Cervical cancer is one of the top five most common cancers in women worldwide with a high mortality rate (
1). Radical hysterectomy is indicated for patients with cervical cancer (
2). Others suggest radical hysterectomy in the early stages of cervical cancer for reducing the recurrence rate and improving the patients’ survival (
3). This is while radical hysterectomy is associated with several complications, such as infection, thromboembolism, genitourinary injury, bleeding, nerve injury, and dehiscence, which increase the risk of postsurgical morbidity and mortality (
4). Furthermore, the patient undergoing hysterectomy is deprived of conception in the future, which can affect her sexual and social life (
5). Accordingly, studies have focused on observational therapies for patients with cervical cancer who wish to preserve their fertility, known as fertility-sparing management strategies, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, trachelectomy, and large loop excision of the transformation zone (large loop conization) (
6). These methods are suggested for early-stage cervical cancers with specific pathologies, such as squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, but not at other stages or other pathologies, like neuroendocrine tumors (REF).
Radical trachelectomy (RT) with pelvic lymph node assessment (with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy) is an acceptable method for selected patients with cervical cancer, who wish to maintain their fertility (
7). This method can be performed by two approaches; abdominal and vaginal, each with their own advantages and disadvantages (
8). The vaginal radical trachelectomy (VRT) has the advantage of less bleeding and higher pregnancy rate, while the abdominal approach has other advantages, such as larger resection, lower recurrence rate, and better oncology results that allow for safe management of invasive cervical cancers ≥ 2 cm with a survival rate similar to radical hysterectomy (
8). However, the matter of lower fertility rate compared to the general population, the higher rate of pregnancy complications, and the need for hysterectomy in future questions the choice of trachelectomy over radical hysterectomy, mainly for the sake of fertility preservation (
9). The patient reported here, was a 39-year-old woman with high-grade invasive cervical cancer, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) that was successfully managed by laparoscopic lymphadenectomy and radical trachelectomy and leading to normal pregnancy in the following years.