Trends in Ovarian Cancer Incidence in Iran

authors:

avatar Yousef Moradi 1 , avatar Mehdi Jafari 2 , avatar Shahla Chaichian ORCID 3 , * , avatar Sorour Khateri 4 , avatar Abdolrasool Akbarian 1 , avatar Bahram Moazzami 1 , avatar Kamyar Mansori 5 , avatar Yaghob Mahmodi 6 , avatar Saeed Samie 1

Pars Advanced and Minimally Invasive Manners Research Center, Pars Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran
Departemanet of Surgery, Research Center for Improvement of Surgical Outcome and Procedures, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Minimally Invasive Techniques Research Center in Women, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
MD, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences , Gonabad, Iran
Master of Medical Surgical Nursing Education, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

How To Cite Moradi Y, Jafari M, Chaichian S, Khateri S, Akbarian A, et al. Trends in Ovarian Cancer Incidence in Iran. Int J Cancer Manag. 2016;9(6):e5452. https://doi.org/10.17795/ijcp-5452.

Abstract

Background:

Cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, among which ovarian cancer has a high incidence and case fatality. Gaining insight into the epidemiology and trends of ovarian cancer can be very influential in cancer screening and treatments programming. This study aimed to investigate the trends in the incidence of ovarian cancer in Iran, because this issue has been neglected so far.

Methods:

This study is a re-analysis of existing data from the cancer data recording system in Iran during the years 2003 to 2009. The incidence rates reported were standardized according to the world health organization (WHO) and the trend in the incidence of this disease was determined by STATA software and the significance of the morbidity trend diagram was also derived via WINPEPI software.

Results:

The statistics of cancer registry center shows an increasing trend of ovarian cancer from 2003 to 2008, while it decreased from 2008 to 2009. During this period, 6078 cases of ovarian cancer were registered in Iran, increasing from 591 cases in 2003 to 1077 in 2009, which shows an approximately 2-fold increase in the incidence of registered cases. During these seven years, the highest incidence rate was seen in Markazi province with 6.33 per 100,000 persons and the least in Kohkiloye-va-Boyerahmad province with zero incidence. Almost all provinces, except a few, had increasing incidence of ovarian cancer.

Conclusions:

According to the results of the study, the incidence of ovarian cancer is increasing in Iran, especially in the central and northwestern regions of the country. This increase may be due to changing the patterns of risk factors for this disease, such as changes in lifestyle in the population, which will lead to changes in the incidence of the disease. Hence, due to the increase in incidence of this cancer, it is recommended to implement screening and early detection programs in high risk areas and populations.

1. Background

Cancer is one of the three main causes of death around the world (1). The death rate from cancer was 8,200,000 in 2012, which has had a 4.8% increase since 2008 (1, 2). In Iran, cancer is the third most prevalent cause of death. Annually, over 30,000 people lose their lives due to cancer in Iran (3). It is estimated that each year more than 70,000 new cases of cancer occur in Iran and with increasing life expectancy and the percentage of elderlies in the population, it is expected that the incidence of cancer be doubled in the next two decades (3, 4). Investigating the causes of women’s mortality showed that cancers are the second cause of death in women, and among gynecologic cancers, ovarian cancer, is the fourth leading cause of mortality in women (5). Gynecologic cancers are also the most common cause of death in women in North America, Northern Europe and Western Europe (1, 6, 7). The incidence of this cancer varies from 9 to 17 new cases per 100,000 women per year (7, 8). Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality rate among gynecologic cancers (9). The most common ovarian cancer is the epithelial type and usually about 60% of patients present with metastasis due to minimal symptoms (10, 11). The mean age of women at diagnosis is 51 years (12). Although the improved treatment methods of ovarian cancer has increased the life expectancy of patients in the last decade, patients’ survival has ultimately increased slightly (13). One of the major causes of mortality in these patients, despite appropriate treatment, is delay in referral of women with ovarian cancer, especially epithelial tumors (14). Therefore, measures should be implemented in order to prevent the risk factors and identification of symptoms to patients, so that the prevalence of the disease and its complications decline. In particular, in the era of modern health care systems, where prevention in the first level is the preferred method, compared to other issues. Only 10% of tumors occur in women younger than 40 years and about 3% in women under 30 (15).

