Underprivileged provinces, particularly Sistan and Baluchestan, are characterized by ethnic, religious, and cultural diversity. Historical deprivation in infrastructure, low literacy levels, and provincial vastness directly impact university management. Manager selection must consider socio-cultural and ethnic factors, which can influence optimal selection processes. Political issues, policies adopted by various governments, and internal provincial political conditions have been influential over the years. Lindlöf et al. found in Sweden that appointing managers with political affiliations to public organizations presents both advantages and disadvantages for policymakers. The appointment of administrative and executive managers to ensure political commitment to strategies for increasing executive system efficiency, coupled with reactive politicization resulting in decreased executive system efficiency, demonstrates serious paradoxes in administrative affairs (
5).
One of the most significant program weaknesses is human resource management challenges, including structural issues, improper and non-transparent changes in job duties, missions, recruitment of temporary and inefficient staff, low employee motivation in service delivery, disregard for job positions and individual needs, and sudden increases in workload for field-level personnel. Given these challenges and needs, adopting new evidence-based approaches in health system management and policy-making could improve health status in Sistan and Baluchestan province.
5.1. Policy Implementation
5.1.1. Micro and Medium Levels
Policymakers are recommended to:
1. Prioritizing local conditions: Considering provincial cultural, social, economic, and ethnic characteristics in manager selection and health policy development and implementation to enhance program effectiveness.
2. Strengthening management: Adopting transparent and merit-based policies in the recruitment and promotion of managers to increase university efficiency and productivity.
5.1.2. Macro Level
Human resource development: (1) Designing and implement appropriate educational and professional programs to improve service quality; (2) providing better conditions and benefits to attract and retain local and non-local specialists; (3) employment and payment equity – establishing a transparent and fair system for staff recruitment and compensation.