Abstract
Background:
Empirical studies show social and psychological supports are pivotal for maintaining physical, psychological, and social health in patients living with HIV/AIDS.Objectives:
The present study aimed at evaluating social and psychological support and the relationship between these two factors among HIV/AIDS patients receiving services form health centers of Zahedan province, south eastern Iran.Methods:
A cross sectional study was conducted. HIV/AIDS patients, who received services from health care facilities of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences were recruited in the study. Psychological well-being and social support were assessed using the Ryff Scales of Psychological Well-Being and medical outcomes study Social Support Scale (MOS-SSS) questionnaires, respectively. Multivariable linear regression analysis using backward stepwise method was conducted to determine factors related to psychological health and social support.Results:
A total 110 patients aged over 16 years old (83 males) were included in the study. Unsafe injecting drug use was the major HIV transmission route (59.1%). Mean psychological health score was significantly higher in males compared to females (P = 0.048). Also, a gender difference was observed for mean social support score, although it was non-significant. The regression analysis showed that females versus males and AIDS patients versus HIV infected patients had lower score of psychological well-being, moreover, social support positively and independently related to the score of psychological well-being (β = -0.505; 95% confidence interval: 0.360 to 0.649).Conclusions:
The findings suggest that female patients, those living in the AIDS stage, and those with poor social support are more vulnerable to having lower level of psychological well-being. Harm reduction programs should be reinforced in such groups.Keywords
1. Background
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection affects all aspects of life, including psychological, physical, and social aspects, and also causes fear of living with the disease. Family members and care takers of these patients might also be affected by these challenges. Furthermore, HIV infection can lead to loss of social, occupational, residential, and economic opportunities (1).
Patients with HIV/AIDS have reported experiences of stigma and discrimination regarding public support and health care. Inappropriate and derogatory behaviors can make patients secluded. The fear of notoriety and rejection by relatives and friends can lead to these patients trying to hide their disease so that, it can induce problems in prevention of disease transmission and receiving care and treatments (2).
This disease changes people’s lives. It causes a decrease in self-confidence, increase in the feeling of vulnerability, physical symptoms, and disturbed thoughts in patients. It disorganizes daily performance, social activities, and peace of mind. Other complications include frequent physician visits, high treatment costs, and drugs side effects (3).
The World Health Organization (WHO) states that social and psychological support can help cope with related problems. Patients, who receive appropriate support from their family and community, show increased resiliency and experience less psychological problems. Other effects of good social support are higher tendency to treat and prevent infection transmission (1).
Based on United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) report, it has been estimated that about 75 700 patients with HIV/AIDS lived in Iran during year 2014 (4), nearly 29% were females and about 2% were children under five years old. According to Iran’s ministry of health report, 29 414 individuals with HIV/AIDS were recognized in Iran at the end of year 2014, 89.3% of whom were male. Among them, 483 patients with HIV/AIDS were registered as those under services by Zahedan University of Medical Sciences (south-east Iran) (5).
Harm reduction programs and expansion of counseling services have been priorities for HIV prevention programs.
Behavioral disease counselling centers under the supervision of medical sciences universities are active all over the country for the control and prevention of HIV/AIDS.
These centers provide counseling about training, treatment, prevention, and harm reduction for high risk individuals or patients with HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted diseases.
2. Objectives
The present study aimed at evaluating social support and psychological well-being and assessing the relationship between these two factors among patients with HIV/AIDS, who receive health services from Zahedan University of Medical Sciences. The results could be used to promote harm reduction policies in such patients.
3. Methods
3.1. Study Design and Patients
A cross-sectional study was performed during year 2016. The People living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) from cities, including Zahedan, Khash, Saravan, Chabahar, Konarak, and Nikshahr were registered in the health centers of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences (ZUMS). For the current study, the researchers considered all patients with HIV/AIDS (age > 16 years), who referred to behavioral diseases counseling centers for receiving health services during April to September, 2016. The patients were invited to participate in the study and the purpose of the study was explained to the patients. This study excluded those, who did not agree to participate in the study.
3.2. Measures
Data were collected by trained interviewers by face-to-face interviews with HIV/AIDS cases when receiving services.
Ryff's Psychological Well-Being Scales was used to measure psychological health. This questionnaire was designed by Ryff in 1989 and was revised in 2002. This version evaluates psychological health based on 18 questions about six factors: self-acceptance, environmental mastery, positive relations with others, personal growth, purpose in life, and autonomy. Scoring of these 18 questions is done by a six-point scale from one to six; a higher score generally shows better psychological wellbeing (6).
