Body Mass Index and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Iran

authors:

avatar Bibi Hajar Zahmatkesh ORCID 1 , avatar Nasrinossadat Alavi 2 , avatar Afsaneh Keramat ORCID 3 , avatar Ahmad Khosravi ORCID 4 , avatar Reza Chaman 5 , *

Student Research Committee, Department of Reproductive Health, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran
Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
Midwifery Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran
Center for Health Related Social and Behavioral Sciences Research, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran
Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

how to cite: Zahmatkesh B H, Alavi N, Keramat A, Khosravi A, Chaman R. Body Mass Index and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Iran. Int J Cancer Manag. 2017;10(4):e5921. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijcm.5921.

Abstract

Background:

Various studies in Iran on the role of BMI higher than normal (BMI ≥25) on breast cancer have reported different results.

Objective:

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to estimate the odds ratio of overweightness and obesity as risk factors of breast cancer in studies conducted in Iran.

Evidence Acquisition:

The following main databases were searched from 2004 to 2014 to find related articles: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus and Iranian databases (SID and Magiran), breast cancer conferences held in Iran, key journals, and the references of the selected articles. Keywords were: Cancer, Tumor, Neoplasm, Neoplasia, Carcinoma, Malignancy, Malignant, Benign. The combination with OR and added it to search field with AND to words such as Iran and breast was used as the search strategy. The observational studies (cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional) in Iran that had reported the relation between BMI and breast cancer in Persian and English were searched. There were no limitations in terms of age, race, ethnicity, and marital status for women. The exposure was BMI ≥ 25 (overweight and obese) and the outcome was breast cancer with pathological confirmation. Two reviewers separately used the STROBE checklist for quality assessment, critically appraised papers and extract the data. The overall estimate was the odds ratio.

Results:

Of 4396 studies, after evaluation of heterogeneity, 7 case-control studies with a sample size of 33552 were included in the meta-analysis. A significant relation was observed between obesity (OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.24 - 2.64) and odds of breast cancer. A significant relation was also observed between overweightness and odds of breast cancer (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.13 - 1.89).

Conclusions:

Meta-analysis results showed a significant relation between obesity and overweight with risk of breast cancer in Iranian women. We recommended Iranian women to be aware of the effect of weight on breast cancer and encouraged them to decrease their weight via physical activity and diet control.

1. Introduction

Both in developing and developed countries, breast cancer is at the top of the list in women`s cancers. Breast cancer is increasing in developing countries, due to increased life expectancy, Western lifestyle and industrialization (1).

According to the International agency for research on cancer (IARC), 1.7 million new cases of breast cancer were identified in 2012, and 6.3 million patients were diagnosed since 5 years ago. Breast cancer is the first cause of cancer death in women (522000 deaths in 2012) and the most commonly diagnosed cancer among the women of 140 countries out of 184 countries around the world (2).

Of all deaths caused by breast cancer in the world, 21% have been attributed to alcohol consumption, overweightness, obesity, and lack of physical activity. In high-income countries, 27% have been attributed to obesity and overweightness as the most important risk factors. In middle and high-income countries, 18% have been attributed to overweightness, obesity, and physical activity, as the most important risk factor (10%) (3).

Most available studies and meta-analyses have considered BMI a marker of generalized obesity. They have also shown the increased risk of breast cancer in all ethnic groups of overweight or obese women during postmenopausal period (4-7).

In a study by Ghiasvand et al. (2011) on the risk factors of breast cancer in young women, no relation was observed among height, weight, BMI, and breast cancer (8). However, a study by Hajian et al. (2013) showed that obesity and overweightness significantly increase the risk of breast cancer in pre- and postmenopausal women (9).

A review by Cheraghi et al. in 2012 showed that the relation between high BMI and breast cancer was low (10). Another review by Namiranian et al. on the risk factors of breast cancer in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMRO) demonstrated that overweightness and obesity increase the risk of breast cancer and this association was statistically significant (11).

Due to the uncertainty of results of previous studies, high prevalence of obesity in women and increasing incidence of breast cancer, genetic and regional differences, and other risk factors, this review was conducted in Iranian population with its own characteristics.

