Cholera: A Latent Threat to Human Health

authors:

avatar Nader Alaridah ORCID 1 , * , avatar Nour Shewaikani 2 , avatar Assem Al Refaei 2 , avatar Ahmad Al-leimon ORCID 2 , avatar Seba Alghananeem 2 , avatar Hussain Hazem ORCID 2 , avatar Abdalrhman Froukh 2 , avatar Obada Al-leimon ORCID 2

Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases: Vol.19, issue 3; e139934
published online: May 28, 2024
article type: Review Article
received: August 12, 2023
revised: February 27, 2024
accepted: May 4, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid-139934

how to cite: Alaridah N, Shewaikani N, Al Refaei A, Al-leimon A, Alghananeem S, et al. Cholera: A Latent Threat to Human Health. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2024;19(3):e139934. https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid-139934.

Abstract

Cholera outbreaks caused by the bacterium Vibrio cholerae present a significant global health challenge, with a notable increase in cases recently reported. The disease is characterized by severe watery diarrhea, leading to dehydration and potential fatalities if not promptly addressed. Transmission occurs through contaminated food and water sources, underscoring the importance of water sanitation and hygiene measures to prevent outbreaks. Limited healthcare access and inadequate reporting systems make estimating cholera cases and deaths challenging. Antibiotic resistance is also a concerning issue, necessitating the development of new treatment options. Prompt laboratory diagnosis is essential, with rapid diagnostic tests and PCR showing promise for pathogen detection. Treatment involves fluid replacement and appropriate antibiotic use to reduce disease severity and transmission. Oral cholera vaccines offer preventive measures for high-risk individuals during outbreaks. To combat the escalating cholera epidemic and save lives, a comprehensive approach, including improved water sanitation, early detection, and timely treatment, is crucial.

1. Context

Cholera outbreaks are caused by the bacterium Vibrio cholerae, serotypes O1 or O139. The disease manifests as sudden severe watery diarrhea that could lead to serious dehydration and death if not treated with oral or intravenous hydration solutions. Vibrio cholerae is easily transmitted via the fecal-oral route and can rapidly spread to multiple communities. In more severe cases, it can cross national borders and cause a far-reaching epidemic surge. We are currently witnessing an unprecedented rise in cholera epidemics, evident in the 29 countries reporting cholera outbreaks during 2022, compared to fewer than 20 countries reporting them throughout the last five years (1, 2). The urgency of the situation is further underscored by the shift in vaccine strategy from a standard 2-dose regimen to a one-dose approach due to vaccine shortages. The global disease trend indicates more numerous, severe, and widespread outbreaks, necessitating stronger prevention and treatment interventions. Herein we highlight the recent epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment alternatives that could help combat this persistent plague.

1.1. Epidemiology

The earliest recorded outbreak of cholera dates back to 1817 in the Ganges Delta of India (3). Since then, cholera has spread through trade routes and caused seven different pandemics between 1817 and 1961, with the last still ongoing and affecting countries in Africa, Asia, and South America (3). According to the latest World Health Organization (WHO) estimates, 2.86 million cholera cases occur annually in endemic countries, with 95,000 dying from the disease. However, precise estimates remain challenging due to the lack of standard reporting of cholera cases and deaths and the lack of healthcare access in countries affected by wars, such as Yemen and Syria (1). This is particularly important, considering that 84% and 41% of all cases and deaths linked to cholera were in Yemen in 2017 (2). Based on data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, countries with 100 or more reported cases per 100,000 persons between January 2022 and January 2023 included Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Lebanon, Malawi, Pakistan, and Syria (4). Figure 1.

Choropleth map of cholera incidence by country, according to the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control
Choropleth map of cholera incidence by country, according to the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control
Figure 1.

Choropleth map of cholera incidence by country, according to the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control

1.2. Transmission and Risk Factors

Vibrio cholerae, the causative agent of cholera, is primarily transmitted through the ingestion of contaminated food or water, although person-to-person transmission can occur. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the majority of cholera cases are associated with contaminated water sources, such as wells, rivers, and lakes, or with food prepared with contaminated water. This is evident in the quality of drinking and domestic water sources and springs in cholera-prone Ugandan communities, which were found to be outside the WHO-recommended values (5). Household hygiene can be an important factor in mitigating cholera transmission, especially with recent evidence suggesting that interventions targeting case-centered and within-household transmission are most effective (6).

Vibrio cholerae thrives in certain environmental conditions, including alkaline pH, temperatures up to 30 degrees C, and 15% salinity, often found in brackish water in estuaries and coastal regions. Climate events such as rainfall can impact the dynamics of cholera spread. For instance, the El Niño phenomenon, characterized by the warming of surface water in the eastern and central equatorial Pacific Ocean, caused rainfalls and floods and was linked to the emergence of cholera in specific districts of Uganda (7). Nevertheless, drought- and famine-affected areas were also struck by cholera. This rather complex dichotomy was observed in Niger, where cholera surged during severe droughts in 2004 and resurged in 2006 following excessive rainfalls (8). Moreover, the disruption of sanitation systems, as in countries affected by wars, has resulted in cholera outbreaks. These countries include the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Yemen, and Zimbabwe (9, 10). Crowded camps and slums, where open defecation is common and pit latrines are scarce, are also high-risk areas for cholera outbreaks.

