No statistically significant relationship was found between maternal co-morbidities, including thyroid problems, anemia, diabetes, and heart diseases, and cesarean section outcomes, except for hypertensive disorders. Additionally, no significant relationship was found between the number of diseases and complications. These findings indicate appropriate interaction between the obstetrics and anesthesiology teams. This suggests that, in addition to proper prenatal care, cesarean sections were scheduled following pre-operative anesthesia visits and necessary consultations, ensuring the procedures were performed timely and under ideal conditions. Gestational diabetes, defined as glucose intolerance first diagnosed during pregnancy, is the most prevalent endocrine disorder in pregnancy and is influenced by various underlying factors (
15,
16).
In line with the literature, gestational diabetes was reported as the most common co-morbidity in this study. Studies have demonstrated that diabetes is an important risk factor for cesarean section. In pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus, compared to non-diabetic women, the overall cesarean section rate was reported to be 1.52 times higher (
17). In a racially low-risk population, the prevalence of diabetes during pregnancy has been reported as 2 - 5% (
18). Contrary to Basirat et al.'s 2010 research, which showed that gestational diabetes was associated with adverse outcomes, our study did not find it to lead to serious complications, indicating proper prenatal care and timely consultations (
19). Hypertensive disorders were the second most common co-morbidity, with the highest percentage related to first pregnancies. This may be due to complications such as severe headaches and visual impairments requiring various medical interventions and, in some cases, ICU transfer. Overall, these complications could make pregnancy a difficult experience, potentially discouraging plans for subsequent pregnancies. Meng et al.'s 2023 study found that patients with preeclampsia had a higher rate of maternal cardiovascular complications (
20).
In contrast to our study, Eslamimoghadam et al.'s 2018 study showed that gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with poor maternal and neonatal outcomes, with mothers experiencing early readmission and neonates showing more malformations. However, similar to our findings, gestational diabetes mellitus was the most common co-morbidity (
21).
Faraji 2022 study evaluated the effect of high serum Inhibin-A levels in the first and second trimesters on adverse pregnancy outcomes. They concluded that high serum Inhibin-A levels increase the odds of preeclampsia, preterm birth, fetal growth retardation, and low birth weight (
22).
One of the most important findings of this study was the management of critical cardiac cases in the absence of a general hospital. During the study period, only one case with a mild cardiac problem underwent cesarean section at Al-Zahra Hospital. However, more than ten severe cardiac cases were transferred to the main specialized heart surgery center of the province, benefiting from specialized services including CCU care and cardiac anesthesiologists, and all survived. Although cardiovascular disease is a well-known risk factor for maternal mortality, no mortality occurred in this process. This study revealed that despite limited facilities, proper communication and cooperation can be effective. Considering the lack of CCU wards and specialized cardiac services in many public academic hospitals in our country, this study provides an easy, affordable, and accessible guide for maternal health. Transferring the mother to the private sector or performing cesarean sections without the required equipment are not ethically or legally acceptable options.
In this study, no significant association was found between maternal co-morbidities and Apgar scores. More than 90% of the babies were born with an Apgar score of 7 - 10, indicating accurate fetal monitoring, timely cesarean sections, and appropriate anesthesia techniques. Since this center is an academic and referral hospital, it is crucial to minimize the number of deliveries with low Apgar scores. The results of this study contrast with Knosgaard et al.'s 2023 study, which showed higher cesarean section outcome frequencies in mothers with hypothyroidism (
23). It also contrasts with Chu et al.'s 2020 study, which reported that maternal anemia was associated with adverse outcomes (
24). In line with the current study, Ramos Filho and Antunes's 2020 study showed that hypertensive disorders were associated with a higher proportion of cesarean section complications but not related to Apgar scores (
9).
The differences in study results across centers can be attributed to variations in research methods and populations studied. For example, a retrospective study in a center with an inadequate data recording system will yield different quality findings compared to a prospective study with close supervision. The commitment to accurately recording and reporting medical errors and documentation also varies. Additionally, the characteristics of each hospital—whether general or specialized, academic or private—along with the experience of the treatment team and the available equipment, can affect cesarean section outcomes. Socio-economic status differences among studied populations and the quality of communication between obstetricians and anesthesiologists at each center also play crucial roles in delivery outcomes. Some aspects are specific to each region and cannot be generalized.
Given the importance of maternal and newborn health, it is recommended to conduct this research prospectively to obtain more complete and reliable results by examining additional risk factors. Due to the nature of a retrospective study, the investigated co-morbidities were limited to those recorded in the files. Other risk factors, such as high BMI or maternal addiction, were not assessed. Given the importance of the issue, a well-planned prospective study is strongly suggested.
5.1. Conclusions
It was concluded that despite a notable number of maternal co-morbidities and risk factors, no significant adverse outcomes were reported. This indicates appropriate interaction between the obstetrics and anesthesiology teams, as well as standard and careful maternal and fetal monitoring in this center. Special attention should be paid to the treatment and care of maternal hypertensive disorders. Another valuable finding was the successful teamwork in managing severe cardiac cases, with no mortality or morbidity among them. Despite the acceptable results, as this hospital is an academic and referral center, efforts should be made to minimize complicated cases and restrict them to super-emergency situations that do not allow enough time for evaluation. This study strongly emphasizes the importance of teamwork and appropriate participation of different specialized fields.