Abstract
Keywords
Precision Medicine Neurosurgery Brain Neoplasms Artificial Intelligence Wearable Electronic Devices Epilepsy
1. Context
The healthcare industry faces unprecedented challenges due to an increasing patient population and a longer life expectancy. Consequently, in recent years, the healthcare industry has experienced a shortage of human resources. Nevertheless, relying solely on human capital to meet the rising demand for healthcare services is insufficient (1). According to estimates, approximately 13.8 million people worldwide receive neurosurgical treatments annually (2). However, more than five million low- and middle-income individuals have untreated neurosurgical diseases each year, despite an increase in the number of neurosurgeons to more than 50,000. Therefore, the world needs 23,000 neurosurgeons to fix the neurosurgical shortage, particularly in developing nations. However, educating neurosurgeons is competitive, time-consuming, and costly and requires highly devoted trainers and specialized surgical equipment (3-7).
Therefore, technology has paved the way for human-machine interaction to resolve this issue in the 21st century. With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI), computers can mimic and surpass human intelligence (1). As a result, neurosurgeons can provide their patients with the best possible health care through AI during diagnostic and prognostic procedures and in supporting them during surgical procedures. Aside from creating, analyzing, and storing clinical data, AI is also important for reducing expenses in neurosurgery (8).
Neurosurgery, where technology and medicine are intertwined, can benefit from AI and machine learning since high-tech medical equipment and complex information systems are frequently used in neurosurgery. Furthermore, neurosurgeons have been at the forefront of adopting innovative technology to provide superior patient treatment since Kwoh et al. performed the first modern robotic technique for computed tomography (CT)-guided stereotactic brain surgery in 1988 (9). It is well known that inside and outside operating rooms, neurosurgeons use various noninvasive imaging methods, including CT scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (10, 11). As AI improves the quality of these high-resolution radiological images, invasive diagnostic procedures can be minimized, complications can be identified, and better care can be provided. Additionally, neurosurgery produces a lot of diagnostic and therapeutic data, making it an ideal candidate for machine learning. Accordingly, this article discusses artificial intelligence applications in neurosurgery, particularly concerning epilepsy, brain tumors, and patient evaluation.
2. Patients Evaluation
Due to time constraints and fatigue, primary care physicians may encounter difficulties getting complete medical histories from their patients (12). Data are collected via paper questionnaires or interviews during a patient visit, and the information is then manually recorded in the electronic health record (EHR). Lack of time or training results in missing or poor-quality data (13). Consequently, information gaps can lead to inaccurate diagnoses and a failure to address issues that affect 18 million Americans annually (14).
Thanks to recent technological advancements in AI and natural language processing, AI-based conversational bots can extract meaningful information about a person's personal and family history before the visit (15). Chatbots, avatars, and voice assistants are some of the conversational agents that mimic human communication through text or voice (16). These agents have been used in healthcare to screen, triage, counsel, and manage chronic conditions and train healthcare professionals. Some benefits have been reported, including improving patient engagement, reaching large populations, and supporting populations with poor health literacy (17). For instance, telemedicine for routine monitoring and follow-up visits could benefit people who live in remote areas without access to specialists and reduce the cost and time required to travel to them. In addition, such a patient-centered approach can lead to more frequent and punctual visits (8). It is also beneficial for geriatric patients, given that they are more likely to experience a more significant number of chronic conditions, which may require constant monitoring. However, traveling back and forth to clinics for every issue can be exhausting and not always necessary. Additionally, some of these individuals may have physical or cognitive disabilities, leading to a lower referral rate or the inability to explain their symptoms clearly in short sessions. Consequently, this might result in misdiagnosis (18).