Host factors also play an essential role in determining the risk of V. cholerae infection and its symptoms. Lower socioeconomic conditions and extremes of age are frequently associated with higher infection risk (11). Other host factors impacting infection risk and severity include diet and immunity. Malnutrition has been shown to be associated with an increase in the duration of diarrhea and hospitalization. Furthermore, protein-energy malnutrition reduced the protective efficacy of an orally administered cholera vaccine in a mouse model (12). Protection against cholera can be provided by breastfeeding due to breast milk antibodies and glycans, which have been shown to exert a vibriocidal immune response and reduce the risk of severe cholera (13).

Unexpectedly, reduced host immunity, as seen in people suffering from Acquired Iimmunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), did not affect the severity of cholera but might be associated with a higher risk of infection. This was exemplified in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, where the prevalence of HIV infection in patients with culture-confirmed cholera was four times higher than the adult prevalence in the region (14).

1.3. Pathogen and Pathogenesis

Vibrio choleraeis a motile, gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterium belonging to the Proteobacteria phylum. Vibrio choleraehas more than 200 serogroups that vary in virulence, epidemiology, and evolutionary lineages. The serological classification of cholera strains is based on differences in the sugar composition of the heat-stable surface somatic "O" antigen. In fact, the majority of V. cholerae serogroups are not pathogenic, with only two groups, 'O1' and 'O139', being associated with cholera epidemics and pandemics (15). The two biotypes of V. cholerae O1, namely classical and El Tor, have distinct roles in cholera epidemiology. While the classical biotype is associated with the first six pandemics, the ongoing seventh pandemic is attributed to the El Tor biotype (16).

The infectious dose of these V. cholerae species varies depending on a multitude of host, pathogen, and environmental conditions. Animal models show different infectious doses when compared to human studies, with the latter requiring doses of 108 - 1011 to produce consistent colonization. Despite acid resistance mechanisms, adding a bicarbonate buffer to neutralize gastric acidity has been found to reduce the infectious dose in humans (17).

Vibrio cholerae is known to be acid-resistant, utilizing an acid tolerance response (ATR) when exposed to human gastric acids (18). The ATR mechanism of V. cholerae involves several physiological changes that allow the bacterium to maintain its structural integrity and metabolic activity in low pH environments. For example, V. cholerae alters its gene expression, enhancing the expression of the lysine decarboxylase, CadA, under conditions of low pH and high lysine concentrations. CadA, among other amino acid decarboxylases, consumes protons in their enzymatic reactions, thus maintaining internal pH (19).

Similar to environmental pH, the presence of bile acids represents a major component in virulence regulation for V. cholerae among other enteropathogens (20, 21). ToxR, a transmembrane transcription factor, possesses a periplasmic domain serving as an environmental sensor for bile acids (22). Positioned within a regulatory cascade, ToxR triggers the expression of toxin coregulated pilus (TCP) and cholera toxin (CT) (23). CT, housed within the cholera toxin bacteriophage (CTXÏ•), falls under the direct control of ToxT (24). Research on the impact of bile acids has yielded mixed results, with some studies suggesting a repressive effect on ToxT-dependent transcription of CT and other virulence factors (25, 26). Conversely, bile acids have been shown to induce ToxR and CT transcription through a ToxT-independent mechanism (27, 28).

The influence of bile acids may also be subject to modulation by calcium concentrations. In the presence of established bile acid inducers of tcpA, the pilus subunit, a notable increase in tcpA expression was observed with elevated calcium levels, while this effect was mitigated upon calcium chelation within murine intestines (29). Another abundant molecule in the intestines is bicarbonate, which has been observed to enhance ToxT binding affinity to virulence gene promoters when at high levels, thus serving as an in-vivo signal modulator, particularly given its high concentration near the epithelium (30). In summary, V. cholerae adeptly responds to environmental cues like gastric acids, bile acids, and calcium, modulating its virulence and pathogenesis.

Vibrio cholerae leverages flagellar motility to penetrate the mucus layer and establish intestinal colonization. The complex transcriptional changes that follow are mediated by the production of ToxT. TCP is encoded in the V. cholerae pathogenicity island 1 (VPI-1) and plays a crucial role in attaching V. cholerae to human intestinal Caco-2 cells (31) (Figure 2). CT, encoded in the cholera toxin bacteriophage (CTXÏ•), comprises a single A subunit (CTA1) and five B subunits (CTB1-5) arranged hexamerically. Subunit B binds to the ganglioside GM1 cell surface receptor on human jejunal epithelial cells, entering the cytoplasm through receptor-mediated endocytosis and retrograde transport from the endoplasmic reticulum (32). The A subunit catalyzes ADP ribosylation of adenylate cyclase (AC), leading to increased AC activity and intracellular cAMP concentration. Elevated cAMP activates protein kinase A (PKA), which phosphorylates the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR), enhancing chloride secretion into the intestinal lumen (33). A single intraperitoneal injection with CFTR inhibitors belonging to the Thiazolidines chemical class reduced cholera-induced fluid secretion in mice by more than 90% over 6 hours (34). Another target of the CTA-PKA pathway is the inhibition of the Na+/H+ exchanger 3 (NHE3), thus increasing Na+ in the intestinal lumen (35). The combination of elevated sodium and chloride expands luminal fluid volume, resulting in watery diarrhea.