Currently, there is no approved method for screening ovarian cancer, so efforts are conducted to identify early symptoms of ovarian cancer with the hope that cancer can be diagnosed and treated at an early stage (16, 17). If the diagnosis in the first phase can reach from 25% to 75%, the mortality rate of this disease will decrease by 50% (17). Several factors are involved in the development of ovarian cancer, including reduced number of pregnancies, in addition to infertility that increase the incidence of the disease (18). Other important factors include the long reproductive period, (early menarche, and late menopause) and history of infertility (19). Obesity in adulthood can increase its prevalence up to 50% before menopause. On the other hand, having at least one child or using oral contraceptives for more than 5 years reduces the risk of ovarian cancer (20). The survival rate of the affected patients is placed after the survival rates of the breast, lung and colon cancers; the 5-years’ relative survival of this cancer in general is reported from 30 to 50% in various reports, but at the same time, sufficient studies have not been conducted in this regard in Iran (21).

2. Objectives

It seems that the prevalence of this disease is high in Iran, but there is no study determining the trend of this important disease and the changes in its incidence in recent decades and its epidemiology in Iran; the few studies are regional with limited samples and as far as epidemiologic data is a prerequisite for successful planning, this study aimed to assess the epidemiology and determine the trends in the incidence of ovarian cancer in Iran from 2003 to 2009.

3. Methods

The present cross-sectional study was conducted using available data. The data from national cancer registry and the center for disease control of the ministry of health and medical education has been used. Center for Disease Control receives data from pathology centers in the country, and controls them for accurate coding, information deficits and duplications by Pars software. Population-based cancer registries, by definition, use multiple sources (including hospital records, records from diagnostic facilities and even death certificates) to collect cancer data. While this is usually easier to achieve in smaller countries, a vast geographical territory such as Iran, with its climate and cultural diversity, may pose technical and logistic problems to this objective. While the pathology-based cancer registration is in place, we hope that the addition of the population-based cancer registries, and establishment of new registries in poorly covered areas, will improve cancer reporting in the country (22, 23). In this study, all cases, registered since 2003 to 2009 in the whole country as well as the statistics of ovarian cancer in all provinces, have been studied. The direct incidence reported was then standardized according to the world health organization (WHO) standards. The collected data was accordingly investigated for the whole country based on the number of cases and standardized incidence rates for provinces. After data collection, the chart of the disease trend during the study period and the prevalence of ovarian cancer were drawn for different regions. The significance of figures was calculated by using the WinPepi software.

4. Results

Assessing the statistics of cancer registry center in Iran shows that from 2003 to 2009, the incidence of ovarian cancer had an increasing trend in women since 2008; while after 2008, it had a decreasing trend, compared to the previous years (Figure 1). According to this statistics, 6078 cases of ovarian cancer were recorded during this period. The highest number has been reported in 2008 with 1096 cases and the lowest in 2003 with 736 cases (Table 1). The statistics of cancer registry center showed that the highest incidence in women's cancer was in 2008 with 4.25 per 100,000 women and the lowest in 2003 with 34.2 per 100,000 people. Also, the survey of central cancer registry showed the incidence of ovarian cancer in women from 2003 to 2009 in 30 provinces, as shown in Table 2. According to this table, during these seven years, the highest incidence was in Markazi province with 6.33 in 100,000 people in 2009 and the lowest incidence in the Kohkiloye Boyerahmad province in 2003 with zero reported case. This statistic shows that the central, north, and north-west provinces had the highest incidence, whereas the lowest incidence was in the east and southeast provinces. However, statistics show an increasing incidence in some of these provinces. The statistical significance of changes in trend diagram of age standardized incidence rate (ASR) of ovarian cancer per 100 thousand people was assessed by means of WINPEPI software. According to this diagram, changes in the trend of ovarian cancer occurrence in women is significant (Figure 2) (P = 0.048).

Table 1.

Incidence of Ovarian Cancer in Iran, According to the Statistics of Cancer Registry Center

ASRFrequency, (%)Number of CasesStatistics of Cancer Registry Center
2.343.515912003
2.883.597362004
2.983.247932005
3.183.228382006
3.963.469472007
4.253.2310962008
43.3010772009
Table 2.

Standardized Incidence of Ovarian Cancer in all Provinces of Iran From 2003 to 2009

Province2009200820072006200520042003
East Azarbayjan3.914.973.571.041.051.600.30
West Azarbayjan2.782.163.232.253.682.882.37
Ardebil4.032.021.453.180.413.760.83
Isfahan4.364.455.014.163.112.722.27
Ilam2.411.631.351.941.120.621.48
Bushehr4.643.964.181.540.781.990.97
Tehran5.704.524.294.253.762.965.80
Charmahal and Bakhtiari1.223.564.473.912.770.880.68
South Khorasan0.721.630.252.441.243.542.48
Razavi Khorasan3.463.353.382.831.83
North Khorasan2.891.651.120.570.52
Khuzestan4.324.562.992.022.172.701.10
Zanjan2.441.531.280.580.501.860.65
Semnan2.114.522.930.482.442.851.44
Sistan and Baluchestan1.021.050.600.730.341.230.36
Fars4.613.754.123.232.361.942.40
Qazvin3.452.752.694.172.402.012.88
Qom1.912.181.492.351.911.372.53
Golestan3.664.143.132.233.492.202.64
Gilan4.542.883.311.852.332.561.44
Lorestan3.154.073.131.842.432.480.65
Mazandaran3.013.772.382.822.191.641.82
Markazi6.331.333.012.423.111.682.27
Hormozgan2.412.612.772.770.821.160.30
Hamedan3.284.113.532.291.681.341.48
Kordestan4.252.522.091.912.461.621.11
Kerman3.862.142.122.312.522.701.48
Kermanshah3.962.972.532.372.002.061.85
Kohkiloye-Boyerahmad5.363.844.470.800.931.830.00
Yazd5.184.862.233.034.093.212.82
Trends in the Incidence of Ovarian Cancer From 2003 to 2009
Trends in the Incidence of Ovarian Cancer From 2003 to 2009
Chart of Significance of Variance Trend for Occurrence of Ovarian Cancer in Iran
Chart of Significance of Variance Trend for Occurrence of Ovarian Cancer in Iran

5. Discussion

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic cancer in women and includes 25% of the genital tract neoplasms in the United States (5, 24). Ovarian cancer is known as the fifth leading cause of cancer death among women in the United States (24). In Iran, it is the eighth most common cancer in terms of incidence, twelfth fatal cancer, and sixteenth considering the burden of disease attributable to cancer (3, 21). According to the study by Mousavi and colleagues (3), the age-standardized incidence rate of ovarian cancer in 2005 - 2006 in Iran has been reported 4.3 per 100,000 people (25); the results of this study showed as well that the prevalence of ovarian cancer is relatively high in Iran; the age-specific incidence rate in the current study was 3.37 that corresponds to this study. In most developed countries, the incidence and mortality of this type of cancer is declining, as the results of studies by Siesling et al. (26) and Penault-Llorca et al. (27), conducted in 2003 and 2006, respectively, showed that this type of cancer has lower prevalence in developed countries, which has been approved by the results of further studies in this areas, such as the studies by Smith et al. and Murthy et al. (26). These studies have shown that the incidence of this cancer is higher in developing countries, for example, in the study conducted in Tunisia and India, it was found that the incidence in these countries has rapidly increased over several years, as the annual percentage of changes was 7.4% in Tunisia and variable from 1.8 and 6.4% in India (4, 21, 28). The reason for this decline in developed countries versus developing countries can be the early detection with regular screening tests, such as ultrasound examination, and controlling cancer risk factors, such as obesity, smoking, immobility, poor diet, early menarche, and late menopause. According to the results of this study, the incidence of the disease is increasing in Iran, like other developing countries, which is consistent with the results obtained in the studies by Almasi and Farahmand in Shiraz, showing a growing rate of this cancer in Iran. In their study, the reason for this difference was reported to be the lower use of protective factors, such as oral contraceptives and the lower mean age of women, compared to the developed countries. The results of the study conducted by Zendeh del and colleagues in Iran, from the pathology centers, indicated an increasing trend in Iran, particularly in Yazd and Isfahan provinces, which is consistent with the data of cancer registry center (20). According to a study conducted in Semnan by Babaei and colleagues, the age-standardized incidence of cancers of the female genital tract increased over a 5 year period (76 - 80), but the highest incidence of the disease was estimated between the ages of 50 and 59 years, which is inconsistent with the statistics of cancer registry center (70 to 80 years), which might be due to the reduced exposure to risk factors and increased life expectancy (3, 20). According to Table 2, there was an increasing trend in Yazd, Kohkiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad, Fars, Khuzestan, North and Razavi Khorasan, Tehran and Bushehr provinces from 2003 to 2008, while there was a downward trend in the Chaharmahal Bakhtiari and Qom in the incidence of ovarian cancer. Generally, Isfahan, Tehran, Yazd, East and West Azarbayjan had the highest incidence during this period. As a final point, with regard to Figure 1, we can conclude an increasing trend in the incidence of ovarian cancer that can be due to changing patterns of risk factors, such as lifestyle changes in the provinces and in the population, leading to changes in the incidence of the disease. Nevertheless, part of the increased incidence may be due to higher disease diagnosis, use of different data collection methods (population-based cancer registries since 2006), possible changes in diagnostic methods, raise in justification and awareness of physicians about the importance of reporting them and other possible causes, such as age or the cohort effect. Therefore, more etiologic studies are recommended in these areas.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Becker AE, Hernandez YG, Frucht H, Lucas AL. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: risk factors, screening, and early detection. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(32):11182-98. [PubMed ID: 25170203]. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11182.