Medical outcomes study Social Support Scale (MOS-SSS) is used to measure social support. The MOS-SSS was designed by Sherbourne and Stewart in 1991. This brief, self-administered social support survey instrument was created for patients in the medical outcomes study (MOS); it is easy to administer to chronically ill patients, and the items are short, simple, and easy to understand. The MOS is a 19-item scale that covers four dimensions, including emotional/informational support, tangible support, positive social interaction, and affectionate support. This scale shows the agreement or disagreement of the phrases with a five-point Likert scale from one (none of the time) to five (all of the time). The lowest score of this scale is 19 and the highest is 95. To achieve the total score, all the scores are pulsed together. A higher score in this scale indicates that testers have the desired social support (7).
These two scales have been frequently used in other studies in Iran and their validity and reliability have been verified for the Iranian population (8).
3.3. Statistical Analysis
Continuous and categorical variables were described using means (standard deviation (SD)) and percentages (%), as appropriate. The independent two-sample t-test was used to test differences between the two means. Univariate and stepwise multivariable linear regression analysis using backward methods were performed to estimate the effect of the explanatory variables on psychological health. The results are expressed as regression coefficients (β) (95% confidence interval (CI)), indicating predicting change in mean psychological health per unit increase in the level of the explanatory variables. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. All the statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software (version 20).
4. Results
A total 110 PLWHA (age > 16 years; 83 male) were included in the study. Demographic and epidemiologic information of patients have been summarized in Table 1. The majority of the patients had not completed high school, acquired infection from IV drug abuse, and were in the AIDS stage. Compared with female patients, the males had significantly higher psychological health (P = 0.048), moreover, male patients had higher social support score than females, although it was non-significant.
Demographic and Epidemiological Variables of the Patients
| Variables | Valuea | P Value for Independent Sample t-Test |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 83 (75.5) | |
| Female | 27 (24.5) | |
| Age (y) | ||
| Mean ± SD | 38.53 ± 8.02 | |
| Min - Max | 18 - 58 | |
| Disease stage | ||
| HIV positive | 52 (47.3) | |
| AIDS | 58 (52.7) | |
| Duration after infection diagnosis (y) | ||
| Mean ± SD | 5.58 ± 3.78 | |
| Min - Max | 1 - 14 | |
| Infection way | ||
| IV drug abuse | 66 (60) | |
| Unsafe sex | 13 (11.8) | |
| Sex with husband | 25 (22.7) | |
| Other way | 6 (5.5) | |
| Education level of patients | ||
| Illiterate | 12 (10.9) | |
| Primary school | 36 (32.7) | |
| Secondary school | 35 (31.8) | |
| High school and more | 27 (24.5) | |
| Score of Social Support Scale (MOS-SSS) | 0.361 | |
| Male | 45.40 ± 7.81 | |
| Female | 43.7 ± 9.37 | |
| Score of Ryff's Psychological Well-Being Scales | 0.048 | |
| Male | 44.87 ± 8.45 | |
| Female | 41.44 ± 5.01 |
The results of univariate analysis are presented in Table 2. The results demonstrate that those with higher social support levels and those infected via sexual contact vs IV drug abuse, had significantly better psychological health. Table 3 shows the relationship between explanatory variables and psychological health in the multivariable analysis. Based on multivariate regression analysis (backward method), the final model included social support score, gender, and stage of infection. Social support was positively and independently related to psychological health, as a one unit increase in social support score predicted increase of 0.505 in the mean psychological health score. However, gender (female versus male) and stage of infection (AIDS versus HIV infection) were inversely related to psychological health, as the mean of psychological health score was lower in female patients and those living in AIDS stage compared to the other category.
