Pituitary adenomas account for approximately 10 to 15 percent of primary operated brain tumors (
1,
2) and would be the third most common intracranial neoplasms after glioma and meningioma (
10,
11). These tumors have been classified either according to their size or immunohistochemically by pituitary cell type: micro-adenoma measures 10 mm or less in diameter, macro-adenoma over 1 cm in diameter, some are endocrinologically active and others are non-functioning (
1). About 10 to 20 percent of all pituitary adenomas are GH-producing (
2,
5). Associated clinical manifestations are mainly related to over-production of IGF-1 by endocrine active tumors, which might cause obvious clinical features of acromegaly in adults (
1,
6) or the mass effect of macro-adenomas (
1,
4,
12). So, as the pituitary adenoma increases in size, upward growth of the tumor with extension to supra-sellar region, called mass effect, often causes progressive visual loss and results in tunnel vision and then blindness (
4,
12). Also, the occurrence of diabetes mellitus in relation to a GH-producing pituitary adenoma because of potentially insulin antagonist effect has been well described (
13-
15). This is similar to our case in which growth hormone producing macro-adenoma presented with acromegaly, visual impairment and diabetes mellitus. Histopathologically, growth hormone producing adenomas are either densely granulated with dense acidophilic cytoplasm showing diffuse growth hormone immune-reactivity or sparsely granulated with weak or nearly absent staining for growth hormone as well as the distinctive presence of fibrous bodies (
1,
4,
16). Differences in biological behavior are reflected in the morphologic features. Sparsely granulated growth hormone adenomas that occur in younger ages have been associated with a distinctly poorer prognosis and a propensity for aggressive recurrences (
4,
16,
17). Aggressive tumors erode the dura or bone, and may infiltrate surrounding structures, such as the cavernous sinus, cranial nerves, blood vessels, sphenoid bone, and para-nasal sinuses or brain (
1,
7-
9). Our case of sparsely granulated growth hormone adenoma, brain invasion and recurrence was a rare example of this entity. It is important to recognize that lymphocytic hypophysitis and inflammatory diseases of the pituitary gland are other rare differential diagnosis of a sellar mass. Lymphocytic hypophysitis represents the most typical of these disorders and is presumed to be of autoimmune origin. It has been characterized by disruption of pituitary gland acini with focal or diffuse lymphocytic infiltration in normal parenchyma (
18-
20). Although lymphocytic hypophysitis is a relatively rare condition most frequently seen in women during pregnancy or postpartum (
21), infiltration of pituitary adenoma by inflammatory cells are extremely rare occurring in younger ages and has no association with pregnancy (
22). There is some proposal about the presentation of lymphocytic infiltration in pituitary adenoma but the definite cause of the process is unknown yet. These hypotheses are: the direct effect of secreted hormones on the immune system, local presentation of a general autoimmune disorder, local expression of autoimmune reaction (
22) or in our case, this lymphoid infiltration might be due to previous surgery. Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) may be seen in various types of solid tumors like germinoma, melanoma, ovarian, breast, and colon cancer (
23-
25). The mechanisms of this infiltration are different and may be due to recognition of tumor antigens by host cells or inflammatory response and chemotaxis (
23). The prognostic significances of TILs are also different, for example in ovarian cancer these TILs have made the prognosis favorable with longer survival but in germinoma their consequences have been more relapses and worse prognosis (
23). The data about TILs in pituitary adenomas is scant. In some cases peri-tumoral infiltrations may be due to inflammatory reaction and is called secondary hypophysitis but TILs inside the pituitary adenoma is a different condition (
23). Some cases of pituitary adenomas with lymphocytic infiltration have been reported (
10,
22,
23,
26). A previous study of 1400 pituitary adenomas demonstrated that lymphocytic infiltration was exclusively of T-cells type (16) but interestingly in our case and few other reports (
10,
26), it has shown mixed T and B cells. From a case control study, Lupi et al. have shown that this lymphocyte infiltration inside the pituitary adenomas, whether functional or non-functional, could lead to a worse prognosis (
23). The present case is considered to be of interest with regard to presence of mixed T and B lymphocytic infiltration and germinal center formation and also invasion of the brain parenchyma simultaneously. According to all studies about pituitary adenomas, the significance of lymphoid infiltration in these tumors remains to be established.