Hematuria is defined as the presence of more than five red blood cells in each microscopic field of a non-centrifuged midstream urine sample (
1,
2).
Hematuria is classified as macroscopic or microscopic. Macroscopic hematuria refers to visible blood in the urine, whereas microscopic hematuria is detected by urinalysis or microscopic examination, with more than five red blood cells in the field of view at 1000x magnification (
3,
4). Hematuria originating from the lower urinary tract may appear red or pink because of hemoglobin oxidation in red blood cells; with greater oxidation, it may appear brown (
3,
4).
Under normal physiological conditions, the glomerular filtration barrier prevents blood from entering the renal collecting system, making hematuria rare. If this barrier is disrupted, red blood cells may pass through the glomerular basement membrane into the urine collecting system (
4). Microscopic hematuria can have various causes, including glomerulonephritis, interstitial nephritis, Alport syndrome, and infections such as cystitis, prostatitis, pyelonephritis, or kidney stones (
5,
6).
In children, factors such as exercise, inflammation, structural disorders, malignancy, trauma, infections, blood disorders such as sickle cell anemia, and congenital renal malformations can contribute to hematuria. Comprehensive assessment, including a detailed history, physical examination, blood-test parameters related to hematuria, urinalysis, and radiological evaluation, is effective for accurate diagnosis and identification of the underlying pathology (
7). Various imaging modalities, including kidney, ureter, and bladder radiography, intravenous pyelography (IVP), computed tomography (CT), ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), can be used to evaluate hematuria. Radiological evaluation combined with cystoscopy is useful for examining the bladder and lower urinary tract for bleeding lesions; however, the imaging techniques studied are not completely satisfactory for ruling out pathology in these organs (
8). At the time of cystoscopy, bilateral retrograde pyelography, in which iodinated contrast is injected through catheters placed in the ureters during cystoscopy and plain radiographs are obtained, may also be performed and is often used to evaluate upper urinary tract pathology (
7).
There is no universal agreement on the optimal imaging approach for hematuria. Traditionally, IVP has been considered the standard method (
7,
9,
10); however, it was developed before the availability of high-resolution ultrasound, CT, and MRI. More recently, multidetector CT, in which each rotation of the radiographic beam produces multiple sets of images rather than a single image, has become routine for evaluation. It provides cross-sectional images and can be reformatted to show the urinary tract in a manner similar to IVP (
11). Because CT uses ionizing radiation, and because pediatric patients may require repeated CT examinations, this modality has a limited role as the first imaging intervention (
11). Similarly, MRI can be used to detect urinary tract abnormalities, but its utility is limited by cost and insufficient supporting data (
11).
Ultrasound is the first imaging modality used for patients with hematuria (
12-
14). Ultrasound has high sensitivity for detecting various pathologies, including urinary tract neoplasms and stones, inflammatory processes, congenital anomalies, vascular lesions, and obstructive causes (
15) (
Figure 1). However, ultrasound has diagnostic limitations in detecting stones or pathological lesions in the ureters. Urography with nephrotomography may also miss small exophytic masses in the anterior and posterior kidneys and small bladder masses (
16,
17). The choice of imaging modality may be influenced by the clinical situation. For example, positive urine cytology may make urography very important, whereas serious risk factors for contrast reactions may make ultrasound more appropriate. When ultrasound is negative and the source of hematuria remains unclear, urography should be added. If urography is negative, CT may be indicated (
10,
17,
18). When ultrasound is used as the initial screening modality, imaging yield may be increased by adding a plain abdominal film.
Typical ultrasound images in the setting of hematuria in childhood (adapted from Horváth et al., Pediatric Nephrology, 2023, with permission). A, Juxtavesical ureteral stone with acoustic shadowing (arrow). B, Nephrolithiasis (arrow: kidney stone). C, Hydronephrosis due to pyeloureteral stenosis (arrow: enlarged pyelon). D, Nephrocalcinosis (arrow: deposition of calcium salts in the papillae of the kidney). E, Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) (arrow: typical cysts in ADPKD). F, Nutcracker syndrome, defined as extrinsic compression of the left renal vein by the superior mesenteric artery and aorta (arrows: AMS, superior mesenteric artery; VCI, inferior vena cava). G, Increased kidney size and inhomogeneous parenchymal hyperechogenicity, including areas of the cortex and medulla, in nephrotic syndrome (arrow: hyperechogenic kidney) (13).
Ultrasound has an important role in children and pregnant women with hematuria, in whom ionizing radiation should be avoided. MRI urography is currently considered an alternative imaging modality for children, pregnant women, and patients with contraindications to iodinated contrast agents. However, MRI urography is not widely accepted in clinical practice, is expensive, and has not been sufficiently evaluated for effectiveness; therefore, it cannot be recommended as an initial examination (
11). The first step in the evaluation of kidney stones is stone detection. The sensitivity of plain abdominal radiography for stone detection is approximately 45% to 58%. Although many stones are radiopaque, radiography alone is not sufficient for evaluating a patient suspected of having a urinary stone. Ultrasonography can detect 90% of stones confined to the kidney (
19). However, its sensitivity for detecting ureteral stones and smaller stones (< 5 mm) is poor. Non-contrast CT remains the gold standard and is indicated in children with persistent symptoms of kidney stones and non-diagnostic ultrasound findings. IVP may be considered in patients with hypercalciuria when medullary sponge kidney is suspected (
20).