Celiac disease was initially proposed to affect white Europeans exclusively. However, recent epidemiological studies have reported its occurrence in almost every part of the world, including Africa, the Middle East, Asia, and South America (
13). The global prevalence of CD is approximately 0.5-1%, except for those who consume very little or no gluten (
14). Celiac disease is a relatively common cause of chronic diarrhea in Iran, Iraq, and Kuwait and is diagnosed in 2-8% of patients with type 1 diabetes in Iran, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. These numbers are obtained while the per capita consumption of wheat in many of these countries is among the highest in the world (> 150 kg per person per year) (
15). Due to the limited availability of epidemiological studies on the prevalence of CD and its symptoms in Iran, particularly in the country's southeast, this study looked into the frequency distribution of clinical and demographic characteristics of 110 CD patients in South Khorasan from March to August 2019. According to the findings, the most common symptoms in both sexes were abdominal pain and diarrhea. Previous research shows these symptoms affect 85 – 54% of the population (
16). In a study by Rostami Nejad et al., the prevalence of diarrhea in CD patients ranged from 6.5 to 20% (
17). Previous studies have also reported constipation as another common disease symptom, and women are more likely to suffer from it. The frequency of constipation in women may be affected by physiological differences in the anatomy of the pelvis, as well as other factors such as hormones, including estrogen and progesterone. One study found constipation in 52% of people, which was higher than ours (
18). In an Italian study, constipation was found in 13% of the CD patients, which was lower than ours (
19).
Celiac disease manifests as osteopenia, osteoporosis, arthritis, and inflammation (
20). Our findings appear consistent with previous studies despite differences in populations and study areas. Regarding comorbidities, musculoskeletal problems, including osteoporosis (15.5%), psychological disorders such as depression (15.5%), and peripheral neuropathy (12.7%, were the most common diseases associated with CD. Most previous studies have found that CD increases the risk of depression and osteoporosis. A clinical visit should include a mood assessment. Besides, depression is prevalent in CD in varying degrees, ranging from 6 to 57%. This rate went from 6.5% (
21) to 14% (
22), 17% (
23), and 19 - 24% (
24).
A study by the US National Institutes of Health, which looked at the 12-month prevalence of major depressive episodes in American adults with CD, found that 6.7% of these patients showed some depression (
25). Preventing osteoporosis in younger CD patients and aggressively treating this disease in older patients should also be prioritized. In women with CD, the risk of osteoporosis is more than twice that in men; this risk is also nearly 4 times higher in CD patients than in healthy people (
26).
The first step in CD screening and diagnosis is evaluating serological markers and tTG-IgA antibodies. The second step is the detection of anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA). The sensitivity and specificity of both methods are high. Studies on diagnostic laboratory markers in patients indicated that anti-tTG-IgA had a sensitivity of 96.8%, a specificity of 91%, and a positive predictive value of 91.2%. In comparison, its negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were 96.8% and 97.7%, respectively (
27). According to another study, the sensitivity of tTG-IgA and EMA tests was 92% for the diagnosis of CD, but the specificity of TTG and EMA tests was 98.5% and 100%, respectively (
13).
A weak association was observed between lower tTG-IgA levels and intestinal enteropathy among symptomatic patients with CD (
14). In contrast, tTG-IgA levels (> 100 U/mL) were found to be highly specific for Marsh III lesions (
28). Our findings about the serum levels of anti-tTG-IgA in 110 participants showed that 28 (25.5%) had immunoglobulin levels of less than 12 U/mL (negative), 7 (6.4%) had immunoglobulin levels of around 12 - 18 U/mL (borderline), and 75 (68.2%) had immunoglobulin levels greater than or equal to 19 U/mL (positive). Their mean serum levels of anti-tTG-IgA were 16.352 ± 91.642 U/mL. Moreover, 9 (8.2%), 9 (8.2%), 12 (10.9%), 26 (23.6%), and 54 cases (49.1%) belonged to Marsh I, Marsh II, Marsh IIIa, Marsh IIIb, and Marsh IIIc classes, respectively. In a study of 49 participants, 3, 4, and 5 patients were categorized as having Marsh I, Marsh II, and Marsh IIIa, respectively (
3,
28). Another study among 1440 people showed that 7 individuals had positive serological evidence for anti-tTG-IgA, 5 of whom were satisfied to undergo endoscopy, and all of them showed a Marsh IIIc classification of CD in their gastrointestinal biopsy (
29). Singh et al. also reported Marsh 0 (n = 1), Marsh III (n = 8), Marsh II (n = 1), and Marsh IIIa (n = 1) classifications of CD among their participants (
30). Tursi et al. studied 119 patients with CD and observed Marsh I lesions in 13 patients (10.92%), Marsh II in 24 anti-tTG (20.16%), Marsh IIIa in 27 anti-tTG (22.68%), Marsh IIIb in 31 anti-tTG (26.05%), and Marsh IIIc in 24 anti-tTG (20.16%) participants. This study revealed that the prevalence of anti-tTG and its mean serum values were higher in CD patients with severe enteropathy (Marsh IIIb-c lesions) than in those with mild enteropathy (Marsh I-3a) (
31). Webb et al. noted that among 230 individuals with CD, 67 had low tTG-IgA levels (less than 5 U/mL), of whom 55% had Marsh III lesions (
27). In a study by Karami, serological results revealed that 47% of the participants had tTG antibodies. Based on the disease severity classification, the highest frequency (57%) was linked to Marsh III. Furthermore, 10% of the CD patients were simultaneously diagnosed with diabetes (
32).
Gastrointestinal pathology tests in the current study revealed that Marsh IIIc categorization is more common in CD patients, consistent with the findings of earlier studies (
33). Tissue changes were also observed in people with CD, although 25.5% of the participants had harmful antibody levels. Factors such as different measurement methods and technical errors in the measurement process of this type of antibody can justify this finding. In this regard, false negatives caused by abnormal serum IgA levels, elimination of gluten from the diet, and even the intake of immunosuppressive drugs and corticosteroids should be considered (
34).