Another facet of cholera pathogenesis includes the formation of microcolonies and biofilms, along with quorum-sensing signaling systems and regulatory networks. Vital proteins for these processes feature the type IV pilus and TCP among others. Microcolony and biofilm formation are favored in the environmental conditions of low cell density, which are enhanced by CT-induced augmentation of luminal fluid volume. The low cell density is also crucial for pathogenicity and immune evasion as high cell density induces quorum sensing that activates HapR, a transcription factor. Regarding pathogenicity, HapR binds to promoters to repress the expression of CT and TCP. Regarding immune evasion, HapR reduces bacterial tryptophan uptake, thus providing host enterocytes with precursors for serotonin synthesis that activate innate immune signaling (36). In brief, V. cholerae exploits flagellar motility, ToxT-mediated transcriptional changes, TCP, and CT to colonize the intestine, induce diarrhea, and evade immune detection through microcolony and biofilm formation.

The internalization of cholera toxin and its pathogenic effects
The internalization of cholera toxin and its pathogenic effects
Figure 2.

The internalization of cholera toxin and its pathogenic effects

1.4. Laboratory Diagnosis

Diagnosing cholera presents challenges due to the similarity of symptoms with many other causes of gastroenteritis. Limited facilities and supplies, especially in underdeveloped areas where cholera is prevalent, exacerbate these challenges. Traditional culturing methods for diagnosis are time-consuming, which is problematic given the rapid and severe nature of cholera infections that demand prompt intervention. Consequently, clinical diagnosis is often relied upon during diarrheal illness outbreaks. Additionally, laboratory findings such as hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, metabolic acidosis, and isonatremic dehydration can provide supporting evidence for cholera before confirmatory tests are reviewed (37).

As the recent harsh cholera outbreaks inspired the current review, we will first shed light on effective diagnostics in such settings. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are considered a valid method for an initial alert of a cholera outbreak. Antibody-based cholera RDTs work by detecting V. cholerae's lipopolysaccharides (LPS) within 15 to 30 minutes in a stool sample. In a meta-analysis involving 20 studies and 8 distinct commercial rapid tests, the combined sensitivity relative to bacterial culture, the gold standard for diagnosis, was 90% (95% CI, 86 - 93), with a specificity of 86% (95% CI, 81 - 90) (38). The results generated by RDTs are not as specific and sensitive as those generated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), bacterial culture, or darkfield microscopy (39). However, some studies found RDTs' accuracy, particularly those with enrichment in the alkaline peptone water (APW) step, comparable to that of stool culture when using PCR as a reference (40).

Efforts should be placed into improving RDTs to make them effective point-of-care (POC) testing tools in developing countries that are susceptible to recurrent cholera outbreaks and lack sufficient microbiological laboratories and expertise.

1.5. Clinical Features

Depending on the inoculum size and the individual's susceptibility, the incubation period of cholera ranges from several hours to three to five days. The most distinctive clinical feature of cholera is acute watery diarrhea. As cholera may be confused with other diarrheal diseases, severe cholera, also called cholera gravis, stands out with its characteristic profound and rapid loss of fluids, which typically has a fishy odor. Fluid loss may reach as high as one liter per hour in adult patients and 20 mL/kg/h in children (41). Another unique feature of severe cholera diarrhea is the passage of profuse rice-water stool (42).

The resultant hypovolemia is the most lethal sequela of the diarrhea, which may manifest as hypotension, tachycardia, dry mucous membranes, dizziness, decreased urine output, and in more severe conditions, shock, and death. This was evident in the early stages of the cholera epidemic in Haiti when the median time between the onset of symptoms and death in individuals who died before presentation to a cholera treatment center was 12 hours (43). Other gastrointestinal manifestations of cholera infection are abdominal cramping and vomiting, which may begin before or after the onset of diarrhea.

Significant complications of this illness include metabolic acidosis, which may occur due to the loss of stool bicarbonate or lactic acidosis from poor perfusion. In addition, pneumonia may occur due to vomiting accompanied by aspiration. The latter is considered frequent comorbidity in children with a high mortality rate (44).

1.6. Treatment

1.6.1. Fluid Replacement

Replacing lost fluids and electrolytes constitutes the cornerstone of cholera treatment. The main method of achieving this is through oral rehydration solution (ORS). The currently utilized WHO standard ORS formulation, established in 2002, is glucose-based reduced osmolarity (sodium 75 mEq/L, glucose 75 mmol/L, and osmolarity of 245 mOsm/L), as sodium is better absorbed when glucose is present (32). Rehydration takes place in two steps: Replacement and maintenance. Through clinical assessment and WHO guidelines, the degree of dehydration and the amount of fluids needed are determined (45).

