This study aimed to design a master's degree curriculum in spiritual health, following Tyler's model, through a three-phase approach (
17).
In the initial phase, the primary objective is to assess the existing state of spiritual health education programs and examine the historical and practical aspects through an extensive literature review. A comprehensive search was conducted across relevant international databases, including Google, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, ERIC, PubMed, CINAHL, EBSCO, ProQuest, Elsevier, Medline, SCOPUS, and Science Direct. The search terms utilized were (spiritual health OR spirituality) AND (program OR curriculum) AND (education OR training).
The gathered articles underwent an initial screening process by two researchers (the first and second authors) to evaluate the relevance of their titles and content. Any articles deemed irrelevant were excluded. The remaining articles, focusing on the experiences of individuals in the realm of spiritual health education in Iran and other countries, were then reviewed by two additional researchers (the third and fourth authors). These researchers were responsible for extracting relevant content pertaining to spiritual health education from the articles and evaluating them in accordance with the research objectives and the cultural and religious context of Iran. In the event of any challenges or disagreements during the content extraction process, a final discussion and consultation were conducted with another researcher (the sixth author).
In the second phase, a focus group discussion on the spiritual health curriculum was conducted, involving eight experts and scholars with extensive experience in spiritual health and curriculum development. All participants held Ph.D. degrees in medical education and had practical knowledge of integrating spirituality into education. The focus group meeting (as outlined in
Table 1) was organized in consideration of the time constraints, resulting in a productive session lasting three hours with two half-hour breaks interspersed. Initially, the focus group session was led by the proficient moderator (the first author), who holds a Ph.D. and possesses a decade of experience in conducting research in the field of spirituality. Drawing upon available resources and the insights gained from the focus group discussion, the initial draft of the program titled "Master's Degree in Spiritual Health Curriculum" was developed. This curriculum was designed in accordance with Tyler's curriculum development model (
17), encompassing four essential steps: Defining the educational objectives, identifying relevant educational experiences, organizing the experiences, and evaluating the achievement of the objectives. Tyler's model is considered one of the oldest, simplest, and most extensively utilized models in curriculum design. Its user-friendly nature, grounded in four distinct stages, has contributed to its popularity and widespread adoption (
18). Upon extracting relevant content pertaining to spirituality, the contents were subsequently designed following Tyler's model, encompassing four key steps, namely:
● Part one: Objectives of the spiritual health curriculum
● Part two: Content of the spiritual health curriculum
● Part three: Teaching and learning opportunities for the spiritual health curriculum
● Part four: Evaluation of the spiritual health curriculum
| Number | Field of Study | Academic Ranking | Age (y) | Male/Female | Job Experience (y) |
|---|
| 1 | Medical education | Professor | 62 | Male | 28 |
| 2 | Nursing education | Associate professor | 52 | Female | 21 |
| 3 | Islamic sciences and theology | Professor | 54 | Male | 25 |
| 4 | Health policy | Associate professor | 51 | Male | 20 |
| 5 | Social medicine | Associate professor | 49 | Female | 18 |
| 6 | Curriculum planning | Professor | 55 | Male | 25 |
| 7 | Health psychology | Associate professor | 48 | Female | 19 |
| 8 | Medical ethics | Associate professor | 43 | Female | 15 |
In the final phase, the nominal group process was employed to facilitate consensus among the experts. The initial draft of the curriculum was presented to 15 experts in a face-to-face setting to gather their consensus ideas. Experts were encouraged to provide feedback on any existing items. The selected experts for this stage formed an interdisciplinary team comprising specialists in areas such as spirituality, spiritual well-being, medical ethics, psychology, social medicine, medical education, nursing, and clergy.
Table 2 presents the demographic characteristics of these experts. The draft underwent revisions based on the experts' feedback to ensure agreement on each item and was subsequently returned for a final vote. This iterative process continued until an 80 percent agreement was reached. The nominal group process is particularly useful when designing programs or services that are being introduced for the first time or when the consensus among experts is lacking (
19,
20).
| Number | Field of Study | Academic Ranking | Age (y) | Male/Female | Job Experience (y) |
|---|
| 1 | Medical education | Professor | 62 | Male | 28 |
| 2 | Medical education | Assistant professor | 35 | Female | 8 |
| 3 | Medical education | Assistant professor | 37 | Female | 9 |
| 4 | Nursing education | Associate professor | 52 | Female | 21 |
| 5 | Islamic sciences and theology | Professor | 54 | Male | 25 |
| 6 | Health policy | Associate professor | 51 | Male | 20 |
| 7 | Social medicine | Associate professor | 49 | Female | 18 |
| 8 | Curriculum planning | Professor | 55 | Male | 25 |
| 9 | Health psychology | Associate professor | 48 | Female | 19 |
| 10 | Medical ethics | Associate professor | 43 | Female | 15 |
| 11 | Islamic sciences | Associate professor | 52 | Male | 21 |
| 12 | Islamic sciences | Assistant professor | 48 | Male | 19 |
| 13 | Islamic sciences | Professor | 60 | Male | 24 |
| 14 | Psychiatrist | Professor | 65 | Female | 27 |
| 15 | Health in disaster | Assistant professor | 40 | Female | 12 |