This cross-sectional descriptive-correlational study was done in 2016. Study population consisted of all older adults who were 60 years of age or and lived at their private homes in Kashan, Iran. Participants were selected via multistage sampling. Initially, all older adults who routinely referred to healthcare centers in Kashan, Iran, were identified. Then, a random sample of older adults was recruited from each healthcare center using name lists kept in the centers. The number of older adults who were selected from each center was proportionate to the total number of older adults who referred to that center. Finally, we referred to the homes of the selected individuals and invited them to the study. The eligibility criteria included individuals 60 years of age or more, physical and mental abilities to respond study questionnaires, and having at least 1 grandchild. Participants who were reluctant to stay in the study or incompletely filled out their questionnaires were excluded.
Sample size was estimated through the sample size estimation formula for the correlation of 2 numerical variables (
17) and the results of an earlier study, which reported a correlation coefficient of 0.16 (
18). Considering type I and II errors of 0.05 and 0.85, the size of study sample was estimated to be 348. However, to compensate a potential withdrawal rate of 15%, sample size was expanded to 400.
Data were collected using 3 questionnaires. The first was a demographic questionnaire with items such as age, gender, educational status, financial status, current employment status, marital status, possession of a private home, and general health status. The second questionnaire contained only 1 item on life satisfaction: “How much are you satisfied with your life?” This item was scored on a four-point scale from 25 (“Very little”) to 100 (“Very much”). The 3rd questionnaire was related to GGR and was developed based on Bengston Model of Intergenerational Solidarity and also the results of earlier studies (
7,
19,
20). This questionnaire contained 16 items on intergenerational relationship in the following 3 dimensions:
1. Association attachment: this dimension contained 4 items, which were scored 1 - 5, resulting in a total score of 4 - 20. Examples of the items of this dimensions were, “How often did your grandchildren visit you in the past year?” and “How many times did you talk with your grandchildren over telephone in the past 1 year?”
2. Emotional attachment: the 3 items of this dimension were scored from 1 to 4 and thus, the total score of this dimension ranged from 3 to 12. Emotional attachment was assessed using questions such as “How is your relationship with your grandchildren?” and “How much you and your grandchildren love each other?”
3. Functional attachment: the 9 items of this dimension were scored on a 1 - 4 scale, resulting in a total score of 9 - 36. The items were on financial, instrumental, and social support by grandchildren for their grandparents. Examples of the items of this dimension included, “How much do your grandchildren respect you or show you kindness?” “Do your grandchildren help you in going out of home, for example for a medical visit?”
The mean score of each dimension was changed to the 1 - 100 scale in order to facilitate inter-dimensional comparisons. The validity of this questionnaire was assessed via the content validity ratio and the content validity index. Accordingly, several experienced experts in gerontology were invited to rate each item. The content validity ratio and the content validity index of the questionnaire were 0.89 and 0.94, respectively. Moreover, the Cronbach’s alpha of the questionnaire was 0.86.
For data collection, we referred to each participant’s home, explained the aim of the study, secured his/her informed consent, and completed study questionnaires. Collected data were entered into the SPSS software (v. 23.0), where Pearson correlation analysis was used for correlation examination. Moreover, multiple linear regression analysis with the Enter method was used to evaluate the role of GGR and its association, emotional, and functional attachment dimensions in predicting participants’ life satisfaction. The criteria for selecting independent variables were the results of previous studies and the significant correlation of the intended variables with life satisfaction in univariate analysis. Statistical analysis using kurtosis and skewness measures showed the normal distribution of the dependent variable (i.e. life satisfaction) and the independent variables (i.e. GGR and its association, emotional, and functional attachment dimensions). The data were presented using the measures of descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation, and relative frequency. The Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences approved the ethical considerations of the present study under No 9352.