Furthermore, medical technologies, such as wearable devices (WDs), are becoming increasingly crucial for personal analytics since they enable users to monitor their health, record physiological information, and schedule medications while monitoring their physical state. In addition, these technologies provide continuous medical data for monitoring metabolism, detecting and treating diseases, and supporting people in living healthier lifestyles. Likewise, this technology has been successfully utilized in the assessment of motor function in neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease (PD) and Huntington's disease (HD) by analyzing information regarding tremors, abnormal gait, bradykinesia, rigidity, and chorea (19). Besides WDs for detecting resting tremors in PD, vibrotactile stimulators are also used for reducing the severity of resting tremors (20). Another use of WDs is in stroke rehabilitation and recovery. For instance, it is possible to monitor and collect movement data unobtrusively using sensors such as an inertial measurement unit. These sensors can be used to determine a patient's motor deficits and determine treatment options. In addition to monitoring a patient's response to treatment by capturing data during daily life activities, the system will provide immediate feedback to enable patients to undergo more extensive training outside the clinic (21).
Moreover, technology, such as laptops equipped with cameras, can be used to track eye movements and irregularities or determine the underlying cause of the problem. For example, a patient with central nerve palsy caused by cerebral compression can be detected using eye-tracking technology in neurology while watching a movie or television. This method's repeatability and minimal danger make it suitable for many applications. However, it cannot replace the traditional invasive procedure (22-24).
Some smartphone applications have primarily been developed for cognitive change assessment to monitor dementia patients and record their wandering episodes. In addition, they may be able to aid in collecting information concerning potential risk factors for other cognitive disorders and early behavioral changes. For example, an app called "Ivitality" is designed to perform five digitally modified versions of traditional cognitive exams. Another instance is the "Delapp" app, designed to detect delirium in hospitalized patients (25).
Additional research could assist in developing suitable sensors for brain tissues that can detect chemical biomarkers that may cause neurological disorders, such as neurotransmitters. In addition, by collecting consistent and sustained data on vital signs, AI can predict clinical laboratory test results with less error (26).
3. Epilepsy Management
Epilepsy affects approximately 10% of the population at some point in their lives. Unfortunately, despite countless trials to cure epilepsy, antiepileptic drugs may be ineffective for about 30% of these patients. In addition, patients' treatment outcomes vary depending on their intrinsic characteristics, such as seizure types and semiologies, brain lesions, or comorbid neuropsychological dysfunctions, as well as extrinsic factors, including treatment initiation stage and treatment conditions. Accordingly, choosing the proper treatment for each patient necessitates individualized approaches, which is essential for effectively assessing the patient's state (27-30). Hence, AI can contribute to the success of this procedure.
With the development of high-performance computing technology and multiple mathematical algorithms, researchers can analyze increasing data to tailor treatment plans for epileptic patients. There are two main areas of focus for these computational studies: The first is the development of machine learning algorithms derived from large quantities of information obtained from numerous patients to develop computational machines capable of performing specific tasks, such as predicting disease outcomes and automatic diagnosis. Secondly, biophysical in-silico platforms can replicate the individual patient's brain network dynamics using the patient's specific data, enhancing understanding of the pathophysiology and determining the best treatment. Therefore, integrating various types of patient data and analysis results into one platform using computational approaches is essential. These methods could suggest a new paradigm for precision medicine if successfully implemented (31).
Recently, AI-based approaches to epilepsy include automatic seizure detection and prediction, understanding the epileptogenesis, presurgical planning, optimizing the medical and surgical management, including the prediction of seizure freedom and delineation of epileptic networks, development of wearable electronic devices for people with epilepsy, and automated neuroimaging analysis (32, 33).
4. Automated Seizure Detection and Prediction
Applying machine learning to analyzing massive, complex datasets has sparked significant interest in the automated detection of seizures in electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. Various methods, including the support vector machine (34, 35), k-nearest neighbor (36, 37), and deep learning classifiers (38, 39), have been utilized to accomplish this task. In addition, the same algorithm has also been used to predict seizure rates from EEG data using a restricted database, with prediction times up to several minutes (40, 41).
As an alternative to EEG recordings, seizure detection using machine learning has been expanded to non-traditional data sources such as video recordings, surface electromyography (EMG), and mobile devices (EEGs). For instance, a neural network technique was utilized to evaluate video recordings of neonates' bedside-recorded extremity movements, with a specificity and sensitivity of approximately 90% for detecting seizures in neonates (42). Likewise, the sensitivity and specificity were substantially enhanced when EEG data were added (43). Attempts have also been made to classify recordings of nocturnal seizures as tonic, tonic-colonic, or focal motor seizures using infrared camera data, infrared markers attached to anatomic landmarks for motion detection, and artificial neural networks (ANN) (44).
5. Application in Surgical Management of Epilepsy
Regarding epilepsy surgery, although it can increase the likelihood of seizure freedom for eligible patients with drug-resistant epilepsy from 10% to 67% (45), surgery remains underutilized or performed late in disease progression. This operation is likely underutilized due to its mortality and morbidity concerns, while both are comparable to knee and hip replacement surgeries (46). In epilepsy surgical planning and predicting surgical outcomes, especially following temporal lobectomy, machine learning approaches are increasingly applied as a tool for earlier intervention.
According to Grigsby et al., ANNs were used to encode clinical, electrographic, neuropsychological, imaging, and surgical data from 65 patients to predict the outcomes of anterior temporal lobectomy. According to the analysis, Engel I outcomes were predicted with an 80.0% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity, while Engel II outcomes were predicted with 100% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity (47).
Based on the hypothesis that machine learning algorithms could identify epilepsy surgery candidates early in the disease progression, Wissel et al. trained ML algorithms using n-grams extracted from free-text neurology notes, EEG and MRI reports, visit codes, medications, procedures, laboratories, and demographics. Two epilepsy centers were therefore equipped with site-specific algorithms. A total of 5,880 pediatric patients and 7,604 adults were grouped according to their surgical and nonsurgical diagnoses. The study revealed that AI-based models identified adult patients better than pediatrics eligible for surgery. However, it was possible to predict pediatric surgical patients 2.0 years before their presurgical evaluation (48). However, machine learning might not accurately predict long-term outcomes in some cases. Therefore, identifying the patient's epileptic network before epilepsy surgery is essential (49, 50).
6. Brain Tumors
Innovative AI applications in the disciplines of machine learning, natural language processing, computer vision, and robotics have the potential to revolutionize neurosurgical practice, which could have a significant impact on the management of brain tumors, including potential clinical uses of AI in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of brain tumor surgery.
Artificial intelligence might play an essential role in diagnosis, assessing, and planning as part of the preoperative stage of brain tumor management. The first thing to note about its role in diagnosis is that machine learning models, according to previous studies, can diagnose hematological disorders better than physicians (51). For example, Podnar et al. conducted a study that employed machine learning to identify minor differences in routine blood tests, which allowed for the early detection of brain tumors. Most notably, the machine learning algorithm demonstrated a decreasing trend in eosinophil and basophil counts and an upward trend in neutrophil counts and serum glucose among patients. In addition, their model has comparable sensitivity and specificity to CT and MRI, which were 96% and 74%, respectively (52). Hence, scientists believed this model could be utilized as a screening tool for intracranial malignancies; however, it failed to distinguish between primary and secondary brain tumors. In more recent research, Tsvetkov et al. revealed that glioblastoma in patients could be detected by differential scanning fluorimetry with a 92% accuracy using an AI-powered detection tool (53).
Neuroimaging, specifically MRI, has remained the gold standard in diagnosing brain tumors. Nonetheless, a lack of expertise in selecting appropriate MRI sequences can result in a loss of critical clinical findings, excessive medical expenses, or even patient injury. Machine learning has become increasingly crucial in treating brain tumors by automating sequence selections and assisting radiologists in diagnosis. According to Brown and Marotta a natural language processing ML system was developed to analyze MRI brain imaging requests and select the most clinically valuable sequences for MRI brain imaging (54). Radiomics also offers the capability of converting clinical imaging arrays into quantitative characteristics. By mining and validating them using machine-learning algorithms, quantitative imaging biomarkers can be developed for describing intratumoral dynamics (55).
In addition to blood marker tumor screening and optimizing imaging sequences, ML algorithms have been applied to various tasks related to diagnosing and assessing brain tumors. A few examples are as follows:
- Identifying and quantifying the molecular expression of brain tumors
- Detecting metastases within the central nervous system
- Distinguishing primary from metastatic lesions
- Determining the grade of the tumor
- Predicting the presence of genetic mutations
A further benefit of this technology is that it can accurately predict the surgery outcome and stratify the risk before surgery to design a specific treatment plan (56). According to Ko et al., an ML platform could accurately predict the progression and recurrence of meningiomas using only radiological data (57).
As AI technology, particularly computer vision, is rapidly developing, machine learning systems may also play a significant role in treating intraoperative brain tumors. The project will benefit some areas, including intraoperative tumor identification, workflow analysis, robotic surgery, and risk detection (56).
Given that residual peripheral tumor tissue is the leading cause of tumor recurrence in brain tumors, more extensive tumor resection is associated with longer survival time in brain tumors, particularly glioma and GBM (58). Although several imaging modalities are utilized as guidance tools during brain tumor surgery, these imaging techniques have distinct limitations. As an example, the intraoperative neuronavigation system uses preoperative image information derived from CT or MRI to guide surgery in real time; however, due to the phenomenon of brain shift, the accuracy of tumor margin delineation decreases as the surgical procedure progresses (59-62). Integrating deep learning platforms with hyperspectral imaging (HSI) can address this issue for the intraoperative identification of brain tumors. Besides, HSI combines intraoperative imaging with spectroscopy to provide detailed information about the surrounding structures both spatially and molecularly (63, 64). The method was employed by Fabelo et al. as a deep learning platform for the analysis of HSIs of six GBM patients, which included a neural network containing three convolutional layers. Backgrounds were identified with 98% accuracy, while tumor tissue was detected with 42% accuracy. The authors also reported that the system had an 88% sensitivity to categorize images as tumor-free and a 100% specificity, which indicated that this technology performed well when classifying normal tissues (58, 63).
An exciting new application of artificial intelligence is intraoperative workflow analysis, which uses computer vision combined with machine learning platforms to analyze how steps, phases, instruments, gestures, anatomy, and pathology are executed during an operation. The AI-based workflow analysis can provide numerous advantages, including improved intraoperative surgical planning and routing, accurate identification of anatomical structures, identification of risks early, standardization of phases and steps, the creation of operative notes, and contributions to simulations and training programs. In addition, this technology is expected to significantly reduce surgical errors, complications, and operation times within the next few years and enhance surgeons' awareness of potential risks (65-67).
Due to the outstanding data-assimilation capabilities of AI systems, the postoperative phase could profit in various ways, including predicting complications and recurrence, bioinformatic early warning systems, and individualized follow-ups and treatments. Primary spheres of influence include inpatient, outpatient, and oncology care.
In patients with brain tumors, postoperative complication development is influenced by many static and dynamic factors, which can be assessed most effectively using AI techniques. Greater integration of AI in brain tumor surgery could prevent or mitigate postoperative complications such as surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism, adverse drug events, pressure ulcers, falls, and hypoglycemia. These avoidable postoperative problems cause many patients to suffer needlessly. Artificial intelligence can help reduce these common problems (56).
7. Conclusions
Artificial intelligence benefits neurosurgeons as it can be utilized before, during, and after a surgical procedure. A combination of humans and computers can use artificial intelligence to improve healthcare delivery by better matching patients with appropriate procedures, increasing intraoperative activities, providing postoperative follow-ups, and improving access to treatment by leveraging the most recent advances in AI technology. Hence, AI may eventually pave the way for personalized medical care. Precision medicine predicts health outcomes, prognoses disease processes, prevents diseases, reduces surgical complications, and develops numerical models to analyze clinical data. There are applications for AI in both personalized and precision medicine. However, additional research, funding, and interdisciplinary collaboration are required before AI can be widely applied in neurosurgery.
References
-
1.
Aluttis C, Bishaw T, Frank MW. The workforce for health in a globalized context--global shortages and international migration. Glob Health Action. 2014;7(1):23611. [PubMed ID: 24560265]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3926986]. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23611.
-
2.
Dewan MC, Rattani A, Fieggen G, Arraez MA, Servadei F, Boop FA, et al. Global neurosurgery: the current capacity and deficit in the provision of essential neurosurgical care. Executive Summary of the Global Neurosurgery Initiative at the Program in Global Surgery and Social Change. J Neurosurg. 2019;130(4):1055-64. [PubMed ID: 29701548]. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.11.JNS171500.
-
3.
Kato Y, Liew BS, Sufianov AA, Rasulic L, Arnautovic KI, Dong VH, et al. Review of global neurosurgery education: Horizon of Neurosurgery in the Developing Countries. Chin Neurosurg J. 2020;6:19. [PubMed ID: 32922948]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7398343]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-020-00194-1.
-
4.
Solomou G, Murphy S, Bandyopadhyay S, Horsfall HL, Mohan M, Chari A, et al. Neurosurgery specialty training in the UK: What you need to know to be shortlisted for an interview. Ann Med Surg. 2020;57:287-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.07.047.
-
5.
Mooney MA, Yoon S, Cole T, Sheehy JP, Bohl MA, Barranco FD, et al. Cost Transparency in Neurosurgery: A Single-Institution Analysis of Patient Out-of-Pocket Spending in 13 673 Consecutive Neurosurgery Cases. Neurosurgery. 2019;84(6):1280-9. [PubMed ID: 29767766]. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy185.
-
6.
Yoon JS, Tang OY, Lawton MT. Volume-Cost Relationship in Neurosurgery: Analysis of 12,129,029 Admissions from the National Inpatient Sample. World Neurosurg. 2019;129:e791-802. [PubMed ID: 31203075]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.034.
-
7.
Mukhopadhyay S, Punchak M, Rattani A, Hung YC, Dahm J, Faruque S, et al. The global neurosurgical workforce: a mixed-methods assessment of density and growth. J Neurosurg. 2019:1-7. [PubMed ID: 30611133]. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.10.JNS171723.
-
8.
Mofatteh M. Neurosurgery and artificial intelligence. AIMS Neurosci. 2021;8(4):477-95. [PubMed ID: 34877400]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8611194]. https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2021025.
-
9.
Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988;35(2):153-60. [PubMed ID: 3280462]. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.1354.
-
10.
Aziz T, Roy H. Deep Brain Stimulation. 2021. Available from: https://oxfordre.com/psychology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore-9780190236557-e-710?rskey=gRxG14&result=9.
-
11.
Panesar SS, Kliot M, Parrish R, Fernandez-Miranda J, Cagle Y, Britz GW. Promises and Perils of Artificial Intelligence in Neurosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2020;87(1):33-44. [PubMed ID: 31748800]. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz471.
-
12.
Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2015. https://doi.org/10.17226/21794.
-
13.
Wang C, Bickmore T, Bowen DJ, Norkunas T, Campion M, Cabral H, et al. Acceptability and feasibility of a virtual counselor (VICKY) to collect family health histories. Genet Med. 2015;17(10):822-30. [PubMed ID: 25590980]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4503525]. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2014.198.
-
14.
Singh H, Meyer AN, Thomas EJ. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(9):727-31. [PubMed ID: 24742777]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4145460]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002627.
-
15.
Holdsworth LM, Park C, Asch SM, Lin S. Technology-Enabled and Artificial Intelligence Support for Pre-Visit Planning in Ambulatory Care: Findings From an Environmental Scan. Ann Fam Med. 2021;19(5):419-26. [PubMed ID: 34546948]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8437572]. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2716.
-
16.
Laranjo L, Dunn AG, Tong HL, Kocaballi AB, Chen J, Bashir R, et al. Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25(9):1248-58. [PubMed ID: 30010941]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6118869]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy072.
-
17.
Milne-Ives M, de Cock C, Lim E, Shehadeh MH, de Pennington N, Mole G, et al. The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(10). e20346. [PubMed ID: 33090118]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7644372]. https://doi.org/10.2196/20346.
-
18.
Choudhury A, Renjilian E, Asan O. Use of machine learning in geriatric clinical care for chronic diseases: a systematic literature review. JAMIA Open. 2020;3(3):459-71. [PubMed ID: 33215079]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7660963]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa034.
-
19.
Cohen AB, Nahed BV. The Digital Neurologic Examination. Digit Biomark. 2021;5(1):114-26. [PubMed ID: 34056521]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8138139]. https://doi.org/10.1159/000515577.
-
20.
Tabacof L, Braren S, Patterson T, Fry A, Putrino D. Safety and Tolerability of a Wearable, Vibrotactile Stimulation Device for Parkinson's Disease. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021;15:712621. [PubMed ID: 34867237]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8636931]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.712621.
-
21.
Maceira-Elvira P, Popa T, Schmid AC, Hummel FC. Wearable technology in stroke rehabilitation: towards improved diagnosis and treatment of upper-limb motor impairment. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):142. [PubMed ID: 31744553]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6862815]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0612-y.
-
22.
Chen ZH, Fu H, Lo WL, Chi Z, Xu B. Eye-tracking-aided digital system for strabismus diagnosis. Healthc Technol Lett. 2018;5(1):1-6. [PubMed ID: 29515809]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5830938]. https://doi.org/10.1049/htl.2016.0081.
-
23.
Li J, Wan C. Non-invasive detection of intracranial pressure related to the optic nerve. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021;11(6):2823-36. [PubMed ID: 34079745]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8107303]. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-20-1188.
-
24.
Samadani U, Farooq S, Ritlop R, Warren F, Reyes M, Lamm E, et al. Detection of third and sixth cranial nerve palsies with a novel method for eye tracking while watching a short film clip. J Neurosurg. 2015;122(3):707-20. [PubMed ID: 25495739]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4547625]. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.JNS14762.
-
25.
Chinner A, Blane J, Lancaster C, Hinds C, Koychev I. Digital technologies for the assessment of cognition: a clinical review. Evid Based Ment Health. 2018;21(2):67-71. [PubMed ID: 29678927]. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2018-102890.
-
26.
Dunn J, Kidzinski L, Runge R, Witt D, Hicks JL, Schussler-Fiorenza Rose SM, et al. Wearable sensors enable personalized predictions of clinical laboratory measurements. Nat Med. 2021;27(6):1105-12. [PubMed ID: 34031607]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8293303]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01339-0.
-
27.
Niriayo YL, Mamo A, Kassa TD, Asgedom SW, Atey TM, Gidey K, et al. Treatment outcome and associated factors among patients with epilepsy. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):17354. [PubMed ID: 30478263]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6255833]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35906-2.
-
28.
Malmgren K, Edelvik A. Long-term outcomes of surgical treatment for epilepsy in adults with regard to seizures, antiepileptic drug treatment and employment. Seizure. 2017;44:217-24. [PubMed ID: 27839670]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2016.10.015.
-
29.
Anyanwu C, Motamedi GK. Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy. Brain Sci. 2018;8(4):49. [PubMed ID: 29561756]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5924385]. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8040049.
-
30.
Mohanraj R, Brodie MJ. Early predictors of outcome in newly diagnosed epilepsy. Seizure. 2013;22(5):333-44. [PubMed ID: 23583115]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2013.02.002.
-
31.
An S, Kang C, Lee HW. Artificial Intelligence and Computational Approaches for Epilepsy. J Epilepsy Res. 2020;10(1):8-17. [PubMed ID: 32983950]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7494883]. https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.20003.
-
32.
Abbasi B, Goldenholz DM. Machine learning applications in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2019;60(10):2037-47. [PubMed ID: 31478577]. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.16333.
-
33.
Nair PP, Aghoram R, Khilari ML. Applications of artificial intelligence in epilepsy. Int J Adv Med Health Res. 2021;8(2):41-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijamr.ijamr_94_21.
-
34.
Zisheng Z, Parhi KK. Seizure detection using wavelet decomposition of the prediction error signal from a single channel of intra-cranial EEG. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:4443-6. [PubMed ID: 25570978]. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944610.
-
35.
Chavakula V, Sanchez Fernandez I, Peters JM, Popli G, Bosl W, Rakhade S, et al. Automated quantification of spikes. Epilepsy Behav. 2013;26(2):143-52. [PubMed ID: 23291250]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.11.048.
-
36.
Siuly S, Kabir E, Wang H, Zhang Y. Exploring sampling in the detection of multicategory EEG signals. Comput Math Methods Med. 2015;2015:576437. [PubMed ID: 25977705]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4419228]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/576437.
