Abstract
Background:
There are limited available scientific sources of data and rare controlled studies to guide the anesthesiologist regarding preoperative analgesic care in opioid addict patients, despite the increasing prevalence of opioid dependency.Objectives:
In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of using Dexmedetomidine (Dex) during femoral neck surgery on the postoperative analgesic consumption in opium addict patients.Patients and Methods:
The present study is a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Patients suffering from femoral neck fracture with a history of opium addiction who were candidates for surgery under spinal anesthesia were included. After induction of spinal anesthesia using hyperbaric bupivacaine, either Dex or normal saline was infused for patients. Dex with a dose of 0.5 µg/kg/h in the intervention group and normal saline with a dose of 0.5 cc/kg/h in the control group was administered. After the surgery, pain intensity of the patients in recovery was assessed in 10-minute intervals based on visual analog scale (VAS) until 2 hours postoperatively. Time to pain and the total amount of opium consumption for pain control in 24 hours postoperatively were calculated and compared between the 2 groups.Results:
Finally, 25 patients in each group were studied. Demographic and baseline characteristics of the patients in the 2 groups were not significantly different. Mean morphine consumption in recovery until 2 hours postoperatively showed no significant difference between Dex and control groups (P = 0.24). However, the mean opioid use during 24 hours postoperatively was significantly difference and it was lower in the group receiving Dex infusion (P < 0.001).Conclusions:
It is likely that intravenous Dex infusion during femoral neck fracture surgery under spinal anesthesia can lead to the less opioid use throughout the 24 hours postoperatively in opium addict patients.Keywords
Femoral Neck Fractures Anesthesia Spinal Dexmedetomidine Pain Management Drug Users
1. Background
Post-operative pain (POP) is endured by millions every day all over the world and its effective relief is very important and necessary (1, 2). POP imposes additional costs on the health care system every year and it is an important aspect considered in the healthcare process (3, 4). Inappropriate pain management in different settings, from the emergency department to the operating room and afterward, has been documented in the current literature and research regarding better approach is still ongoing (5-8). The efficient management of POP is currently a part of surgery process and reduces patients’ morbidity as well as their mortality, accelerates recovery and discharge from the hospital, improves patients’ quality of life, and reduces costs. The efficient management of POP includes a multimodal approach during which various drugs with different mechanisms and administration routes are used. One of the aspects considered in this regard is the social history of the patient. A history of drug abuse is one of the most important things that should be recorded in patients’ medical profile since opium addict patients make up a large portion of hospital visitors and obviously, their pain threshold and need for analgesia are different (9-11). Addiction is an international problem and one of the healthcare problems in various societies and there may be only a few countries not having this issue. Addiction is one of the 4 major crises that has caused serious harm to at least 200 million people around the world (9, 10, 12). The prevalence of drug abuse such as opioid use is on the rise, and a considerable percentage of opioid-addict patients are admitted for surgery. Some authors believe that these patients can be expected to the experience of increased postoperative pain, greater postoperative opioid consumption, and prolonged use of healthcare resources for managing their pain (13). Dexmedetomidine (Dex) is one of the drugs considered for POP in opium addict patients in recent studies. This drug is a highly selective α2-adrenergic and has been used as an analgesic along with other anesthetic drugs for reducing POP in opium-addict patients (14). Achieving adequate pain control in opioid addict patients can be challenging because commonly used strategies for alleviating postoperative pain may have diminished effectiveness (13). There are limited available scientific sources of data and rare controlled studies to guide the anesthesiologist regarding preoperative analgesic care in opioid addict patients, despite the increasing prevalence of opioid dependence (15).
2. Objectives
In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of using Dex during femoral neck surgery on postoperative analgesic consumption in opium addict patients.
3. Patients and Methods
The present study is a double-blind randomized clinical trial carried out in Imam Hossein teaching Hospital, Tehran, Iran, in 2015.
3.1. Study Population
In this study, patients aged between 18 to 75 years with a proximal fracture of the femur and a history of inhaled or oral opium abuse for 6 consecutive weeks who were candidates of femoral neck surgery using spinal anesthesia were included. Pregnant and lactating women, patients with a history of chronic pain and use of analgesics, and those with a body mass index (BMI) more than 35 were excluded from the study. History of diabetes, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accidents, hypertension, malignancy, renal failure, hepatic dysfunction, coagulation disorders, history of allergy to drugs, and the need for blood transfusion during surgery were also considered as the exclusion criteria. We should note that patients who could not bear the spinal anesthesia for any reason and needed general anesthesia were also excluded from the study.
3.2. Randomization and Blinding
Demographic data and baseline characteristics of the patients were gathered using a pre-designed checklist. In this study, patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups of intervention and control. Using the random numbers table, each patient was given a number and accordingly was allocated to one of the groups. Patients were blinded to the administered drug and the anesthesiologist and the surgeon were blinded to the grouping of patients. Another physician who did not have any role in the study process prepared the intravenous (IV) drug infusion pump. In the intervention group, Dex solution in normal saline was infused while in the control group, normal saline alone was infused for blinding and preventing information bias.
3.3. Intervention
To induce spinal anesthesia, 20 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine was injected into the intervertebral space L3 - L4 or L4 - L5 of patients using 25-gage needle and after block stabilization, IV midazolam with 0.02 mg/kg dose was administered. Each one milliliter of Dex (100 µg) was diluted to 1 µg/cc concentration and infused with 0.5 µg/kg/h dose in the intervention group. In control group, normal saline was administered to the patients with a 0.5 cc/kg/h infusion rate. After the surgery, the pain intensity of the patients in recovery was assessed in 10-minute intervals based on the visual analog scale (VAS) until 2 hours postoperatively. If VAS > 3, morphine sulfate was injected with 2 mg dose and repeated until reaching a maximum of 15 mg if needed. In the orthopedic department, the patients underwent infusion of pain pump including 2 and locked-out interval injections for about 15 min by the patients and the used content was calculated in 2 - 6, 6 - 12, 12 - 18, and 18 - 24 hours postoperatively to determine the dose of opium used.
3.4. Sample Size
Since no reliable similar study was done up to the time of proposal preparation, to reduce sampling error, first a sample of 10 patients was drawn with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria and participants were randomly allocated to the 2 mentioned groups. Then, considering the mean difference of need for analgesics between the 2 groups and considering α = 0.05 and β = 0.2, a sample size of 16 patients in each group was calculated. Considering the probability of loss or the exclusion of some patients, 30 subjects were included in each group.
3.5. Statistical Analysis
Data gathered from the patients were entered into SPSS version 22. Mean and standard deviation (SD) were used to describe quantitative data and qualitative data were described using frequency and percentage. To compare means of quantitative data in the 2 groups, Unpaired t-test was used and if data distribution was not normal, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney-U test was applied. To compare qualitative data in the 2 groups, Pearson Chi-Square and if needed Fisher-Exact-Test were used. All statistical tests were carried out as 2-tailed at the significance level of 0.05. Confidence interval (CI) of 95%, type 1 error of 0.05, and type 2 error of 0.2 were considered.
3.6. Ethical Issues
This study was done after receiving approval from the ethics committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences under the number IR.SBMU.MSP.REC.1395.22. All the patients participated after they received a thorough explanation regarding the process of the study and giving a written consent. Adhering to the principles of Helsinki declaration and keeping patient data confidential were among the other measures taken for maintaining ethical conduct in this study. The protocol of the study was registered on the Iranian registry of clinical trials (www.IRCT.ir) under the code number IRCT201608019593N4.
4. Results
Totally 60 patients met the inclusion criteria of the study, 3 of which did not give consent for participation and therefore, 57 patients were enrolled. Thereafter, 2 out of the 29 patients in the control group were excluded due to unsuccessful spinal block; in addition, due to the long interval between the block and surgery initiation, another patient was excluded, too. Moreover, 1 patient was excluded due to excessive bleeding and need for blood transfusion. On the other hand, 3 of the 28 patients allocated to Dex group were also excluded. 2 of them had an unsuccessful spinal block and 1 was very nervous since the beginning of the operation and therefore, received propofol infusion for inducing sedation. Consequently, the study was done with 25 patients in each group (Figure 1).
CONSORT Diagram Showing the Flow of Participants Through Each Stage of the Study
4.1. Baseline Findings
Table 1 depicts demographic and baseline data of the study patients including mean age, mean BMI, duration of addiction, mean daily dose of opium used, duration of operation, systolic blood pressure (SBP) before spinal analgesia, and SBP before drug infusion in the 2 groups, which were not significantly different (P > 0.05).
Demographic and Baseline Characteristics of Study Patients
| Variable | Group | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dexmedetomidine | Control | ||
| Sex (male: female) | 22: 3 | 23: 2 | 0.63 |
| Age (year) | 56.92 ± 16.80 | 58.08 ± 13.95 | 0.90 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 25.27 ± 3.17 | 23.99 ± 2.69 | 0.13 |
| Addiction duration (year) | 17.08 ± 12.56 | 16.60 ± 10.04 | 0.91 |
| Mean daily opium consumption (gram) | 1.88 ± 0.75 | 1.92 ± 0.84 | 0.96 |
| SBP before spinal anesthesia (mmHg) | 122.76 ± 9.45 | 124.32 ± 10.83 | 0.59 |
| SBP before drug administration (mmHg) | 112.76 ± 7.49 | 114.88 ± 12.51 | 0.49 |
| Duration of surgery (minute) | 130.80 ± 14.97 | 129.60 ± 15.13 | 0.69 |
4.2. Time to Pain
In the Dex group, the mean time interval between the end of the surgery and patients’ request for receiving opioids in recovery was 66 ± 18.4 minutes, while it was 40.6 ± 9.36 minutes in the normal saline group, which showed a significant difference as presented in Figure 2 (P < 0.001).
Comparison of Time to Pain at Recovery in Study Patients
4.3. Opioid Consumption
Figure 3 and Table 2 show the amount of morphine needed in recovery until 2 hours postoperatively along with 2 - 6, 6 - 12, 12 - 18, and 18 - 24 hour intervals postoperatively in the 2 groups. The difference between the 2 groups in this regard was not significant until 2 hours of recovery postoperatively (P = 0.24); however, in the other time intervals, the differences were significant. The total use of morphine during 24 hours postoperatively was 23.7 ± 3.97 mg in the Dex group and 31.67 ± 2.41 mg in the normal saline group, which showed a significant difference (P < 0.001).
Comparison of Opioid Consumption in the Post-Operative Period in Study Patients
Amount of Opioid Consumption Based on Milligram in Post-Operative Period in Study Patients
| Time | Group | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dexmedetomidine | Control | ||
| At recovery | 3.84 ± 1.52 | 4.4 ± 1.63 | 0.24 |
| 2 - 6 hours | 4.33 ± 1.27 | 5.19 ± 1.01 | 0.01 |
| 6 - 12 hours | 4.75 ± 1.12 | 6.37 ± 0.70 | < 0.001 |
| 12 - 18 hours | 5.22 ± 0.96 | 7.22 ± 0.80 | < 0.001 |
| 18 - 24 hours | 5.56 ± 1.01 | 8.49 ± 0.36 | < 0.001 |
| Total | 23.70 ± 3.91 | 31.67 ± 2.41 | < 0.001 |
5. Discussion
Based on the results of the present study, the mean time interval between the end of the surgery and request for opioids was significantly higher in the Dex group than in the normal saline group. Although the mean morphine use in recovery until 2 hours postoperatively was higher in the normal saline group, the difference was not statistically significant. However, the mean morphine use was significantly lower in the Dex group at the other time intervals. Additionally, the mean total morphine use during 24 hours postoperatively was also significantly lower in the DEX group compared to the control group.
The effect of premedication with α2 agonist on postoperative complications in addict patients has been poorly studied. The results of a study by Jabbary Moghaddam et al. showed that clonidine as premedication can be an effective drug to decrease the incidence of shivering and recovery time after anesthesia for leg fracture operations not only in patients without addiction but also in opium addicted ones whose postoperative complications make a great challenge for anesthesiologists (16).
In one study, Kaya et al. evaluated the effect of Dex infusion during surgery on the need for morphine sulfate in patients undergoing major abdominal surgeries. In that study, the morphine use was lower in the Dex group 2 and 48 hours postoperatively. In addition, the trend of changes in the morphine use by patients to reduce pain had a steeper slope in the placebo group and showed a slower increase in the Dex group, which is in line with the present study (17).
In 2004, a study was done on the effect of Dex and morphine on analgesia after major surgeries. 34 patients in 2 groups were evaluated regarding hemodynamic changes during operation, sedation and analgesia rates during surgery, and additional morphine use postoperatively. The main finding of the study was that in the Dex group patients, clearly less morphine was used during recovery (18).
In another study, Annamalai et al. evaluated the effect of IV Dex on spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine in 2014. The mean total use of analgesics during 24 hours postoperatively was lower in the Dex group than in the normal saline group and the difference was statistically significant. Analgesics in the study were paracetamol, diclofenac, and tramadol (19).
