Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic cancer in women and includes 25% of the genital tract neoplasms in the United States (
5,
24). Ovarian cancer is known as the fifth leading cause of cancer death among women in the United States (
24). In Iran, it is the eighth most common cancer in terms of incidence, twelfth fatal cancer, and sixteenth considering the burden of disease attributable to cancer (3, 21). According to the study by Mousavi and colleagues (
3), the age-standardized incidence rate of ovarian cancer in 2005 - 2006 in Iran has been reported 4.3 per 100,000 people (
25); the results of this study showed as well that the prevalence of ovarian cancer is relatively high in Iran; the age-specific incidence rate in the current study was 3.37 that corresponds to this study. In most developed countries, the incidence and mortality of this type of cancer is declining, as the results of studies by Siesling et al. (
26) and Penault-Llorca et al. (
27), conducted in 2003 and 2006, respectively, showed that this type of cancer has lower prevalence in developed countries, which has been approved by the results of further studies in this areas, such as the studies by Smith et al. and Murthy et al. (
26). These studies have shown that the incidence of this cancer is higher in developing countries, for example, in the study conducted in Tunisia and India, it was found that the incidence in these countries has rapidly increased over several years, as the annual percentage of changes was 7.4% in Tunisia and variable from 1.8 and 6.4% in India (
4,
21,
28). The reason for this decline in developed countries versus developing countries can be the early detection with regular screening tests, such as ultrasound examination, and controlling cancer risk factors, such as obesity, smoking, immobility, poor diet, early menarche, and late menopause. According to the results of this study, the incidence of the disease is increasing in Iran, like other developing countries, which is consistent with the results obtained in the studies by Almasi and Farahmand in Shiraz, showing a growing rate of this cancer in Iran. In their study, the reason for this difference was reported to be the lower use of protective factors, such as oral contraceptives and the lower mean age of women, compared to the developed countries. The results of the study conducted by Zendeh del and colleagues in Iran, from the pathology centers, indicated an increasing trend in Iran, particularly in Yazd and Isfahan provinces, which is consistent with the data of cancer registry center (
20). According to a study conducted in Semnan by Babaei and colleagues, the age-standardized incidence of cancers of the female genital tract increased over a 5 year period (76 - 80), but the highest incidence of the disease was estimated between the ages of 50 and 59 years, which is inconsistent with the statistics of cancer registry center (70 to 80 years), which might be due to the reduced exposure to risk factors and increased life expectancy (
3,
20). According to
Table 2, there was an increasing trend in Yazd, Kohkiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad, Fars, Khuzestan, North and Razavi Khorasan, Tehran and Bushehr provinces from 2003 to 2008, while there was a downward trend in the Chaharmahal Bakhtiari and Qom in the incidence of ovarian cancer. Generally, Isfahan, Tehran, Yazd, East and West Azarbayjan had the highest incidence during this period. As a final point, with regard to
Figure 1, we can conclude an increasing trend in the incidence of ovarian cancer that can be due to changing patterns of risk factors, such as lifestyle changes in the provinces and in the population, leading to changes in the incidence of the disease. Nevertheless, part of the increased incidence may be due to higher disease diagnosis, use of different data collection methods (population-based cancer registries since 2006), possible changes in diagnostic methods, raise in justification and awareness of physicians about the importance of reporting them and other possible causes, such as age or the cohort effect. Therefore, more etiologic studies are recommended in these areas.