-
37.
Firpi H, Goodman E, Echauz J. On prediction of epileptic seizures by means of genetic programming artificial features. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006;34(3):515-29. [PubMed ID: 16463085]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-005-9039-7.
-
38.
Kang JH, Chung YG, Kim SP. An efficient detection of epileptic seizure by differentiation and spectral analysis of electroencephalograms. Comput Biol Med. 2015;66:352-6. [PubMed ID: 25982199]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.04.034.
-
39.
Asif U, Roy S, Tang J, Harrer S. SeizureNet: Multi-Spectral Deep Feature Learning for Seizure Type Classification. 2019. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.03232.
-
40.
Sharif B, Jafari AH. Prediction of epileptic seizures from EEG using analysis of ictal rules on Poincare plane. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017;145:11-22. [PubMed ID: 28552116]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.04.001.
-
41.
Alexandre Teixeira C, Direito B, Bandarabadi M, Le Van Quyen M, Valderrama M, Schelter B, et al. Epileptic seizure predictors based on computational intelligence techniques: a comparative study with 278 patients. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;114(3):324-36. [PubMed ID: 24657096]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.02.007.
-
42.
Karayiannis NB, Tao G, Xiong Y, Sami A, Varughese B, Frost JJ, et al. Computerized motion analysis of videotaped neonatal seizures of epileptic origin. Epilepsia. 2005;46(6):901-17. [PubMed ID: 15946330]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.56504.x.
-
43.
Ogura Y, Hayashi H, Nakashima S, Zu S, Shibanoki T, Shimatani K, et al. A neural network based infant monitoring system to facilitate diagnosis of epileptic seizures. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:5614-7. [PubMed ID: 26737565]. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319665.
-
44.
Achilles F, Tombari F, Belagiannis V, Loesch AM, Noachtar S, Navab N. Convolutional neural networks for real-time epileptic seizure detection. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis. 2018;6(3):264-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681163.2016.1141062.
-
45.
Jobst BC, Cascino GD. Resective epilepsy surgery for drug-resistant focal epilepsy: a review. JAMA. 2015;313(3):285-93. [PubMed ID: 25602999]. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.17426.
-
46.
Singh JA, Lewallen DG. Ninety-day mortality in patients undergoing elective total hip or total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(8):1417-22. [PubMed ID: 22554727]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3413788]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.008.
-
47.
Grigsby J, Kramer RE, Schneiders JL, Gates JR, Brewster Smith W. Predicting outcome of anterior temporal lobectomy using simulated neural networks. Epilepsia. 1998;39(1):61-6. [PubMed ID: 9578014]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb01275.x.
-
48.
Wissel BD, Greiner HM, Glauser TA, Pestian JP, Kemme AJ, Santel D, et al. Early identification of epilepsy surgery candidates: A multicenter, machine learning study. Acta Neurol Scand. 2021;144(1):41-50. [PubMed ID: 33769560]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8178229]. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.13418.
-
49.
Goldenholz DM, Jow A, Khan OI, Bagic A, Sato S, Auh S, et al. Preoperative prediction of temporal lobe epilepsy surgery outcome. Epilepsy Res. 2016;127:331-8. [PubMed ID: 27701046]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5086266]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.09.015.
-
50.
Yankam Njiwa J, Gray KR, Costes N, Mauguiere F, Ryvlin P, Hammers A. Advanced [18F]FDG and [11C]flumazenil PET analysis for individual outcome prediction after temporal lobe epilepsy surgery for hippocampal sclerosis. Neuroimage Clin. 2015;7:122-31. [PubMed ID: 25610774]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4299974]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.11.013.
-
51.
Guncar G, Kukar M, Notar M, Brvar M, Cernelc P, Notar M, et al. An application of machine learning to haematological diagnosis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):411. [PubMed ID: 29323142]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5765139]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18564-8.
-
52.
Podnar S, Kukar M, Guncar G, Notar M, Gosnjak N, Notar M. Diagnosing brain tumours by routine blood tests using machine learning. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):14481. [PubMed ID: 31597942]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6785553]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51147-3.
-
53.
