viewpoints of Medical Students at Basic Sciences Stage. Educ Res Med Sci. 2018;7(2):e79407. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/erms.79407

More by these authors

Hamidreza Mahmoudzadeh-SaghebPubMedScholar
Zahra HeidariPubMedScholar
Mahdi MohammadiPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics