Incidence of Palmaris Longus Agenesis in the Young Iranian Population

authors:

avatar Manouchehr Safari 1 , avatar Laya Ghahari 2 , * , avatar Kamran Hamzei 3

Department of Anatomy, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
Department of Anatomy, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Anatomy, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Annals of Military and Health Sciences Research: Vol.15, issue 2; e62310
published online: June 30, 2017
article type: Original Article
received: April 2, 2017
revised: May 16, 2017
accepted: June 3, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/amh.62310

how to cite: Safari M, Ghahari L, Hamzei K. Incidence of Palmaris Longus Agenesis in the Young Iranian Population. Ann Mil Health Sci Res. 2017;15(2):e62310. https://doi.org/10.5812/amh.62310.

Abstract

Background:

Palmaris longus (PL) is the most variable muscle in the body. The variation includes unilateral or bilateral agenesis, duplication or Y-shaped tendon‎.

Methods:

A total of 480 students within the age range of 18 to 23 years from Tehran medical institutions were ‎randomly selected for the current study‎‎. The Thompson test was used to support the Schaeffer test.

Results:

PL muscle was absent bilaterally in 23% and unilaterally in 28.5% of the subjects with the distribution of 16.9% on ‎the left and 11.6% on the right hands. In females, the bilateral absence was observed in 34.16%, while 18.7% ‎had unilateral absence with the distribution of 5.8% on the left and 12.9% on the right.

Conclusions:

It is believed that palmaris longus muscle is progressively disappearing in Iranian young people and ‎could prove a degenerative trend in the Iranian population.

1. Background

Palmaris longus (PL), phylogenetically degenerated weak accessory flexor of the wrist joint, have the short, muscular belly and long tendon, which crosses the flexor retinaculum and continues as palmar aponeurosis (1). It is the most variable muscle in the body. The variation includes unilateral or bilateral agenesis, duplication, or in the site of insertion. Although the function is very less, PL receives the attraction of the surgeons for its use in reconstructive plastic and hand surgery (2). It is also used to repair ptosis, urinary incontinence, and the restoration of facial paralysis (1).

In males, PL muscle acts as a weak flexor of the wrist, and aids in cupping of the palm (1). This characteristic marks the probable evidence of retrogression of this muscle. It also opposes strong shearing forces on the skin of the palm during gripping, and aiding in cupping of the hand.

Hypothetically, the comparison of the relative length of tendons and body could show the pathway of the degeneration of PL; that is, the degeneration could be associated with increased tendon length and decreased belly from more primitive primates to those most derivate, that is, great apes to modern humans (3).

According to Kapoor SK et al. (4), the agenesis of PL muscle was observed in 15% of the general population, but it is not applicable to all populations and varies among ethnic groups (5).

The current study aimed at determining the incidence of unilateral and bilateral agenesis of PL in the young Iranian population.

2. Methods

A total of 480 first- and second-year medical, dental, and paramedical students from Tehran medical institutions within the age range of 18 to 23 years were enrolled in the study. Demographic data included age, gender, dominant hand, race, and shape and the presence or absence of PL muscle in the forearm. Presence or absence of PL muscle was determined by the Schaeffer and the Thompson fist tests. In the Schaeffer test, the standard test to determine PL muscle, the examiner asked them to turn back their thumb to little finger with semi-flexion at the wrist (Figure 1). Subjects with any deformities or injury in the upper extremity were excluded from the study. The Thompson test was used to support the Schaeffer test and the examiner asked the subjects to turn back their thumb over clenched fist with flexion at the wrist (Figure 2). With these tests, PL tendon was palpated and visualized at distal of the forearm.

3. Results

The prevalence of the PL muscle was observed in 480 students. Among the males, PL muscle was absent bilaterally in 23% and unilaterally in 28.5% of the subjects with the distribution of 16.9% on the left and 11.6% on the right hands. In females, the bilateral absence was observed in 34.16%, while 18.7% had unilateral absence with the distribution of 5.8% on the left and 12.9% on the right hands.

Another variation of the palmaris longus muscle is the bifurcation of its tendon observed in wrist hand. In females, V-shaped tendon or bifurcation in tendon was 5.1%. In males, this anomaly was 0.9% (Table 1).

Table 1.

The Shape of the Palmaris Longus Muscle in the Study Subjects

Total Sample (N = 480)Males (N = 325)Females (N = 155)
Presence (normal)71.11%77.2%60.71%
Presence (Y-shaped)2.29%0.9%5.1%
Absence26.6%21.8%34.19%

Finally, of the 480 investigated subjects, PL muscle was absent in 26.6%, while 47.9% had PL muscle on both hands. However, there was a significant difference between male and female subjects in the absence of PL. On the other hand, many of the V-shaped anomalies were observed in the female groups.

4. Discussion

Identification of the PL is very important to clinicians since its tendon is used as a graft in various surgical procedures and during the administration of medicine/corticosteroids in the carpal tunnel to relieve pain due to carpal tunnel syndrome/arthritis.

According to the literature, there are various methods to find the tendon of PL, each with its own identifying techniques. The most common and traditionally followed method is the Schaffer test as a standard test or model to identify PL muscle (1, 2, 6-20).