Variables Associated with Psychological Health Score in HIV/AIDS Patients in Univariate Analysis
| Variables | Unstandardized Coefficient | 95% Confidence Interval | P Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | Std. Error | Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||
| Age (y) | 0.14 | 0.09 | -0.04 | 0.33 | 0.12 |
| Education level (ordinal categorized) | 1.17 | 0.76 | 0.18 | 3.23 | 0.02 |
| Duration of infection (y) | 0.25 | 0.19 | -0.13 | 0.65 | 0.20 |
| Score of social support questionnaire | 0.56 | 0.07 | 0.41 | 0.71 | < 0.001 |
| Gender (female versus male) | -3.43 | 1.72 | -6.84 | -0.02 | 0.04 |
| Stage of Infection (AIDS versus HIV infection) | -2.95 | 1.48 | -5.89 | -0.01 | 0.05 |
| Infected via IV drug abuse versus sexual contact | -3.19 | 1.55 | -6.27 | -0.10 | 0.04 |
Multivariate Regression Analysis (Backward) to Determine Predictive Effect of Variables on Psychological Health Score in HIV/AIDS Patients
| Variables | Unstandardized Coefficient | 95% Confidence Interval for B | P Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | Std. Error | Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||
| Model 1 | |||||
| Constant | 18.385 | 4.786 | 8.892 | 27.877 | 0.000 |
| Age (y) | 0.150 | 0.087 | -0.022 | 0.322 | 0.086 |
| Education level (ordinal categorized) | 0.309 | 0.713 | -1.105 | 1.722 | 0.666 |
| Duration of infection (y) | -0.058 | 0.169 | -0.394 | 0.277 | 0.730 |
| Score of social support questionnaire | 0.489 | 0.078 | 0.334 | 0.644 | 0.000 |
| Gender (female versus male) | -3.204 | 1.954 | -7.079 | 0.671 | 0.104 |
| Stage of Infection (AIDS versus HIV infection) | -2.916 | 1.351 | -5.595 | -0.237 | 0.033 |
| Infected via IV drug abuse versus sexual contact | 0.347 | 1.723 | -3.071 | 3.766 | 0.841 |
| Model 2 | |||||
| Constant | 18.459 | 4.749 | 9.040 | 27.87 | 0.000 |
| Age (y) | 0.152 | 0.086 | -0.019 | 0.322 | 0.081 |
| Education level (ordinal categorized) | 0.305 | 0.709 | -1.101 | 1.711 | 0.668 |
| Duration of infection (y) | -0.057 | 0.168 | -0.391 | 0.276 | 0.734 |
| Score of social support questionnaire | 0.488 | 0.078 | 0.334 | 0.642 | 0.000 |
| Gender (female versus male) | -2.932 | 1.407 | -5.723 | -0.141 | 0.040 |
| Stage of Infection (AIDS versus HIV infection) | -2.964 | 1.323 | -5.588 | -0.340 | 0.027 |
| Model 3 | |||||
| Constant | 18.774 | 4.639 | 9.575 | 27.97 | 0.000 |
| Age (y) | 0.143 | 0.082 | -0.020 | 0.307 | 0.085 |
| Education level (ordinal categorized) | 0.302 | 0.706 | -1.098 | 1.702 | 0.669 |
| Score of social support questionnaire | 0.482 | 0.075 | 0.333 | 0.631 | 0.000 |
| Gender (female versus male) | -2.952 | 1.400 | -5.728 | -0.175 | 0.037 |
| Stage of Infection (AIDS versus HIV infection) | -3.006 | 1.312 | -5.607 | -0.405 | 0.024 |
| Model 4 | |||||
| Constant | 19.532 | 4.270 | 11.065 | 28.00 | 0.000 |
| Age (y) | 0.131 | 0.077 | -0.021 | 0.283 | 0.091 |
| Score of social support questionnaire | 0.489 | 0.073 | 0.345 | 0.634 | 0.000 |
| Gender (female versus male) | -3.050 | 1.376 | -5.778 | -0.322 | 0.029 |
| Stage of Infection (AIDS versus HIV infection) | -3.124 | 1.277 | -5.657 | -0.592 | 0.016 |
| Model 5 | |||||
| Constant | 23.625 | 3.566 | 16.556 | 30.69 | 0.000 |
| Score of social support questionnaire | 0.505 | 0.073 | 0.360 | 0.649 | 0.000 |
| Gender (female versus male) | -3.536 | 1.358 | -6.229 | -0.844 | 0.011 |
| Stage of Infection (AIDS versus HIV infection) | -2.432 | 1.222 | -4.855 | -0.009 | 0.049 |
5. Discussion
This cross sectional study provides epidemiological data about registered PLWHAs in ZUMS and determinants of psychological health in such patients. The researchers found that most of the patients were male and less educated. Unsafe injection drug use was the leading route of transmission in the patients. Increased level of social support was related to improved psychological health. However, the female patients and those living with AIDS had poor psychological health status.