Preferably, fluids are administered as ORS rather than intravenously due to lower costs, less invasiveness, and fewer emergency department revisits (46). However, in the case of profound ongoing stool losses, termed high purging (≥ 15 mL/kg per hour; seen in 3 - 5% of patients), failure of ORS attempts, and severe dehydration, intravenous fluids become indicated (47, 48). Neutral amino acids were found to increase the intestinal potential to absorb sodium and water ions, but there is insufficient evidence to qualify them as a standard ORS therapy (49). On another note, a review of thirty-five trials showed that patients treated with rice-based ORS experienced fewer and shorter diarrhea bouts than their glucose-based ORS-treated counterparts (50).

1.6.2. Antibiotics and Antibiotics Resistance

When treating cholera with moderate to severe dehydration, antibiotic administration becomes warranted to (1) reduce the time and severity of the disease by up to 50% and (2) limit the transmission of the viable organism to 1 - 2 days (51). Antibiotic administration comes after the initial fluid deficit is replenished, typically in about 4 hours. Antibiotics are chosen according to the patient’s condition and the antibiotic resistance pattern.

Antibiotic resistance is a major obstacle in the treatment of V. cholerae infection. The mechanisms of antibiotic resistance development include the overuse and misuse of antibiotics in both human medicine and the animal industry, efflux pumps, genetic mutations, and horizontal gene transfer (52). A recent meta-analysis showed that previously utilized bacterial cell wall inhibitors, such as aztreonam, cefepime, and imipenem, remain efficient with almost non-existent resistance (53). Other available antibiotic options that could work against cholera include tetracyclines, doxycycline, fluoroquinolones, and macrolides.

Tetracyclines remain a primary choice in treating cholera infection. They have comparable outcomes with doxycycline in terms of stool output, duration of diarrhea, and the requirement for ORS, according to a study in Bangladesh (54). However, high resistance to these two classes has been observed, requiring their use to be limited to settings where ongoing surveillance shows most strains are susceptible to those classes. Consistently, the high use of ciprofloxacin due to its superior effectiveness compared to tetracyclines has led to a dramatic rise in fluoroquinolone resistance (55). Regarding macrolides, azithromycin and erythromycin have shown clinical and bacteriological efficacy. In some instances, azithromycin was superior to fluoroquinolones, yielding better clinical outcomes (56, 57).

Considering the geographic variation in V. cholerae antibiotic resistance patterns is vital. A recent meta-analysis revealed varied rates based on geography, with 0% resistance to novobiocin and ofloxacin in Africa, gatifloxacin and levofloxacin in Asia, and ciprofloxacin in North America, thus necessitating the monitoring of regional and local antibiotic resistance patterns and the use of derived treatment guidelines (58).

1.6.3. Vitamins and Minerals

According to WHO recommendations, a 14-day course of zinc supplementation for children aged 6 months to 5 years can aid in shortening the duration of diarrhea. This is supported by the results of a meta-analysis including 33 trials (59). Contrary to WHO guidelines of 20 mg per day, recent research suggests that half the dose has a lower risk of vomiting but comparable efficacy (60).

Additionally, vitamin A supplementation is warranted when deficiency symptoms accompany acute diarrhea. Furthermore, in resource-limited areas, the routine administration of vitamin A has been associated with reduced morbidity and mortality (61).

1.7. Prevention

The prevention of cholera outbreaks heavily relies on the development of safe and effective water sanitation systems. The biggest limitation to the development of these systems is the high capital cost and extensive resources required to build the infrastructure. A living example of the effectiveness of these infrastructure upgrades in preventing cholera outbreaks is London in the 1800s, where the pioneering epidemiological work of John Snow was followed by the design and construction of a system for sewage disposal (62). In fact, Target 7c of the United Nations' Millennium Development Goals was to halve the proportion of the population without sustainable access to water and basic sanitation by 2015. Despite significant progress in that capacity, an estimated 1.8 billion people worldwide still drink water from sources that are fecally contaminated (63).

Since V. cholerae is transmitted via a fecal-oral route, the importance of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) services extends to personal hygiene and cooking practices. Intriguingly, when compared to water quality or excreta disposal, hand washing with soap was more effective and reduced diarrheal disease by 42 - 48% (64). For cooking practices, Quick et al. found a seven-fold higher risk of illness in people eating cold cooked or raw seafood in El Salvador (65).

Another pillar in the prevention of cholera outbreaks includes early and rapid disease detection and treatment. As mentioned in the diagnosis section, RDTs combined with APW have an 89% sensitivity and 98% specificity that can help with surveillance efforts and medical resource management to limit the severity of outbreaks (39).

Further reduction of cholera risk was attained when oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) were administered along with improved WASH systems in endemic settings (66). This was supported by Malembaka et al.'s finding of single-dose OCV effectiveness of 44.7% 24 - 26 months after vaccination compared to controls (67). The two types of oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) include killed whole-cell vaccines and live attenuated vaccines. Regarding WC vaccines, three are prequalified by the WHO: Dukoral®, Shanchol®, and Euvichol-Plus® (56). Dukoral® contains killed whole cells of the O1 strain along with the recombinant B subunit of CT and provided negative protection in children under 5 years and 15% protection in children over 6 years of age within one year of surveillance. Shanchol® is bivalent, containing killed whole cells from both O1 and O139 V. cholerae strains, and provided 45% protection in all age groups and only 17% in children under 5 years within one year of surveillance (68).

