The outcome of SUI treatment is perfect if the patient achieves the best urine control, at least for morbidity and improvement in the QOL. Since Delorme used the TOT procedure in 2001 to treat SUI (
9), it is universally performed as a low-invasive method in medical centers. On the other hand, anterior vaginal colporrhaphy with the Kelly’s Plication, despite several reports on its low long-term success rate, is used by gynecologists in numerous centers, including Afzalipour Hospital, to treat SUI.
Evidence supporting the value of combination surgery is still limited in females with POP and SUI and two reviews underscored the need for further research (
11). In the current study, patients were included with a pure SUI complaint, without pelvic pain or sense of POP and cystocele grades of I or II according to the pelvic organ prolapse-quantification (POP-Q) classification. Accordingly, no additional vaginal prolapse surgery was performed in the TOT group or the TOT procedure in the anterior colporrhaphy with the Kelly plication group.
In the current study, there was no significant difference after a one-year follow-up between the two procedures. The obtained results showed that a short operation time and a short Foley fixation duration were the benefits of the TOT procedure, compared with anterior colporrhaphy with the Kelly plication.
Regarding the operative complications, there were no urethral or bladder injuries in the two groups. Vaginal erosion and dyspareunia were reported in several studies on the TOT procedure, but there were no such complications in the TOT subjects (
12) of the current study. However, in the anterior colporrhaphy with the Kelly’s plication group, dyspareunia continued in 10% of the cases. There was no de novo urgency in the anterior colporrhaphy with the Kelly’s Plication group, whereas 6.6% of the 30 cases in the TOT group had de novo urgency. In a study on the TOT, among 604 subjects, the de novo urgency rate was 1.5% in 131 cases after a one-year follow-up (
13). A study on the TOT and laparoscopic Burch procedures and another study on the TOT procedure found de novo urgency in 5.2% of 16 TOT cases and 3.7% of 54 TOT cases, respectively (
14,
15). The complications of the TOT procedure in a study on 81 subjects were 4.9% vaginal erosion, 4.9% de novo urgency, 1.2% unrecognized vesicovaginal fistula and 3.7% urinary retention plus postoperative residue (
16). One of the reasons for such differences between the results is probably the dissimilarity of sample size.
In all available sources, there is no clinical trial to compare anterior colporrhaphy with the Kelly plication and the TOT procedure, but these two modalities are assessed separately and compared with other methods.
In the TOT group, the cure rates at one month, six months and one year follow-ups were 86.7%, 80% and 80%, respectively. Different studies from 2003 to 2008 reported cure rates in the TOT groups from 80.5% to 96% at four months to 40 months follow-ups. In contrast, Mellier et al. had 100% pure SUI cases with a 95% cure rate in the TOT group (
12). In another study with 17 ± 4.7 months of follow-up, the objective cure rate in the TOT group was 89.9% (
17). In a randomized clinical trial on 40 subjects with SUI, there was no significant difference between the laparoscopic Burch and TOT procedures after a six-months follow-up, and the cure rate in the TOT group was 84.2% (
14). A clinical trial on the treatment of 35 SUI patients, who underwent the TOT procedure, showed a 91.4% cure rate, 8.6% improvement rate and no failure after an average follow-up period of 14 months, which is, albeit better than the current study results, of no significance (
10). Another research on the TOT efficacy to manage SUI after a one-year follow-up reported a subjective cure rate of 90.7% among 54 patients, while anterior and posterior colporrhaphy was done in 81.5% of the patients and vaginal hysterectomy in 9.25% (
15). A comparison between the TOT and Transobturator Adjustable tape (TOA) procedures with six months of follow-up reported that 72.3% of the 47 patients were cured in the TOT group, which is a relatively lower rate than that of the current study (
18).
Two other clinical trials on the TOT to treat SUI with a sample size almost similar to that of the current study were previously conducted. In the study on the tension-free vaginal tape method versus the TOT procedure, there was a 91.4% cure rate in the TOT group after a mean follow-up period of 30 months. In the other study on the TOT versus laparoscopic Burch procedures, the cure rate in the TOT group was 90.3% after a mean follow-up period of 22 months. In both studies, there were no significant differences between the two procedures after the follow-ups (
19,
20).
In the current study, 80%, 70% and 66.7% of the patients were cured one, six and twelve months after anterior colporrhaphy with the Kelly’s plication, respectively. There are success rate reports of about 37% - 84% in a five-year follow-up (
8). In a study, the comparison between the Burch colposuspension and anterior colporrhaphy with the Kelly’s plication showed a 75% success rate in the latter modality after six months and there was no significant difference between the two procedures (
21). A long-term study on anterior colporrhaphy with the Kelly plication to treat SUI found no failure after a one-year follow-up, but 46.8% of the cases had failure after a five-year follow-up (
8). Elsewhere, a study on the long-term advantages of the Kelly plication to treat SUI reported the 50% recurrence rate of SUI after two years (
22). In six studies between 1995 and 2005, which compared anterior colporrhaphy with the Kelly plication and the other methods of SUI treatment, the cure rates in anterior colporrhaphy with the Kelly plication groups were 55% - 71% (
23).
The foremost among the limitations of the current study were the small sample size, short-term follow-up and lack of a QOL questionnaire. Further studies with greater sample sizes, use of QOL questionnaires, and long-term follow-ups are required to confirm the results of the current study.
The current study concluded no significant difference between the TOT procedure and anterior colporrhaphy with the Kelly plication to treat SUI at short-term follow-ups. Nevertheless, the TOT cure rate was higher than that of anterior colporrhaphy with the Kelly plication during the follow-ups. According to the aforementioned studies and referenced literature, the success rate in anterior colporrhaphy with the Kelly’s plication may decrease in the long term, while there are limited long-term follow-up studies on the TOT procedure. Since the outcome rates of each follow-up in the current study were quite close between the two groups, it was supposed that increasing the sample size would not have made a significant difference to the results. Nonetheless, it is likely that in a long-term follow-up, the results change.