This study employed a qualitative content analysis approach, using semi-structured interviews with experienced counselors. The data were analyzed inductively to identify key themes relevant to protocol development. While this study outlines essential elements of a potential protocol, it does not include implementation procedures or standardized operational guidelines, which require further research and testing.
To achieve the first aim, semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposefully selected counselors who demonstrated maximum variation in their professional experiences. Participants were chosen to represent diverse demographic and professional profiles, including gender, educational level (master’s and PhD), marital status (married and divorced), and parental status.
The researcher obtained a list of licensed counseling centers in Tehran from the Support and Executive Affairs Department of the Iranian Psychological Association. From each of the 22 municipal districts, two centers were identified based on socioeconomic status, with the second center serving as a backup in case the first declined participation. Initial contact was made with center managers to confirm the presence of eligible premarital counselors. Upon confirmation, an invitation message was sent to potential participants, including a link to a demographic form. Those who completed the form were considered willing to participate and were further screened for inclusion criteria.
Interviews were conducted individually at the counselors’ workplaces. Before each interview, participants were informed about the study’s purpose, assured of confidentiality, and reminded of their right to withdraw at any time. The first question — “How do you perceive your professional role as a premarital counselor?” — was designed to elicit open-ended narratives and facilitate rapport. With participants’ consent, interviews were audio-recorded, and observational notes were taken during the sessions.
Interviews continued until theoretical saturation was reached, which occurred after the 18th interview. Saturation was determined based on the repetition of themes and the absence of new conceptual insights. Following each interview, transcripts were reviewed, coded, and analyzed to identify emerging patterns. The process included descriptive reading, extraction of significant statements, formulation of meaning units, theme development, and validation through member checking.
To support the second objective — protocol development — document analysis was conducted in parallel with the interview process. This allowed for triangulation between lived experiences and existing professional guidelines. The final protocol was informed by both empirical data and documentary evidence, ensuring contextual relevance and practical applicability.
3.1. Data Analysis
The primary goal of data analysis in this study was to identify and describe how premarital counselors perceive their professional experiences within the counseling setting. Following each interview, the audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and subjected to a multi-step phenomenological analysis process.
The analysis began with a holistic reading of each transcript to grasp the overall narrative and emotional tone conveyed by the participants. Significant statements and phrases were then extracted, representing key conceptual insights into their lived experiences. These statements were reformulated into meaning units and organized into subthemes and overarching themes. Each theme was described in detail to reflect the depth and nuance of participants’ perceptions.
To ensure the credibility and trustworthiness of the findings, several validation strategies were employed:
- Member checking: Participants were invited to review and confirm the interpretations of their narratives.
- Prolonged engagement: The researcher maintained extended contact with the research setting and participants to deepen contextual understanding.
- Peer debriefing: Interpretations were discussed with colleagues to refine thematic accuracy.
- External audit: Social work professionals reviewed the coding and thematic structure to confirm consistency and reliability.
The data were analyzed using MAXQDA (VERBI Software, Berlin, Germany), a qualitative content analysis software, which facilitated systematic coding and theme development. To enhance transferability, thematic codes were reviewed collaboratively with other researchers to ensure conceptual clarity and applicability across diverse counseling contexts.
This rigorous analytic process enabled the emergence of rich, layered insights into how premarital counselors construct meaning around their professional roles, challenges, and contributions — ultimately informing the development of a culturally grounded competency-enhancement protocol.