The other type of OCVs is live-attenuated vaccines, including Vaxchora®, which is the only FDA-approved cholera vaccine for travelers aged 18 - 64 years. CVD 103-HgR I (Vaxchora®), composed of O1 strains that have been genetically modified to remove the gene encoding the CTA subunit (the toxic subunit), has 90.3% protective efficacy 10 days after vaccination and 79.5% after three months. However, it has no proven efficacy in endemic settings (69).

Current WHO recommendations include the use of OCVs in cholera-endemic areas, as well as for people at high risk of cholera during outbreaks. However, OCVs should not be seen as a replacement for other preventive measures, such as improving access to safe water and sanitation and promoting good hygiene practices (62).

2. Results and Conclusions

The ongoing cholera epidemic, driven by V. cholerae, is a critical global health concern. The disease's severe watery diarrhea and rapid transmission through contaminated sources lead to dehydration and potential death if not promptly treated. Cholera outbreaks are increasing, affecting multiple countries, and necessitate urgent preventive measures. Improving water sanitation, promoting hygiene practices, and implementing early detection are crucial for prevention. Vaccination with oral cholera vaccines offers a promising intervention. Timely fluid replacement and appropriate antibiotic therapy are essential for effective treatment. Combating this escalating epidemic requires immediate and concerted global efforts to save lives and prevent further spread.

References

  • 1.

    Ali M, Nelson AR, Lopez AL, Sack DA. Updated global burden of cholera in endemic countries. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(6). e0003832. [PubMed ID: 26043000]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4455997]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003832.

  • 2.

    Deen J, Mengel MA, Clemens JD. Epidemiology of cholera. Vaccine. 2020;38 Suppl 1:A31-40. [PubMed ID: 31395455]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.07.078.

  • 3.

    Hu D, Liu B, Feng L, Ding P, Guo X, Wang M, et al. Origins of the current seventh cholera pandemic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(48):E7730-9. [PubMed ID: 27849586]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5137724]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608732113.

  • 4.

    Geographical distribution of cholera cases reported worldwide. 2023. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/all-topics-z/cholera/surveillance-and-disease-data/cholera-monthly.

  • 5.

    Bwire G, Sack DA, Kagirita A, Obala T, Debes AK, Ram M, et al. The quality of drinking and domestic water from the surface water sources (lakes, rivers, irrigation canals and ponds) and springs in cholera prone communities of Uganda: an analysis of vital physicochemical parameters. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1128. [PubMed ID: 32680495]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7368733]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09186-3.

  • 6.

    Rebaudet S, Bulit G, Gaudart J, Michel E, Gazin P, Evers C, et al. The case-area targeted rapid response strategy to control cholera in Haiti: a four-year implementation study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(4). e0007263. [PubMed ID: 30990822]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007263.

  • 7.

    Alajo SO, Nakavuma J, Erume J. Cholera in endemic districts in Uganda during El Nino rains: 2002-2003. Afr Health Sci. 2006;6(2):93-7. [PubMed ID: 16916299]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1831971]. https://doi.org/10.5555/afhs.2006.6.2.93.

  • 8.

    Adagbada AO, Adesida SA, Nwaokorie FO, Niemogha MT, Coker AO. Cholera epidemiology in Nigeria: an overview. Pan Afr Med J. 2012;12:59. [PubMed ID: 22937199]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3428179].

  • 9.

    Simpson RB, Babool S, Tarnas MC, Kaminski PM, Hartwick MA, Naumova EN. Signatures of Cholera Outbreak during the Yemeni Civil War, 2016-2019. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;19(1). [PubMed ID: 35010649]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8744546]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010378.

  • 10.

    Ahmed SH, Nashwan AJ. Cholera outbreak amid civil war: A public health crisis in Syria. J Infect Public Health. 2022;15(12):1484-5. [PubMed ID: 36410268]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2022.11.013.

  • 11.

    Grandesso F, Allan M, Jean-Simon PS, Boncy J, Blake A, Pierre R, et al. Risk factors for cholera transmission in Haiti during inter-peak periods: insights to improve current control strategies from two case-control studies. Epidemiol Infect. 2014;142(8):1625-35. [PubMed ID: 24112364]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9151226]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268813002562.

  • 12.

    Rho S, Kim H, Shim SH, Lee SY, Kim MJ, Yang BG, et al. Protein energy malnutrition alters mucosal IgA responses and reduces mucosal vaccine efficacy in mice. Immunol Lett. 2017;190:247-56. [PubMed ID: 28860040]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2017.08.025.

  • 13.

    Clemens JD, Sack DA, Harris JR, Khan MR, Chakraborty J, Chowdhury S, et al. Breast feeding and the risk of severe cholera in rural Bangladeshi children. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;131(3):400-11. [PubMed ID: 2301350]. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115515.

  • 14.

