There are three issues to be discussed in this case. First, during the initial admission of this patient to a different hospital, azotemia was diagnosed as diabetic nephropathy. However, the azotemia was actually due to a prerenal state, because it rapidly resolved with saline infusion. Making this differentiation between the two conditions has an important practical implication. Diabetic nephropathy would signify that this patient would experience a progressive downhill course with the development of end-stage kidney disease. On the other hand, a prerenal state would completely reverse with hydration, as was observed in this case.
Second, hyponatremia was initially attributed to SIADH. While high urinary sodium along with hyponatremia is a feature of SIADH, other features were not consistent with SIADH. The patient was actually volume depleted, a feature not consistent with SIADH. Moreover, the diagnosis of SIADH would require ruling out thyroid and adrenal dysfunction, which was not done in this case. Our patient had hypothyroidism and cortisol deficiency. The combination of volume depletion, hypothyroidism, and cortisol deficiency may have caused elevated ADH levels, which were suppressed with volume repletion, as suggested by diuresis that increased with correction of volume.
An important question is “What caused volume depletion in this patient? Could it be due to hypoaldosteronism?” Serum aldosterone levels were not measured in this case, but hypoaldosteronism was unlikely because ACTH acts only on glucocorticoids and not on mineralocorticoids. Moreover, serum potassium levels were normal in this case. We would have expected hyperkalemia with hypoaldosteronism; however, hyperkalemia is absent in ~50% of patients with primary adrenal insufficiency, which may also be a possibility in the present case.
CSW could have caused volume depletion (
1). Patients with CSW are characterized by high urine output at the time of diagnosis and a further increase in urine output after volume repletion due to the removal of the hypovolemic stimulus for ADH release. Excretion of dilute urine leads to correction of hyponatremia. Indeed, this was observed in our patient. He had high urine output despite being volume depleted on admission and had massive diuresis with correction of hyponatremia after volume repletion. It could be argued that hyponatremia in our patient may have been due to hormonal deficiency. Hypothyroidism and hypoadrenalism lead to hyponatremia in euvolemic states. This patient was in a state of gross dehydration with good urine output at the time of presentation, and his hyponatremia improved following administration of intravenous fluids and not with hormonal supplementation.
The third issue in this case is that although this patient had a pituitary mass, the mass was overlooked in the MRI performed at the other hospital. This indicates that special cuts need to be taken to visualize pituitary tumors. MRI of the pituitary region, involving fine cuts and sagittal and coronal reconstruction, is the gold standard imaging method for pituitary disease (
2). In summary, this case highlights three important conclusions. First, it is important to identify non-diabetic kidney disease in diabetic patients with azotemia because the prognosis may be significantly different. Second, SIADH and CSW are two potential causes of hyponatremia in patients with neurological disorders. The primary distinction lies in the assessment of the volume status (
3). SIADH is a volume-expanded state due to ADH-mediated renal water retention. CSW is characterized by a volume-contracted state resulting from renal salt wasting. Making an accurate diagnosis is important because the therapy for each condition is quite different; vigorous salt replacement is indicated in patients with CSW, while fluid restriction is the treatment of choice in patients with SIADH. Third, proper imaging is important for visualizing pituitary tumors.