  • 2.

    Blake EA, Sheridan TB, Wang KL, Takiuchi T, Kodama M, Sawada K, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex-cord tumors (UTROSCT): a systematic review of literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;181:163-70. [PubMed ID: 25150955]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.07.050.

  • 3.

    Mousavi SM, Gouya MM, Ramazani R, Davanlou M, Hajsadeghi N, Seddighi Z. Cancer incidence and mortality in Iran. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(3):556-63. [PubMed ID: 19073863]. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdn642.

  • 4.

    Tabei SZ, Heydari ST, Mehrabani D, Shamsina SJ, Ahmadi J, Firouzi SM. Current substance use in patients with gastric cancer in Southern Iran. J Cancer Res Ther. 2006;2(4):182-5. [PubMed ID: 17998701]. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.29828.

  • 5.

    Alsayyad J, Hamadeh R. Cancer incidence among the Bahraini population: a five-year (1998-2002) experience. Ann Saudi Med. 2007;27(4):251-8. [PubMed ID: 17684428]. https://doi.org/10.4103/0256-4947.51491.

  • 6.

    Askarian M, Goli A, Oroei M, Faramarzi H. The geographical clusters of gastrointestinal tract cancer in fars province, southern iran. Int J Prev Med. 2014;5(7):857-64. [PubMed ID: 25104997].

  • 7.

    Cabanes A, Vidal E, Aragones N, Perez-Gomez B, Pollan M, Lope V. Cancer mortality trends in Spain. Annals Oncol. 2010;21(3):1980-2007.

  • 8.

    Cook O, McIntyre M, Recoche K. Exploration of the role of specialist nurses in the care of women with gynaecological cancer: a systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(5-6):683-95. [PubMed ID: 25180964]. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12675.

  • 9.

    Cripe J, Tseng J, Eskander R, Fader AN, Tanner E, Bristow R. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian carcinoma: analysis of 30-day morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(2):655-61. [PubMed ID: 25155402]. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4026-6.

  • 10.

    Diaz Mdel P, Osella AR, Aballay LR, Munoz SE, Lantieri MJ, Butinof M, et al. Cancer incidence pattern in Cordoba, Argentina. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2009;18(4):259-66. [PubMed ID: 19404198]. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3283152030.

  • 11.

    Etemadi A, Sadjadi A, Semnani S, Nouraie SM, Khademi H, Bahadori M. Cancer registry in Iran: a brief overview. Arch Iran Med. 2008;11(5):577-80. [PubMed ID: 18759534].

  • 12.

    Ferraro S, Schiumarini D, Panteghini M. Human epididymis protein 4: factors of variation. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;438:171-7. [PubMed ID: 25172040]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2014.08.020.

