1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Patients Sample Collection
| No. | FAB | RBC × 106 | WBC × 103 | Hb (g/dL) | Hct (%) | Plt × 103 | Blast (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AML-M2 | 3.32 | 24.7 | 9.7 | 28.4 | 48 | 35 |
| 2 | AML-M1 | 2.79 | 50.01 | 9.2 | 27.9 | 165 | 50 |
| 3 | AML-M2 | 3.12 | 86.45 | 9.5 | 28.1 | 78 | 65 |
| 4 | AML-M2 | 4.41 | 32.14 | 12.9 | 38.7 | 170 | 40 |
| 5 | AML-M0 | 2.98 | 45.24 | 10.1 | 28.8 | 93 | 35 |
| 6 | AML-M4 | 2.71 | 23.39 | 8.7 | 26.1 | 238 | 25 |
| 7 | AML-M2 | 3.58 | 14.46 | 10.5 | 29.3 | 24 | 60 |
| 8 | AML-M5 | 3.5 | 37.06 | 9.8 | 31.6 | 55 | 25 |
| 9 | AML-M3 | 2.95 | 75.54 | 9.2 | 25.7 | 53 | 45 |
| 10 | AML-M4 | 3.53 | 11.11 | 10.6 | 31.3 | 80 | 80 |
| 11 | AML-M2 | 5.34 | 15.34 | 14.6 | 42.1 | 160 | 45 |
| 12 | AML-M3 | 5.19 | 56.61 | 15.8 | 46.0 | 137 | 55 |
| 13 | AML-M1 | 2.31 | 108 | 6.01 | 21.0 | 10 | 40 |
| 14 | AML-M2 | 4.1 | 36.45 | 11.39 | 34.0 | 78 | 80 |
| 15 | AML-M4 | 5.01 | 13 | 14.6 | 42.14 | 175 | 80 |
| 16 | AML-M5 | 3.03 | 36.54 | 9.5 | 27.3 | 45 | 90 |
| 17 | AML-M3 | 2.42 | 99.14 | 8.3 | 24.8 | 141 | 43 |
| 18 | AML-M4 | 4.18 | 16.36 | 12.3 | 38.05 | 189 | 26 |
| 19 | AML-M6 | 4.45 | 17.45 | 13.5 | 40.4 | 173 | 32 |
| 20 | AML-M2 | 3.56 | 54.04 | 11.6 | 34.4 | 121 | 41 |
| 21 | AML-M1 | 3.06 | 14.4 | 9.3 | 26.6 | 63 | 21 |
| 22 | AML-M2 | 2.75 | 29.5 | 10.3 | 31.4 | 69 | 38 |
| 23 | AML-M4 | 3.43 | 27.76 | 9.5 | 31.3 | 91 | 41 |
| 24 | AML-M2 | 3.37 | 106.7 | 9.4 | 29.2 | 35 | 68 |
| 25 | AML-M3 | 3.11 | 19.45 | 9.3 | 27.7 | 116 | 51 |
| 26 | AML-M2 | 3.33 | 16.86 | 10.3 | 30.2 | 31 | 65 |
| 27 | AML-M4 | 4.17 | 18.54 | 9.8 | 28.1 | 26 | 35 |
| 28 | AML-M5 | 3.67 | 21.41 | 8.6 | 26.1 | 32 | 40 |
| 29 | AML-M2 | 4.02 | 13.52 | 11.7 | 34 | 15 | 30 |
| 30 | AML-M1 | 2.89 | 42.51 | 9.9 | 29.41 | 62 | 28 |
Abbreviations: Hb, hemoglobin; RBC, red blood cells; WBC, white blood cells.