Based on the Iran ministry of health report in 2015, the most common pathway for HIV infection was intravenous drug injection abuse (67%) and then unsafe sexual contact (18%) (5). In contrast with national reports, sexual transmission pathway (both of unsafe sexual contacts and sex with spouse) was notable in the current study as most females acquired the infection form sex with their husband.
Based on UNAIDS reports, females comprise more than half of the patients with HIV/AIDS in the world (9). Most women are infected sexually (9, 10). Overall, 24.5% of patients with HIV/AIDS were women in the current study, which is more than the country statistics (9.9%) (4). In the current study, 25 out of 27 (92.5%) females were infected by sex with their husbands while according to country statistics, 70.8% of females were infected sexually. Perhaps bigamy, polygamy, and high rate of marriage among males in the current study justify this difference.
Psychological health score of infected males was significantly higher than females. Although social support score was higher for males, but it was not statistically significant.
It was recognized in multivariate regression analysis that social support score had a significant positive predictive effect yet disease stage (AIDS versus HIV infection) and gender (female versus male) had a negative predictive effect on patients’ psychological health scores.
Evidences show that the mutual relationship between AIDS and depression is under the influence of biological, psychological, and social factors (11-13).
Almost half of the people with HIV/AIDS have depression, which is two to four times more than the normal population (13).
Results of the study of Prado et al. showed that quality of life of patients with HIV/AIDS is lower than normal individuals or those with other chronic diseases (14).
The study of Sebastian and Siddanna from India showed that males have a higher psychological and social health than females among patients with HIV/AIDS although this difference was not statistically significant. This study also showed that social health of these patients decrease significantly along with increase in age (15). Based on the current results, psychological health of males was significantly higher than females and also positive effect of age for psychological health score in the current study was near the significance level (P = 0.091).
The study of Masoudi and Farhadi showed that patients, who were more socially supported by their families had less psychological distress, better social performance or self-efficacy, and more feeling of responsibility for society’s health (16).
Various studies have shown the effect of social support on well-being and quality of life of patients with HIV/AIDS. These evidences have stated that social support can improve physical or psychological health outcomes and increase treatment and self-care motivation (17, 18), and also prevent transmission of infection during HIV/AIDS disease (19). Geter et al. performed a systematic review during years 2005 to 2016 and evaluated social and structural determinants of HIV treatment and care among black women living with HIV infection. They found that the main barrier for desirable treatment and care among these women consisted of lack of family and/or social support, weakness in quality of HIV services, and HIV stigma. Also, they concluded that good case management and support services, high racial consciousness, and attention to mental health could have positive effects on health outcome in these patients (20). Another study from Tehran (capital of Iran) by Rasoolinajad et al. showed that HIV stigma was significantly correlated with psychological health, social support, and quality of life. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders was recognized as 78% among these patients (21). Also, Noroozi et al. studied the challenges of confidentiality in Iranian HIV positive patients and concluded that multidimensional support system such as health, moral, psychology, religious, social, and family support, are necessary to improve screening programs and solve the ethical and legal issues (22).
It was also recognized in the current study that social support score has a positive predictive and significant effect on psychological health of patients with HIV/AIDS.
Some limitations of the present study should be considered when interpreting the results. Possibility of selection bias should be noticed because a convenience sample of patients was recruited for the study. Temporality between two variables was not met in the cross sectional design. A study with a large sample size by considering all plausible patients is needed to derive valid relationships.
5.1. Conclusions
It seems important to reinforce harm reduction programs and improve social support policies for patients with HIV/AIDS. These interventions can promote psychological health in HIV/AIDS patients and subsequently, improve disease outcomes and ccompliance prevention of disease transmission, especially for women and patients in the AIDS stage.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Word Health Organization. Psychosocial support: HIV/AIDS topics. 2014. Available from: http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/psychosocial/support/en/.
-
2.
Kalichman SC, Simbayi LC. HIV testing attitudes, AIDS stigma, and voluntary HIV counselling and testing in a black township in Cape Town, South Africa. Sex Transm Infect. 2003;79(6):442-7. [PubMed ID: 14663117]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1744787].
-
3.
Edwards LV. Perceived social support and HIV/AIDS medication adherence among African American women. Qual Health Res. 2006;16(5):679-91. [PubMed ID: 16611972]. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305281597.
-
4.