Therefore, in this review, all observational studies including cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies on the relation between high BMI and breast cancer that were published in Persian or English from 2004 to 2014 were searched and investigated so that the overall effect of obesity and overweightness on breast cancer could be estimated and investigated in terms of heterogeneity.

2. Methods

2.1. Searching

This study was intended to determine all observational studies on the relation between BMI and breast cancer, including cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies, that were published in Persian or English from 2004 to 2014. For identification of cancer synonyms, we used a search in MeSH. The following keywords were found:

Cancer, Tumor, Neoplasm, Neoplasia, Carcinoma, Malignancy, Malignant, Benign.

That combination with OR and added it to search field with AND to words such as Iran and breast was used as the search strategy.

The electronic databases of PubMed (search date11/05/2015), Web of Science (search date: 11/05/2015), Scopus (search date11/05/2015), and Google Scholar (search date: 19/04/2015) as well as the Iranian scientific electronic databases such as SID in English and Persian (search date: 14/04/2015) and Magiran in Persian (search date: 19/04/2015) were searched. To do further search, the references of the selected articles were also reviewed. Moreover, the summaries of the research presented at the international breast cancer congresses in Iran, annual breast cancer congresses and seminars in Iran were reviewed. Key journals were reviewed too. To find the texts of the articles from the congresses, seminars, and conferences, the corresponding authors were corresponded with.

2.2. Criteria for Including Studies

The observational studies (cohort, case-control and cross-sectional) on the relation between BMI and breast cancer that were published in Persian and English from 2004 to 2014 (1383 - 1393 Hijri) were searched in the study. The exposures were obesity (BMI ≥ 30) and overweightness (30 > BMI ≥ 25) according to the world health organization classification. The studies that were conducted only on patients were excluded. There were no limitations in terms of age and race, and no adjustment was made.

BMI is a criterion used to identify overweight or obese individuals. BMI is a person’s weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. The desired outcome of this study is breast cancer, which has been confirmed by the pathology report. Therefore, all types of breast cancer, regardless of their pathological features and tumors’ stage, have been included in this study.

Two authors reviewed the obtained articles in terms of the inclusion criteria. The articles were not blind in terms of authors’ names, journal’s name, and results. Any disagreement between the two authors was reviewed by the third author.

2.3. Data Collection and Validity Assessment

Two authors extracted the data of the eligible articles. The extracted variables included publication year, author’s name, type of study, sample size, population age, BMI (including normal, overweight, and obese classifications) number of cases with breast cancer and number of healthy individuals (controls). The extracted data were entered into the software, and the author was corresponded in cases where we encountered lack of some data. The STROBE checklist was used for the quality assessment of studies. Two authors assessed the articles independently. Some of the criteria of the STROBE checklist that were used for the quality assessment of studies are as follows:

Methods: (setting, participants, variables, data sources/ measurement, bias), Results: (main results), Discussion: (limitations, generalizability)

2.4. Measures of Exposure Effect and Data Analysis

The OR was the selected effect size for report. The obtained studies were case-control and cross-sectional studies and there was not any cohort study. The OR means odds of the patient population that were exposed to the risk factor compared to odds of healthy population that were not exposed to the risk factor. A meta-analysis with a 95% confidence interval was used to obtain combined effect size. The analysis was performed using stata software and the results were reported using the random effects model.

2.5. Heterogeneity and Publication Bias

Statistical heterogeneity at the 5% significance level (P < 0.05) was determined using the chi-square index (Chi2). Within-study and between-study inconsistency or variation were estimated using the I2 (12) and the Tau2 (13) statistics respectively.

3. Results

3.1. Description of Studies

Flow Chart of the Identification Process for the Selection of Articles in This Review
Flow Chart of the Identification Process for the Selection of Articles in This Review

Data of BMI were not reported in 32 articles out of 50 full text articles, thus they were excluded. Reviewing the full texts of the articles showed that 18 articles examined BMI, among which 8 articles did not classify the data of BMI, which were excluded. Data of BMI in case and control groups were adjusted in 1 article (14) from these 8 articles. From 10 remained articles that reported to have classified data of BMI, 2 articles (15, 16) had presented their reports in two classifications (BMI < 25, BMI ≥ 25) and 8 articles reported their results in three classifications (normal BMI, overweight, and obesity).

