The main finding of the study was that the mean PSQI score describing impaired sleep quality and disorder in the RFLX decreased by 5.7 points and that of the control group only by 1.5 points, including that in the RFLX group, the change was statistically significant. To understand what point change in PSQI score reduction is clinically important, it has been found that the minimum clinically significant difference in PSQI score starts at a 4.4-point change (
24). Thus, in this study, comparing the results before and after the four-week study period, the RFLX showed a clinically significant reduction in sleep disturbance (PSQI score change of > 4.4 points). Although the mean change in the total PSQI score in the RFLX group is conservative, the transition of the RFLX group to “good” sleeper status (PSQI ≤ 5) demonstrates a significant clinical effect. These findings provide robust preliminary evidence that the therapy may offer meaningful benefits. Future large-scale studies should be positioned to further calibrate the precise scale of this impact. Another important finding was that reflexology improved sleep latency the most among all components and significantly reduced daytime functioning disturbance compared to the post-intervention outcome in the control group. Although these findings offer promising insights and are applicable to broader populations, they should be interpreted with caution, given the study´s limited generalizability, which is discussed in detail later in the limitations section.
Similarly to the positive change in PSQI scores in the RFLX in this study, a meta-analysis covering populations with very different medical conditions (cardiac care unit patients, chemotherapy patients, breast cancer patients, rheumatoid arthritis patients, hemodialysis patients, etc.) found a significant improvement in sleep quality and a reduction in sleep disturbances after the implementation of foot reflexology (
16). A study conducted among working nurses found that a 30-minute-long self-administered foot reflexology twice a week showed a 2.93-point PSQI score improvement in the RFLX vs no meaningful improvement in the control group after a six-week-long intervention period (
25). In the current study, the PSQI score in the RFLX group improved by 5.7 points in the RFLX group vs 1.5 points in the CONT group, with a large between-group effect size. Both studies confirm that foot reflexology significantly improves sleep quality by decreasing the total PSQI score. Still, this study shows a larger improvement, likely due to differences in delivery method (therapist-administered vs self-administered) and population characteristics (no night shifts vs working night shifts). Although a slight improvement in PSQI scores in the CONT group was observed in this study, it may have been partly because the intervention started in November and December, which was the time when the students' examinations were in progress or close to starting. The above interpretation is based on the data examined and the background information of this study and is not supported by existing literature. Therefore, the above possible explanation remains speculative and should be interpreted with caution until objective experimental studies confirm it.
Analyzing the PSQI results separately by component, this study's results suggest that the sleep latency component, which assesses the speed of falling asleep, improved the most in the RFLX group. The present study's results are similar to those of the study among healthy adults, where reflexology implementation was found to induce changes in brain wave activity (N1 and N2 NREM sleep) corresponding to sleep onset within minutes of reflexology initiation, and high levels of sleepiness and sleep occurred (
26). The current study results show that the daytime functioning disorder component, assessing daytime functioning, improved in the RFLX group after a four-week intervention. In contrast, in the control group, the difference between the means before and after the study period for this component was minimal. Comparing this study with a similar study´s results carried out among working nurses, the findings confirm that foot reflexology evokes a significant reduction in such components as sleep latency and a significant improvement in sleep duration and sleep efficiency components (
25). Both studies demonstrate that foot reflexology improves multiple PSQI components among nurses, but the foot reflexology protocol used in the current study produced larger overall improvement, moving participants into the “good sleeper” category (PSQI ≤ 5). A review of foot reflexology indicates that applying pressure to specific areas of the feet stimulates nerves and increases blood circulation and also triggers a neuroendocrine response, causing the body to release natural painkillers, such as endorphins. These biochemical compounds reduce pain and increase overall well-being. This neuroendocrine response may be reflected in improved sleep quality (
20).
The period of reflexology implementation and the duration of a single therapy session are important benefit factors of reflexology (
13). In a study in which reflexology was administered to postoperative cardiac patients only on two consecutive days after surgery, a nonsignificant reduction in total PSQI score was observed. Nevertheless, the study found that reflexology significantly reduced pain intensity (
27). Another study also used only two days of reflexology and found that it significantly reduced impaired sleep quality and disturbance among patients with acute coronary syndrome (
28). Based on the current study's results, the four-week period is sufficient to change the total PSQI score significantly. However, a shorter intervention period may be considered for future similar studies.
Looking at the results of this study and comparing them with previous studies, it becomes clear that the more thoroughly the reflexological points addressed are outlined in the study design (pineal gland, hypothalamus, spinal cord points, solar plexus; and pineal gland, spinal cord, solar plexus, lymphatic system, diaphragm, thyroid, abdominal region, adrenal glands), the greater the benefit of reflexology compared to the control group (
29). However, studies that have either mentioned massage of the whole foot in general terms and included only pineal point manipulation or only solar plexus massage have found, respectively, that there was no statistically significant difference in PSQI scores between the reflexology group and the control group (
22). Interestingly, in a study among healthy adults, the reflexologist used predetermined reflexology points to reduce sleep quality and sleep disorders, and additionally added reflexology points that required attention based on the patient's condition (
26). This highlights the principle of reflexology in practice, where a person’s illness is approached holistically and examined specifically in relation to the individual’s concern. In the current study, to ensure consistency, specific reflexology points were selected: the pineal gland, hypothalamus, hypophysis, spinal points, and solar plexus. The use of these points in the abovementioned studies (
21,
22,
28,
29) and in this study gave statistically significantly better results compared to the control group.
