The emulsification profile of the soybean oil/tween 20/cremophor RH40 lipid mixture is presented in
Figure 1. The ternary phase diagram depicts an extended area of immiscibility, which reflects the high non-polarity of soybean oil as a source of long fatty acid chain (C16 - C18) triglycerides. After the aqueous dispersion of the oil pre-concentrate, narrow areas of self-micro-emulsifying clear dispersions were obtained at maximum concentrations of soybean of 10 - 15% w/w. As depicted in
Figure 1, line ab represents optimum clear micro-emulsions obtained using blends of {soybean oil/cremophor RH40} (1:9) ratios mixed with increasing concentrations of tween 20.
The emulsification profile of the lipid mixture composed of span 80, tween 20, and tween 80 is depicted in
Figure 2. In contrast to the lipid mixture in
Figure 1, this system depicted in
Figure 2, which contains span 80 as a source of oil, has produced single-phase lipid mixtures at all ratios. The aqueous dispersion of the lipidic mix of span 80, tween 20, and tween 80 has produced an area of SMEDDS that is relatively larger than the soybean oil/tween 20/cremophor RH40 mix (
Figures 1 and
2). Maximum amounts of 20 to 25% w/w of span 80 can be included in the lipid mix, and clear microemulsions can still be produced. Lines A, B, C, and D represent binary blends of {span 80/tween 80} at ratios of 5:5, 4:6, 3:7, and 8:2, respectively.
Table 2 shows the effect of Wt% of span 80 in the binary blends of {span 80/tween 80} on the minimum amount of tween 20 that is required to obtain micro-emulsion dispersions. As
Figure 2 and
Table 1 show, moving from lines A to D represents progressive reduction of Wt% of span 80 in the binary blends of {span 80/tween 80}. This reduction in the amount of span 80 incurs less concentration of tween 20 to produce clear micro-emulsions of calculated MEDD of ≈ 10 nm. The MEDD was calculated according to a mathematical equation developed by Hasan (
2), in which strong regression correlation (R
2) of 0.96 was obtained between the square root of HLB value for oil mix against ln (MEDS) of measured values.
Similar results were obtained in the contour plot depicted in
Figure 3, which shows that as Wt% of span 80 increases in the binary blend, a corresponding increase in the calculated oil droplet size is observed. Furthermore, a similar trend was observed in
Figure 4, which shows optical density of emulsion dispersions at λ 400 nm as an approach to evaluate turbidity (
14). There is a corresponding decrease in the optical density of emulsion dispersions, i.e., more optically clear, as the ratio content of span 80 decreases in the binary mix (
Figure 4). Span 80 represents the non-polar constituent in the lipidic mixture, and the further reduction of the Wt% of span 80 produces a correspondingly more hydrophilic oil vehicle, which results in clearer dispersions with minimum surfactant concentrations. This is in congruity with the photograph illustration depicted in
Figure 5, which shows the aqueous dispersions of lipidic mixtures containing {span 80/tween 80} (3:7) at increasing concentrations of tween 20. As the surfactant concentration of tween 20 increases in the oil formulation, aqueous dispersions of these systems become more visually clear.
The emulsification profile of the lipid system which is composed of glycerox/tween 20/cremophor RH40 is shown in
Figure 6. The lipid mixture has produced a complete oil pre-concentrate miscible region with optically clear SMEDDS after aqueous dispersion at all ratios. This system is composed of polar oil glycerox HLB of value 13.2 and two hydrophilic non-ionic surfactants, tween 20 (HLB 16.7) and cremophor RH40 (HLB 14 - 16). The solubility of cilostazol and diclofenac sodium were studied in the ternary mix of glycerox/tween 20/cremophor RH40 (
Table 3). Solubility of 50 or 25 mg/mL of cilostazol could not be obtained in lipidic mixtures even when including 10 to 20% w/w ethanol. Nonetheless, for diclofenac sodium, a 50 mg dose can be solubilized in the lipidic mix.