1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Study Design and Setting
3.2. Participants and Sampling
3.3. Randomization and Blinding Method
3.4. Intervention and Control Groups
3.5. Data Collection
3.6. Statistical Analysis
3.7. Ethical Considerations
4. Results
4.1. Safety and Compliance
4.2. Demographic Characteristics
| Variables | Intervention | Control | Total | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y); mean ± SD | 6.34 ± 1.89 | 6.60 ± 1.53 | 6.47 ± 1.7 | 0.534 |
| Gender | 0.626 | |||
| Male | 20 (57.1) | 22 (62.8) | 42 (60.0) | |
| Female | 15 (42.9) | 13 (37.2) | 28 (40.0) | |
| BMI category | 0.761 | |||
| Underweight | 4 (11.4) | 4 (11.4) | 8 (11.4) | |
| Normal weight | 13 (37.1) | 11 (31.4) | 24 (34.2) | |
| Overweight | 17 (48.5) | 17 (48.5) | 34 (48.6) | |
| Obese | 1 (2.8) | 3 (8.5) | 4 (5.7) |
Abbreviation: BMI, Body Mass Index.
a Values are expressed as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated.
4.3. Outcome Definition
4.4. Frequency of Dry Nights
| Time Points | Intervention | Control | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 19.2 ± 3.7 | 18.9 ± 4.3 | 0.629 |
| Month 1 | 24.5 ± 4.8 | 22.4 ± 5.1 | < 0.001 |
| Month 2 | 26.0 ± 4.6 | 23.2 ± 4.6 | < 0.001 |
a Values are expressed as mean±SD.
b Dry nights are defined as calendar days without any episodes of nocturnal enuresis.
c Unadjusted descriptive means and P-values from independent t-tests are presented for descriptive purposes only.
d The main inferential results, including adjusted mean differences from the linear mixed-effects model, are provided in Table 3.
| Time Points | Intervention (N =35) | Control (N = 35) | Adjusted Mean Difference (Intervention - Control) | 95% CI | P-Value (LMM) | Cohen’s d (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month 1 | 24.5 ± 4.8 | 22.4 ± 5.1 | 2.1 | 1.2 - 3.0 | 0.002 | 0.45 (0.20 - 0.70) |
| Month 2 | 26.0 ± 4.6 | 23.2 ± 4.6 | 2.8 | 1.8 - 3.8 | < 0.001 | 0.60 (0.35 - 0.85) |
| Group×time interaction | - | - | - | - | 0.004 | - |
a Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
b Adjusted mean differences and P-values were obtained from a linear mixed-effects model with a random intercept for participant, and fixed effects for group, time, and the group×time interaction, with baseline dry nights included as a covariate.
c Missing data were addressed by multiple imputation in the intention-to-treat (ITT) sensitivity analysis.
d The per-protocol analysis included participants with greater than 90% compliance.
Adjusted marginal means for number of dry nights per 30-Day Period: Mean number of dry nights recorded at baseline (before treatment), month 1, and month 2 for both intervention and control groups. Dry nights are defined as calendar days without any episodes of nocturnal enuresis, based on caregiver reports. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sample size per group at each time point (n = 35). The intervention group showed a statistically significant increase in dry nights from month 1 onward compared to the control group.
4.5. Adjusted Mean Differences in Dry Nights
Abbreviation: ITT, intention-to-treat.
a Values are expressed by 95% confidence interval (CI).
b Results confirm that main LMM conclusions are robust to analytic approach.
c The ITT analysis using multiple imputation for missing data.
d Per-protocol: participants with > 90 % compliance.
4.6. Responder Analysis at Month 2
| Outcomes | Intervention | Control | Risk Difference (95% CI) | P-Value | NNT (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≥ 50% reduction in episodes | 28 (80.0) | 16 (45.7) | 34.3 (15.1 - 53.5) | 0.001 | 2.9 (1.9 - 6.6) |
| Complete dryness | 20 (57.1) | 8 (22.9) | 34.2 (13.2 - 55.2) | 0.002 | 2.9 (1.8 - 7.6) |
Abbreviation: NNT, number needed to treat.
a Risk difference and NNT calculated using standard methods for binary outcomes.
b Values are expressed by No. (%) or 95% confidence interval (CI).