Therefore, 8 case-control studies (8, 17-23) with a sample size of 33852 individuals were selected and after evaluation of heterogeneity, 7 articles (8, 17-19, 21-23) with a sample size of 33552 individuals were analyzed to determine the pooled OR of obesity and overweightness on breast cancer.

3.2. Effect of Exposure

The effect of high BMI (overweightness and obesity) on breast cancer was assessed in selected studies using the OR. The results of analyzing studies using the random effects method showed that studies were heterogeneous. The risk of breast cancer was higher in obese (BMI ≥ 30) (Pooled OR = 2.456, 95%CI = 1.45 - 4.17) or overweight individuals (30 > BMI ≥ 25) (Pooled OR = 1.746, CI = 1.23 - 2.48). After determining statistical heterogeneity, one article was excluded (20). Therefore, 7 studies were again analyzed (for obesity or BMI ≥ 30: Pooled OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.24 - 2.64) (for overweightness or 30 > BMI ≥ 25: Pooled OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.13 - 1.89) (Tables 1 and 2) (Forest plot Figures 2 and 3). In other words, the odds are breast cancer is lower in women with normal BMI (BMI < 25) than obese or overweight women, and this relation was statistically significant.

Forest Plot of Odds Ratio Estimates of Breast Cancer by Obesity
Forest Plot of Odds Ratio Estimates of Breast Cancer by Obesity
Forest Plot of Odds Ratio Estimates of Breast Cancer by Overweight
Forest Plot of Odds Ratio Estimates of Breast Cancer by Overweight
Table 1.

Meta-Analysis Results of the Odds Ratio of Obesity in Breast Cancer Using the Random Effects Method

AuthorYearSample SizeOR95% Confidence IntervalWeight, %a
Ghiasvand R (19)20125881.7371.252.41417.64
Ghiasvand R (8)20116011.0340.7491.42717.73
Lotfi MH (21)20081054.7612.08810.85810.31
Montazeri A (23)20081342.5191.2535.06111.99
Zare N (18)2013118730.9780.5411.76913.54
Abbasi S (22)20092074.0531.9818.29411.74
Sepandi M (17)201469161.4080.9742.03517.05
Pooled OR1.8121.2432.641100
Table 2.

Meta-Analysis Results of the Odds Ratio of Overweight in Breast Cancer Using the Random Effects Method

AuthorYearSample SizeOR95% Confidence IntervalWeight, %a
Ghiasvand R (19)20127291.581.1772.12219.68
Ghiasvand R (8)20117440.9450.7081.26119.89
Lotfi MH (21)20081001.7420.7743.9217.31
Montazeri A (23)20081611.8870.9873.6089.9
Zare N (18)2013127891.5240.92.58212.57
Abbasi S (22)20092512.5091.4784.26112.51
Sepandi M (17)201489641.160.8261.6318.15
Pooled OR1.4581.1271.887100

The between-study heterogeneity was measured using the Chi2 and I2 tests. Examining the risk factor of obesity showed that Chi2 = 25.01, P < 0.001, l2 = 76%, and the difference among studies or Tau2 = 0.18. Therefore, the results of the present study were heterogeneous and the difference among studies or Tau2 = 0.18. From 7 analyzed studies, 3 studies showed no significant relation between obesity and breast cancer (8, 17, 18). Out of 7 analyzed studies, 5 studies reported no significant relation between overweightness and breast cancer in women (8, 17, 18, 21, 23).

Examining the risk of overweightness showed that Chi2 = 14.59, P < 0.02, l2 = 58.9%, and the difference among studies or Tau2 = 0.065.

In one article (8), overweightness was the protecting factor and 4 studies showed no significant relation between overweightness and breast cancer (17, 18, 21, 23).

Given the low number of studies in this field and lack of access to some studies despite contacting the authors of those studies through phone calls and emails, there is a possibility of publication bias.

4. Discussion

Meta-analysis results showed that BMI ≥ 30 significantly increases the odds of breast cancer in Iranian women, and this relation is statistically significant (Pooled OR = 1.81). Moreover, the odds of breast cancer were higher in overweight women (30 > BMI ≥ 25) than normal BMI (Pooled OR = 1.46). This relation was also statistically significant. Our review results were consistent with the results of other studies (6, 10, 24-27). The meta-analysis results of Namiranian et al. (2014) were also consistent with the results of the present study. Their results demonstrated the pooled OR for the overweight women (25 < BMI < 30) was 1.71 (95%CI = 1.09 - 2.68) and the risk of breast cancer in obese women (BMI > 30) was higher than women with normal BMI (pooled OR = 2.21, 95%CI = 1.71 - 2.36) (11).