In a study of rheumatoid arthritis patients, reflexology was performed for six weeks, with a frequency of once a week (60 minutes per session) (
21). The present study's corresponding numbers were four weeks and twice weekly (20 minutes per session), and the PSQI questionnaire was not administered before the start of the intervention but only at the end of the first week of intervention (
21). The prevalence of impaired sleep quality and disturbance in the above-mentioned study involving patients with rheumatoid arthritis was seemingly less severe than among female students participating in the Tartu Applied Health Sciences University study, and both groups in this study showed a more pronounced improvement in sleep quality following the intervention. These differences may reflect variations in baseline health status, the chronic pain burden characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis, and the differing life circumstances of clinical patients versus generally healthy student populations. The current study showed a more significant reduction in impaired sleep quality and disorders in the RFLX group compared to the study results with rheumatoid arthritis patients (
21). On this basis, it can be concluded that an intervention period of six weeks, as was also used in the study among working nurses (
25), is not necessary. More frequent therapy sessions – two sessions per week, 20 minutes each time for a four-week study period – could be compelling enough.
This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. One limitation of the study is the potential for selection bias introduced by the recruitment method, as the use of voluntary email responses may have resulted in a sample that is not representative of the broader population. This self-selection process could favor candidates with greater motivation and access to technology, while potentially excluding underrepresented individuals, and thereby affecting the generalizability of the findings. Second, a priori sample size calculation was not conducted, which weakens the justification of statistical power and may increase the risk of Type II error. Twenty of the 50 expected subjects participated in the study. Only female students aged 18 - 25 who were actively studying at the university were included in the study. According to the university's data, on April 10th, 2023, 600 students met such criteria. On this basis, it can be said that 20 out of 600 female students who participated in the study is very small. One probable reason could be, for example, that the time commitment was too high for a female student, as inclusion in the RFLX group involved four consecutive weeks of interventions. In addition, similar studies have been conducted in hospital settings, where it was significantly more straightforward to administer reflexology therapy to patients in an inpatient ward due to the availability of ordinary time slots (
21,
22,
30). Thus, future research should use a larger sample to achieve more reliable, and generalizable results. Third, the study design did not include a sham group, making it difficult to rule out nonspecific effects such as attention, expectations, or placebo responses. It must be mentioned that although the study results are based on the validated PSQI Questionnaire, the findings rely exclusively on self-reported sleep assessments, which may be subject to recall and response bias; the absence of objective sleep measures, such as actigraphy, limits the robustness and precision of the sleep-related outcomes. Also, the PSQI questionnaire used in this study has some shortcomings in measuring impaired sleep quality and disturbance. Namely, it does not consider irregular sleep duration and timing, shallow sleep, prolonged sleep inertia, hypersomnia, and sleep interrupted by mental or psychological complaints (
31). The search for associations between these impaired sleep quality and disorder components and reflexology may also be engaging and should be considered when planning a similar study. Nevertheless, the PSQI is a globally recognized questionnaire, and its use allows comparisons with other studies on impaired sleep quality and disorders (
32,
33). Another limitation is that two therapists provided the therapy, so the therapies may have differed slightly and, therefore, could introduce potential inter-therapist variability. However, to mitigate this, the therapists jointly practiced reflexology techniques based on a written therapy plan before the study period. Finally, the follow-up period was relatively short, preventing assessment of the longer-term sustainability of the intervention´s effects. These limitations should be addressed in future research to strengthen the evidence base and enhance the validity and generalizability of the findings.
The strengths of the study are outlined below. All subjects were coded and randomly grouped using a computer program, which allowed the data processor to be blinded to additional information obtained during data collection. Second, one of the research members has a professional training in reflexology (1,000 hours of training and three years of professional experience in reflexology practice), which allowed for a high-quality reflexology plan and a detailed overview of the location of the reflexology points performed. Third, the four-week reflexology period, with a total of eight therapy sessions, is a more longer intervention period than in other studies (
27,
28). Therefore, the result of this study provides a good insight into the effects of reflexology performed over an extended period.
5.1. Conclusions
The results of this study suggests that reflexology is an effective method for improving sleep quality and reducing sleep disorders among Health Sciences University female students. The observed improvement in the PSQI total score shows that reflexology can be a valuable stress-relief tool for university students during intense study periods, for example, to help them manage their academic pressure. These findings indicate that reflexology may serve as a practical, low-cost supportive strategy for students in healthcare professions to help address sleep-related concerns. In addition, this feasible, nurse-delivered complementary therapy has potential value for integration into the clinical nursing environment. However, given the preliminary nature of the results, larger and more rigorously designed clinical trials are essential to confirm these effects before recommending broader implementation.