1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Plant Materials
3.2. Preparation of Extract
3.2.1. Preparation of Aqueous-alcoholic Extract
3.2.2. Preparation of Dried Extracts and Standard
3.3. Animal Treatments
3.4. Biochemical Parameters
3.5. Histopathological Sample Preparation and Evaluation
3.6. Immunohistochemical Sample Preparation
3.7. Statistical Analyses
4. Results
4.1. Toxicity
4.2. Biochemical Parameters
| Groups | AST (unit/L) | ALT (unit/L) | GGT (unit/L) | ALP (unit/L) | Total Bilirubin (mg/dL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (saline) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 215.75 ± 100.20 A | 80.50 ± 14.27 A | 0.25 ± 0.50 A | 225.75 ± 141.54 A | 19.25 ± 8.53 B |
| %CV | 46.44 | 17.72 | 2.0 | 62.69 | 44.31 |
| DOX | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 221.00 ± 65.84 B | 102.00 ± 76.63 B | 1.17 ± 1.94 B | 307.67 ± 33.90 B | 15.17 ± 5.15 B |
| %CV | 29.79 | 75.12 | 1.65 | 11.01 | 33.94 |
| Chicory | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 150.80 ± 24.50 B | 62.40 ± 6.46 A | 0.40 ± 0.54 A | 214.2 ± 117.69 A | 32.80 ± 23.59 A |
| %CV | 16.24 | 10.35 | 1.35 | 54.94 | 71.92 |
| Melatonin | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 49.67 ± 17.94 B | 129.33 ± 18.03 A | 0.50 ± 0.54 A | 184.83 ± 95.64 A | 16.0 ± 3.16 B |
| %CV | 36.11 | 13.94 | 1.08 | 51.74 | 19.75 |
| Both (DOX + chicory / melatonin) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 67.60 ± 11.86 B | 125.67 ± 10.78 A | 0.60 ± 0.54 A | 254.6 ± 61.35 A | 11.5 ± 1.73 B |
| %CV | 8.57 | 8.58 | 0.9 | 24.09 | 15.04 |
a Analysis was done by Kruskal-Wallis for AST, GGT, and total bilirubin and one-way analysis of variance test for ALT and ALP. A: Significant difference from DOX. B: Significant difference from A.
4.3. Histopathological Structure of the Liver
Histopathological evaluation of the livers. A: Control group not exposed to doxorubicin. B: DOX group we treated with doxorubicin. C: Chicory, D: Melatonin, and E: Chicory + melatonin compared to DOX group (P < 0.05); (HE × 200). Freeform: Vacuolar degeneration; Yellow arrow: Necrotic hepatocyte; Chevron: Inflammation; P: Portal vein; V: Central vein
| Groups | Necrosis | Leucocyte Infiltration | Vacuolar Degeneration | Congested Blood Vessels | Total Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (saline) | 0.00 ± 0.00 A | 0.00 ± 0.00 A | 0.00 ± 0.00 A | 0.00 ± 0.00 A | 0.00 A |
| DOX | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 3.67 ± 0.51 B | 1.83 ± 0.75 B | 2.50 ± 1.22 B | 2.17 ± 0.75 B | 11.34 B |
| %CV | 14.10 | 41.10 | 48.80 | 34.70 | |
| Chicory | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 2.17 ± 0.75 C | 1.33 ± 0.5 B | 1.33 ± 0.51 C | 1.50 ± 0.54 B | 8.17 C |
| %CV | 34.70 | 38.70 | 38.34 | 36.50 | |
| Melatonin | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 1.67 ± 0.51 C | 0.67 ± 0.51 C | 1.00 ± 0.00 C | 0.67 ± 0.51 A | 4.18 D |
| %CV | 31.00 | 77.50 | 00.00 | 77.50 | |
| Both (DOX + chicory / melatonin) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 0.83 ± 0.75 A | 0.33 ± 0.51 D | 1.00 ± 0.00 C | 0.33 ± 0.51 A | 2.49 D |
| %CV | 90.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 154.90 |
a They were treated with Chicory extract and Melatonin. Scoring was performed as 0 = absent; 1 = low or weak; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; and 4 = high or frequent, and also the total score. Analysis was done by Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance test. A: Significant difference from DOX. B: Significant difference from A. C: Significant difference from A and B. and D: Significant difference from A, B and C.
4.4. Immunohistochemistry Analysis of TNFα in the Liver
| Factor | Control (Saline) | DOX | Chicory | Melatonin | Both (DOX + Chicory / Melatonin) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNFα % | 12.26 ± 1.35 A | 17.54 ± 0.70 B | 17.27 ± 0.95 B | 14.72 ± 0.66 C | 13.59 ± 0.98 A, C |
a Data are mean ± SD, and analysis is carried out using one-way ANOVA. A: significant difference from DOX. B: Significant difference from A. C: Significant difference from A and B.

