A total of 105 participants in the study completed the questionnaire. The means ages of students were 13.41 ± 0.74 and the family number mean was 7.54 (2.882). A number of students reported that smokeless tobacco users were Pan 26 (24.8%), Gutkah 9 (8.6%), Biti 5 (4.8%), and Nas 4 (3.8%), which had consumed at least once in the last month of the study (
Table 1).
According to the above table, the Spearman correlation test indicates a significant non-linear relation among smokeless tobacco consumption with the family number, mother's literacy, and father's literacy (P value < 0.05) (
Table 2). In this study, 14 students (13.3%) had already consumed as recreational and 48 students (45.7%) reported having had smokeless tobacco use at least once, 30 days before studying (
Table 1). In another study in Iran, 19.9% of students reported having smokeless tobacco use at least once, 30 days prior to the study. This indicates the high involvement of students in the use of this substance in Sistan and Baluchestan (
6,
13,
14). Our study showed that smokeless tobacco users such as Pan 26 (24.8%), Gutkah 9 (8.6%), Biti 5 (4.8%), and NAS 4 (3.8 %) had used at least once in the last month of the study (
Table 1). In the study by Jalilvand et al., held at Sistan and Baluchistan University students, results showed that Pan (7.63%) was the form of smokeless tobacco further used, followed by Nas (3.38%), about 21 (78%) Paan users belonged to the college of Engineering, while 7 (52%) of the Nas users studied psychology, coinciding with the relationship of our study to a certain extent (
7).
In South Africa, 1.3% of participants reported smokeless tobacco use at least once, 30 days before the study (
15). In addition, it was also 6.4% in Karachi, Pakistan (
16). Contrary to our study, these studies have been less frequent than consumption in the last 30 days. In our country, there has not been enough research into the use of smoke-free tobacco. Therefore, we consider this point as a limitation of our study. In the study by Rakhshani and colleagues, poor awareness and attitude have reported, which almost confirms the results of our study (
2,
17). In another study, Fattahi et al., assessed the impact of education on prevention and also reported low knowledge about pan in students (
18,
19). To obtain more complete results, future research is needed in Sistan and Baluchistan, more specifically among students around the Chabahar city (
20).
We suggest that another study be conducted in non-educational settings, to see tangible and realistic reports from students and other people. The main limitation of our study was that our students were male, we suggest that studies be conducted for female students as well. Another limitation of our study was that, despite the choice of two schools in the two different districts, more students were living in the suburbs of Chabahar.
Overall, the results of the study indicated that the prevalence of smokeless tobacco use in students around the city of Chabahar is high, which requires appropriate interventions to prevent it.