This randomized experimental study was conducted on 30 CAD patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in a cardiac clinic affiliated with Mazandaran University of Medical Science, Iran (15 patients in each group).
The participants were selected using a convenience sampling method based on inclusion criteria. Then, they were randomly allocated to two groups using a computer-generated random number system. The sample size was calculated based on previous studies. During the study, none of the patients were excluded. The intervention was conducted on scheduled separate days of the week to prevent interaction between the two groups.
The inclusion criteria were all CAD patients who underwent PPCI, were 30 to 60 years old, willing to participate, had minimum literacy, and did not have physical and psychological disorders (including blinding, psychosis, etc.). Patients unwilling to continue cooperation, hospitalization, and death were excluded.
The data collection tools included demographic information on age, gender, etc. The next tool was the short form-36 health survey (SF-36). The questionnaire was designed by Ware et al. to assess the quality of life and consists of 36 items with two general performance measures, including the physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS). This scale also consists of eight health constructs: Physical functioning (10 items), physical role functioning (four items), bodily pain (two items), the general perception of health (five items), energy and vitality (four items), social functioning (two items), emotional role functioning (three items) and mental health (five items). The total range of scores is 0 - 100. The overall score includes two categories, physical and mental. A higher score on the scale for each domain indicates a better quality of life (
13,
14). The reliability of this questionnaire was conducted on the Iranian population via Cronbach's Alpha. It was 0.91 and 0.87 for PCS and MCS, respectively (
15). In the present population, the reliability via Cronbach's alpha was 0.88 for overall SF-36.
After obtaining written permission from the Ethics Committee of Islamic Azad University, Gorgan branch, the researcher introduced himself to the patients, and then he explained the procedures of the study to them. The intervention was performed in eight consecutively sessions. The eligible patients completed demographic data and SF-36 quality of life in the first intervention session. The content of the sessions is provided in
Table 1. Forty-five days after the last session, a posttest of SF-36 quality of life was completed in each group.
| Groups | Content |
|---|
| CBT (sessions) | |
| 1 | Establishing a therapeutic relationship. Familiarizing the patient with CAD (causes, including the psychological causes of CAD). Familiarizing the patient with the purpose of the research, normalizing the problem and creating hope, checking the patient's expectations from the treatment, arranging (number of sessions, time of sessions, assignments) |
| 2 | A brief review of the previous session. List the problems related to CAD. Classification of the problems with the help of the patient. Training the cognitive triangle model (relationship between thought-feeling-behavior and the difference between them) Training and recognition of the emotion and separation of emotion from thought Identification of client's emotions and scoring based on the intensity of emotion. Summarization and feedback |
| 3 | A brief review of the previous session. Cognitive restructuring (identification, evaluation, change, and correction of self-occurring thoughts related to CAD and angioplasty procedure). Summarization and feedback. Presentation of the weekly assignment worksheet |
| 4 | Examining the weekly assignment. Creating new behaviors. Paying attention to the behavioral chain (related to CAD and angioplasty procedure). Summarizing and feedback. Weekly assignment |
| 5 | Examining the weekly assignment. Teaching cognitive errors and inefficient thinking. Examining the cognitive errors of clients in connection with heart disease and therapeutic procedures. Summarizing and feedback. Presentation of cognitive errors identification worksheet. |
| 6 | Examining the weekly assignment. Familiarizing the patient with the fundamental beliefs related to CAD Identifying the patient's attitudes and their relationship with heart disease and its impact on the treatment process and compliance with the treatment. Providing a worksheet to identify the related fundamental beliefs |
| 7 | Examining the weekly assignment.Teaching stress management, self-control, and raising mood |
| 8 | Examining the weekly assignment. Anxiety management training and ways to improve the quality of life. Completing the posttest (SP-36) quality of life questionnaire |
| Control | Receive routine care based on the cardiologist's management plan. After completing the intervention, CBT content provided in a psychological care package |
The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Islamic Azad University, Gorgan branch (IR.IAU.SARI.REC.1401.068). All the procedure was explained to participants, and signed informed written consent was obtained.
The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 24.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Chicago, IL). Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to test the normality distribution. The frequency, mean, and standard deviation was used to describe the variables. The chi-square test was used to explore the independent nature of some categorical variables. The ANCOVA test made the comparison of the means between the two groups. A P-value less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant.