In the last two decades, there have been significant advancements in surgical interventions for renal tract stone disease, particularly with the introduction of minimally invasive techniques like ESWL and PCNL (
10). PCNL has become a widely utilized procedure among patients with renal calculi (
16). Due to the high recurrence rates of renal stones, these patients often require additional intervention. Previous studies suggested that individuals who have undergone open interventions in the past may experience higher failure rates with subsequent PCNL procedures (
17). However, this study compared four groups with different histories of renal surgery. It determined that the type of previous stone surgery did not impact the outcomes or complications of subsequent PCNL procedures. These findings align with other studies that have demonstrated the successful execution of PCNL with minimal risk of complications in patients who have previously undergone open surgery or PCNL (
10,
18).
In the present study, no statistically significant difference was observed between the four groups concerning gender, age, and BMI. However, the patient's mean age in the group with a history of open surgery was higher than the other three groups. No significant difference was found between the groups concerning demographic characteristics, which is in line with the literature (
19).
Based on the findings of the present investigation, the patients with a history of previous open surgery exhibited a higher mean duration of operative time. This result is in accordance with earlier studies which have also documented prolonged operative times for individuals who had previously undergone open nephrolithotomy (
18,
20). Several factors may potentially contribute to the extended duration of PCNL procedures in patients with prior open surgery or PCNL. These factors include the inherent challenges associated with dilating the tract within a scarred collecting system and perinephric spaces, difficulties encountered during the extraction of stone fragments using grasping forceps and rigid nephroscopy within a scarred kidney, as well as the meticulous fixation of the kidney within the retroperitoneum.
The present investigation demonstrated comparable durations of hospitalization among the four examined groups, with no patients necessitating extended stays in the hospital. Inconsistencies regarding hospitalization outcomes subsequent to PCNL have been noted in prior research (
10,
18,
19). Certain studies have indicated prolonged hospital stays for individuals who had undergone previous open surgery, contrasting with the findings of our study (
21,
22).
Both study groups, with and without prior open surgery, exhibited long access times. Similar findings were reported by Margel et al. and Khorrami et al., who observed greater access attempts in patients with previous open surgery (
22,
23). Importantly, our study revealed that a history of renal stone surgery did not adversely affect the success rate of PCNL. The success rates were 90% in group one, 86% in group two, 88% in group three, and 82% in group four. These results align with the outcomes reported by Kurtulus et al. (
24), who compared the success rates of patients undergoing initial PCNL surgery for kidney stones with those previously undergoing open kidney stone surgeries. They found no significant difference in cumulative stone-free rates between the two groups. However, other studies have suggested that open stone surgery may increase the failure rate of PCNL (
25,
26). Furthermore, it was observed that success rates declined as the number of accesses increased (
19).
An important finding of this study was that patients who had no prior experience with open surgery but underwent cold compression and received antipyretics showed a significant incidence of postoperative fever. This observation contradicts the findings of Khorrami et al. (
23), which did not identify any differences in fever-related complications.
Hemorrhage, attributed to the kidney's high vascularity, represents a notable complication of PCNL. Hemorrhage of varying degrees is observed in every PCNL procedure (
27), predominantly stemming from venous sources and often manageable through conservative measures (
28). Reddy and Shaik reported instances of acute bleeding requiring transfusion among patients without a history of open surgery (
10). In situations where conservative approaches prove ineffective, angioembolization emerges as a successful and efficacious intervention for terminating bleeding, with a reported success rate of 95% (
29). Our study witnessed a limited number of cases necessitating angioembolization, akin to the hemorrhage rate of 0.8% requiring embolization reported by Zhang et al. (
30). Grade 1 and 2 complications were frequently observed in our study cohort. In contrast, no grade 5 complications were encountered, consistent with earlier literature (
5,
31-
33).
The current study was subject to certain limitations, including a limited sample size and a retrospective design, which could potentially impact the strength of the findings. Furthermore, the surgeries were performed by a team comprising consultants and resident doctors, as per the teaching hospital setting, rather than a single surgeon. Notwithstanding these limitations, the study's favorable outcomes regarding the effectiveness of PCNL in this specific patient population may be significant and merit further exploration through a prospective study involving a larger sample size.
5.1. Conclusions
PCNL has emerged as an effective and safe treatment option for kidney stone management, irrespective of prior interventions. This minimally invasive approach offers a viable choice for all patients. Our study revealed that individuals with a history of open surgery exhibited higher levels of hemoglobin loss and longer surgical durations, potentially attributable to underlying histological and anatomical alterations in the kidney. Nevertheless, conducting larger-scale prospective multicenter studies to validate these findings is crucial.