Radiation-induced sarcoma (RIS) is a well-known treatment complication that constitutes about 3% of all sarcomas (
7). RIS was initially described in the early 1900s by Perthes et al. Later, the diagnostic criteria of RIS were introduced by Cahan et al. (
8) as the lesions of different histology that are located at the RT field with a latency period of more than 4 years. In 2010, the sarcoma group of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) modified this definition and declared that RIS may occur as soon as 6 months after RT (
9). Over the past decades, the incidence of RIS has significantly risen (
10). This may be due to an increase in the survival of irradiated patients by more effective systemic therapies, more utilization of RT (e.g. with the increased rate of breast-conserving surgery), and the increased use of modern RT techniques (e.g. intensity-modulated radiation therapy) (
11). Studies have shown the poor prognosis of RIS in comparison with primary sarcomas. The RIS is relatively higher grade, larger, and deeper in location. Furthermore, prior RT impairs effective surgery and RT that further mitigates the prognosis (
9). The MSS is a rare entity among Iranian females that accounts for 0.03% of breast cancers (
2). It may be developed de novo or arise secondary to RT (
12). In 1962, Berg et al. (
13) defined the pathologic features of MSS. According to the 2013 World Health Organization classification of tumors, stromal sarcoma is categorized as the tumors with uncertain differentiation (
14). Microscopically, MSS is characterized by spindle cells with nuclear atypia, brisk stromal mitotic activity, and IHC positivity for vimentin and CD10, and negativity for CD34 (
15,
16). Histologically, its differential diagnosis is cystosarcoma phyllodes and metaplastic carcinoma. It can be differentiated from the former and later by sparing the lobular component and IHC characteristics, respectively (
17). Because of the rarity of this disease, the therapeutic approach remains controversial. Similar to other sarcomas, surgery is the only potentially curative modality. Considering limited lymphatic involvement, wide local excision or mastectomy without lymphadenectomy is the most accepted surgical approach for MSS. The primary goal is resection of the tumor with negative margins (
18). In the case of inoperable tumors, other modalities (e.g. chemotherapy or RT) can potentially facilitate the resection. However, the tumor of our case was resistant to the AI regimen. This case report can provide a clue to try alternative choices as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for MSS with chondroid components. Future studies can reveal this notion. Followings are learning points of this case report:
1) MSS is an extremely rare entity; so, the mainstay of therapy remains a major dilemma.
2) MSS has an aggressive natural history that intends to spread either locally or distant.
3) MSS with chondroid differentiation was resistant to the standard chemotherapy of sarcoma (i.e. AI regimen).
4) Radiotherapy is a potential choice in the case of chemoresistant MSS.