The results showed that ST is effective in improving the dimensions of diabetes self-management in adolescents with T1D. These results were in line with the findings of some previous research (
28,
29,
33). In explaining this finding, it can initially be stated that diabetes is a chronic disorder that causes numerous metabolic problems (
1), thus necessitating a complex and daily self-management diet, including carbohydrate counting, insulin-balanced BG activity, and blood monitoring.
On the other hand, as one of the paths of ST to managing T1D, it should be said that spirituality can interfere with coping sources, especially when patients neglect their care activities and rely on prayer and/or meditation to manage their illness (
29). In this way, spirituality seeks to enhance and strengthen the patient's coping resources and proposes strategies such as prayer or meditation along this path.
The second point is that spirituality can even make and distinguish people's acute activities of existing diseases. Spirituality refers to the meaning or purpose of life, the search for integrity, and the relationship with a creature or spiritual reality. Spirituality involves the search for meaning and purpose, through which one establishes one's relationship with time, oneself, others, and God (
28). Moreover, this therapeutic effect of spirituality is another path in which spirituality can be beneficial. This path of ST can help to deal with chronic diseases by providing support, confidence, and hope (
29). Here, managing the symptoms of illness or work that can exacerbate or worsen the disease itself is very valuable.
Another thing is that T1D is specific to adolescents, and they include diabetes management in their daily lives (
12-
14) and fight with the feeling of being different from their peers (
15,
29). Therapeutic therapy enables this struggle by facilitating adaptation to the disease and its symptoms. Studies have shown that individuals with strong spiritual beliefs and values are more resilient to disease, experience fewer acute periods of illness, and have reduced complications (
31,
32). In this way, this struggle becomes a very valuable and meaningful adaptation.
The final point is that ST is not merely stimulating spiritual beliefs but also involves some useful and effective activities. The spiritual beliefs of an individual may be expressed through religion or religious participation, which encompasses involvement in an organized system of beliefs, rituals, and accumulated traditions (
33). Thus, spirituality for adolescents with T1D encompasses not only new spiritual beliefs that can be very useful and effective in combating the disease but also a set of activities that can both embody these spiritual beliefs and create efficient daily activities rather than inefficient and unconstructive involvement.
The results showed that the effectiveness of ACT, based on the dimensions of diabetes self-management, was significant in adolescents with T1D, with some research findings aligning (
23,
24,
26). To explain these findings, it is essential to note that ACT has foundations and principles within its content that facilitate diabetes self-management in patients. Diabetes-related self-care requires that the patient, with the help of doctors, make lifestyle, nutritional, and dietary changes that lead to successful behavioral and attitudinal changes, fostering self-confidence in managing diabetes (
23).
Compared to previous treatment methods, the most important feature of ACT is the improvement of patients' psychological flexibility, which enables them to actively overcome their problems by consciously making changes to become more aware and in touch with their abilities. Patients attempt to modify their behavior momentarily, actively, and intentionally or make continuous efforts to achieve their goals and values (
24). Therefore, ACT facilitates individual characteristics in patients to act and take action to achieve their goals. The ACT encourages the patient to take committed action regarding the problem at hand. With the help of ACT, patients can ground themselves (i.e., see themselves from an objective perspective, observing everything, including their perceptions, feelings, and will), clarify their values (through constructed language aspirations and chosen life directions), and commit to action (choosing behavioral changes that are consistent with values, taking responsibility for actions, and supporting an effective life based on values) (
26). Of course, it must be acknowledged that the context for such committed action is the acceptance of the current situation, including the disease of T1D and its implications.
Acceptance of a diagnosis of T1D, especially in adolescents and young adults, can be a challenging process that significantly affects quality of life and mental health. Research shows that greater acceptance is associated with better adaptation to the disease, improved quality of life, and reduced distress (
26)). Conversely, difficulty accepting the disease can lead to negative emotions that potentially affect mental health and general well-being. In this regard, a meta-analysis by Wang et al. indicated the effectiveness of ACT on self-care behaviors, diabetes acceptance, self-efficacy, anxiety, and depression in type 2 diabetic patients (
18).
The ACT emphasizes the acceptance of unwanted experiences while encouraging value-based behaviors to help individuals resist unwanted emotions, change their perception and response to unwanted thoughts, and control external actions to achieve their valued goals (
23). The ACT provides the context for accepting the disease as a significant challenge for people with T1D and further encourages them to take committed action to combat and treat this significant life challenge.
It was found that despite the effectiveness of ST and ACT on the variable of diabetes self-management, there is no significant difference between the two therapeutic interventions in this effectiveness. There are no similar findings to compare with the current ones, so these findings lead to several important explanations.
First, both therapeutic approaches were effective in improving diabetes self-management in patients with T1D for different reasons that lie at the heart of these therapeutic approaches and were explained. Despite the differences in the content of these two therapeutic approaches, there are also similarities in their content that have led to relatively similar results in working with patients with T1D.
On the one hand, spirituality can interfere with coping resources, especially when patients neglect self-care activities and rely on prayer and/or meditation to manage their illness (28). On the other hand, ACT is an improvement in patients' psychological flexibility that enables them to actively overcome their problems, where they consciously make changes to become more aware and in touch with their abilities. Patients attempt to modify their behavior momentarily, actively, and intentionally or make continuous efforts to achieve established goals and values (
23).