A number of studies have been carried out on Dex in recent years proving the effect of this drug on extending sensory blockade and even some motor blockades. However, there has not been any study in opium addict patients regarding the effects of Dex. As shown in the present study, the amount of morphine sulfate used postoperatively reduced in the addicts receiving IV Dex during surgery. This means that our results are similar to the results of other studies regarding the effect of Dex on the quality of spinal block in terms of sensory block duration. Although not tested in our study, a less need for morphine postoperatively in the Dex group could prove the prolonged duration of sensory blockade (20).
Unlugenc et al. conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study to examine the effect of pre-anesthetic administration of Dex. They reported that a single IV dose of Dex given 10 minutes before induction of anesthesia significantly reduced postoperative morphine consumption at identical pain scores (21).
The efficacy of IV Dex in prolonging the analgesic duration of brachial plexus block for shoulder surgery was assessed in a randomized clinical trial and it was found that Dex reduced the pain and opioid consumption up to 8 hours postoperatively and did not prolong the duration of the motor blockade (22).
Lin et al. claimed that the addition of Dex to IV morphine contained patient-controlled analgesia resulted in superior analgesia, less morphine consumption, and lower morphine-induced side effects (23).
There are still considerable disagreements on the effect of Dex Infusion during surgery on hemodynamic parameters (24, 25). Therefore, it is suggested to carry out further studies and consider non-addicted participants in need of surgery as well as addicted ones to study the effect of Dex on hemodynamic parameters changes and compare such variables between them. Taking more variables such as cardiac output and ejection fraction into consideration would raise the value of such studies.
5.1. Limitation
One of the limitations of this study was that the study population consisted of opium addicts and although they were given a thorough explanation of the study process and written consent was obtained from them, we cannot be 100% sure that they have not used opium postoperatively. On the other hand, there is no standard and reliable method to properly select these patients for participation in studies regarding the definition of addiction considering the parameters of drug abuse rate, duration of addiction, and potential effects of drugs on them that can affect the study results. As mentioned before, the definition of addiction in DSM-5 does not include these items but mostly evaluates qualitatively emotional, mental, and behavioral problems in the addicts. It is suggested to carry out more studies, considering non-addict patients in need of surgery along with addicts regarding the effects of DEX on hemodynamic changes and pain and compare the results.
5.2. Conclusion
It is likely that IV Dex infusion during femoral neck fracture surgery under spinal anesthesia leads to less opioid use within 24 hours postoperatively in opium addict patients.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(2):534-40. table of contents. [PubMed ID: 12873949].
-
2.
Thomazeau J, Rouquette A, Martinez V, Rabuel C, Prince N, Laplanche JL, et al. Acute pain Factors predictive of post-operative pain and opioid requirement in multimodal analgesia following knee replacement. Eur J Pain. 2016;20(5):822-32. [PubMed ID: 26517014]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.808.
-
3.
Dabbagh A, Ghorbanloo M, Taherian M, Hosseini SM, Tavakkolpour AA, Rzavi SS. Frequency of postoperative pain and its associated factors in Taleghani hospital. Res Med. 2010;33(4).
-
4.
Bowen KR, Baum JD. Life after addiction—post-operative pain management in an obstetrical patient on long-term buprenorphine therapy. Open J Obstetric Gynecol. 2017;7(9):951-6. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2017.79096.
-
5.
Baratloo A, Mirbaha S, Delavar Kasmaei H, Payandemehr P, Elmaraezy A, Negida A. Intravenous caffeine citrate vs. magnesium sulfate for reducing pain in patients with acute migraine headache; a prospective quasi-experimental study. Korean J Pain. 2017;30(3):176-82. [PubMed ID: 28757917]. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2017.30.3.176.
-
6.
Arhami Dolatabadi A, Memary E, Kariman H, Nasiri Gigloo K, Baratloo A. Intranasal Desmopressin Compared with Intravenous Ketorolac for Pain Management of Patients with Renal Colic Referring to the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2017;7(2):43595. [PubMed ID: 28824859]. https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.43595.
-
7.
Baratloo A, Rouhipour A, Forouzanfar MM, Safari S, Amiri M, Negida A. The Role of Caffeine in Pain Management: A Brief Literature Review. Anesth Pain Med. 2016;6(3):33193. [PubMed ID: 27642573]. https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.33193.
-
8.
Baratloo A, Bafarani SA, Forouzanfar MM, Hashemi B, Friedman BW, Abdalvand A. Intravenous caffeine versus intravenous ketorolac for the management of moderate to severe migraine headache. Bangladesh J Pharmacol. 2016;11(2):428. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjp.v11i2.26333.
-
9.