    Severe K, Anglade SB, Bertil C, Duncan A, Joseph P, Deroncenay A, et al. Clinical Features of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients Presenting with Cholera in Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;95(5):999-1003. [PubMed ID: 27549637]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5094251]. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0105.

  • 15.

    Moore S, Thomson N, Mutreja A, Piarroux R. Widespread epidemic cholera caused by a restricted subset of Vibrio cholerae clones. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(5):373-9. [PubMed ID: 24575898]. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12610.

  • 16.

    Mukhopadhyay AK, Takeda Y, Balakrish Nair G. Cholera outbreaks in the El Tor biotype era and the impact of the new El Tor variants. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2014;379:17-47. [PubMed ID: 24710767]. https://doi.org/10.1007/82_2014_363.

  • 17.

    Cash RA, Music SI, Libonati JP, Craig JP, Pierce NF, Hornick RB. Response of man to infection with Vibrio cholerae. II. Protection from illness afforded by previous disease and vaccine. J Infect Dis. 1974;130(4):325-33. [PubMed ID: 4443613]. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/130.4.325.

  • 18.

    Merrell DS, Bailey C, Kaper JB, Camilli A. The ToxR-mediated organic acid tolerance response of Vibrio cholerae requires OmpU. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(9):2746-54. [PubMed ID: 11292792]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC99489]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.9.2746-2754.2001.

  • 19.

    Merrell DS, Camilli A. The cadA gene of Vibrio cholerae is induced during infection and plays a role in acid tolerance. Mol Microbiol. 1999;34(4):836-49. [PubMed ID: 10564522]. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01650.x.

  • 20.

    Midgett CR, Almagro-Moreno S, Pellegrini M, Taylor RK, Skorupski K, Kull FJ. Bile salts and alkaline pH reciprocally modulate the interaction between the periplasmic domains of Vibrio cholerae ToxR and ToxS. Mol Microbiol. 2017;105(2):258-72. [PubMed ID: 28464377]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5498992]. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13699.

  • 21.

    Li P, Rivera-Cancel G, Kinch LN, Salomon D, Tomchick DR, Grishin NV, et al. Bile salt receptor complex activates a pathogenic type III secretion system. Elife. 2016;5. [PubMed ID: 27377244]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4933562]. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15718.

  • 22.

    Gubensak N, Sagmeister T, Buhlheller C, Geronimo BD, Wagner GE, Petrowitsch L, et al. Vibrio cholerae's ToxRS bile sensing system. Elife. 2023;12. [PubMed ID: 37768326]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10624426]. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88721.

  • 23.

    Almagro-Moreno S, Root MZ, Taylor RK. Role of ToxS in the proteolytic cascade of virulence regulator ToxR in Vibrio cholerae. Mol Microbiol. 2015;98(5):963-76. [PubMed ID: 26316386]. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13170.

  • 24.

    Lee D, Choi H, Son S, Bae J, Joo J, Kim DW, et al. Expression of Cholera Toxin (CT) and the Toxin Co-Regulated Pilus (TCP) by Variants of ToxT in Vibrio cholerae Strains. Toxins (Basel). 2023;15(8). [PubMed ID: 37624264]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10467113]. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15080507.

  • 25.

    Gupta S, Chowdhury R. Bile affects production of virulence factors and motility of Vibrio cholerae. Infect Immun. 1997;65(3):1131-4. [PubMed ID: 9038330]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC175102]. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.65.3.1131-1134.1997.

  • 26.

    Plecha SC, Withey JH. Mechanism for inhibition of Vibrio cholerae ToxT activity by the unsaturated fatty acid components of bile. J Bacteriol. 2015;197(10):1716-25. [PubMed ID: 25733618]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4402388]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.02409-14.

  • 27.

    Bina TF, Kunkle DE, Bina XR, Mullett SJ, Wendell SG, Bina JE. Bile Salts Promote ToxR Regulon Activation during Growth under Virulence-Inducing Conditions. Infect Immun. 2021;89(12). e0044121. [PubMed ID: 34543121]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8594600]. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00441-21.

  • 28.

    Hung DT, Mekalanos JJ. Bile acids induce cholera toxin expression in Vibrio cholerae in a ToxT-independent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(8):3028-33. [PubMed ID: 15699331]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC549475]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409559102.

  • 29.

    Hay AJ, Yang M, Xia X, Liu Z, Hammons J, Fenical W, et al. Calcium Enhances Bile Salt-Dependent Virulence Activation in Vibrio cholerae. Infect Immun. 2017;85(1). [PubMed ID: 27849180]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5203667]. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00707-16.

  • 30.

    Thomson JJ, Withey JH. Bicarbonate increases binding affinity of Vibrio cholerae ToxT to virulence gene promoters. J Bacteriol. 2014;196(22):3872-80. [PubMed ID: 25182489]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4248830]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01824-14.

  • 31.

    Labbate M, Orata FD, Petty NK, Jayatilleke ND, King WL, Kirchberger PC, et al. A genomic island in Vibrio cholerae with VPI-1 site-specific recombination characteristics contains CRISPR-Cas and type VI secretion modules. Sci Rep. 2016;6:36891. [PubMed ID: 27845364]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5109276]. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36891.

  • 32.