Farhoudi B. Islamic Republic of Iran AIDS progress report on monitoring of the United Nations general assembly special session on HIV and AIDS. National AIDS Committee Secretariat, Ministry of Health and Medical Education; 2015.
-
5.
Ministry of Health and Medical Education. HIV/AIDS statistics. Tehran, Iran: Ministry of Health and Medical Education; 2015.
-
6.
Khanjani M, Shahidi S, Fath-Abadi J, Mazaheri MA, Shokri O. [Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Ryff’s scale of Psychological well-being, short form (18-item) among male and female students]. Iran j psychiatry clin psychol. 2014;8(32):27-36. Persian.
-
7.
Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(6):705-14. [PubMed ID: 2035047].
-
8.
Bayani AA, Mohammad Koochekya A, Bayani A. [Reliability and validity of Ryff’s psychological well-being scales]. Iran j psychiatry clin psychol. 2008;14(2):146-51. Persian.
-
9.
World Health Organization. UNAIDS: Global report: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic. Geneva; 2010.
-
10.
Abdool Karim SS, Churchyard GJ, Karim QA, Lawn SD. HIV infection and tuberculosis in south Africa: An urgent need to escalate the public health response. Lancet. 2009;374(9693):921-33. [PubMed ID: 19709731]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2803032]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60916-8.
-
11.
Ramasubbu R, Beaulieu S, Taylor VH, Schaffer A, McIntyre RS; Canadian Network for Mood, et al. The CANMAT task force recommendations for the management of patients with mood disorders and comorbid medical conditions: Diagnostic, assessment, and treatment principles. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2012;24(1):82-90. [PubMed ID: 22303524].
-
12.
Schuster R, Bornovalova M, Hunt E. The influence of depression on the progression of HIV: Direct and indirect effects. Behav Modif. 2012;36(2):123-45. [PubMed ID: 22089635]. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445511425231.
-
13.
Nanni MG, Caruso R, Mitchell AJ, Meggiolaro E, Grassi L. Depression in HIV infected patients: A review. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015;17(1):530. [PubMed ID: 25413636]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-014-0530-4.
-
14.
Prado G, Feaster DJ, Schwartz SJ, Pratt IA, Smith L, Szapocznik J. Religious involvement, coping, social support, and psychological distress in HIV-seropositive African American mothers. AIDS Behav. 2004;8(3):221-35. [PubMed ID: 15475672]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1480649]. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AIBE.0000044071.27130.46.
-
15.
Sebastian ST, Siddanna S. Social, psychological and health concerns of people living with HIV/AIDS in Mysore District, Karnataka. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(3):LC06-10. [PubMed ID: 27134901]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4843287]. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/17212.7420.
-
16.
Masoudi M, Farhadi A. [Family social support rate of HIV positive individuals in Khorram Abad]. Yafteh. 2006. Persian.
-
17.
Battaglioli-DeNero AM. Strategies for improving patient adherence to therapy and long-term patient outcomes. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2007;18(1 Suppl):S17-22. [PubMed ID: 17275718]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jana.2006.11.020.
-
18.
Kalichman SC, DiMarco M, Austin J, Luke W, DiFonzo K. Stress, social support, and HIV-status disclosure to family and friends among HIV-positive men and women. J Behav Med. 2003;26(4):315-32. [PubMed ID: 12921006].
-
19.
Plach SK, Stevens PE, Heidrich SM. Social roles and health in women living with HIV/AIDS: A pilot study. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2006;17(2):58-64. [PubMed ID: 16800168]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jana.2006.01.006.
-
20.
Geter A, Sutton MY, Hubbard McCree D. Social and structural determinants of HIV treatment and care among black women living with HIV infection: A systematic review: 2005-2016. AIDS Care. 2018;30(4):409-16. [PubMed ID: 29376409]. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2018.1426827.
-
21.
Rasoolinajad M, Abedinia N, Noorbala AA, Mohraz M, Badie BM, Hamad A, et al. Relationship among HIV-related stigma, mental health and quality of life for HIV-positive patients in Tehran. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(12):3773-82. [PubMed ID: 29297112]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-2023-z.
-
22.
Noroozi M, Kadivar M, Madani M, Salari P. To tell, or not to tell; Confidentiality in an Iranian HIV positive patient: A viewpoint. J Family Reprod Health. 2017;11(1):50-5. [PubMed ID: 29114269]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5664990].