No similar research has addressed fascia suturing in the field of urology. For closing infection-suspicious fascia, it is better to apply the sutures individually. However, the preferred suture material has not been confirmed (
7). Nevertheless, comparing PDS with Prolene sutures showed the superiority of PDS, primarily when sutures are performed with 5-mm intervals (
4). Vicryl suture maintains its strength in kidney parenchyma; thus, it is more acceptable than other sutures (
8). Vicryl suture is a synthetic, biocompatible, and regenerative tool that minimizes tissue reaction complications of surgical wounds. Surgical wounds are divided into early and late forms. Early complications include infection, dehiscence, or sinus formation at the site of the wound, while herniated surgical site and chronic pain are among the late complications. The kind of stitch may influence the incisional outcome. Applying Vicryl sutures in midline fascia repair instead of non-absorbable ones does not increase wound complications (
9,
10).
Many surgeons still apply nylon sutures for fascia repair and are afraid of absorbent types. Although studies assessing suture material on incision complications are widespread in general surgical procedures, a limited number of studies have addressed them in urology operations. Previous research has publicized more contamination rates in the non-absorbable (Prolene and PDS) sutures (
11). Non-absorbable sutures also increase sinus formation in the healing suture line of fascia in the company of lasting discomfort. Operational time is so critical in the contamination of the wound. However, the rate of wound and hernia infections in the surgical area was negligible in our patients, potentially due to a cleaner urologic surgical environment and a shorter duration of surgery. In urologic surgeries, the intestine is only opened in the case of radical cystectomy. Even in such cases, no wound infection or hernia was observed in our patients.
Regarding renal transplantation, where the patient's immune system was compromised, no wound infection, wound dehiscence, or hernia was detected at the surgical site. There have been more reports of the breach of the wound and pseudo-infection with the absorbable (Vicryl) suture (
12). In this study, all surgeries were elective and non-emergent, performed by the same surgeon, which can explain the low rate of surgical site complications. The rate of hernia and wound breach is lower in monolayer mass closure compared with multi-layered closure, despite multi-layered suturing of the muscles and fascia. However, continuous mass closure of midline fascia with Vicryl led to satisfactory results. Discomfort in the incisional region was minor in absorbable stitches like Vicryl, which confirms our study (
13).
There is still much controversy about the type (absorbable or non-absorbable) and pattern (continuous or interrupted) of the suture in incision complications (
14,
15). Notably, the appropriate suture should be selected depending on the procedure. Some prefer the continuous form as it spreads pressure throughout the wound and decreases tissue ischemia. However, much evidence in the urologic field regarding fascia repair is granted from general surgery (
16). On the contrary, interrupted suturing can lead to wound infection and incision hernia by creating ischemia and necrosis due to multiple nodes and varying degrees of node tension. Finally, the type of knot (forwarder or surgeon knot) might affect suture outcomes (
17). The PDS suture is superior, but it was not employed in our center due to its high cost and scarcity.
4.1. Conclusions
The fascia repair could be treated with Vicryl suture in a continuous form in all urologic surgeries, with a very low rate of wound infection and hernia at the operation site, sinus formation, and long-term surgical site discomfort. However, we suggest more research to confirm the Vicryl suture safety in urologic fascia repairs.