    Cervin J, Wands AM, Casselbrant A, Wu H, Krishnamurthy S, Cvjetkovic A, et al. GM1 ganglioside-independent intoxication by Cholera toxin. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14(2). e1006862. [PubMed ID: 29432456]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5825173]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006862.

  • 33.

    Guichard A, Cruz-Moreno B, Aguilar B, van Sorge NM, Kuang J, Kurkciyan AA, et al. Cholera toxin disrupts barrier function by inhibiting exocyst-mediated trafficking of host proteins to intestinal cell junctions. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14(3):294-305. [PubMed ID: 24034615]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3786442]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2013.08.001.

  • 34.

    Ma T, Thiagarajah JR, Yang H, Sonawane ND, Folli C, Galietta LJ, et al. Thiazolidinone CFTR inhibitor identified by high-throughput screening blocks cholera toxin-induced intestinal fluid secretion. J Clin Invest. 2002;110(11):1651-8. [PubMed ID: 12464670]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC151633]. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI16112.

  • 35.

    Jenkin KA, Han Y, Lin S, He P, Yun CC. Nedd4-2-dependent Ubiquitination Potentiates the Inhibition of Human NHE3 by Cholera Toxin and Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;13(3):695-716. [PubMed ID: 34823064]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8789535]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.11.006.

  • 36.

    Jugder BE, Batista JH, Gibson JA, Cunningham PM, Asara JM, Watnick PI. Vibrio cholerae high cell density quorum sensing activates the host intestinal innate immune response. Cell Rep. 2022;40(12):111368. [PubMed ID: 36130487]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9534793]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111368.

  • 37.

    Cieza J, Sovero Y, Estremadoyro L, Dumler F. Electrolyte disturbances in elderly patients with severe diarrhea due to cholera. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995;6(5):1463-7. [PubMed ID: 8589324]. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.V651463.

  • 38.

    Muzembo BA, Kitahara K, Ohno A, Debnath A, Okamoto K, Miyoshi SI. Cholera Rapid Diagnostic Tests for the Detection of Vibrio cholerae O1: An Updated Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(11). [PubMed ID: 34829444]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8622830]. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11112095.

  • 39.

    Muzembo BA, Kitahara K, Debnath A, Okamoto K, Miyoshi SI. Accuracy of cholera rapid diagnostic tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022;28(2):155-62. [PubMed ID: 34506946]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.08.027.

  • 40.

    Bwire G, Orach CG, Abdallah D, Debes AK, Kagirita A, Ram M, et al. Alkaline peptone water enrichment with a dipstick test to quickly detect and monitor cholera outbreaks. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):726. [PubMed ID: 29157211]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5696767]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2824-8.

  • 41.

    Harris JB, LaRocque RC, Qadri F, Ryan ET, Calderwood SB. Cholera. Lancet. 2012;379(9835):2466-76. [PubMed ID: 22748592]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3761070]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60436-X.

  • 42.

    Nelson EJ, Chowdhury A, Harris JB, Begum YA, Chowdhury F, Khan AI, et al. Complexity of rice-water stool from patients with Vibrio cholerae plays a role in the transmission of infectious diarrhea. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(48):19091-6. [PubMed ID: 18024592]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2141913]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706352104.

  • 43.

    Lantagne D, Balakrish Nair G, Lanata CF, Cravioto A. The cholera outbreak in Haiti: where and how did it begin? Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2014;379:145-64. [PubMed ID: 23695726]. https://doi.org/10.1007/82_2013_331.

  • 44.

    Ryan ET, Dhar U, Khan WA, Salam MA, Faruque AS, Fuchs GJ, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and microbiology of endemic cholera among hospitalized patients in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;63(1-2):12-20. [PubMed ID: 11357989]. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2000.63.12.

  • 45.

    Guideline U. Paediatric emergency triage, assessment and treatment. J Geneva: World Health Organization. 2016.

  • 46.

    Freedman SB, Thull-Freedman JD, Rumantir M, Atenafu EG, Stephens D. Emergency department revisits in children with gastroenteritis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;57(5):612-8. [PubMed ID: 23820403]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182a1dd93.

  • 47.

    Hartling L, Bellemare S, Wiebe N, Russell K, Klassen TP, Craig W. Oral versus intravenous rehydration for treating dehydration due to gastroenteritis in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;2006(3). CD004390. [PubMed ID: 16856044]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6532593]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004390.pub2.

  • 48.

    Alam NH, Islam S, Sattar S, Monira S, Desjeux JF. Safety of rapid intravenous rehydration and comparative efficacy of 3 oral rehydration solutions in the treatment of severely malnourished children with dehydrating cholera. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;48(3):318-27. [PubMed ID: 19274788]. https://doi.org/10.1097/mpg.0b013e318180af27.

  • 49.

    Das R, Sobi RA, Sultana AA, Nahar B, Bardhan PK, Luke L, et al. A double-blind clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of a multiple amino acid-based ORS with the standard WHO-ORS in the management of non-cholera acute watery diarrhea in infants and young children: "VS002A" trial protocol. Trials. 2022;23(1):706. [PubMed ID: 36008819]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9403960]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06601-5.