The pooled OR in their review was higher than the current review due to increased number of articles and higher extent of the study area.

The results of Hosseinzadeh et al. (2014) in a case – control study demonstrated no association between high BMI and developing breast cancer (28). Low sample size, time of calculating of BMI, difference in diet and life style in area of research might be the causes of differences in results.

Some studies also showed that higher BMI increases the risk of breast cancer during menopause, but it decreases the risk of breast cancer during premenopausal period (10, 24). Suzuki et al. (2009) had reported an increased risk of breast cancer in overweight menopausal women (Pooled OR = 1.89, 95%CI = 1.52 - 2.36), while overweightness in women during premenopausal was a protective factor against breast cancer (7).

In this study, it was not feasible to investigate the effects of increased BMI on breast cancer during premenopausal and menopause periods because of insufficient data of articles.

Inappropriate data in some of studies, lack of access to data of summaries and not reported data of BMI according to menopause status were limitations of this review.

Review of seminars and congresses held in Iran and correspondence with Iranian universities of medical sciences to send data related to our study were strengths of current meta-analysis. More research in Iran is necessary for elucidating the association between BMI categories and developing breast cancer according to menopause status and geographical area.

4.1. Conclusion

The meta-analysis results of the present study showed that obesity and overweightness in Iranian women significantly increase the risk of breast cancer. Since data of 8 summaries were not accessible or were not appropriate, there is a possibility of publication bias. We recommend Iranian women to be aware of effect of weight on breast cancer and encourage them to decrease their weight via physical activity and diet control. These changes of life style can prevent breast cancer and decrease financial resources related to treatment and care.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    WHO. Introduction of breast cancer 2016. Available from: http://www.who.int/cancer/detection/breastcancer/en/.

  • 2.

    IARC. GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated age-standardised incidence and mortality rates. Fact Sheets. Population Fact Sheets: women 2012. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_population.aspx.

  • 3.

    Danaei G, Vander Hoorn S, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, Ezzati M, Comparative Risk Assessment collaborating G. Causes of cancer in the world: comparative risk assessment of nine behavioural and environmental risk factors. Lancet. 2005;366(9499):1784-93. [PubMed ID: 16298215]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67725-2.

  • 4.

    Kawai M, Minami Y, Kuriyama S, Kakizaki M, Kakugawa Y, Nishino Y, et al. Adiposity, adult weight change and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal Japanese women: the Miyagi Cohort Study. Br J Cancer. 2010;103(9):1443-7. [PubMed ID: 20842123]. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605885.

  • 5.

    Mathew A, Gajalakshmi V, Rajan B, Kanimozhi V, Brennan P, Mathew BS, et al. Anthropometric factors and breast cancer risk among urban and rural women in South India: a multicentric case-control study. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(1):207-13. [PubMed ID: 18542077]. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604423.

  • 6.

    Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, Heller RF, Zwahlen M. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet. 2008;371(9612):569-78. [PubMed ID: 18280327]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60269-X.

  • 7.

    Suzuki R, Orsini N, Saji S, Key TJ, Wolk A. Body weight and incidence of breast cancer defined by estrogen and progesterone receptor status--a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2009;124(3):698-712. [PubMed ID: 18988226]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.23943.

  • 8.

    Ghiasvand R, Maram ES, Tahmasebi S, Tabatabaee SH. Risk factors for breast cancer among young women in southern Iran. Int J Cancer. 2011;129(6):1443-9. [PubMed ID: 21064105]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25748.

  • 9.

    Hajian K, Gholizadehpasha A, Bozorgzadeh S. Association of obesity and central obesity with breast cancer risk in pre- and postmenopausal women [In Pesrsion]. J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2013;15(3):7-15.

  • 10.

    Cheraghi Z, Poorolajal J, Hashem T, Esmailnasab N, Doosti Irani A. Effect of body mass index on breast cancer during premenopausal and postmenopausal periods: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(12). e51446. [PubMed ID: 23236502]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051446.

