The results of the present study demonstrated that vitamin C supplementation cannot decrease serum level of PTH significantly.
According to data, the incidence of CKD is higher in men and people older than 45 years. In this study, the mean age of patients was also 60.66 (SD 11.47) years, and most of them (60.5%) were male and 90.8% of patients were older than 45 years. These results are supported by earlier studies.
In other studies more than 50% hemodialysis patients were jobless, but in our study only 3.9% of the patients were unemployed, and the rest (96.1%) were retired or employed. This could indicate that the government and insurance companies provide appropriate support for hemodialysis patients in Iran. Like similar studies, in this study diabetes and hypertension were the most common causes of nephropathy (diabetes and hypertension 77.7%).
In 2008, Richter proposed that there is an inverse correlation between serum level of vitamin C and biointact PTH (
3). He measured serum vitamin C level, while prescribing no vitamin C analogues.
Similarly, in 2011 Sanadgol reported that vitamin C is able to reduce biointact PTH level. Although there were no placebo and control groups in his study, he confirmed that there is an inverse correlation between vitamin C and SHPT in hemodialysis patients (
1).
In 2011, Sanadgol and his colleagues measured the mean level of biointact PTH after a prescription of 200 mg of vitamin C, three times a week for 3 months, and explained that the mean of serum PTH was notably reduced at the end of the first month after the prescription of vitamin C. But this influence became gradually weaker after 2 months, so that serum level of PTH increased in 3 months; however, it was still lower than the baseline level. They stated that the reason of this finding may be associated with decreased calcium-sensing sensitivity of receptors to vitamin C.
In spite of Sanadgol study, we observed no significant association between serum levels of PTH and vitamin C. It can be associated with sample size diversity (21 versus 76), usage of placebo, randomization, and control group in our study.
At the initiation of the plan, we selected patients with serum PTH levels more than 200 pg/mL, and randomly divided them into two parallel groups. We prescribed 250 mg intravenous vitamin C immediately after hemodialysis for 2 months, and then assessed the PTH level changes. None of our sampled patients recently used vitamin C supplements. Nevertheless, in our study the level of serum PTH was not measured at the end of the first month. The mean of serum PTH decreased at the end of the second month in the intervention group (699.8 versus 441.4). It can be demonstrated that vitamin C influences on the serum level of PTH. But there was a decrease in serum level of PTH in the control group too; however, it was not comparable with the reduction in the intervention group (441.4 versus 424.6). The main cause of the observed diminution in serum levels of PTH at control group is unknown, but it may be associated with what is called “placebo effect”. Also, we should have examined the serum levels of PTH at the termination of the first month after prescription.
Not measuring plasma level of vitamin C before, and after the study, and not specifying the patients who had vitamin C deficiency before study were the limitations in our study which prevented the capability to generalize the findings. Removing these limitations was not a feasible option due to the financial costs, and the limitations of the laboratories capable of providing the circumstance for this test.
Conclusions: This study finding does not warranted therapeutic effect of vitamin C on secondary hyperparathyroidism. Although serum level of PTH decreased in intervention group with supplemental vitamin C, this decrease was observed in placebo group too. Therefore in this study we did not observe any significant association between vitamin C supplementation and secondary hyperparathyroidism.