1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Cultivation of Parasite and Macrophages
3.2. Plant Materials and Extraction
3.3. Cytotoxic Effects of Extract on Macrophage Cells
3.4. Effect of Extract on Promastigotes
3.5. Effect of Extract on Infectivity Rate and the Number of Amastigotes in Macrophages
3.6. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Cell Cytotoxicity Activity
Inhibitory concentration (IC50) for cytotoxicity of Laser trilobum hydro-ethanolic extracts (increasing concentrations: 500 - 3000 μg/mL) on the macrophage cell line (RAW264.7) after 24 and 48 h by using MTT assay and GraphPad Prism Version 8.0 software. All data reported as a mean of three repeated experiments.
4.2. Antileishmanial Effects of Laser trilobum Extracts on Promastigotes
4.3. Antileishmanial Effects of the Herbal Extract on Infected Macrophages and Intracellular Amastigote Numbers
| Conc. (μg/mL); Time (h) | Percentage of Infected Macrophages | No. of Amastigotes per 100 Macrophages | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treated | Control | P-Value | Reduction | Treated | Control | P-Value | Reduction | |
| 500 | ||||||||
| 24 | 56.33 ± 1.00 | 58.00 ± 1.00 | 0.95 | 2.88 | 23.33 ± 2.08 | 25.33 ± 1.53 | 0.257 | 7.9 |
| 48 | 66.67 ± 1.53 | 69.67 ± 2.08 | 1.00 | 4.31 | 25.67 ± 1.53 | 28.33 ± 1.15 | 0.22 | 9.39 |
| 72 | 71.00 ± 2.00 | 75.33 ± 1.53 | 1.00 | 5.75 | 30.67 ± 1.53 | 32.67 ± 1.53 | 0.32 | 6.12 |
| 750 | ||||||||
| 24 | 52.33 ± 0.58 | 58.0 ± 1.0 | 0.086 | 9.78 | 21.00 ± 2.00 | 25.33 ± 1.53 | 0.17 | 17.09 |
| 48 | 62.33 ± 1.53 | 69.67 ± 1.53 | 0.095 | 10.53 | 23.33 ± 1.53 | 28.33 ± 1.15 | 0.096 | 17.65 |
| 72 | 66.0 ± 2.00 | 75.33 ± 1.53 | 0.079 | 12.38 | 28.33 ± 1.53 | 32.67 ± 1.53 | 0.10 | 13.28 |
| 1000 | ||||||||
| 24 | 40.67 ± 1.53 | 58.0 ± 1.0 | 0.023 | 29.88 | 11.0 ± 1.0 | 25.33 ± 1.53 | 0.044 | 56.57 |
| 48 | 45.33 ± 1.53 | 69.67 ± 1.53 | 0.03 | 34.94 | 9.67 ± 1.15 | 28.33 ± 1.15 | 0.01 | 68.87 |
| 72 | 54.00 ± 2.65 | 75.33 ± 1.53 | 0.05 | 28.32 | 13.33 ± 0.58 | 32.67 ± 1.53 | 0.04 | 59.20 |
| 1250 | ||||||||
| 24 | 31.67 ± 1.53 | 58.0 ± 1.0 | 0.001 | 45.40 | 8.33 ± 1.53 | 25.33 ± 1.53 | 0.001 | 67.11 |
| 48 | 34.33 ± 1.53 | 69.67 ± 1.53 | 0.001 | 50.72 | 6.00 ± 1.00 | 28.33 ± 1.15 | 0.001 | 78.82 |
| 72 | 43.33 ± 1.53 | 75.33 ± 1.53 | 0.001 | 42.48 | 8.00 ± 1.00 | 32.67 ± 1.53 | 0.001 | 75.51 |
| 1500 | ||||||||
| 24 | 23.33 ± 1.53 | 58.0 ± 1.0 | 0.000 | 59.78 | 4.67 ± 1.53 | 25.33 ± 1.53 | 0.000 | 81.56 |
| 48 | 19.67 ± 1.53 | 69.67 ± 1.53 | 0.000 | 71.77 | 2.67 ± 0.58 | 28.33 ± 1.15 | 0.000 | 90.58 |
| 72 | 32.00 ± 2.65 | 75.33 ± 1.53 | 0.000 | 57.52 | 3.67 ± 0.58 | 32.67 ± 1.53 | 0.000 | 88.77 |
a Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of experimens done in triplicate.
4.4. Comparative Effects of Extract and Glucantime on Infected Macrophages and the Number of Intra-macrophage Amastigotes
Percentage of infected macrophages when treated with effective concentrations of Laser trilobum extract compared to glucantime (as reference drug) and untreated (negative control) groups at 24, 48, and 72 h after incubation; results are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM; n = 3).



