The clinical and laboratory data are summarized in
Box. The patients’ ages ranged from 47 to 82 years (mean, 69 years). In 24 cases, abnormalities were found in the digital rectal examination, including increased volume of the gland and/or induration of one or both prostatic lobes, suggesting carcinoma. In the remaining 10 cases, the prostate was normal or slightly increased in volume as ascertained by digital rectal examination. The prostate-specific antigen level ranged from 4.8 to 27 ng/mL (mean, 14.8 ng/mL). No patient had evidence of systemic disease or metastasis as determined by clinical or radiological studies.
Table 1 summarizes the utility of additional sections in ASAP in the current study and in previous reports.
Table 2 shows the value of additional sections and immunohistochemical analysis of 30 biopsies in the present study. In 4 cases, focal carcinoma was diagnosed using only the additional sections (13.3%). In 2 of these cases, focal areas with carcinoma that were not present in the original sections were observed. In 4 other cases, immunohistochemical analysis was the only useful method for diagnosing cancer. In 9 cases (30%), both methods were useful for classifying focal glandular atypia as carcinoma. However, in 6 biopsies, the criteria for carcinoma were more apparent in the additional sections. Thus, when all methods were used for diagnosis, including additional sections, immunohistochemistry, and a combination of both, 17 biopsies with focal glandular atypia (56.6%) were diagnosed as focal carcinomas.
Additional sections revealed several histological criteria for carcinoma in one-third of the biopsies. The most frequent finding included malignant glands with an increased infiltrative pattern, nucleomegaly, hyperchromatic nuclei, nucleoli apparent, rigidity of glandular lumen, and intraluminal basophilic or eosinophilic secretions (
Figures 1,
2,
3,
4). The combination of architectural and cytological findings that enabled a diagnosis of carcinoma varied from one case to another. Thus, in some cases, there was an increased number of neoplastic glands with a clearly infiltrative pattern that was not apparent in the original cuts. These cases might or might not show cytological alterations, such as nucleomegaly, apparent nucleoli, rigidity of the glandular lumen, or intraluminal secretions. In other biopsies, the number of glands was similar in the additional sections compared to the original sections, but there was more apparent nucleomegaly and/or more prominent nucleoli, thereby facilitating a malignant diagnosis. Half of the cases had basophilic or eosinophilic intraluminal secretions, and 2 cases had crystalloids. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, glomeruloid bodies, collagenous micronodules, or neural infiltration were not observed in the additional sections in any of the cases.
Interestingly, in 4 of the 30 biopsies, the diagnosis of carcinoma was established only by additional sections, as the immunohistochemical analysis did not demonstrate an absence of basal cells. Two of these biopsies showed other areas with malignant glands that were not evident in the original sections. These results emphasize the importance of analyzing additional sections in addition to immunohistochemical analysis. In practice, it will be important for the additional levels to be continuous with the ASAP area to prevent tissue loss. As such, communication between the pathologist and the laboratory technician is valuable.