3.2. RNA Purification and Preparation of cDNA
3.3. Real-Time Quantitative PCR
| Gene | Accession Number | Forward Primer (5’-3’) | Reverse Primer (5’-3’) | Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABL | NM-005157 | TCCTCGTCCTCCAGCTGTTA | ACCCGGAGCTTTTCACCTTT | 218 |
| Akt | NM-005163 | TCCTCCTCAAGAATGATGGCA | GTGCGTTCGATGACAGTGGT | 181 |
| c-Myc | NM-002467 | CCACAGCAAACCTCCTCACAG | GCAGGATAGTCCTTCCGAGTG | 105 |
| CIP2A | NM-020890 | ACCCCAACATAAGTGCTTCAC | TCTCTGGTTTCAATGTCTACTGC | 79 |
| PP2A | NM-178001 | TCTCAGGCATACGCTGACTAC | GGAGACTCTGTACTCGAAGGT | 90 |
3.4. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. The Expression Level of CIP2A and PP2A in AML Samples
| Clinical Variables | Total Patients, 30 (100) | Evaluable Patients | Evaluable Patients | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIP2A (↑) | CIP2A (↓) | P Value | PP2A (↑) | PP2A (↓) | P Value | ||
| Age, year | 49, 19 - 83 | 0.325 | 0.871 | ||||
| n < 60 | 19 (63.3) | 14 (46.6) | 5 (17) | 7 (23.3) | 12 (40) | ||
| n ≥ 60 | 11 (36.4) | 8 (26.4) | 3 (10) | 3 (10) | 8 (26.7) | ||
| Sex | 0.470 | 0.312 | |||||
| Male | 17 (56) | 10 (33.3) | 7 (23.4) | 4 (13.3) | 13 (43.3) | ||
| Female | 13 (44) | 9 (30) | 4 (13.3) | 3 (10) | 10 (33.4) | ||
| Percentage of blast | 0.556 | 0.117 | |||||
| n < 40 | 10 (33.3) | 9 (30) | 1 (3) | 2 (6) | 8 (26.7) | ||
| n ≥ 40 | 20 (66.7) | 13 (43.3) | 7 (23.7) | 4 (13.3) | 16 (54) | ||
| AML subtype | 0.281 | 0.120 | |||||
| M3 | 4 (13.5) | 2 (6.5) | 2 (6.5) | 1 (3) | 3 (10) | ||
| Non-M3 | 26 (86.5) | 20 (67) | 6 (20) | 5 (16.4) | 21 (70.6) | ||
Abbreviation: AML, acute myeloid leukemia.
aValues are expressed as No. (%) or median, range.
bStatistically significant values: P < 0.05.
4.2. The Expression Level of Akt and c-Myc Was Increased in AML Patients as Compared to Healthy Counterparts
| Clinical Variables | Total Patients, 30 (100) | Evaluable Patients | Evaluable Patients | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akt (↑) | Akt (↓) | P Value | c-Myc (↑) | c-Myc (↓) | P Value | ||
| Age, year | 49, 19 - 83 | 0.254 | |||||
| n < 60 | 19 (63.3) | 13 (43) | 6 (20) | 0.435 | 15 (50) | 4 (13.3) | |
| n ≥ 60 | 11 (36.4) | 9 (30) | 2 (15) | 7 (23.4) | 4 (13.3) | ||
| Sex | 0.120 | ||||||
| Male | 17 (56) | 12 (40) | 5 (16.6) | 0.740 | 11 (36.6) | 6 (20) | |
| Female | 13 (44) | 10 (33.3) | 3 (10) | 10 (33.3) | 3 (10) | ||
| Percentage of blast | 0.391 | ||||||
| n < 40 | 10 (33.3) | 7 (23.3) | 3 (10) | 0.276 | 8 (26.3) | 2 (6) | |
| n ≥ 40 | 20 (66.7) | 15 (50) | 5 (16.7) | 16 (53.3) | 4 (13.4) | ||
| AML subtype | 0.726 | ||||||
| M3 | 4 (13.5) | 3 (10) | 1 (3) | 0.178 | 3 (10) | 1 (3) | |
| Non-M3 | 26 (86.5) | 22 (73.3) | 4 (13.7) | 20 (67) | 6 (20) | ||
Abbreviation: AML, acute myeloid leukemia.
aValues are expressed as No. (%) or median, range.
bStatistically significant values: P < 0.05.
4.3. Correlation Between Akt, c-Myc, CIP2A, and PP2A Expression Levels in the Studied Groups
A, while the expression levels of CIP2A in leukemic patients were significantly higher than the control group, the mRNA expression level of PPI2A significantly decreased; B, there was a significant elevation in the expression levels of both Akt and c-Myc in leukemia patients as compared with samples collected from the normal volunteers. Values are given as mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments.
Correlation between the expression level of Akt, c-Myc, CIP2A, and PP2A in leukemic samples. Normal distribution of data was achieved by log 10 computation and correlation between Akt, c-Myc, CIP2A, and PP2A was determined in 30 AML patients. Values are given as mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments.
Schematic representation proposed for the plausible role of PI3K axis in AML cells. Through aberrant activation of the PI3K signaling pathway which subsequently leads to the over-expression of Akt, c-Myc would be expressed in malignant cells and turn lead to the excessive expression of CIP2A, a direct inhibitor of PP2A. Upon PP2A suppression, Akt and c-Myc remained phosphorylated and this defective loop may be responsible for providing an opportunity for AML cells to proliferate more vigorously.