  • 50.

    Gregorio GV, Gonzales ML, Dans LF, Martinez EG. Polymer-based oral rehydration solution for treating acute watery diarrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12(12). CD006519. [PubMed ID: 27959472]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006519.pub3.

  • 51.

    Nelson EJ, Nelson DS, Salam MA, Sack DA. Antibiotics for both moderate and severe cholera. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(1):5-7. [PubMed ID: 21142691]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1013771.

  • 52.

    Dadgostar P. Antimicrobial Resistance: Implications and Costs. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:3903-10. [PubMed ID: 31908502]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6929930]. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S234610.

  • 53.

    Nateghizad H, Sajadi R, Shivaee A, Shirazi O, Sharifian M, Tadi DA, et al. Resistance of Vibrio cholera to antibiotics that inhibit cell wall synthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1027277. [PubMed ID: 37021056]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10069679]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1027277.

  • 54.

    Alam AN, Alam NH, Ahmed T, Sack DA. Randomised double blind trial of single dose doxycycline for treating cholera in adults. BMJ. 1990;300(6740):1619-21. [PubMed ID: 2196962]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1663251]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.300.6740.1619.

  • 55.

    Saha D, Khan WA, Karim MM, Chowdhury HR, Salam MA, Bennish ML. Single-dose ciprofloxacin versus 12-dose erythromycin for childhood cholera: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366(9491):1085-93. [PubMed ID: 16182896]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67290-X.

  • 56.

    Saha D, Karim MM, Khan WA, Ahmed S, Salam MA, Bennish ML. Single-dose azithromycin for the treatment of cholera in adults. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(23):2452-62. [PubMed ID: 16760445]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa054493.

  • 57.

    Kaushik JS, Gupta P, Faridi MM, Das S. Single dose azithromycin versus ciprofloxacin for cholera in children: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2010;47(4):309-15. [PubMed ID: 19578229]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-010-0059-5.

  • 58.

    Rostami A, Zadeh FA, Ebrahimzadeh F, Jafari-Sales A, Gholami S. Globally Vibrio cholera antibiotics resistance to RNA and DNA effective antibiotics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb Pathog. 2022;172:105514. [PubMed ID: 35537594]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105514.

  • 59.

    Lazzerini M, Wanzira H. Oral zinc for treating diarrhoea in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12(12). CD005436. [PubMed ID: 27996088]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005436.pub5.

  • 60.

    Dhingra U, Kisenge R, Sudfeld CR, Dhingra P, Somji S, Dutta A, et al. Lower-Dose Zinc for Childhood Diarrhea - A Randomized, Multicenter Trial. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(13):1231-41. [PubMed ID: 32966722]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7466932]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1915905.

  • 61.

    Imdad A, Mayo-Wilson E, Haykal MR, Regan A, Sidhu J, Smith A, et al. Vitamin A supplementation for preventing morbidity and mortality in children from six months to five years of age. J Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2022;(3).

  • 62.

    Davies HG, Bowman C, Luby SP. Cholera - management and prevention. J Infect. 2017;74 Suppl 1:S66-73. [PubMed ID: 28646965]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-4453(17)30194-9.

  • 63.

    Bain R, Cronk R, Wright J, Yang H, Slaymaker T, Bartram J. Fecal contamination of drinking-water in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2014;11(5). e1001644. [PubMed ID: 24800926]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4011876]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001644.

  • 64.

    Cairncross S, Hunt C, Boisson S, Bostoen K, Curtis V, Fung IC, et al. Water, sanitation and hygiene for the prevention of diarrhoea. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i193-205. [PubMed ID: 20348121]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2845874]. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq035.

  • 65.

    Quick RE, Thompson BL, Zuniga A, Dominguez G, De Brizuela EL, De Palma O, et al. Epidemic cholera in rural El Salvador: risk factors in a region covered by a cholera prevention campaign. Epidemiol Infect. 1995;114(2):249-55. [PubMed ID: 7705488]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2271272]. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268800057915.

  • 66.

    Im J, Islam MT, Ahmmed F, Kim DR, Tadesse BT, Kang S, et al. Do Oral Cholera Vaccine and Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Combine to Provide Greater Protection Against Cholera? Results From a Cluster-Randomized Trial of Oral Cholera Vaccine in Kolkata, India. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024;11(1):ofad701. [PubMed ID: 38274552]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10810060]. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad701.

  • 67.

    Malembaka EB, Bugeme PM, Hutchins C, Xu H, Hulse JD, Demby MN, et al. Effectiveness of one dose of killed oral cholera vaccine in an endemic community in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a matched case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2024;24(5):514-22. [PubMed ID: 38246191]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11043051]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00742-9.

  • 68.

    Kabir S. Critical analysis of compositions and protective efficacies of oral killed cholera vaccines. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2014;21(9):1195-205. [PubMed ID: 25056361]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4178583]. https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00378-14.

  • 69.

    Song KR, Lim JK, Park SE, Saluja T, Cho SI, Wartel TA, et al. Oral Cholera Vaccine Efficacy and Effectiveness. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9(12). [PubMed ID: 34960228]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8708586]. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9121482.