| 1 | Human Resource Management International Digest/United Kingdom/2021 (18) | Qualitative | Thematic analysis/interview | 15 women | Individual: personality types, stage of working life; Organizational: Organizational policies and commitments |
| 2 | Ademuyiwa et al./Nigeria/2021 (19) | Quantitative | Average response ranking/Hierarchical sampling/questionnaire | 896 questionnaires | Individual: Stress, mental fatigue, burnout; Interpersonal: Lack of helpers at home; Organizational: Lack of support from colleagues in performing official duties |
| 3 | Adisa et al./Nigeria/2019 (20) | Qualitative | Thematic analysis/semi-structured interview | 32 women | Cultural factors: cultural contexts [patriarchy in society] |
| 4 | Akkas et al./Bangladesh/2015 (21) | Qualitative and quantitative | Targeted sampling method | 50 women | Individual: life role values, perfectionism, number of children, life cycle stage; Interpersonal: Family involvement, child care arrangements; Organization: Long working hours, organizational inflexibility, overtime work, discrimination in the workplace, and authoritarian management styles |
| 5 | Bernas and Major/United Kingdom/2000 (22) | Quantitative | Path analysis tests finding relationships | 206 questionnaires | Organizational: Having a quality relationship with the supervisor can reduce work-life conflicts and associated stress |
| 6 | Bharathi and Mala/India/2016 (23) | Quantitative | Analysis of exploratory factors | 186 employed women | Individual: Personal perception of people such as lack of time to do things, not paying enough attention to themselves, feeling guilty for not caring enough for children |
| 7 | Brown et al./United States and the Republic of Korea/2020 (24) | Qualitative | Thematic analysis | 20 working women in America, 20 working women in Korea | Cultural factors: A Strong Organizational culture in America; Strong social culture; [like family-friendly culture and social support in Korea] |
| 8 | Choi/Korea/2020 (25) | Quantitative | Multiple regression scanning and analysis | 226 women | Organizational: There is a strong positive relationship between perceived organizational support and work-family conflicts among female employees |
| 9 | Eckart and Ziomek‐Daigle/United States/2019 (26) | Quantitative | Multiple correlations and regressions | 226 women | Individual: Number of children under 18 years at home, caring for the elderly or sick with special needs; Organizational: Working hours per week, work experience, flexibility in the workplace, autonomy in the workplace |
| 10 | Wei et al./China/2009 (27) | Qualitative | Content analysis | 121 women | Individual: The role of self-perceived professional and social factors by the individual, education, income, and work experience; Interpersonal: Spouse’s stress and sacrificing the family's satisfaction |
| 11 | Hassan/Malaysia/2020 (28) | Qualitative | Content analysis | 76 women | Organizational: Incentives and services provided by employers and institutions to reduce the workload of women [adequate leave, flexibility in management and working hours, and support system] |
| 12 | Hassan et al./Malaysia/2020 (29) | Quantitative | Correlation | 80 women | Organizational: There was a relationship between workplace spirituality [meaningful work and a sense of consensus] and work-life balance. |
| 13 | Kang and Wang/Korea/2018 (4) | Qualitative | 6-step cresol analysis | 16 women | Individual: Concerns about child care, a strong craving for a job, and career aspirations; Interpersonal: Lack of support from family and colleagues; Organizational: Lack of support systems |
| 14 | Kaur et al./India/2018 (30) | Quantitative | Correlation | 100 working women | Individual: Life concerns like babysitting; Organizational: Organizational inflexibility toward working women |
| 15 | Lee et al./United states/2013 (31) | Quantitative | Structural modeling technique | 276 married working women | Individual: Job satisfaction; Interpersonal: Receiving support from individuals, especially spouses |
| 16 | Lee et al./United States/2017 (32) | Quantitative | Hidden personality profile approach | 440 women | Individual: Personality traits [worker-oriented, parent-oriented, balanced] |
| 17 | Lo/Hong Kong/2003 (33) | Qualitative | Qualitative content analysis | 50 women | Interpersonal: The traditional culture of families and the many home responsibilities of women; Organizational: Inflexible policies of organizations |
| 18 | Maragatham and Amudha/India/2016 (34) | Quantitative | ANOVA and chi-square | 150 women | Individual: Mental balance and physical health; Interpersonal: Number of dependents and sponsors |
| 19 | Noor/Malaysia/2002 (35) | Quantitative | Regression analysis | 310 women | Interpersonal: Spouse support; Organizational: Long working hours and overloaded roles increase work-life conflict. |
| 20 | Nwagbara/Nigeria/2020 (36) | Qualitative | Exploratory | 43 women | Cultural factors: Cultural factors and social realities such as patriarchy in societies increase the intensity of work-life conflicts for women. |
| 21 | Rehman and Azam Roomi/Pakistan/2012 (37) | Qualitative | Interpretive phenomenology | 20 women | Individual: Lack of time planning; Interpersonal: Men do not accept women's responsibilities in the family; Cultural: Gender bias, social and cultural norms in a patriarchal society |
| 22 | Sane and Pingali/India/2015 (38) | Qualitative | Factor Analysis | | Cultural: High household responsibilities due to the cultural context; Interpersonal: Lack of companionship between spouses |
| 23 | Sudhindra et al./India/2020 (39) | Quantitative | Regression | 467 women | Interpersonal: Family support, caring for other people at home; Organizational: Organizational support in the workplace |
| 24 | Sundaresan/India/2014 (40) | Quantitative | Factor Analysis | 125 women | Individual: Having very little time for oneself, high levels of stress, and incoherence in household chores; Interpersonal: Expectations of others to meet their needs; Organizational: Excessive work pressure |
| 25 | Taghizadeh et al./Iran/2021 (6) | Qualitative | Factor analysis | 29 women | Individual: Job stress, insufficient individual abilities, and skills, high value for work and family; Interpersonal: unsupportive family environment, family overload, and hegemonic masculinity |
| 26 | Uddin et al./Bangladesh/2020 (41) | Quantitative | Path coefficient evaluation | 558 people | Organizational: Support and protectionist organizational policies |
| 27 | Uysal Irak et al./2019 (9) | Quantitative | Path analysis | 201 working mothers | Interpersonal: Spouses’ support; Organizational: Emotional support by the supervisor |
| 28 | Uzoigwe et al./Nigeria/2016 (42) | Quantitative | Multiple linear regression analysis | 173 women | Individual: Excessive family responsibilities and roles; Organizational: High job demands |
| 29 | Valk and Srinivasan/India/2011 (43) | Qualitative | Exploratory analysis | 13 women | Individual: Multipurpose responsibilities and try to solve them all; Interpersonal: Social support; Organizational: Supportive organizational policies and practices |
| 30 | Zayed et al./Egypt/2021 (12) | Quantitative | Correlation | 442 Women | Individual: Work overflows; Interpersonal and organizational: Lack of decision-making authority, lack of support from colleagues, and lack of support from supervisors |
| 31 | Zito et al./Italia/2013 (44) | Quantitative | Correlation | 207 nurses (92.5% female) | Organizational: Work shifts, overworking, lack of support of organizations to access more services such as child care centers; Individual: The cognitive burden of the conflict and how the individual perceives the issue |