The techniques of the Schaeffer and the Thompson’s fist tests were used in the current study to prove the presence or absence of PL muscle.

Table 2.

Prevalence of the Palmaris Longus Muscle in the Literature Review

Study Population (Author, Date)Total Sample (N)Male/Female (N)AgeBilateral AbsenceUnilateral Absence (L)Unilateral Absence (R)Bilateral Presence
Caucasian population (20) Thompson Mockford et al., 2001300150/15018 - 40%8.6%6.6%9.6%75.2
A Chinese population study (19) Sebastin and Lim 2006329120/2097 - 85%1.2%2.4%0.9%95.5
Indian population (4) Kapoor Tiwari et al., 2008500236/2646 - 65%8%6.2%3%82.8
Turkish population (18) Kose Adanir et al., 20091350675/67518 - 85%15.04%7.04%4.51%73.41
Yoruba population (17) Mbaka and Ejiwunmi 2009600335/2658 - 60%6.7%3.2%2.5%87.6
Indian population (21) Agarwal 2010385195/19020 - 24%3.37%11.16%5.7%79/74
The Northern, Serbia (15) Eric, Krivokuca et al., 2010800400/40018 - 75%15.9%13%8.6%62.5
Chilean Subjects (14) Alves Ramírez et al., 201120086/11417 - 32%9%6%5%80
Pakistani population (10) HUSSAIN 2011610378/22818 - 74%12.95%4.91%3.60%78.54
East African population (12) Kigera and Mukwaya 2011800391/40912 - 70%1.1%2.3%1%95.6
Indian population (2) Sankar Bhanu et al., 2011942450/49218 - 23%8.28%10.19%9.55%71.98
A population of Saudi Arabia (10) HUSSAIN 2012400200/20021 - 25%7.75%9%7.75%75.5
Korean population (9) Kyung Lee et al., 2012269149/12018 - 30%2.23% 1.11%0.74%95.9
An orthopedic surgery center in Iran (22) Abdolahzadeh Lahiji et al., 20131000682/318-%6.7%5.9%10.2%77.2
Egyptian population (7) Raouf, Kader et al., 2013386112/27419 - 70%31.1%7.8%11.9%49.2
South African population (6) Venter Van Schoor et al., 2014706363/3435 - 99%11.9%7.7%6.9%73.5
Young Iranian population The current study, 2017480325/15518 - 23%26.6%13.3%12.08%47.91

Some authors suggested that the PL muscle absence is more common in females (2, 7, 10, 14), consistent with the findings of the current study regarding the bilateral absence. Unilateral absence occurred more often on the left hand in males (6, 12, 21) and unilateral absence on the right hand in the females (7, 14, 17). The current study reported a similar prevalence in females and males in bilateral absence, but recorded higher absence than the valid reference (5) and other populations (4, 9, 10, 12, 14, 17, 19-21). The authors agreed with the current study (2) and reported higher figures than that of the current study records (7).

Another variation of the PL muscle is the bifurcation of its tendon or the belly (23-25) and V shape anomaly in tendon (26). The current study recorded 2.3% variation in tendon 5% in females and 1% in males. Since the authors (24, 26) reported an abnormal case for tendon shape, the variation was not clear and it was not reported statistically.

Knowledge of the PL muscle variations and its normal anatomy is useful. The tendon of PL muscle is a significant anatomical landmark for surgical approaches in this area and may cause compression of the median nerve (23).

According to Sebastin SJ (27) lack of any difference in favor of the normal population may indicate the gradual phylogenetic degenerative trend for this muscle; authors believe that PL muscle is progressively disappearing in Iranian young people and could prove a degenerative trend in the Iranian population.

References

  • 1.

    Femi Akinlosotu FE, Omirinde JO. Prevalence of missing palmaris longus muscle in the arm of secondary school children in ibadan. Arch Bas App Med. 2015;3:89-92.

  • 2.

    Sankar KD, Bhanu PS, John SP. Incidence of agenesis of palmaris longus in the Andhra population of India. Indian J Plast Surg. 2011;44(1):134-8. [PubMed ID: 21713200]. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.81448.

  • 3.

    Aversi Ferreira RAGMF, Bretas RV, Maior RS, Davaasuren M, Paraguassu Chaves CA, Nishijo H, et al. Morphometric and statistical analysis of the palmaris longus muscle in human and non human primates. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/178906.

  • 4.

    Kapoor SK, Tiwari A, Kumar A, Bhatia R, Tantuway V, Kapoor S. Clinical relevance of palmaris longus agenesis: common anatomical aberration. Anat Sci Int. 2008;83(1):45-8. [PubMed ID: 18402087]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-073X.2007.00199.x.

  • 5.

    Snell RS. Clinical anatomy for medical students. 7 ed. Boston, United States: Little, Brown and Company; 2007. 2007 p.

  • 6.

    Venter G, Van Schoor AN, Bosman MC. Degenerative trends of the palmaris longus muscle in a South African population. Clin Anat. 2014;27(2):222-6. [PubMed ID: 23362128]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22226.