  • 13.

    Hassan S, Muere A, Einstein G. Ovarian hormones and chronic pain: A comprehensive review. Pain. 2014;155(12):2448-60. [PubMed ID: 25172822]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2014.08.027.

  • 14.

    Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(5):277-300. [PubMed ID: 20610543]. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20073.

  • 15.

    Karlsen NS, Karlsen MA, Hogdall CK, Hogdall EV. HE4 tissue expression and serum HE4 levels in healthy individuals and patients with benign or malignant tumors: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(11):2285-95. [PubMed ID: 25169975]. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0447.

  • 16.

    Kodama M, Grubbs BH, Blake EA, Cahoon SS, Murakami R, Kimura T, et al. Feto-maternal outcomes of pregnancy complicated by ovarian malignant germ cell tumor: a systematic review of literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;181:145-56. [PubMed ID: 25150953]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.07.047.

  • 17.

    Kotsopoulos J, Prescott J, De Vivo I, Fan I, McLaughlin J, Rosen B, et al. Telomere length and mortality following a diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(11):2603-6. [PubMed ID: 25159293]. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0885.

  • 18.

    Lankarani KB, Khosravizadegan Z, Rezaianzadeh A, Honarvar B, Moghadami M, Faramarzi H, et al. Data coverage of a cancer registry in southern Iran before and after implementation of a population-based reporting system: a 10-year trend study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:169. [PubMed ID: 23647828]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-169.

  • 19.

    Le PN, McDermott JD, Jimeno A. Targeting the Wnt pathway in human cancers: therapeutic targeting with a focus on OMP-54F28. Pharmacol Ther. 2015;146:1-11. [PubMed ID: 25172549]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.08.005.

  • 20.

    Masoompour SM, Yarmohammadi H, Rezaianzadeh A, Lankarani KB. Cancer incidence in southern Iran, 1998-2002: results of population-based cancer registry. Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;35(5):42-7. [PubMed ID: 21840285]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2011.05.018.

  • 21.

    Karimi M, Mehrabani D, Yarmohammadi H, Jahromi FS. The prevalence of signs and symptoms of childhood leukemia and lymphoma in Fars Province, Southern Iran. Cancer Detect Prev. 2008;32(2):178-83. [PubMed ID: 18632219]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdp.2008.06.001.

  • 22.

    Kolahdoozan S, Sadjadi A, Radmard AR, Khademi H. Five common cancers in Iran. Arch Iran Med. 2010;13(2):143-6. [PubMed ID: 20187669].

  • 23.

    Mirzadeh M, Mirzaei M, Mirzaei M, ShogaeiFar H. Years of Life Lost and Childhood and Adolescent Cancer Mortality in Yazd Province, Iran (2004-2009). Iran J Ped Hematol Oncol. 2015;5(3):125-30. [PubMed ID: 26705450].

  • 24.

    Orozco LJ, Tristan M, Vreugdenhil MM, Salazar A. Hysterectomy versus hysterectomy plus oophorectomy for premenopausal women. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. 2014;7:5638. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd005638.pub3.

  • 25.

    Resta G, Vedana L, Marino S, Scagliarini L, Bandi M, Anania G. Isolated splenic metastasis of ovaric cancer. Case report and literature review. G Chir. 2014;35(7-8):181-4. [PubMed ID: 25174293]. https://doi.org/10.11138/gchir/2014.35.7.181.

  • 26.

    Siesling S, van Dijck JA, Visser O, Coebergh JW, Working Group of The Netherlands Cancer R. Trends in incidence of and mortality from cancer in The Netherlands in the period 1989-1998. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39(17):2521-30. [PubMed ID: 14602138]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00622-1.

  • 27.

    Penault-Llorca F, Bertucci F, Adelaide J, Parc P, Coulier F, Jacquemier J, et al. Expression of FGF and FGF receptor genes in human breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 1995;61(2):170-6. [PubMed ID: 7705943]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910610205.

  • 28.

    Sadeghi A, Behmard S, Shafiepoor H, Zeighmani E. Cancer of the esophagus in southern Iran. Cancer. 1977;40(2):841-5. [PubMed ID: 890664].