Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a dominantly inherited disorder characterized by the formation of hundreds to thousands of colorectal adenomas by the second or third decade of life (
1-
4). Without surgical treatment the presentation of malignant tumors inevitably occurs, usually before the age of 40 years, emphasizing the importance of an early detection by screening of all risk family members (
1). The identification and characterization of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene in 1991 has facilitated the direct identification of germline mutations responsible for FAP (
5-
7). Knowledge of the specific APC mutation is of great importance for the presymptomatic diagnosis of FAP. Indeed, once the specific disease-causing mutation has been identified in a family, the need for annual endoscopic examination can be omitted in those who test negative, whereas the surveillance has to be improved by a closer follow-up by a yearly sigmoidoscopy beginning after the childhood, in those who test positive. To perform the mutation analysis of the APC gene, a large number of well-established techniques are currently available including RNase protection assay (
8), single stand conformation analysis (
9), hetroduplex analysis (
10), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (
11), protein truncation test (
12), colorimetric assay (
13), chemical cleavage of mismatch (
14) and dHPLC (
15). Overall, frequency of identifying the causative mutation ranges from 21% to 82% (
16-
18). The main reasons for this low detection rate are that mutations in FAP have an extremely heterogeneous spectrum and are scattered all along the 15 exons of the APC gene, which is a rather large gene with an open reading frame of 8535 nucleotides coding for a predicted final protein product of 2843 amino acids with a mass of 311 KDa (
6,
7). Another reason is the sensitivity of the mutation detection technique used itself (
19). The remaining reasons for the lack of identification of the causative mutation are the possibility of clinical misdiagnosis of FAP, the lack of exploration of regulatory elements influencing APC expression and the possibility of non-allelic genetic heterogeneity in FAP (
16,
17). For the genetic counseling of FAP families, Cottrell et al (1992) (
9) advocated a hierarchical approach to the genetic analysis, starting with a search for the APC gene mutations, followed by linkage studies using closely linked markers. In the same way, we proposed a strategy for APC mutation screening for the first time in Mashhad, Ghaem hospital, Iran. First a rapid screening of a large area of APC by analyzing the 5' half of exon 15, second, an analysis of APC exons 1-14, third, a screening of the remaining part of APC exon 15.