Tsvetkov PO, Eyraud R, Ayache S, Bougaev AA, Malesinski S, Benazha H, et al. An AI-Powered Blood Test to Detect Cancer Using NanoDSF. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(6):1294. [PubMed ID: 33803924]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7999960]. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061294.
-
54.
Brown AD, Marotta TR. Using machine learning for sequence-level automated MRI protocol selection in neuroradiology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25(5):568-71. [PubMed ID: 29092082]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7646939]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx125.
-
55.
Zhou M, Scott J, Chaudhury B, Hall L, Goldgof D, Yeom KW, et al. Radiomics in Brain Tumor: Image Assessment, Quantitative Feature Descriptors, and Machine-Learning Approaches. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(2):208-16. [PubMed ID: 28982791]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5812810]. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5391.
-
56.
Williams S, Layard Horsfall H, Funnell JP, Hanrahan JG, Khan DZ, Muirhead W, et al. Artificial Intelligence in Brain Tumour Surgery-An Emerging Paradigm. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(19):5010. [PubMed ID: 34638495]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8508169]. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13195010.
-
57.
Ko CC, Zhang Y, Chen JH, Chang KT, Chen TY, Lim SW, et al. Pre-operative MRI Radiomics for the Prediction of Progression and Recurrence in Meningiomas. Front Neurol. 2021;12:636235. [PubMed ID: 34054688]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8160291]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.636235.
-
58.
Fabelo H, Halicek M, Ortega S, Shahedi M, Szolna A, Pineiro JF, et al. Deep Learning-Based Framework for In Vivo Identification of Glioblastoma Tumor using Hyperspectral Images of Human Brain. Sensors (Basel). 2019;19(4):920. [PubMed ID: 30813245]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6412736]. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19040920.
-
59.
Gerard IJ, Kersten-Oertel M, Petrecca K, Sirhan D, Hall JA, Collins DL. Brain shift in neuronavigation of brain tumors: A review. Med Image Anal. 2017;35:403-20. [PubMed ID: 27585837]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2016.08.007.
-
60.
Kast RE, Auner GW, Rosenblum ML, Mikkelsen T, Yurgelevic SM, Raghunathan A, et al. Raman molecular imaging of brain frozen tissue sections. J Neurooncol. 2014;120(1):55-62. [PubMed ID: 25038847]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1536-9.
-
61.
Reinges MH, Nguyen HH, Krings T, Hutter BO, Rohde V, Gilsbach JM. Course of brain shift during microsurgical resection of supratentorial cerebral lesions: limits of conventional neuronavigation. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004;146(4):369-77. [PubMed ID: 15057531]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-003-0204-1.
-
62.
Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Hastreiter P, Fahlbusch R. Intraoperative compensation for brain shift. Surg Neurol. 2001;56(6):357-64. [PubMed ID: 11755962]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-3019(01)00628-0.
-
63.
Fabelo H, Ortega S, Lazcano R, Madronal D, M. Callico G, Juarez E, et al. An Intraoperative Visualization System Using Hyperspectral Imaging to Aid in Brain Tumor Delineation. Sensors (Basel). 2018;18(2):430. [PubMed ID: 29389893]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5856119]. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020430.
-
64.
Fabelo H, Ortega S, Ravi D, Kiran BR, Sosa C, Bulters D, et al. Spatio-spectral classification of hyperspectral images for brain cancer detection during surgical operations. PLoS One. 2018;13(3). e0193721. [PubMed ID: 29554126]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5858847]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193721.
-
65.
Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Witkowski ER, Stafford C, Navarette-Welton AJ, Rattner DW, et al. Computer Vision Analysis of Intraoperative Video: Automated Recognition of Operative Steps in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2019;270(3):414-21. [PubMed ID: 31274652]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7216040]. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003460.
-
66.
Sarker SK, Chang A, Albrani T, Vincent C. Constructing hierarchical task analysis in surgery. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(1):107-11. [PubMed ID: 17483993]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9380-z.
-
67.
Maktabi M, Neumuth T. Online time and resource management based on surgical workflow time series analysis. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017;12(2):325-38. [PubMed ID: 27573276]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1474-4.