Firoozeh M, Takfallah L, Mohammadi-Semnani S, Jahan E, Emami A. The evaluation of personality disorders among drug abusers. Med Sci J Islamic Azad Univesity-Tehran Medical Branch. 2012;22(2):152-6.
-
10.
Davoodi G, Sadeghian S, Akhondzadeh S, Darvish S, Alidoosti M, Amirzadegan A. Comparison of specifications, short term outcome and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction in opium dependent patients and nondependents. J Tehran Univ Heart Center. 2006;1(1):48-53.
-
11.
Gharaei B, Jafari A, Aghamohammadi H, Kamranmanesh M, Poorzamani M, Elyassi H, et al. Opioid-sparing effect of preemptive bolus low-dose ketamine for moderate sedation in opioid abusers undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 2013;116(1):75-80. [PubMed ID: 23223117]. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826f0622.
-
12.
Alimohammadi H, Baratloo A, Abdalvand A, Rouhipour A, Safari S. Effects of pain relief on arterial blood o2 saturation. Trauma Mon. 2014;19(1):14034. [PubMed ID: 24719825]. https://doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.14034.
-
13.
Carroll IR, Angst MS, Clark JD. Management of perioperative pain in patients chronically consuming opioids. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004;29(6):576-91. [PubMed ID: 15635517].
-
14.
Upadhyay SP, Mallick PN, Elmatite WM, Jagia M, Taqi S. Dexmedetomidine infusion to facilitate opioid detoxification and withdrawal in a patient with chronic opioid abuse. Indian J Palliat Care. 2011;17(3):251-4. [PubMed ID: 22346054]. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.92353.
-
15.
Mitra S, Sinatra RS. Perioperative management of acute pain in the opioid-dependent patient. Anesthesiology. 2004;101(1):212-27. [PubMed ID: 15220793].
-
16.
Jabbary Moghaddam M, Ommi D, Mirkheshti A, Dabbagh A, Memary E, Sadeghi A, et al. Effects of clonidine premedication upon postoperative shivering and recovery time in patients with and without opium addiction after elective leg fracture surgeries. Anesth Pain Med. 2013;2(3):107-10. [PubMed ID: 24244918]. https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.7143.
-
17.
Kaya FN, Yavascaoglu B, Turker G, Yildirim A, Gurbet A, Mogol EB, et al. Intravenous dexmedetomidine, but not midazolam, prolongs bupivacaine spinal anesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57(1):39-45. [PubMed ID: 20039221]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-009-9231-6.
-
18.
Arain SR, Ruehlow RM, Uhrich TD, Ebert TJ. The efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus morphine for postoperative analgesia after major inpatient surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004;98(1):153-8. table of contents. [PubMed ID: 14693611].
-
19.
Annamalai A, Singh S, Singh A, Mahrous DE. Can intravenous dexmedetomidine prolong bupivacaine intrathecal spinal anesthesia? J Anesthesia Clinical Res. 2014.
-
20.
Dinesh CN, Sai Tej NA, Yatish B, Pujari VS, Mohan Kumar RM, Mohan CV. Effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine on hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia: A randomized study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014;8(2):202-8. [PubMed ID: 24843333]. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.130719.
-
21.
Unlugenc H, Gunduz M, Guler T, Yagmur O, Isik G. The effect of pre-anaesthetic administration of intravenous dexmedetomidine on postoperative pain in patients receiving patient-controlled morphine. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005;22(5):386-91. [PubMed ID: 15918389].
-
22.
Abdallah FW, Dwyer T, Chan VW, Niazi AU, Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Oldfield S, et al. IV and Perineural Dexmedetomidine Similarly Prolong the Duration of Analgesia after Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized, Three-arm, Triple-masked, Placebo-controlled Trial. Anesthesiology. 2016;124(3):683-95. [PubMed ID: 26649424]. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000983.
-
23.
Lin TF, Yeh YC, Lin FS, Wang YP, Lin CJ, Sun WZ, et al. Effect of combining dexmedetomidine and morphine for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(1):117-22. [PubMed ID: 18987053]. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen320.
-
24.
Wang G, Zhang L, Lou S, Chen Y, Cao Y, Wang R, et al. Effect of Dexmedetomidine in Preventing Postoperative Side Effects for Laparoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Trial Sequential Analysis (PRISMA). Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(10):2927. [PubMed ID: 26962789]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002927.
-
25.
Peng K, Liu HY, Wu SR, Cheng H, Ji FH. Effects of Combining Dexmedetomidine and Opioids for Postoperative Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin J Pain. 2015;31(12):1097-104. [PubMed ID: 25654534]. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000219.