  • 11.

    Namiranian N, Moradi-Lakeh M, Razavi-Ratki SK, Doayie M, Nojomi M. Risk factors of breast cancer in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(21):9535-41. [PubMed ID: 25422252]. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.21.9535.

  • 12.

    Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557-60. [PubMed ID: 12958120]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.

  • 13.

    Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley Online Library; 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470712184.

  • 14.

    Reyhani M, Fahami F, Mosharaf SH, Tarkesh N. The relation between the amount of dairy products and animal proteins consumption and breast cancer in isfahani women [In Pesrsion]. J Zanjan Univ Med Sci Health Serv. 2012;20(81):45-54.

  • 15.

    Eslamian G, Amiri S, Shakeri M. Dietary fiber, glycemic index, and glycemic load in relation to breast cancer in Iran. Thrita J Med Sci. 2012;1(3):82-8. https://doi.org/10.5812/thrita.7222.

  • 16.

    Mobarakeh ZS, Mirzaei K, Hatmi N, Ebrahimi M, Dabiran S, Sotoudeh G. Dietary habits contributing to breast cancer risk among Iranian women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(21):9543-7. [PubMed ID: 25422253]. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.21.9543.

  • 17.

    Sepandi M, Akrami M, Tabatabaee H, Rajaeefard A, Tahmasebi S, Angali KA, et al. Breast cancer risk factors in women participating in a breast screening program: a study on 11,850 Iranian females. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(19):8499-502. [PubMed ID: 25339054]. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.19.8499.

  • 18.

    Zare N, Haem E, Lankarani KB, Heydari ST, Barooti E. Breast cancer risk factors in a defined population: weighted logistic regression approach for rare events. J Breast Cancer. 2013;16(2):214-9. [PubMed ID: 23843856]. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2013.16.2.214.

  • 19.

    Ghiasvand R, Bahmanyar S, Zendehdel K, Tahmasebi S, Talei A, Adami HO, et al. Postmenopausal breast cancer in Iran; risk factors and their population attributable fractions. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:414. [PubMed ID: 22992276]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-414.

  • 20.

    Hajian-Tilaki K, Kaveh-Ahangar T, Hajian-Tilaki E. Is educational level associated with breast cancer risk in Iranian women? Breast Cancer. 2012;19(1):64-70. [PubMed ID: 21573750]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-011-0273-6.

  • 21.

    Lotfi MH, Charkhatti S, Shobairi S. Breast cancer risk factors in an urban area of Yazd city- Iran, 2006. Acta Med Iran. 2008;46(3):258-64.

  • 22.

    Ismail P, Abbasi S, Azimi C, Othman F, Einollahi N, Dashti N, et al. Risk factors for breast cancer in Iranian women: A case-control study. Int J Canc Res. 2009;5(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijcr.2009.1.11.

  • 23.

    Montazeri A, Sadighi J, Farzadi F, Maftoon F, Vahdaninia M, Ansari M, et al. Weight, height, body mass index and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a case-control study. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:278. [PubMed ID: 18826621]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-278.

  • 24.

    Amadou A, Hainaut P, Romieu I. Role of obesity in the risk of breast cancer: lessons from anthropometry. J Oncol. 2013;2013:906495. [PubMed ID: 23431300]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/906495.

  • 25.

    Shi J, Zhang M, Li L, Holman CD, Chen J, Teng Y, et al. Body mass index and its change in adulthood and breast cancer risk in China. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11(5):1213-8. [PubMed ID: 21198265].

  • 26.

    Kruk J, Marchlewicz M. Dietary fat and physical activity in relation to breast cancer among Polish women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(4):2495-502. [PubMed ID: 23725163]. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.4.2495.

  • 27.

    Li HT, Han XH, Liu YX, Leng KM, Dong GM. Relationship between body mass index and incidence of breast cancer. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(7):11549-53. [PubMed ID: 26379979].

  • 28.

    Hosseinzadeh M, Eivazi Ziaei J, Mahdavi N, Aghajari P, Vahidi M, Fateh A, et al. Risk factors for breast cancer in Iranian women: a hospital-based case-control study in tabriz, iran. J Breast Cancer. 2014;17(3):236-43. [PubMed ID: 25320621]. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2014.17.3.236.