Cover image of the article: Effect of Erdosteine on Cyclosporine Induced Chronic Nephrotoxicity

Image Credit:Nephro-Urol Mon

Effect of Erdosteine on Cyclosporine Induced Chronic Nephrotoxicity

Authors

Carlo Briguori1,*, Gerolama Condorelli2
How to Cite:Briguori C, Condorelli G. Effect of Erdosteine on Cyclosporine Induced Chronic Nephrotoxicity. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2012;4(2):487-488. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.2694

Dear Editor,
Drugs and exogenous toxins, including aminoglycosides, amphotericin B, cisplatin, and radiocontrast media, may cause acute kidney injury (1). The manifestations which indicate that damage is occurring are a sudden increase in kidney injury biomarkers (NGAL [neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin], KIM-1 [kidney injury molecule-1], etc.) and kidney failure (creatinine, cystatin C). This implies a requirement for close monitoring of kidney function with eventual dose reduction or even the interruption of drug administration. However, it may eventuate that, even if the source of the damage is stopped, it could still result in permanent kidney failure. One of the major causes of kidney injury driven by different compounds is an increase in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), activation of stress kinases and thus apoptosis (2, 3).
In their study “Protective effect of erdosteine on cyclosporine induced chronic nephrotoxicity in rats,” Uz et al. discuss the role of cyclosporine (CsA) in nephrotoxicity. CsA therapy causes dose and time related deterioration of kidney functions by inducing an increase in free radical production (4). The authors describe erdosteine, a mucolytic and anti-inflammatory agent used for the treatment of chronic pulmonary diseases, as having protective effects against CsA-induced nephropathy. This was assessed by evaluating changes in the levels of antioxidant enzymes and nitric oxide (NO) and by the study of kidney morphology through immunohistochemistry. Erdosteine has an antioxidant activity thanks to the presence of two blocked sulfhydryl groups. Erdosteine induced a marked decrease in proximal tubule degenerative changes compared with the CsA group. Moreover, the activity of the anti-oxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase (GSHPx), increased after CsA + erdosteine treatment. Also increments of malondialdehyde (MDA) and nitric oxide (NO) levels in the rats’ kidneys were prevented by its administration.
Recently the activity of other mucolitics has been proven to result in a reduction of kidney oxidative damage. Our studies have demonstrated that N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a thiol compound classically known as a mucolytic agent, is a potent antioxidant that scavenges a wide variety of oxygen-derived free-radicals and may be capable of preventing acute kidney injury (5, 6). Our in vitro data, using kidney cells, confirmed that NAC may be effective due to its antioxidant properties by preventing contrast-induced renal cell apoptosis. This effect was dose-dependent: indeed, the greater the dose, the larger the cellular benefit. Although still controversial, the protective effects of NAC in preventing contrast-induced acute kidney injury have been observed in several clinical studies and meta-analyses (6, 7).
In conclusion, mucolytic agents seem to be effective in preventing drug–induced nephrotoxicity. Additional studies are however, warranted in order to clarify whether these drugs should be included in our clinical practice.

Footnotes

  • Please cite this paper asBriguori C, Condorelli G. Effect of Erdosteine on Cyclosporine Induced Chronic Nephrotoxicity. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2012;4(2):487-8. DoI: 10.5812/numonthly.2694

  • Financial DisclosureThere is no financial disclosure.

References

  • 1.
    Rosner MH, Okusa MD. Drug-associated acute renal failure in the intensive care unit. In: de Broe ME, Porter GA, Bennett WM, Verpooten GA, editors. Clinical Nephrotoxins: Renal Injury from Drugs and Chemicals. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press; 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84843-3_2.
  • 2.
    Bakris GL, Lass N, Gaber AO, Jones JD, Burnett JC, Jr. Radiocontrast medium-induced declines in renal function: a role for oxygen free radicals. Am J Physiol. 1990;258(1 Pt 2):F115-20. [PubMed ID: 2301588].
  • 3.
    Kyriakis JM, Banerjee P, Nikolakaki E, Dai T, Rubie EA, Ahmad MF, et al. The stress-activated protein kinase subfamily of c-Jun kinases. Nature. 1994;369(6476):156-60. [PubMed ID: 8177321]. https://doi.org/10.1038/369156a0.
  • 4.
    Uz E, Uz B, Kaya A, Akdeniz D, Ruzgaresen NB, Uz E, et al. The protective effect of erdosteine on cyclosporine induced chronic nephrotoxicity in rats. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2012;3(4):280-4.
  • 5.
    Romano G, Briguori C, Quintavalle C, Zanca C, Rivera NV, Colombo A, et al. Contrast agents and renal cell apoptosis. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(20):2569-76. [PubMed ID: 18468994]. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn197.
  • 6.
    Briguori C, Quintavalle C, De Micco F, Condorelli G. Nephrotoxicity of contrast media and protective effects of acetylcysteine. Arch Toxicol. 2012;85(3):165-73. [PubMed ID: 21140133]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-010-0626-5.
  • 7.
    Acetylcysteine for prevention of renal outcomes in patients undergoing coronary and peripheral vascular angiography: main results from the randomized Acetylcysteine for Contrast-induced nephropathy Trial (ACT). Circulation. 2012;124(11):1250-9.

Copyright

Copyright © 2012, Nephrology and Urology Research Center. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

20
Jun
2012
Erdosteine Therapy for Renal Failure: Current Perspectives

Erdosteine Therapy for Renal Failure: Current Perspectives

Arunachalam Muthuraman

Muthuraman A. Erdosteine Therapy for Renal Failure: Current Perspectives. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2012;4(3):. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.2628

29
Oct
2013
Dyslipidemia in Renal Transplant Recipients Treated With Cyclosporine A

Dyslipidemia in Renal Transplant Recipients Treated With Cyclosporine A

Mariusz Niemczyk

Niemczyk M. Dyslipidemia in Renal Transplant Recipients Treated With Cyclosporine A. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2013;5(5):1005-1005. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.14167

14
Nov
2016
Comparison of the Efficacy of Tacrolimus Versus Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy

Comparison of the Efficacy of Tacrolimus Versus Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy

Hamidreza Omrani,
Sima Golmohamadi,
Fateme Hichi,
Masoud Sadeghi

Omrani H, Golmohamadi S, Hichi F, Sadeghi M. Comparison of the Efficacy of Tacrolimus Versus Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2017;9(1):e42473. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.42473

1
Mar
2012
Cyclosporine Effects on Pediatric Kidney Recipients

Cyclosporine Effects on Pediatric Kidney Recipients

Maryam Hami

Hami M. Cyclosporine Effects on Pediatric Kidney Recipients. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2012;4(2):491-492. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.2659

13
Jan
2014
No Association Between Cyclosporine Levels and Dyslipidemia?

No Association Between Cyclosporine Levels and Dyslipidemia?

Guido Filler

Filler G. No Association Between Cyclosporine Levels and Dyslipidemia?. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2014;6(1):e14296. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.14296

More by these authors

Carlo BriguoriPubMedScholar
Gerolama CondorelliPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics
Indexed in