  • 7.

    Raouf HA, Kader GA, Jaradat A, Dharap A, Fadel R, Salem AH. Frequency of palmaris longus absence and its association with other anatomical variations in the Egyptian population. Clin Anat. 2013;26(5):572-7. [PubMed ID: 23339087]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22186.

  • 8.

    Soltani AM, Peric M, Francis CS, Nguyen TT, Chan LS, Ghiassi A, et al. The variation in the absence of the palmaris longus in a multiethnic population of the United States: an epidemiological study. Plast Surg Int. 2012;2012:282959. [PubMed ID: 23213502]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/282959.

  • 9.

    Kyung DS, Lee JH, Choi IJ, Kim DK. Different frequency of the absence of the palmaris longus according to assessment methods in a Korean population. Anat Cell Biol. 2012;45(1):53-6. [PubMed ID: 22536552]. https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2012.45.1.53.

  • 10.

    Mahmood T, Butt KA, Ahmed N, Shahid R, Hussain FN. Prevalence of congenital absence of palmaris longus tendon in healthy volunteers, a cross sectional study. Hand. 2012;79(610):12-95.

  • 11.

    Hiz O, Ediz L, Ceylan MF, Gezici E, Gulcu E, Erden M. Prevalence of the absence of palmaris longus muscle assessed by a new examination test, (Hiz-Ediz Test) in the population residing in the area of Van. J Clin Exp Invest. 2011;2(3):254-9. https://doi.org/10.5799/ahinjs.01.2011.03.0050.

  • 12.

    Kigera JW, Mukwaya S. Frequency of agenesis Palmaris longus through clinical examination--an East African study. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):28997. [PubMed ID: 22174943]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028997.

  • 13.

    Eric M, Koprivcic I, Vucinic N, Radic R, Krivokuca D, Leksan I, et al. Prevalence of the palmaris longus in relation to the hand dominance. Surg Radiol Anat. 2011;33(6):481-4. [PubMed ID: 21107568]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0751-0.

  • 14.

    Alves N, Ramirez D, Figueiredo Deana N. Study of frequency of the palmaris longus musclem in chilean subjects. Int J Morphol. 2011;29(2):485-9. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-95022011000200030.

  • 15.

    Eric M, Krivokuca D, Savovic S, Leksan I, Vucinic N. Prevalence of the palmaris longus through clinical evaluation. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32(4):357-61. [PubMed ID: 19816651]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0573-0.

  • 16.

    Enye LA, Saalu LC, Osinubi AA. The prevalence of agenesis of palmaris longus muscle amongst students in two lagos based medical schools. Int J Morphol. 2010;28(3). https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-95022010000300029.

  • 17.

    Mbaka GO, Ejiwunmi AB. Prevalence of palmaris longus absence--a study in the Yoruba population. Ulster Med J. 2009;78(2):90-3. [PubMed ID: 19568443].

  • 18.

    Kose O, Adanir O, Cirpar M, Kurklu M, Komurcu M. The prevalence of absence of the palmaris longus: a study in Turkish population. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129(5):609-11. [PubMed ID: 18418616]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0631-9.

  • 19.

    Sebastin SJ, Lim AY. Clinical assessment of absence of the palmaris longus and its association with other anatomical anomalies-- a Chinese population study. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2006;35(4):249-53. [PubMed ID: 16710495].

  • 20.

    Thompson NW, Mockford BJ, Cran GW. Absence of the palmaris longus muscle: a population study. Ulster Med J. 2001;70(1):22-4. [PubMed ID: 11428320].

  • 21.

    Agarwal P. Absence of the palmaris longus tendon in Indian population. Indian J Orthop. 2010;44(2):212-5. [PubMed ID: 20419011]. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.61863.

  • 22.

    Abdolahzadeh Lahiji F, Ashoori K, Dahmardehei M. Prevalence of palmaris longus agenesis in a hospital in Iran. Arch Iran Med. 2013;16(3):187-8. [PubMed ID: 23432173].

  • 23.

    Christos L, Konstantinos N, Evagelos P. Revision of Carpal Tunnel Release due to Palmaris Longus Profundus. Case Rep Orthop. 2015;2015:616051. [PubMed ID: 26075127]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/616051.

  • 24.

    Iqbal S, Iqbal R, Iqbal F. A bitendinous palmaris longus, aberrant insertions and its clinical impact, a case report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(5):3-5. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2015/12182.5954.

  • 25.

    Kumar N, Patil J, Swamy RS, Shetty SD, Abhinitha P, Rao MK, et al. Presence of multiple tendinous insertions of palmaris longus: a unique variation of a retrogressive muscle. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2014;24(2):175-8. [PubMed ID: 24795520].

  • 26.

    Alshaham A. Anomalous V shape palmaris longus tendon, two cases. J Med Cases. 2010;1:68-70. https://doi.org/10.4021/jmc114e.

  • 27.

    Sebastin SJ, Lim AY, Bee WH, Wong TC, Methil BV. Does the absence of the palmaris longus affect grip and pinch strength? J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30(4):406-8. [PubMed ID: 15935531]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsb.2005.03.011.